I think I exist, and if I'm punished for my texts, I exist for some powerful man

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

René Descartes said once, that if the human being thinks that makes this person existed. In his lifetime, normal or ordinary people did not exist for rulers of the nations. And everything, that said against the king or rulers was the straight attack against the god. If we think this way, everybody who says something against rulers exists only when they are punished.


When we are following the way of thinking, what Descartes followed, we must say that if somebody makes texts or makes speeches, what means nothing, we must ask a question "why this person would punish"? If writing means nothing, the consequences must be nothing? So what in some writings or speeches is so harmful, that the king gives the order to arrest that text maker. Why poor philosopher causes the situation, that all nation must change the laws in the country?


When people make the own writings,  this person must have the capacity to think about those things. And that kind of writings might be harmful to people, that believe that person must keep quiet when somebody would not ask something about that person. Only persons who have right to speak or write something, are superiority officers. And the role of henchmen is to keep their mouth shut, when their leaders are speaking.


When the person raises to a very high-rank official, would the orders, what this person gives become so-called common orders. This might cause some misunderstandings because that kind of person is above everything. Normal man or woman can't say or do anything, what might harm that superiority official.


And if some worker would say something bad about this very high-rank businessman, would that cause the situation, that this person must step down from the tower, and say something about this case to that worker. In this case would look very funny, that some main director of enterprise corporation kicks this worker off. And in this case, would happen that the director would give common orders, that the doors of the company will be closed for the person, who is from some city or state. This means that the director wants to make generic orders for hiring the position. Those high ranking officials of the private or public sectors might sometimes hide behind orders, what are given to all industry. This means, that this person would just walk away if somebody says or does something bad about that person who might be king of the state.


Soon comes to the orders to kick off 3000 persons from their working place, because somebody said that the slips, what this boss used was not very good looking. So that kind of thing might cause the situation, that thousands of workers would kick off or something like that would happen. This is how powerful men are working in real life. And also everybody, who writes about those things, should be quiet because they would not find the jobs from those companies.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

About Eastern day and one punishment over 2000 years ago

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Today is a Good Friday and we all remember the judgment, what was given to one man in Palestine or Judea, how Romans called that place. Nowadays we know, that the judgment for crucifixion was wrong, an innocent man was dead by the most horrific way, what Romans ever knew. And today we ask one question: why Romans choose that way to execute the man, who was very kind to other people? Why they made service for the people, who wanted to kill that man, who would become known as Jesus Christ?


What was the action that Rabbi made, get that punishment? In the Roman way to act against the persons, who were harmful to them, was not so open, that every people in the world should see those political executions. The Roman way was that those persons who were harmful to it or emperor, just poisoned that they would not tell anything to other people. The killing orders for ordinary people were given the way, that they would not track to the emperor himself. Emperor was above all people, and he was sitting outside everything. If the killing orders were given to some person, the way that can be tracked to emperor's palace, the emperor of the Roman empire would get in danger.


The normal method of crucifixion was used the poisoned whips, and if the used poison was cobra's poison, the whipped person would die immediately. And if the person would send to crucifixion place, the poisoned nails would keep this poor person silent. When we are talking about Apostles and other investigators, they would try to follow the line of the order.


They wanted to know the reason, why the innocent man went to Golgata in that way? Was something, what Jesus made seemed like political radicalism? The crucifixion was meant for royal punishments, and somebody has given little controversial theory, that Jesus took the other person place on the cross in that very long day. We all know that this is the only theory, what is against the official theology of the Church.


So this is only the written thoughts about one of the most well-known mysteries on Earth. What was the thing, what caused that reaction? Has Jesus protected some other person in the very first Eastern in history? When we are talking about the personality of Jesus, we must notice that this man was Rabbi. He was the member of the Theological elite of Judea, and if somebody dares to touch that man, were the punishment death. That was the way in that country. So why people dare to yell at him? Jesus was the holy man, good speaker, and well known Rabbi, and that means the curse for the people, who harmed him.


In some days I have thought that maybe Jesus felt guilty about the things what happened in Jerusalem during his birth. Here I write about the happenings, that all children of that city were slaughtered by Roman legions. Why was Jesus only child who left alive in that town? And why Romans were not looking for him?


When that brutal and horrifying action was done the Romans thought that they were eliminated all family of King David. And in this way to see, the survival of that child might cause the thinkings of quilty in his mind. Here I must say that I know one way to escape from that city. This way makes me feel sad, but maybe Jesus had the twin brother, who was given to Romans. And if this thought were true, the feeling of that man's head and heart might be something else than good. Maybe that caused hate in his mind.


And when we are thinking about the theory of Antichrist, the brother of Jesus, we might think that maybe Romans were saved some of those children. Maybe they found evidence that some of the children had twin brother or sister. And then they would transfer that brother to Rome. And maybe they told to that boy, what his parents have done. This would cause hate in his mind. But as I have written before, this is only thoughts of the Eastern day and the things, what were culminated the point, where innocent man crucified in Palestine.


Picture 1:

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/storyimage/JO/20170411/ARTICLE/304119938/AR/0/AR-304119938.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/about-eastern-day-and-one-punishment.html