Is gravitation pulling or pushing force?

   

 Is gravitation pulling or pushing force?

What could be the form of the wormholes? (If they are real)

Wormholes or energy channels between space and time could be hollow. The thing is that nobody has ever seen a wormhole yet. Or in this case, we are talking about gravitational wormholes. Not electromagnetic wormholes that are the high-energetic radiation beams through the universe. 

Theoretically is possible that electromagnetic wormholes can form real wormholes. The idea is that electromagnetic radiation forms the ion tunnel. And if those ions start to rotate that thing can form the electromagnetic Tipler cylinder by using those particles. The thing is that the virtual Tipler cylinder would make time dilation. When the electromagnetic radiation hits that structure. 

It starts to send radiation inside the cylinder. Then that system would load energy to those particles. When those particles are coming away from that tube. They would start to release their extra energy. That energy would put those particles in their WARP bubbles. And the energy that comes backward will drive the particle ahead. 

Another thing that can form the virtual Tipler cylinder is that could be a fast-rotating magnetic field. In those cases could be possible that the fast-rotating whirl is forming the area where is no quantum fields and the energy would start to flow in that area. 

If there are no quantum fields in those hypothetical tunnels the objects can travel faster than light because the speed of light is higher in the wormholes than in their environment. The wormholes could form when black holes are superpositioning. 

The idea of the gravitation theory is that wormholes are the channels that are traveling across spacetime. The cosmic web is the thing that is giving a tip that wormholes would exist. But what would be the exact structure of the Einstein-Rose bridge? Why particles could travel faster than the speed of light in those hypothetical tunnels. 

The idea is that the wormhole itself is hollow. There is an absolute vacuum where are no quantum fields in the Einstein-Rose bridges. But the walls of the energy tunnel have extremely high energy levels. That means the wormhole itself releases energy to its environment. So wormhole pushes the objects away from it. 

Inside black holes, behind their event horizons, is the world where all particles and wave movement travels with the same speed. 

And that thing makes it possible that the radiation or object can dive in that energy channel only from the ends of the wormhole. The idea is that the lower energetic area in the wormhole pulls wave movement and particles in it. Energy t always travels from the higher energetic areas to lower energetic areas. 

That means the outcoming energy will push the object to the wormhole. The thing is that if a wormhole is an area where are no quantum fields. Or those fields are all traveling in the same direction. The object rides with an energy wave in that channel. 

Theoretically, wormholes could form only between black holes. And inside the event horizon. All particles and wave movement would travel at the same speed. The thing is that there is the possibility that the gravitation of the black hole would crush the information. But the crushing would happen in the radiation area around the black hole. 

When the object travels at the wormhole it touches the wall of that energy bridge. And when the object is coming from a black hole to that channel it would pull energy behind it. Or it rides with an energy wave. Ahead of the object would be the lower energetic area. And the energy would drive the object forward. So simply saying, the thing that the object is riding with energy waves is the thing that denies the aging of the object. 

What if gravitation is pulling force?

Gravitation is an interesting force of nature. The thing that makes this thing interesting is that it acts to the objects the same way without depending on their polarity. So what is gravitation? 

Is it the superposition of particles? Are there mysterious gravitons in the particles and are those hypothetical particles forming those hypothetical strings. In that idea, gravitation is the superposition between subatomic particles. 

The idea is that those yet unknown particles are forming strings or energy channels between objects. Or otherways could the thing that the gravitation is the superposition between quantum fields of atoms or electrons explain why gravitation is so weak? 

And could that superposition form between electrons, quarks, or gluons? In that case, gravitons might not exist. Or they are already known particles like gluons that have a role that researchers have not noticed yet. 

And then those strings are starting to crepe. And that thing means that those creping strings are starting to pull objects together. But could gravitation be the pushing force?

Or, what if..? 

The pushing gravitation effect. 

The pushing gravitational effect is the theory that the outside energy of the system is pushing objects together. The gravitation would be forming in the case that between objects is forming the area where is lower energy level than behind those objects. 

Then the energy that is behind those objects will start to push those objects together. The thing is that those objects would be driven together by the outcoming effect.

And the question is, what causes the time dilation? 

The answer would be that the objects that are closing each other are riding with gravitational or another energy wave. The thing is that energy travels to the lower energetic area and that energy load will pump more energy to those objects. That energy that is pushing those objects together would also cause time dilation. 

If gravitation is pulling force that means the hypothetical strings that are forming between objects. Start to act as antennas. In theories, gravitation is like radiation or wave movement. The electromagnetic radiation would start to interact with those strings. And that thing increases their energy that is giving more power to gravitation. 

https://www.andersoninstitute.com/religion-and-time.html

https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/329631-scientists-havent-created-a-warp-bubble-but-theyre-a-bit-closer-to-testing-one

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/paging-zefram-cochrane-humans-have-figured-out-how-to-make-a-warp-bubble/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipler_cylinder

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

J.Edgar Hoover and the position of the FBI

J.Edgar Hoover and the position of the FBI 

(How Mrs. Ruth Vanderbildt-Towny knew the length of the prohibition law?)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

J. Edgar Hoover (1895-1972) was one of the most complicated characters of the history of the United States of America. He was the man, who led FBI from the age of 24 until his death at the age of 77 in 1972. He was the head of the FBI from its establishment in the year 1924 until his death and the years in the service were 59. During the prohibition law, that man worked against corruption, and he got very much success. In the early years, FBI was known as BOI (Bureau of Investigations  (or Intelligence)) and in the year 1935 that office took the name FBI (Federal Bureau of investigations), and there is one remarkable thing in the history of that bureau.

During the Second World War, the president of the United States offered Hoover the rank of the General Lieutenant. And the problem was, that the president of the United States would be the chief and give commands to the FBI. In Kennedy's era, that thing was again under the discussions and the reason for that was that Kennedy wanted to put the FBI under the political control, but there was one excuse, and that was that the control for the FBI took Kennedy himself, if that model of selection of the personnel would be taken in the bureau. In that case, the president would use it in the own purposes.

There is one thing, what would raise the FBI in the position, what it has even today. The thing is called the prohibition law, what filled the pockets of American gangsters with dollars. When we are talking about the explosive rise of the numbers criminal activities during the prohibition laws from 1920 to 1933, we must also notice that the archive and reporting methods of the crimes were became more advanced, and that means that the people were reported about crimes more often than before, and that might also raise the percent of the criminal activities.

How Mrs. Ruth  Vanderbildt-Towny knew the length of the prohibition law?

There is one little detail, what makes us interesting, and it's the story that before the prohibition law Mrs. Vanderbildt-Towny ordered enough alcohol, that it was enough for the all 13 years of the existence of that law.  And here we must ask one thing, "hos she could predict that?". Was somebody told that woman, that someday the prohibition law would be disembed? That will mean that the law was meant for the temporary or appointment solution.

 When we are thinking about the case that the prohibition law would cause the problems for the United States, would that person mean some politicians have made money for selling illegal alcohol during the prohibiting law? And that would be very awkward, but as we know, that also  Americans are only human beings. In some other countries were similar laws, what was meant for making people stop drinking. The reason for the attempt to make people becoming sober was that in that time people drink too much alcohol and also the State wanted to collect money from that product in the form of the taxes.

When we are thinking about the situation, that some politicians became rich because of the smuggling the alcohol, that would cause the situation, that the politicians, who had a relationship with Mafia would enter to the parliament. The power of the FBI was and still is, that the information of those actions might be found in its archives and that would give power to that organization to control the politicians.

During the prohibiting law could some politicians make money by selling alcohol, and that money will go to the banks of Canada, and then it would be returned to the United States, by some import companies. And that money could help the politician rising to the power. Of course, when the prohibiting law has dismantled the smuggling itself was not the crime anymore. But violence and murders, what was connecting the smuggling business were still crimes.

What is the problem with CIA? And why it was created?

CIA Headquarters Langley, Virginia
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is problematic because it is a civil organization. The reason, why CIA was established in 1947 by Rear admiral Roscoe Hillerkoetter was that the role of the intelligence was problematic for military and civilian leaders. The leader of OSS (Organization of Strategic Services) was lead by General major William "Wild Bill" Donovan, and because the leader of the intelligence was the lower rank officer the vital reports could be left to the tables without notice. And the otherwise the leaders of the intelligence would not always read the reports what came from the field.


And that caused sometimes very bad situation if some fortresses or their location were not in the knowledge of the field corpses. Hillerkoetter and his superiorities wanted to create the intelligence service, where the henchmen could say something to their superiorities, and otherwise, he wanted to create the intelligence agency, what work was extremely professional, and positions in that system based only in the personnel own abilities and training. The model, what was used to form that system came from the FBI, but the CIA was able to work out of the United States territory.


This thing makes  CIA very problematic organization because the reports what would not satisfy the leaders is not causing the divorcement of that agent. When we are thinking about the position of field agents, their life can be very dangerous. Sometimes those men and women have got problems with their works in the places like customs. And maybe the president of Russia Vladimir Putin is one of them, who have been humiliated in some customs during his KGB career.


The leader of Russia should be some commander of tank-divisions, that he would have only one way to see things. And the President Of The United States would also be the easier person if that man gets 's only positive things in the life. Trump has faced the feelings about bankruptcy, and people's attitude for that. He has seen, what kind of attitudes people have for persons, who fail in the business life.


And after that would be better for somebody that this kind of persons would not raise in power again, because they have the deal like second-class people. But Trump has shown, that resistance could turn to power. And he has shown, that the rise after the catastrophe is possible. Sometimes I have thought that is the newspapers cold attitude for Trump reason for that bankruptcy? Did some journalist deal that man with the bad attitude?


Spies are problematic also because they are talking with opponents, and they are under the influence of the opponent. Spying and espionage is a work, where operators face the things, what their superiorities would not want, that they would notice. Sometimes DEA or other police intelligence agencies agents face the riot police's baton or SWAT-team assault during their operations. And this is, of course, very traumatic.

Picture I

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/headhuntersholosuite/images/0/04/CIA_headquarters.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160725155533

About nicknames of the people

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Nicknames are the thing, how the friends and social environment call people. They are sometimes only the translations about real names or they are marking some personal detail of the man. When some gang member is called "the Rat" backward, that could mean that this person likes so-called "rat bikes", what are one style to make Choppers. But that can also mean, that this person is suspected the informer for the police or that person can also tell things for other members of the gang, or be some other way traitorous.


But there is also nicknames, what mission is to show respect for the person. That kind of nicknames are very fine, and their mission is also cover the identity of the carrier of that name. But when we are thinking about the gangs, there are persons, who use only nicknames, we are facing the person, who have something to hide. Or sometimes the nickname of the person is given because this person is violent and other members of the gang would afraid that man. In that case, the other persons might use themselves very disgusting nicknames, because they want to please that person.


Sometimes the nickname is given because the person looks like something. When we are talking about nicknames, like "Spooky", the person is normally very big and strong, and maybe that person walks the little bit bent position. So that person is exactly like some "Spooky" in the children's channel. But when we are thinking about the shape of actor David Duchovny in the TV-series "X-files", does this person look like some spooky in the TV? This is one flop in this fictive series, what told about humanoids and FBI.


But when we are looking at those "Spookies", there would be children, who afraid those characters, and maybe if the fear is connected with the summer home, there could be some person stand in the yard when the child has been waking up in the night. And if that kind of afraid is very dominating, the reason for that should be uncovered. If there would stand some man in poplin jacket, the reason for that would be nice to know.

What kind of people are the teasers?

"The teaser"

John Edmond "Sweet Banana" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7mQ7N8e7ac. 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Almost every person, who writes to the Internet, have faced teasing. That means that somebody claims, to be the better person than the others. And of course, those teasers make life very bad for other persons by claiming something about their victims, what is embarrassing to them. That kind of things are very sad, and sometimes the teaser would think to survive about those things. Of course, the targeted person can take that case to the police, what might actually do something about that teasing.


The most important thing in that situation is, to deliver those messages straight to police without doing any changes to them. The original messages would uncover the source of the information, and if some nurse or social worker would deliver information about the sexual minorities or something like that, makes that person a criminal activity. If somebody yells something to the targeted teaser, should the victim listen to that message carefully, because the worlds, what are used uncovers, why that teaser dares to do, why he or she dares to do those things?


And in those messages is sometimes phrases, what uncovers the rings, where that information have been given to those teasers. Some phrases like "it' no fear" are actually very contagious, but they are not used in many places. And also the things, what the message involves uncovers the source. Sometimes that teasing involves information, what have very common knowledge about person's life, and maybe something about those words is containing very private information about the victim. This data might contain also the things, what are spoken only in the family.


In that case, the teaser has got informer inside the family of the victim. This would make possible to track the informer very fast.  Sometimes that traitor uncovers because of the behavior of that person changes, and that possible ex-very close friend start to avoid the victim, who was just treated because that traitor would understand to making wrong. And that's why the seller of that information must believe that the victim is the somehow bad person.


Sometimes, brother, sister or cousin have given the information, what makes the teaser feel be very strong. And this is, of course, forming the induction ask: why that family member has given that information? The teasers are promised something to that person if the family member gives information for that kind of people. The worlds and behavior, what teaser uses tell about the environment, where that person lives. And if there would be attitude, that uninformed person is always right, would that tell that our teaser has grown in the environment, where all personnel uses uniform.  And what is that environment, would uncover as the attitude to the violence.


The firemen have the very different attitude to violence than police has, and military men have different attitudes than police has. But there is one very common thing in each of those systems. The thing is, that superiorities are always very big authorities in that system. And when we are returning to think about that relationship with violence, we must think, what kind of person teases other, and when the situation turns to violence, would that teaser turn the back to the victim.


That is the mark of "being adult" in those systems. Every teaser is always "elder man" or elder woman to other persons. And this is of course very big status for that person. Being "elder" means that this teaser has right to say anything, what comes in the mind to another person. But one thing is different in the world of the real teaser. Teaser has used the position of superiority because that person has learned to give orders.


And learning to give orders, means that those orders have been followed in some places. Because the cheater is a superiority, is the situation very embarrassing, because the position as the superiority means that the henchmen of that teaser have to follow those commands. That system, of course, denies violence in that environment, that means that if somebody gets angry, would this person kick off from that organization. The position of superiority is, of course, very important part of growing the full day teaser, who makes other person's life in that work very difficult.

Links:

Here is some music:

John Edmond "Sweet Banana" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7mQ7N8e7ac. 

https://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/

Why must we have superiority for other persons every time, when something goes wrong?

https://sites.google.com/view/socialbehaviorsandselesteem/etusivu

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/why-must-we-have-superiority-for-other.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about threats, the weak persons would normally treat to another people. Their purpose is to raise their weak self-esteem and inability to talk with other people about threats and violent behavior. Weak persons are unable to hear critics about themselves, and they are also unable to handle social situations. They are normal persons, who would always want to show their superiority to other people, and that means, they are unable to handle the social situation without looking the object downwards. They are always right in every case, and if they are in superior position for other person, they would show that to everybody. Weak persons are always want to talk with superiority and officials, if they are sometimes feel that they are right. 

People with bad self-esteem always call the boss, because they want only to show how important they are. And who cares about the person, who were responsible for the thing, what caused the violent situations. They want to show, how wealthy they are by using expensive jewelry and clothes. And of course those persons want to hear only things, what pleases them. And if the person, who is the target for hate is not even responsible for the thing, what caused the hate is same to those persons. The first thing, what those users of very expensive clothes make is to call the boss in the situation. 

This is the major problem in the everyday life. We all want to hear something, what we like. And if somebody doesn’t please us, we feel angry and hate. Sometimes I have thought that sometimes we are all those persons in expensive clothes. If some young person would make something wrong, we are lower tolerance level than with adult people. When some youngster yells to us, we would feel angry, and then we think that some 15 years old youngster is bad person. We cannot accept the situation, that some bicyclist would make scratches to our car, because this person just drives the cycle beside of our car. 

We want to call this persons parents and then call the police, who would give punishment to that youngster. But when some other adult makes the same thing to our car, we would accept the offer to repaint that piece of damaged painting. But why we must always be so adult, that we want to get some person in the court, because we want to show superiority for that person? Why we ever tell anything to some person self? Why we always must get authority from some official or superiority person, when we have some problems? The law says that we have not to tell anything to the underage person, but is it easier to give punishments behind the back? About need to be superior for other persons is clearly seen the situation, where some handicapped person makes some jobs. 

We want to see that the work, what this person does is somehow worse than our own work. This is the very interesting situation because the persons who are handicapped makes usually the same missions than so-called ”normal workers”, but their salary is normally extremely low. When some underage person would get punishment, would it be better than this person knows the reason for sending behind the bars? This might be the good thing that the person can change the behavior, but the most interesting way to get punishments is that the person would lock in some room, without telling the reason for that. 

And the learning of behavior needs that the person would know, why the punishment would given. This is the only thing, what makes person to understand where the target of the punishment made wrong movement? The philosophy of punishments is that they would be given for some reason. And when the punished person would know the reason, can this person fix the actions or behavior, and this is impossible if that person would not know the reason for punishment. But if the punishment would be automatically given, would that cause the situation, that this person doesn't even care about the behavior. 

If the punishment would come behaves that person good or bad way, would this person lost the care of the behavior. When I sometimes think about the situation, that the person would get punishment without the reason, would this also be the similar situation, that person would not be told about the reason for punishment. In some protective works the policy is, that if some person would not make the jobs well immediately, when this person came to work, the result would be kicking off. And in those cases the reason for kicks is almost ever mentioned to that person.

https://sites.google.com/view/socialbehaviorsandselesteem/etusivu

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/why-must-we-have-superiority-for-other.html

The message of the Hugo Simberg painting “At the Crossroads”

"At the crossroads"
Hugo Simberg
(1894)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The symbolism of the art is the very deep thing. When the portrait is looked the first time many people see only the picture of something. But when we are thinking about the portrait, there might be the very deep story to tell for the watcher. Above the text is Hugo Simberg painting, where angel and devil are walking together with the man.


First, we will see the very funny situation, but then there would be a serious message for the observer. Hugo Simberg wanted to tell us, that when the man learns some skills, this person makes always own choices between good and bad. The devil is on the right side, and it pulls the man to walk together with this character.


Angel in at the left side of the person. The symbol of this character is that the choices must be made by using the heart. This is sometimes difficult, and when we are looking at this portrait, we must say, that the choice to follow the devil seems sometimes be right. And following the devil always looks like very easy.


Evil always promises something nice looking thing, what symbolizes those ships at the strait. The canvas of those ships is red, what symbolizes hate and violence. This thing means that devil promises the revenge for that man. Angel promises nothing. But when we are thinking about those promises, the devil will set this man to the position, where this person must thank this devil. So devil hangs this person in his character, and addicts this man about the gifts what this bad character gives to this man in this painting.


When people are walking with the angel, they will walk straight ahead. But then there would be no choice than choose of two roads what are offered. This person has come to “T” crossing, where he must make the choice, what road would he choose. And they would understand the consequences of the decisions, what this person makes. Following the devil seems very easy, but it would not take the life anywhere. The initial setting of the portrait is quite a mark of Stoic philosophy, where people should be very cold and objective.

And the devil at the right side of the man symbolizes also the inducements of the life. There are many things, how the person can destroy the own and other people life. And those things like drugs, illegal activities and bad company should be avoided. This is the thing what Simberg wants to tell the people in this portrait.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-message-of-hugo-simberg-painting-at.html

Bubble effect and what does it mean in sociology?

Japanese gang members,
who is the leader of the gang
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa


“Bubble effect” is the sociological theorem, where the person is only with the people like this person is. In this homogeneous group of people is only persons who act and behaves like others. And that would make illusion, that everybody on Earth has the same kind of thoughts and values. This is very often seen in the speaking of the members of some street gangs, what uses “uniforms”. “Bubble effect” is the sociological theorem, where the person is only with the people like this person is. In this homogeneous group of people is only persons who act and behaves like others.


And that would make illusion, that everybody on Earth has the same kind of thoughts and values. This is very often seen in the speaking of the members of some street gangs, what uses “uniforms”. Those groups may also have own tattoo code or some other codes, what would show the rank and position in those gangs and Japanese gang in the picture on the top of the text doesn't make exceptions Guess, who is the leader of the gang? (Picture 1).


Those uniforms are actually similar clothes, and in some cases west. Those west are the mark that the person is the member of some gang, and that might seem the little bit silly in the eyes of outsiders. This means that those gang members don’t seem anything abnormal in their west or personal outfit. There is the very good reason for that clothing. Members of those gangs might not see anyone else, except other gang members.


And this makes the same kind of effect, what you might see in some rock music happenings. There might feel that everybody in the world is some kind of rocker. And then the festival ends, the real world might seem different, then before the concert. This situation would be like the people would close in the bubble. There are only the persons who act and think about the same way, And if you are in some festival like Woodstock, there would seem only the people, who wear Rock clothes.


So when some group of people is in this kind of closed room, they don’t understand how prominent they actually are. In the isolated societies is always seems the same effect as in military groups, what uses uniforms. Military uniforms are clothes, what are in same time the thing, what hires a man in the group, but it makes the single military man in the middle of civilians very easy to track.


That is the similar thing, what happens in every society, what have coherent clothes or dress code. Members of that team don’t see anything special in their clothes. And when there are similar opinions in all members head, there would happen that the all group would do something stupid. And if nobody says anything against the bad ideas, the force of the group would cause that somebody would think that, the robberies or violence are the good way to earn money.


And in those groups, everybody must be tougher than the guy before that member. This would sometimes drive all group of the persons to make very bad crimes. This is because the group force would make the decision to begin violent actions easier than lonely person’s case. When there are many men, they are always more frightened than lonely man. That’s why the alienation is worse if there is the group of people, who would start to live outside the society. That will make gangs the problem for public security.

Picture 1

http://static.messynessychic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/rocka-930x578.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/bubble-effect-and-what-does-it-mean-in.html

How can the mobile telephone be used as 3D-modelling?

(Picture 1)

https://www.instagram.com/p/BfbSDw5FIdC/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

How can the mobile telephone be used as 3D-modelling? The answer to that question is simple. This thing uses the same device, what would focus lens of its camera. It also connects the data from the camera of that telephone. So this makes those mobile telephones very sophisticated tools for modeling. The problem of those scanners is that the mobile telephone must be absolutely stable, or the modeling would be failed.


But this can be solved by using selfie-stick, what is installed on the table or stable platform, and if the hands of the stable enough, the scanning can make by keeping the device in hand. But the fixing of this problem could be found from GPS. If this system would be sharp enough, the telephone could fix the errors, what shaking hands causes. In this solution, the GPS would map the place where the telephone is in the sharpness of only small part of the millimeter, and the computer would calculate the errors of the metering.


The system would take the original point, when scanning is beginning, and then it would fix the error what the shaking of hands might cause. This would be done by adding or subtracting the location in the real world of the phone, from the values of the pure ring. This would make the scanning more easier. This little program can revolutionize the CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) -technology.  Now any firm can buy this kind of equipment and use it as making 3D-models for CAD programs and 3D printers.


In this system, the computer in the mobile telephone transmits the distance between the target and telephone by using sonar. Sonar is almost as effective scanning tool as a laser, but the sound travels in the air much slower than air.


The optics of the mobile telephone would focus using Sonar and the situation where the user notices it is when this person wants to take a picture what portraits horizon. In this case, the system of the camera cannot get an echo from the surface, and the optics of camera cannot focus the image.

I have read some articles that same radars what are used in traffic light as traffic calculation sensors could be mounted to RPV-helicopters. Those helicopters can be used to make 3D-models of entire building areas. They use oblique scanning, what is connected to GPS and computing platforms to make 3D models of buildings. The computers would make 3D pictures by those pictures, what this device sends to computers.

Sources:

Picture 1

https://www.instagram.com/p/BfbSDw5FIdC/

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-can-mobile-telephone-be-used-as-3d.html