Showing posts with label wormholes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wormholes. Show all posts

Sunday, May 1, 2022

A white hole is the opposite of a black hole.




What makes a white hole white?


When black holes pull, white holes push. What makes a white hole white? The white color is formed when a material with an extremely high energy level comes out from the wormhole. When the material comes out from that energy tunnel. It releases its energy immediately to spacetime. So the white color of the white hole is the shockwave of energy impulse that is coming out from material that comes from the wormhole. 

The reason why we cannot see material that travels in a wormhole is simply that its energy level is too high. And that thing causes the material vanishes. So what happens when the particle is jumping to the fourth dimension? When the energy level of the particle is high enough its shape transforms and it disappears. 


What drops particles away from the fourth dimension?


When the energy level of the particle decreases. It falls back to the third dimension. And in that process material (or particles and wave movement or information) releases its extra energy. The reason why it is so hard to jump to the fourth dimension is simple. Normally particle or wave movement cannot reach the necessary energy level. 

As I wrote before, the dimension is like a room. The roof is the highest possible energy level of the particle. If the particle should jump to a higher dimension it should go through that roof. But the problem is that energy is like the pillar under the particle. It can reach the roof quite easily. But for traveling through the roof. It needs extra energy from the upper room. 

The jump to the fourth dimension happens through quantum entanglement. The quantum entanglement forms between the particle with the lowest energy level in the fourth dimension and the particle that is the highest possible energy level in the third dimension. That means if the energy level of the particle is changing it jumps out from the third dimension or drops out from the fourth dimension. 

When the particle in the fourth dimension pumps energy to the particle in the lower dimension. It reaches the energy level. That is high enough to jump out from the third dimension. The idea is that the particle in the fourth dimension pumps energy to lower energy particles. But it loses its energy in that process. 

But the problem is that the particle that is in the highest energy level in the third dimension takes contact with the particle in the lowest energy level in the fourth dimension. And if that quantum entanglement forms between particles where another part is in the too low energy level it pulls another particle out from the fourth dimension. 

The particle can reach the highest possible energy level by using energy that comes from the third dimension. But the thing is that the highest possible energy level means that the particle reaches energy stability. That means the energy would not travel from space to particle. 

And then the thing is that particle requires some other particle from the upper room or higher dimension to transmit energy to the lower dimension. The energy flow in superpositioned and entangled particles travels from higher energy levels to lower energy levels. That thing means that the energy flow continues until those two particles have the same energy level. 

So in that model, the particle that is in the fourth dimension rises or pulls the other particle from the third dimension to the higher dimension. But why the particle can drop from the fourth dimension? The reason for that is also simple. If the energy level of the particle in the third dimension is too low it would decrease the energy level of the particle so much that it falls from the fourth dimension. 


Could dark matter be the particles that are in the fourth dimension? 


When we think that the dimension is a certain energy level the particles that are traveling in a wormhole are just invisible. They are existing. But they cannot interact with other particles. The wormhole should go to the point where the radiation pike of the black hole travels. 

If that material that travels in that radiation channel sends radiation. There is the possibility that the radiation of that radiation channel covers the radiation that the material inside that energy channel sends. So is a dark matter the matter that travels in a wormhole? 

And the question is why is that material that is at too high an energy level that it cannot interact with regular material or third-dimensional material? The answer to that question can be in the spin of the particles. If the particle is smooth it cannot send the wave movement. Or it sends the straight wave movement. 


Could the energy that travels out from the particle that is in hyper-high energy level just push other particles away? That thing denies the interaction with other particles. 


The thing that causes the effect that makes particles possible to observe is wave movement the energy level changes. If some particle is smooth there are no errors in the wave movement that comes outside it. The thing is that the hair or pikes of the particle are the things that make the particle visible. When that pike will push the outer quantum field it sends the wave movement. 

If the particle is hairy it causes the "thunder". That thunder is the wave movement. The fourth dimension could mean that the rotation speed of the particle is so high that it would pull those hairs to its surface. Another thing is that the radiation or wave movement that particle sends turns so high that it pushes other quantum fields away. Those pikes or hair of the particle act like small antennas. They are driving energy out of the particle. Then that particle just pushes other particles away from it. 


https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Friday, April 8, 2022

Why connecting quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity is so difficult?



Is there some particle that is orbiting electrons missing? Do electrons have an orbiting particle? Or why we cannot connect the theory of relativity to quantum mechanics?


When we are trying to connect the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, we are facing some problems. There seems something that is missing in the atoms. Is there some unknown force that is causing the thin that the theory of relativity is not able to connect with quantum mechanics? Or is there something that causes the effect that the quantum mechanics differs from the theory of relativity? 

The thing that makes building the completed model of the universe so difficult is that the gravitation seems to affect oppositely than other forces or interactions. When other forces or interactions are pushing things away from each other. 

Gravitation acts another way. Gravitation is making the objects fall unlike things like electromagnetism which has a push and pull effect. The gravitation has only a one-way effect. 


Could the sub-electron, or the particle that orbits electrons possible? We don't know if there are some sub-structures in the atom that we don't know. 

But when an electron changes its trajectory it releases a photon. So could the source of that photon some, yet unknown particle that orbits the electron. 


That photon is the particle form, not wave movement. And that thing causes an interesting question. Is it possible that the electron has the companion particle? The extremely small-sized particle that is orbiting electrons could be possible. 

The electrons have an extremely small size. And that hypothetical sub-electron would have more extremely smaller size and mass. If that particle will exist. It would be the most revolutionary thing in the history of physics. 


The wormhole inside the laser ray can be a suitable tool for making quantum computers. 


There is one way to make the wormhole or the channel that removes the quantum fields from the limited range. The idea is that if inside the laser ray will put the particle is put the practice that thing forms a shadow or otherways saying, short-range synthetic wormhole. The electromagnetic wave movement will close the particle in it. 

And also the particle denies that the laser ray cannot travel through it. That thing forms the channel where is no wave movement, because laser rays will protect it against the outcoming effects. And that thing makes it possible to make the superposition between two photons inside that channel. 

That kind of thing can make also it possible that the exhaust gases of the futuristic spacecraft can travel faster than the speed of light. 

That thing can be the system where an electron will be put in the laser ray. When a laser ray covers the electron there is a shadow where are no quantum fields at that point. That allows the photon can travels faster than it travels outside that channel. 

If the particle is used to make a shadow has a larger size than the electron. That thing makes it possible that the electron can reach the same speed as the photon. Because there is no quantum field in that shadow that is slowing the speed of electrons. And that thing makes the new type of rocket engines possible. 


Fundamental interactions


Quantum mechanics


The standard model of physics


Theory of relativity


Wormholes


https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

We could build a wormhole if the universe has extra dimensions.



The wormholes can revolutionize information technology, space travel, and energy production. If they are possible to create.  Even if we cannot travel through wormholes we can send qubits through them. Or we can at least bring energy from higher dimensions to us. And that thing could solve the energy problems of the human race. 

When we are saying that the extra dimensions are tiny we might call them like that because they are in our third dimension. Those hypothetical dimensions are looking small if we stand outside them. But if we are jumping into those dimensions they are changing. And turning the space into what is almost like our third dimension. 

The size of the dimension depends on the position of the observer. If the observer is an inside dimension. That thing means that this character observes things. Like we are observing our universe. But the problem with the extra dimensions is that they are invisible to us. There is the possibility that inside the black hole is the fourth dimension. The fourth dimension is the energy layer. 

That is above the third dimension where we are living. So we can think the dimension is like the floor in the house. The higher dimensions are at the higher energy level. And that makes particles difficult to travel to the fourth dimension. 

The energy falls to the lower dimensions. And that makes the particle that travels to the higher dimension should travel against the energy flow from the higher dimensions. 

So the dimension is the certain energy level or certain series of energy levels where the observer sees an object. If the energy level between observer and object is between certain layers that make the object visible to an observer. 




The universe and things like extra dimensions are interesting things. When we are thinking about the dimensions. We should say that we are living in the third dimension. The third dimension is the energy limit where we can see the object. 

And the fourth dimension is the energy level that is too high that we can see the material. The thing that makes the material invisible is that it will be pushed to a smaller size when its energy level rises. And that thing makes the extra dimensions invisible to us. 

When we are thinking of higher dimensions like the fourth dimension we must remember that the energy flows to the lower energy level. So the higher dimension would be at the higher energy level. When the material comes out from the fourth dimension to the third dimension it must just lose its energy. But the main problem is how to get to the fourth dimension? 

When we are thinking that we can send particles to the fourth dimension we must just increase their energy level. If the energy level is high enough the particle jumps out from the third dimension. If we are thinking that the particle is acting as a water droplet we should turn the film around. 

When the energy level of the particle will increase, that thing rises the particle out from our third dimension. So the dimension is the area between energy limits where we can see particles and other objects. And if the energy level of the object is too high or too low we cannot see that thing. 

The thing that makes a wormhole interesting is that it can transport energy to our dimension. So if there is the possibility to make a wormhole where just one particle travels to a higher dimension that thing solves energy problems for the entire human race. But the problem is how to get to the fourth dimension? The fact is that there is the possibility to make the black hole that is the channel between dimensions. But that kind of thing is dangerous. 

Another idea is to make the particle with an extremely high energy field that makes it almost jump to the fourth dimension. And then. Just at the moment when the particle is jumping out from the universe or turns into a back hole particles with a low-energy level will be put under it. 

This extremely low-energetic particle will put to resonate with the particle at the higher energy level. This thing makes energy cannel between those particles and then it causes the fourth dimension falls to the lower dimension causing an energy flow. 

That thing will increase the energy flow. And that thing causes the energy channel between dimensions can open. If that kind of energy channel is possible it offers us an endless energy source, even if we cannot ever travel through that channel. 


https://www.space.com/build-wormhole-using-extra-tiny-dimensions


Brane theory

Extra dimensions

Wormhole


https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/



Monday, December 20, 2021

Is gravitation pulling or pushing force?

   

 Is gravitation pulling or pushing force?




What could be the form of the wormholes? (If they are real)


Wormholes or energy channels between space and time could be hollow. The thing is that nobody has ever seen a wormhole yet. Or in this case, we are talking about gravitational wormholes. Not electromagnetic wormholes that are the high-energetic radiation beams through the universe. 

Theoretically is possible that electromagnetic wormholes can form real wormholes. The idea is that electromagnetic radiation forms the ion tunnel. And if those ions start to rotate that thing can form the electromagnetic Tipler cylinder by using those particles. The thing is that the virtual Tipler cylinder would make time dilation. When the electromagnetic radiation hits that structure. 

It starts to send radiation inside the cylinder. Then that system would load energy to those particles. When those particles are coming away from that tube. They would start to release their extra energy. That energy would put those particles in their WARP bubbles. And the energy that comes backward will drive the particle ahead. 

Another thing that can form the virtual Tipler cylinder is that could be a fast-rotating magnetic field. In those cases could be possible that the fast-rotating whirl is forming the area where is no quantum fields and the energy would start to flow in that area. 

If there are no quantum fields in those hypothetical tunnels the objects can travel faster than light because the speed of light is higher in the wormholes than in their environment. The wormholes could form when black holes are superpositioning. 

The idea of the gravitation theory is that wormholes are the channels that are traveling across spacetime. The cosmic web is the thing that is giving a tip that wormholes would exist. But what would be the exact structure of the Einstein-Rose bridge? Why particles could travel faster than the speed of light in those hypothetical tunnels. 

The idea is that the wormhole itself is hollow. There is an absolute vacuum where are no quantum fields in the Einstein-Rose bridges. But the walls of the energy tunnel have extremely high energy levels. That means the wormhole itself releases energy to its environment. So wormhole pushes the objects away from it. 


Inside black holes, behind their event horizons, is the world where all particles and wave movement travels with the same speed. 


And that thing makes it possible that the radiation or object can dive in that energy channel only from the ends of the wormhole. The idea is that the lower energetic area in the wormhole pulls wave movement and particles in it. Energy t always travels from the higher energetic areas to lower energetic areas. 

That means the outcoming energy will push the object to the wormhole. The thing is that if a wormhole is an area where are no quantum fields. Or those fields are all traveling in the same direction. The object rides with an energy wave in that channel. 

Theoretically, wormholes could form only between black holes. And inside the event horizon. All particles and wave movement would travel at the same speed. The thing is that there is the possibility that the gravitation of the black hole would crush the information. But the crushing would happen in the radiation area around the black hole. 

When the object travels at the wormhole it touches the wall of that energy bridge. And when the object is coming from a black hole to that channel it would pull energy behind it. Or it rides with an energy wave. Ahead of the object would be the lower energetic area. And the energy would drive the object forward. So simply saying, the thing that the object is riding with energy waves is the thing that denies the aging of the object. 


What if gravitation is pulling force?


Gravitation is an interesting force of nature. The thing that makes this thing interesting is that it acts to the objects the same way without depending on their polarity. So what is gravitation? 

Is it the superposition of particles? Are there mysterious gravitons in the particles and are those hypothetical particles forming those hypothetical strings. In that idea, gravitation is the superposition between subatomic particles. 

The idea is that those yet unknown particles are forming strings or energy channels between objects. Or otherways could the thing that the gravitation is the superposition between quantum fields of atoms or electrons explain why gravitation is so weak? 

And could that superposition form between electrons, quarks, or gluons? In that case, gravitons might not exist. Or they are already known particles like gluons that have a role that researchers have not noticed yet. 

And then those strings are starting to crepe. And that thing means that those creping strings are starting to pull objects together. But could gravitation be the pushing force?


Or, what if..? 


The pushing gravitation effect. 


The pushing gravitational effect is the theory that the outside energy of the system is pushing objects together. The gravitation would be forming in the case that between objects is forming the area where is lower energy level than behind those objects. 

Then the energy that is behind those objects will start to push those objects together. The thing is that those objects would be driven together by the outcoming effect.

And the question is, what causes the time dilation? 

The answer would be that the objects that are closing each other are riding with gravitational or another energy wave. The thing is that energy travels to the lower energetic area and that energy load will pump more energy to those objects. That energy that is pushing those objects together would also cause time dilation. 

If gravitation is pulling force that means the hypothetical strings that are forming between objects. Start to act as antennas. In theories, gravitation is like radiation or wave movement. The electromagnetic radiation would start to interact with those strings. And that thing increases their energy that is giving more power to gravitation. 


https://www.andersoninstitute.com/religion-and-time.html


https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/329631-scientists-havent-created-a-warp-bubble-but-theyre-a-bit-closer-to-testing-one


https://www.techrepublic.com/article/paging-zefram-cochrane-humans-have-figured-out-how-to-make-a-warp-bubble/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tipler_cylinder


https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Thursday, May 24, 2018

The dark matter and the "Big Bang" theory (What was before the Big Bang?)




Kimmo Huosionmaa

The parallel universe theory could be only the academical "joke" without one thing, what astronomers have found. They have discovered the thing, that there is too much matter in the universe and this dark matter, what would not send any kind of radiation makes one thing happen. There is also found the thing, called "dark energy" in the universe, and that means that the dark matter exists. There were actually found also the "dark energy, and this was sometimes explained that at the beginning of the history, just in the time of "Big Bang" was too much energy in the universe.


The "dark energy" is actually the gravitation, what caused by this dark matter, what is actually mostly atomized hydrogen, or there is a theory, that the dark matter is something more exotic. But normally I have thought that this dark matter is hydrogen or some other things like protons, what means ionized hydrogen or electrons. If the dark matter would be electrons, that thing would be noticed as the radio signals, that comes from nowhere. And maybe the "three-kelvin radiation" is part of the dark matter.


But when we are thinking about the source of that matter, what we cannot see straight, but we can see the gravitation of this so-called "dark matter", because of all calculations, what is made for calculating the universe movements are sometimes very inaccurate, what means that something disturbs metering of the objects. And when we are thinking, where that matter is coming from, there is one explanation for that. This is that just after "Big bang" the universe were full of quasars and black holes, what just exploded. In the theory of the "Big Bang", the universe was actually the hypermassive black hole, what was started to send photons.


The origin of that black hole would be in the universe, what was existed before our own universe. This supermassive particle would involve all material, what was in that past universe, And it was in the middle of nowhere in the empty space, and if the supermassive particle  would not get anything in it, would that thing cause that the black hole starts to pull the material away as a "Hawking's radiation", and because the black hole would lose its mass the steaming if the black hole would go faster and faster. And suddenly it would explode.


Somebody like me has sometimes thought that maybe "Big Bang" was caused by the impact of two hypermassive black holes, and another of those particles were antimatter, wah caused the very huge explosion. Sometimes I have seen theories, about the "Big Bang" that this very rough phenomenon, what can actually be caused by the thing, that two interplanetary nebulas were impacted together, and if another one was antimatter cloud, would the released energy level be very huge.


 When we are thinking about that theory, the different electric charges would drive those clouds together, and the annihilation would cause the born of the universe. And because annihilation, what happens when antimatter and matter touch together and the origin of dark matter could be explained that at the beginning of the universe was too much energy, and that caused that there is a matter what was not calculated.

When those clouds of antimatter and matter touched together, the annihilation caused the very big explosion, and in this case, That phenomenon would be known as the "Big Bang"  But there is another theory about the existence of the dark matter. That is that there is another universe in somewhere, and the wormhole or singularity would transfer material between another universe and our universe. This theory is very often passed in the TV-programs, but if some matter comes from another universe, would it increase the mass in our universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Monday, May 21, 2018

Hawking's radiation and wormholes


" The Sombrero Galaxy" (M-104)
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-actually-means-hawkings-radiation.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are looking at texts about Black Holes, we sometimes face the term "Hawking's radiation". But what that term means? When we are trying to Google that term, we would meet the texts, where black holes mentioned to lost from existence, by sending the "Hawking's radiation". And maybe we can now understand that term. The term "Hawking's radiation" means that sometimes one photon would flee from that supermassive piece. In this case, the black hole needs other stars or material around it, and that mass what this black hole sucks in it, that black hole can easily compensate the lost photons.


 But the situation changes when the black hole would transfer to absolute empty space, where is not even light or electrons around it. There would happen the case, that the black hole will be steamed away because of the electrons or photons are flying from that piece. When we are talking about material, also the photons and electrons have mass, and when the structure where even the light cannot flee, would pull the electrons and photons inside it, would it get more mass for it. Photons and electrons are actually same particles and the speed or energy level of those particles separate them from each other.


When we are thinking about my favorite thing, the wormhole or "Einstein-Rose bridge" we can say that forming that channel across the universe, should the black hole find another black hole, and then those black holes must start to oscillate with the same frequency. That would make possible to create that channel across the universe. But when we are thinking about traveling across that channel, would there be one thing sure. That would not dangerous, because of the "Einstein-Rose bridge" can forming between two black holes. And when something would come out from another side of the channel, would the black hole start to pull that thing again in it. And that means that the traveler would travel easily out from that channel. But this works only if those black holes would have the same mass.


If another black hole would be bigger than another, the results would be devastating.  If the black hole what sends the particle to the wormhole is bigger, it works like the super cannon, what can accelerate the particle at very high speed. And if something comes out from wormhole with the speed of light, would the result be that impact energy would destroy the planet immediately. When the case would turn that receiving black hole would be bigger, the piece what would send thru that tunnel, would it snap back to the sender with destructive results, and the  If human race would sometimes use wormholes for traveling across the universe, we must be sure, that those black holes would be the same size.


This means that traveling thru the electromagnetic wormholes are just in the level of theory. When we are thinking about traveling thru that tube, we must send the spacecraft to the targeted solar system, and then it would make the electromagnetic wormhole, and the similar singularity would be produced on the Earth, and that would allow traveling between stars. But first, we must send the spacecraft to another star, and it would take very long time. There is one thing what we ever thought, and that is, the ship what travels thru those "bridges" should across the central point of the wormhole, that it could travel to another side of that tube. And that can be done by using rockets to give more speed to our fictional spacecraft. When we are talking about intergalactic traveling, we can make wormhole near the center of our galaxy, and then drive the spacecraft thru that supermassive black hole. and if there is a wormhole between two supermassive black holes would the travel be very calm.


But if the partner is the normal black hole, would the result be, that spacecraft would travel very roughly in somewhere where we ever thought to send that fictional spaceship. This text is, of course, hypothetical thinking about the world of wormholes, and I used that space trip as an example how difficult is to make those trips thru the wormhole safely. And in the real life would happen very badly, because there might be no wormhole between two black holes.


And actually, we don't even know where those roads between two black holes would end, and that means that the trip across that channel would be like random, and we cannot be sure, where we would send that hypothetical spaceship if we would find small enough black hole, what we could cope with our own technology. In that case, we would find the very small black hole, and then we would create the electromagnetic black hole, what would oscillate with the same frequency, and of course, that artificial black hole should be the same size than the targeted black hole.


If we are thinking carefully that ship what travels thru the black holes, must send across the central point of the wormhole, and that would be key to travel across those channels. If the ship would stay in the center point of the wormhole,  it would stay in there forever. And then the use of motors would transfer it to another black hole. But this is only fiction, and good day to spend time with thinking about those phenomena, what are actually the most high energy thing in the universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/M104_ngc4594_sombrero_galaxy_hi-res.jpg/1200px-M104_ngc4594_sombrero_galaxy_hi-res.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-actually-means-hawkings-radiation.html

Could fast-spinning aerial vehicles be behind some UAP cases?

“The Phantom Twist drone’s unique rotation renders it almost invisible when in flight (Image Credit: Northwestern University).” (The Brief) ...