Kimmo Huosionmaa
Sometimes there is a problem with the graduate works what are made by political leaders, and sometimes those problems like plagiarism are made in purpose, and the purpose of that kind of actions might be that the level of the passing levels of some academical graduates could be downed. Maybe those very well known works are made with knowledge, that this kind of actions might cause some problems. And then somebody makes the report of those graduates.
After that, there would take big pipe on the hand, and after this, every person, who is suspicious about those works would be stamped as political enemies and after that, the university would get very bad threat, because the political leaders claim that is only the political hunting trip. Of course in this kind of cases, there would be persons, who defend this political leader, by claiming that the political career has been caused the re-checking of the graduate. The problem with political leaders is that they are effective users of media, and of course, there are millions of followers for that leader.
Of course, university personnel, whose mission is to check those works are only hunting this leader. Every time, when this happens would be guilty find from university, what took the point in secondary things like points and brackets. Persons who are working in University are always wrong because people want to believe that this kind of graduates is so well known and nice people, that they cannot do anything wrong.
The problem with political leaders is, that their way to use academic studies is sometimes meant for shutting other people mouth, and give portrait that this political leader is the highest grade of the specialist. I don't know how many times the graduate could recheck before the work is done. But those things are always the problem in the academic community, and I hope that there would not find any plagiarism in those checks.
