Showing posts with label gravitational interaction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gravitational interaction. Show all posts

Saturday, September 16, 2023

Neutron stars and mountains generate gravitational waves.

    Neutron stars and mountains generate gravitational waves. 


The mountains of the neutron stars are less than milli- or micrometer class. But the neutron star is one of the densest objects in the universe. 

That means even the smallest anomalies in their form have a bigger effect than around the smaller objects. The neutron star is a very homogenous object that consists of only neutrons or a neutron-quark structure where in the middle of it is some kind of quark liquid. 


********************************************************************


Could the dark energy form when waves in elementary particles' quantum fields push the quantum field around them away?


Could the dark energy form when waves in elementary particles' quantum fields push the quantum field around them away? In that case, the quantum hills around the elementary particles interact like mountains on neutron stars.

There is a model that no particle in the universe is not perfectly slight. The stretch in the quantum field is a small energy wave. That means the energy wave in the elementary particle's quantum field is the thing that interacts with its environment like a neutron star's mountain interacts. 

The small anomaly whose height is probably less than a micrometer conducts gravitational waves away from the neutron star's structure. So the energy wave in the elementary particle's quantum field could be an effect that causes the dark energy. 

And there are stretches also in the shell of the elementary particles. Sometimes is introduced that when the elementary particles spin very fast, the stretches on it's quantum field push the outside quantum fields away. And that thing causes the effect called Dark Energy. 


********************************************************************


Artist's depiction of a highly magnetize neutron star known as a magnetar. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/S. Wiessinger (Phys.org/Researchers: If neutron stars have mountains, they should generate gravitational waves)

And then neutron star's mountains can generate gravitational waves. 


Researchers say that neutron star's mountains can generate gravitational waves. There is a possibility that neutron stars can be mountains and mountain areas. Those things' height is less than a millimeter. But they are acting as antennas that make anomalies or points with different strengths in neutron star gravitational waves. 

The "mountain" on the neutron star conducts gravitational waves out from the neutron star's core. A fast-rotating neutron star turns that point in different directions. The neutron star's gravitational field is extremely dense. The thing that limits the height of the mountains is gravity. The neutron star is an extremely slight object, and even if one neutron is on the above others can cause visible interaction. 


Also, mountains on Earth can act as those neutron star's mountains. And that means Earth can send gravitational waves that are far weaker than neutron star's gravitational waves.  


Sometimes people ask why neutron stars are not deacy. Or why neutrons in neutron stars do not decay. The reason for that is energy that comes from outside the neutron star. A neutron star pulls material like plasma into it. And those ions and anions will travel to it's poles. 

The neutron star itself is in a bubble. That sends radiation into it. The loss of energy is the thing that causes the neutron's death. When neutrons are in space they send photons. Whenever a neutron sends a photon, it loses its energy. And when enough energy is gone, the quantum field around the neutron cannot keep it in its form. And that causes decay. There are lots of neutrons in neutron stars, so if one of them decays that has no effect in a short period. 

The thing is that strong gravity with weak nuclear interaction are things, that keep neutron stars in their form. The gravitational waves can form in mountains of those things. Or the strings between those neutrons are pushing quantum fields around that strange structure. And there is the possibility that that interaction forms gravitational waves. 

Another thing is the fast rotation speed. The neutron star will dilate time because of outcoming energy, and a strong gravitational field. And also fast rotation speed slows time at a neutron star's shell. The outcoming energy causes a situation where the neutrons get new energy. And that denies their decay. 


https://phys.org/news/2023-09-neutron-stars-mountains-generate-gravitational.html

Monday, December 20, 2021

Beyond the standard model and curving spacetime

  

 Beyond the standard model and curving spacetime 



Image 1:


The splitting photon along with the Muon G-2 anomaly caused a situation. Re-estimation of the entire standard model of particle physics is needed. The question is that what if the photon is not an elementary particle? The photon or every other elementary particle can be superpositioned. But they cannot split in two. What if the photon is some kind of meson? And that thing causes another thought. What if there are some other particles like quarks that involve other particles. 

The thing is that we should look for the particles that are connecting the photons. Like gluons are connecting quarks. So is the particle that makes photon stay in one piece some very small and very energetic particle that looks like gluon. The splitting photons are giving a tip that the Majorana-particle exists. 


But could that mysterious "Majorana Particle" or "Majorana fermion" actually be a hadronic boson? Could it be possible that some Fermions are bosons? 


And could that "Majorana Boson" be the graviton. Graviton is the hypothetical transportation particle that transports gravitation. So if the graviton is the thing that keeps the photon together. It should be a very small, and at the same time high energetic particle. 

The thing that photons are splitting means they cannot be elementary particles. The elementary particles are not splitting. The term elementary particle means that there are no other particles in it. But if even a photon is not an elementary particle. That means that there might be some other particles that are just believed to be elementary particles. But they involve something smaller particles. 

So could there be other yet unknown particles inside quarks and even gluons? Or is it possible that we don't know any real elementary particles? There is predicted an exotic six-quark particle by using supercomputers. But is it possible that there are super protons or super neutrons where are seven or more quarks? But are there sub-structures also in the quarks? understanding the interactions of particles and gravitation are required for making TOE(Theory of Everything). 



Image 2: 


x-x-x-x-x--x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-


Is gravitation some kind of superposition?


The main question about gravitation is could the graviton exist? And the second thing is is it pulling or pushing force? And one of the questions is: could the gravitation be some kind of superposition effect. The idea is that the hypothetical gravitons are forming the strings between each other. And those strings are pulling or pushing the gravitons to each other. That graviton-connected string starts travel from the higher energetic object to the lower energetic object. 

Then those strings which are are wave-movement or energy start to pull those gravitons together. So the gravitation would be the wave movement that travels from the higher energetic area to the lower energetic area. Like all other forms of energy. The question is: does the gravitation travel the opposite way against the flow of those hypothetical gravitational strings. 

x-x-x-x-x--x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-




Image 3: 


Curvature of spacetime


Measurements of the curving spacetime are the thing that is used to confirm Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. There have not been found errors. And that is the evidence of the extraordinary well-documented theory. The Theory of Special Relativity is the thing that can use in a straight universe. But the Theory of General Relativity is suitable for curving spacetime. 

When we are thinking about the curvature of spacetime in the 3D environment we must realize the thing that the curving spacetime is curving all around the object. So the rubber levels and iron balls are not helping us in modeling that phenomenon. 

When we are thinking that curving space around the massive object has the ball form. We should think that space is getting shorter in that area. The thing is that modeling the curvature in a 3D environment is very difficult. So when the object is curving spacetime we should think that there is a ball-looking pit in the spacetime. So the curvature of spacetime around the 3D object is more like a tunnel than the pit.

The Brane theory is one of the things that can model the curving spacetime in a 3D environment. The branes or layers are surrounding the gravitational center at a 360 degrees angle. And those layers are also surrounding the central object of gravitation from all directions. That theory is created for modeling the gravitation effect. But the problem is that researchers can just model the gravitational interaction between one layer and the gravitational center. 

The problem is that there might be one common gravitational center in the area. But there are also sub-centers. As an example, Sagittarius A is the gravitational center of the Milky Way but the local gravitational center in our solar system is the Sun. And if we increase accuracy the Earth is the gravitational center for the moon etc. 

The problem is that the gravitational center is not only a black hole or some other most massive object in the area. Every single object is turning gravitational center if we are using high-enough resolution. If we are using high enough accuracy.

Even a single electron is turning to a gravitational center if the zoom is high enough. And the gravitation is interaction. That means there is no straight universe at all. If we use high-enough resolution. And at that point, I must say that every gravitational center is acting the same way. But the pit that the gravitation is making is always depending on how powerful gravitation is. The black holes are extreme objects, but also other objects are curving spacetime. 


The gravitational interaction curves spacetime also around other objects than just the gravitational center. 


Above is the image of the curvature spacetime. There are three objects the Sun, the moon, and Earth. The gravitation of the Sun pulls Earth to the Sun. But the centripetal force keeps it at the trajectory. And then the moon is also pushing energy to the Earth. 

When the moon is orbiting the Earth. The direction of its gravitation effect changes. When the Moon is at the side of the Sun it pulls Earth stronger than when it's at another side. Also, the side-movement is chancing the energy transportation. 

And then that thing is pumping energy to the Earth. But the thing that makes energy transportation and modeling difficult is that gravitation and energy transportation is interaction. This means that energy travels also from Earth to the Moon. 

Also, things like gravitational waves are the thing that transmits energy. Maybe gravitational waves have no big effect in large systems. But they can affect microgravitational systems. And if the gravitational waves affect billions of years. They might cause some even large-scale effects.


Sources:


https://muon-g-2.fnal.gov/


https://www.newscientist.com/article/2301876-photons-could-be-split-in-two-to-create-a-weird-new-form-of-light/


https://phys.org/news/2021-12-exotic-six-quark-particle-supercomputers.html


https://scitechdaily.com/split-photons-new-research-predicts-the-existence-of-a-previously-unimaginable-particle/


https://www.techexplorist.com/new-groundbreaking-technique-reveals-new-details-long-theorized-fifth-force-nature/41165/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boson


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curved_space


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermion


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particle


https://www.zmescience.com/science/physicists-claim-that-a-photon-can-be-split-into-halves/



Image 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime


Image 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model


Image 3: https://forum.babylonjs.com/t/general-relativity-simulation-of-spacetime-curvature-due-to-mass/10731


https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/


Could fast-spinning aerial vehicles be behind some UAP cases?

“The Phantom Twist drone’s unique rotation renders it almost invisible when in flight (Image Credit: Northwestern University).” (The Brief) ...