Agent provocateurs and their relationship with the mafia.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Agent provocateurs are suitable actors when somebody wants to justify the use of force against some groups. Those provocateurs are professional rioters, who are throwing the rocks and Molotov cocktails against the police, and after that, the riot control team has free hands to use the power against those demonstrators. In some cases, those provocateurs are claimed to burn cars or broke windows during demonstrations, and that would justify the police actions against the people.


In some cases, the journalists, who have written books about mafia and some other criminal organizations have faced the things, that their cars have been pushed by other vehicles or their garbage have not taken away. In those cases that a person has faced the psychic violence, where each work, what is ordered have been done only after the reclamations. And that thing causes very bad stress for people, who are facing that kind of things. In Italy, those journalists have faced the thing, that their parking lot has been filled with garbage, and that kind of things are disgusting.


When we are thinking about the demonstrations against the Bank of World and the G-12 meetings, the demonstrations have many times turned to violent riots, and that thing is very sad because people have the right to protest. In some cases, there have been claimed that the demonstrations were manned with professional provocateurs, who would start to throw the petrol bombs against police, and the reason for those claiming is mentioned that the demonstrations wanted to crush, because somebody doesn't like those people.


Somebody suspect that behind those actions is some security services, what want to demonstrate, that the demonstrations would be crushed also in the western nations. Or the actor would be some private security corporation, what will want to cause fear in the mind of those persons, who take the part of the meeting. That would make rational thinking very difficult, and also riots make those meetings very unpopular for cities, what is hosting them.


Sometimes is claimed that the terrorism in the 1970's has caused by provocations, what were made the mercenaries, who worked for some multinational corporations. The international terrorism caused very much problems for socialists, and that's the reason, why those attacks, what is claimed to made by RAF (Rote Armeé Fraction). That kind of terrorism justified the massive police actions against the left-wing radicals. And when we are thinking about the political field where the IRA operated, the reason for underline the socialistic ideology could be caused by the weapons, what the leaders of that group wanted to get from the Eastern Block.


When we are remembering the bomb strike against Margaret Thatcher, the prime minister of Great Britain. The person behind this bomb strike made very bad service for IRA, and sometimes there are rumors that behind that strike were Loyalists, who wanted that British army would be more active in Northern Ireland. The Loyalist is the world, what some Protestant's groups like UVF (Ulster Volunteer Fighters) used about themselves, for underlining the friendship for the British government.


And that would give the picture, that those groups are supported by the British government. But in the real life, those loyalists organizations are also classified as terrorists, and I sometimes wonder, why they are not mentioned so often in the situation in Northern Ireland. Many of the groups, what operates in Northern Ireland have very mighty names, but in the real world, those groups might have only about 20 members, and that makes them dangerous.


Some of those groups would be ordinary criminals or mercenaries, who would make strikes for money, and in those cases, they would play the IRA or UVF members. And the targets for those attacks might be some drug dealers, who would not pay the "protection money" for those men. And of course, real IRA and UVF have sold contract killings for criminals, because that would get money for their actions. Maybe there are men who are still believing in terrorism, but as we might see, anybody could write those letters to the wall after shooting somebody.

http://yhteiskuntajakansa.blogspot.com/2018/08/aatteellisista-ryhmista-seka-lehdiston.html

http://yhteiskuntajakansa.blogspot.com/2018/08/syrjaytyneet-ovat-loistava-kohde.html

The second civil war of the United States of America

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.


 And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.


If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?


What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?

Strange things about "Eilean Mor" island. (Eilean Mor´s mystery part II)

https://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sometimes I have thought, that the mystery of "Eilean Mor" is the mystery because it wanted to be the mystery. The island is small, so I have thought that there is not much to write, but I was wrong. This writing is straight from my head, and that's why there is no physical evidence about those things, what I will write. And the use of imagination is allowed about this kind of things. But here we go. I have thought, that maybe the guards of the lighthouse vanished by accident because the name "Eilean Mor" seems like the name of the ship. And maybe somebody got orders to eliminate the crew of the ship named "Eilean Mor", what might be brought weapons to IRA.


And if the thing, what got that information was from some loyalist underground organization, might that person or some other loyalists attack to that island for getting those weapons. Or maybe those weapons were stored at the island under the guard of the lighthouse workers, and then they were killed and throw in the water. Another version is if two of three men started to be good fellows and left one of them outside. That means, that those two men left every work in the lighthouse for one man and somehow violated him. Then there was the fight where some of those men died, and who survived flee from the hands of the law.


But there might be some other explanations about this thing. When we are thinking about the stories of giant birds, that might cause by some kind of magnetic phenomenon, what could make birds, what seems very strange.  Maybe that electric vortex caused the vanish of those persons, who were in the lighthouse during the incident. This means that the powerful electric field caused the electric arc, what would burn those men to the ash. One of the wildest theories, what I ever heard is that the lighthouse of "Eilean Mor" was used for early laser test, where the glass stick was light by using the light of the lighthouse.


Because those men didn't know the equipment, they put the power on those acetylene lights, and then the laser ray would put them vanish as steam. The laser could be installed inside the lighthouse quite easily in an upside position, and the ray would be targeted by using the mirror at the top of the lighthouse. The lamps can put circularly around the laser-element. But as you might notice, that explanation seems got quite far. But the truth is, that inside the lighthouse could be installed quite a powerful laser, and this weapon could be invisible. The laser can be used against the ships and the mirrors, what allows to use it against satellites can be installed on the small boats. And maybe in some lighthouse is this kind of thing inside it. But I don't believe that was the reason, why those men were vanished from "Eilean Mor".

Picture I

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofScotland/The-Eilean-Mor-Lighthouse-Mystery/