A wild white paper says that consciousness is an interaction between brains and space.

The new neuroscientific white paper suggests that consciousness may be more than just an internal effect in the brain. This means that consciousness forms when brains interact with quantum fields around them. This might be ridiculous. When. We look at it first. But then we must remember. There are small magnesite crystals. In. Human neurons. The magnesite conducts electric impulses in axons. This means axons can interact with electromagnetic fields. And the white paper claims that consciousness is a quality of the universe. Or, anyway. It's too big to fit in the grey matter in the human brain. 

Consciousness is something. Researchers have tracked it. For. A long time. The thing is that consciousness and dreams are an interesting combination. Sometimes, or almost every time, our brains behave as if dreams are true. They handle information that they form in sleep. 

The same way. As when visions come from the senses. This makes dreams interesting. So, in some models. 

Brains interact. With. Electromagnetic fields around them. This means that while we sleep. We could. Theoretically see what other people think. 

The big problem is that our memory is switched off, and we cannot remember things that we see while we sleep. But we know that while we sleep. Our mind works. And. Sometimes we have solutions to complex problems in the morning. Composer Giuseppe Tartini’s Devil’s Trill is the most well-known. Case. A person created something while sleeping. Tartini claimed that he saw that composition in his dreams. 

There are two very interesting versions of what that thing could be. In this case, we think Verdi told the truth. If. Verdi told the truth. And. He saw that composition in his dreams. Maybe somebody sat in Verdi’s room and taught him that composition. But. 

There is a question. Did Verdi really see that sonata in his dreams? 

The problem is this. How to make? People remember their dreams. Dreams are meant for analyzing things that happen in daylight. But the problem is that. We cannot understand why those solutions require memory. 

Or are they somewhere? That we call the subconscious? And how could humans use those memories if they cannot reach them? 

How could he remember that event? In some very wild models, that experience was retrocausal. Verdi’s brain. Took information that came from the future. But that is one of the wildest explanations that we can imagine. We know many things from brains. But we cannot actually know what makes them conscious. 

https://futurism.com/health-medicine/neuroscience-research-paper-human-brain-consciousness-idealism

New supercomputers made wider simulations of the universe than ever before.

"DESI’s recent analysis confirms gravity’s standard model and hints at dynamic dark energy, reshaping our cosmic understanding. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Dark Energy May Be Evolving, Transforming Our View of the Universe)

The new supercomputers can connect data from multiple sources. And they made a more comprehensive simulation of the universe than before. Those simulations offer a theoretical model that researchers can compare to observations that they made using their finest systems. The fact is that there are also missing things about the universe. 

Things like dark energy and dark matter are important for those models because they are dominant effects in the universe. And without a dominating effect, all models of the systems are not well. 

The thing is that sometimes researchers say that even small missing bites of the system make it impossible to make models of it. But what if we miss 95,1% of the system? Can we make any trusted models about the system using that data? The thing is that the supercomputers process information that exists.  And those systems can make models. About the interactions of the forces in the system. 

"The largest astrophysical simulation of the universe was achieved using the Frontier supercomputer, involving enhanced computational power to simulate both atomic and dark matter comprehensively. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (Scitechdaily, Frontier Supercomputer Unveils the Largest Universe Simulation Ever)

Einstein was right. There was no different type of gravity in the young universe. The thing that makes errors in calculations and observations is normally the energy level in the young universe was higher than in the modern universe. That thing causes a stronger repel effect than energy causes in the modern universe. The relationships between dark and visible energy were different. 

The energy effect of visible energy was higher in the young universe. The effect of dark energy was lower if we compare it to visible energy. There was a time in the young universe when visible and dark energy interactions had the same strength. When the expansion of the universe continued. The distance between the objects increased. And that made the visible energy interactions weaker. 

Dark energy may evolve. But nobody knows why. Does the dark energy change its form when the effect of visible energy turns weaker? 

When we think about energy like electromagnetism we often forget that electromagnetic radiation makes standing waves between objects. Those standing waves cause asymmetry in energy flow because the dominant or brighter object pushes that energy back. 

"An animated look at how spacetime responds as a mass moves through it helps showcase exactly how, qualitatively, it isn’t merely a sheet of fabric. Instead all of 3D space itself gets curved by the presence and properties of the matter and energy within the Universe. Multiple masses in orbit around one another will cause the emission of gravitational waves." (Big Think, What happens when a gravitational wave meets a black hole?)

"When a gravitational wave passes through a location in space, it causes an expansion and a compression at alternate times in alternate directions, causing laser arm-lengths to change in mutually perpendicular orientations. Exploiting this physical change is how we developed successful gravitational wave detectors such as LIGO and Virgo. However, unlike this illustration, the gravitational waves do not simply propagate in a "tube," but rather spread out through all of three-dimensional space." (Big Think, What happens when a gravitational wave meets a black hole?)

The other thing is gravity is also an interaction. There are also other objects in the universe than black holes. And also other objects than black holes pull fields and objects to it. The fact is that if two particles fall to a black hole those particles can impact each other before they fall through the event horizon. That means that. Even if black holes have dominating gravitational effects. Also, other particles around them have their own gravity fields. 

So if we want to use potholes to model those things we can draw black holes as big and deep potholes that other potholes orbit. But. There are also many other gravity points. That interacts with black holes. Another interesting thing is the situation where a black hole pulls gravity waves into it. That causes oscillation in the black holes. 

Another thing is that when the gravity center moves in the gravity field that thing causes a situation in the Higgs field or quantum field around it turned denser. That means the Higgs field goes somewhere. The particles spin. And that spin means. The particles transform some part of the field into kinetic energy. In the same way, a black hole's spin transforms energy that falls into the back hole into the kinetic form. 

But then we must ask, where black hole pull that energy? When a black hole or any other object spins it turns energy around it to the kinetic form. When an object rotates friction turns that energy into thermal energy. But what if there is no friction? 

Or what if an object can tie all energy that it gets into it? That means that the object's spin turns faster and faster until it releases its energy. So can the ball spin forever? The ball can spin forever if it gets more energy than it releases. The thing is that the spinning ball creates thermal energy. 

And only a small part of that energy travels in the ball. The thing. That makes the situation more complicated and denies the perpetual motion that the heat also travels out from the ball. The energy asymmetry in energy flow causes energy to travel out from the ball. 

The IR radiation that we call thermal energy or thermal radiation makes the standing wave that hovers a little bit above the ball. That standing wave makes a small vacuum around that ball. The standing wave causes the energy not to impact the ball. The same heat energy that can accelerate will slow the speed of the ball. 

The thing that spinning ball could conduct thermal energy into it and turn the energy asymmetry that way that it gets more energy than delivers and can turn it into the fundamental thing. But if it cannot release that energy, the ball turns into a black hole. The energy rises the mass of the object. That means. If the object gets enough energy, it becomes a black hole. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/gravitational-wave-meet-black-hole/

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-energy-may-be-evolving-transforming-our-view-of-the-universe/

https://scitechdaily.com/frontier-supercomputer-unveils-the-largest-universe-simulation-ever/

Can Tachyon be real?

"Tachyons are hypothetical particles that move faster than the speed of light and travel backwards through time. (Image credit: Yuichiro Chino via Getty Images)" (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

***********************************************

Article from Space.com. 

"Traveling faster than light and time-travel could be real for tachyons. If one thing science fiction excels at, it's allowing us to marvel at the breaking of the physical laws of the universe. We watch and read in wonder as the warp engines of the starship Enterprise push it to beyond the speed of light, or as Barry or Wally  —  whoever is carrying the name of the Flash at the time  —  does the same in no more than a pair of yellow boots. " (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

"Likewise, we enjoy tales of adventurers like the Doctor, or Doc Brown, using weird seemingly antiquated machinery to violate the laws of causality. What if there was a fundamental particle that could do all these things? Moving faster than light like the Flash, and traveling back through time without the need for a TARDIS or a Delorian or yellow boots. " (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

"That’s a tachyon. But make no mistake, these particles aren’t just the idling's of science fiction writers. Tachyons are the stuff of "hard" science. " (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

https://www.space.com/tachyons-facts-about-particles

***********************************************

Tachyon is a theoretical faster-than-light particle. And it's a mystery. It should exist.  There are theories that tachyons formed before material. In some other models, the black hole can form tachyons. That happens when particles travel against a field that falls into the black hole. 

But it's harder to see than any other particle. In models, the tachyon moves in the higher dimension. And this makes it unable to exchange information with 3D particles. 

This means that the dimension is the limit to the difference in energy levels. If the difference between the energy levels of two particles is high enough, they are unable to exchange information. 

Tachyon cannot interact with 3D material. Because of its energy level is so high. The interaction time between tachyon and other particles is so short, that we cannot notice it. 

When the tachyon starts to interact the lower energy particle pulls it into a 3D universe. In that model, tachyon transforms into photons or some other bosons. This means that when we see a tachyon it transforms into some other particle. 

Tachyon is an interesting particle because if something travels faster than light, it starts to travel back in time. When we think about the tachyon. And its relationship with another hypothetical particle called: graviton the missing gravity transportation particle we can understand tachyons better. 

****************************************

There is the possibility, that also hypothetical graviton particle is the tachyon tail that forms the channel. That channel is the quasiparticle-like exciton. In that model, the graviton is a quasiparticle that is the channel behind the tachyon. 

In some theories tachyon and graviton are the same thing. If a tachyon exists and it travels faster-than-light it leaves the pothole or channel behind it. That channel forms an exciton-type quasiparticle that pulls a quantum field or information into it. But proving that thing requires the existence of a tachyon. 

****************************************

The idea is that the graviton which could be a small- or quantum-size black hole falls through the universe into the past. If the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light, that causes that particle or object to start to travel back in time. When an object travels back in time, it creates a hole in the spacetime. And we see that thing as a black hole.

Then the photon can fall into that hole. The quantum-size black hole makes the channel where photons can fall. The side-coming energy presses the photon and raises its energy level higher than it should be. In that model, the quantum-size black hole turns the photon into the tachyon. The quantum-size black hole itself pulls photons into the channel where it start to travel into the past. 

When some particle travels in that kind of tunnel or wormhole the side coming energy pushes it to the shape of spaghetti. When the speed of the particle closes the speed of light. 

There grows the nose at the front of the particle. The reason for that is the reflecting quantum field that denies crossing the speed of light in a normal universe. 

In a critical moment, the quantum field jumps away from the particle. And that causes energy to flow out from it in critical moments. The particle or object can accelerate its speed only if energy travels into it. When energy travels out, that slows particles. In the wormhole, side-coming energy continues the energy flow into the particle that travels in it. The side-coming energy accelerates the particle even if the quantum field in front of it jumps away. 

There are three ways that a tachyon can cross the speed of light. The one thing is tachyon travels in an energy channel that pumps energy into it. If that channel is small there is forming an energy wave behind the tachyon. 

If energy cannot bypass that particle. The difference between energy levels behind and ahead of the particle turns high enough. That thing acts like Alcubierre WARP drive. 

In another version, tachyon spin is so fast that when it travels near the speed of light, that spin takes it over the border. The third version is that the particle travels against the quantum field that travels in opposite directions and can cross the speed of light because the impact speed between that field and the particle is higher than the speed of light. 

The energy level in the past is higher than it's now. So the energy that travels through that wormhole from the past to the future can explain dark energy. The tachyon would travel to the past and open this kind of channel into the past. 

The graviton or quantum-size black hole can turn this channel into a spiral-shaped whirl. The black hole itself will create the channel and there is the energy low pressure near the tachyon. That means energy that follows the graviton and photon from above pushes them back in time.

There could be some kind of skyrmions. That travels around the channel in the opposite direction. The idea in this model is that. Those wormholes transport energy from the past to the future by using this shortcut. And maybe that energy is the thing, that we see as dark energy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-energy-mystery-mounting-evidence-points-to-black-holes-as-hidden-source/

https://www.space.com/tachyons-facts-about-particles

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/breakthrough-tachyon-discovery-is-a-major-leap-towards-time-travel-reality/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

There is a new explanation for the strange gamma-rays. That comes from the center of the Milky Way.

The offer for an explanation of that gamma-ray radiation is microsecond pulsars. The problem with that explanation is that the regular pulsars are not sending gamma-rays. They are sending radio waves and the question is how the radio waves and electrons are turning gamma-rays. The fact is that if there is some kind of radio source in the center of the galaxy.  

Radiation comes from that source that travels through the entire galaxy. And in that journey, the outcoming radiation hits that radio wave of electrons. So during that journey radiation that comes from the other particles is increasing the energy level of that radiation.  So the radiation that comes from the pulsars will face a similar effect to lasers. When radiation hits electrons it increases their energy level.

Radiation makes the same thing as protons and neutrons. When the energy level outside the particle decreases. Those particles are sent wave movement until their energy level is the same as the area around them. 

The microsecond pulsars are possible in areas with extremely high energy levels. Normally pulsars are neutron stars that are part of binary stars. Or they are surrounded by interplanetary nebula. The thing that causes the rotation and the radiation pike of the pulsar is material that impacts a neutron star. 

When a pulsar is near the center of the galaxy. It's in an area where the radiation level is extremely high. That energy level increases also the energy level of the radiation that comes out from the neutron star. When that radiation hits particles of high-energy clouds they are storing that wave movement and energy in their quantum field. 

When that radiation travels through that particle energy level around it will decrease. And that thing causes the particle sends its radiation in the form of wave movement. The same thing happens in neutron bombs. When the radiation of the nuclear explosion hits to neutron cloud. Those neutrons are releasing their extra energy in the form of neutron radiation. 

The energy level of the area near the center of the galaxy is extremely high energy. In the galaxy's center is a black hole that sends radiation around it. When the X-rays from that black hole impact a pulsar or neutron star. That increases their energy level. 

Or otherwise, radiation from the pulsars hits the material disk around the black hole. The material around the black hole is at a high energy level. When electrons impact the material around the black hole. They are sending radiation that might have a gamma-ray frequency. 

https://scitechdaily.com/strange-galactic-signal-coming-from-the-center-of-the-galaxy-has-potential-new-explanation/

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

Could a hypothetical quark star be invisible?

There is the possibility that there are so-called "stealth stars" in the universe

The hypothetical quark star is one of the "should be" objects. But there is no single observation of that type of star. Theoretically, quark stars are the medium between neutron stars and black holes. But why we cannot see that thing? 

Could the reflection that comes from free quarks have a wavelength that we cannot observe? The free quarks will send the radiation that has so short wavelength that we cannot observe that radiation because we have no object that resonates with that thing.

What if radiation comes straight from the surface of quarks? Normally the radiation comes from the quantum fields of atoms or protons and neutrons. But if there are free quarks somewhere in the universe, those quarks would send radiation that has so short wavelength that we cannot see that thing. So does that thing explain, why we have no observations about the hypothetical quark stars? Are those objects sending wavelength that is invisible to us?

Could dark energy mean the radiation that comes straight from the surface of quarks? If naked quarks are sending the radiation. That radiation has a wavelength that is shorter than any other radiation. Normally quarks are in the protons and neutrons. And those objects are sending radiation from their quantum fields. 

But there is the case where the quarks might be free. That case is the quark star. There is the possibility that the quark stars are invisible to us because in those cases the quarks are sending radiation in the wavelength that is the size of quarks. 

The thing that might cause the forming of a stealth star is the case, where the reflection is coming back in the form of a wavelength that is impossible to see. So maybe so-called quark stars have small bubbles of quarks on their surface that make them invisible to the eye.

In that case, the reflection happens with a wavelength that is coming from the frequency of quarks. When radiation hits the quarks they are sending echo as the wavelength that is the same. As the size of those subatomic particles. In normal cases, quarks are in the protons and neutrons. And we can see things like neutron stars. 

The reflection from the neutron stars is coming as the wavelength that is the same as the size of neutrons. But in quark star the quarks are naked. They are without the quantum field and give the reflection as the pure quarks. In a neutron star, the radiation reflection comes from quantum fields that surround neutrons. So if naked quarks are giving reflection or sending radiation that means the wavelength of that radiation would be far shorter than radiation that comes from neutrons. 

The question of planet 9 is causing an interesting theorem. Could that mysterious object that causes the strange gravitational effect to the trajectory of planet Neptune be the fermion or rather saying quark star. 

There is the possibility that the quark stars are invisible because the quarks are sending radiation reflection in a wavelength that is impossible to notice. There is the possibility that quark stars are not smooth. In some theories, the quarks are making the small hills or small bubbles in the surface of the quark stars. And that thing means that the reflection from that surface is coming from an extremely short wavelength. 

There is the possibility that there are so-called "stealth stars" in the universe. In some ideas, extremely heavy objects can surround by the whirl of electrons. Which are pushing photons away from the surface. In some other visions, the halo that is caused by reflecting radiation around quark stars can eliminate the reflection. In that case, the star reflects 100% of radiation in the same direction where that incoming wave movement is coming. 

And in this case, the counter radiation of the object will delete the incoming radiation. So in this idea, the object acts like an active jammer system that denies the echo of the radiation. When the incoming and reflecting radiation with the same wavelengths hit together they are neutralizing each other. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/calculations-point-to-massive-quark-stars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_star

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_star

Image:https://physicsworld.com/a/calculations-point-to-massive-quark-stars/

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The giant accelerator would allow interstellar traveling

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The power source for interstellar traveling is the major problem in those futuristic spacecraft. If we are thinking about Warp-drive, what can travel faster than light, we must realize, that we would need the brand new technology, in the very giant scale. The spacecraft that would travel faster than light must be base the technology, what is ever created in the real life, and making this technology really is the very complicated process. The shape of the spacecraft would be like some science fiction spacecraft, what uses antimatter or WARP-propulsion for increasing the speed of 80-90 percent of the speed of light.


And in this spacecraft would be particle accelerator, what could be like the linear version of "Hedron", what is located in CERN. That accelerator would be like some extreme long tube at the nose of the spacecraft, what might be quite similar, what is planned to use in "Project Thor". The difference would be that the device is equipped with antimatter-motors, what will accelerate it for speed, what is near the speed of light, and then the accelerator would be launched. But the size of this spacecraft would be much bigger, what is planned for "Thor".


The interstellar spacecraft would first accelerate the top speed, what could be something like 90 percent of the speed of light, and the particle accelerator would shoot the capsule to the top speed. The problem of this hypothetical spacecraft would be the size of this thing. The accelerator must be over hundreds of kilometers long, and the electricity, what is used in this gigantic rail gun is very high. This spacecraft would be built in the space, and it would be very huge. If it sometimes would be made.


So there must be the very powerful power source, that this very huge spacecraft would be worked. And after the spacecraft have been shot by the railgun there is no return back. The capsule would fly to Alpha Centaur in about two years, but the problem is the slowing. And of course, the home trip would be difficult. In one scenario this spacecraft would use sophisticated artificial intelligence, and it would have sub-robots, what would build another accelerator at the orbiter of the target star.


This kind of artificial intelligence could also make the copy of the spacecraft if that is damaged. This technology is called "Von Neumann technology". In this case, those robots would search suitable materials from asteroids, what is orbiting the star by using laser-spectrometers. Then the materials would be transferred to the factory, and then those systems can create microchips and other stuff, what is needed for new spacecraft. This kind of systems can help us to colonize the entire galaxy in the distant future, but there are many technical problems to win before the trip to stars would be real.

Fermi paradox: Where is everybody? (Where are other civilizations?)

https://marxjatalous.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If we would calculate the number of known planets, what are on the habitable zone of the sun type star we would get number one if we would live in 1950's And if we would see how many known civilizations were in that kind of planets in that time, we can get number one. So if we would calculate the probability to meet intelligent civilization on the Earth-type planet, what is in the habitable zone of the star, we could find number 100. So in every earth type planet, what orbits the star in the habitable zone should have an intelligent life form.


And here we must ask again where are those civilizations? When we are looking at the Drake equation, we must think about the question, where are the aliens, if every earth-type planet in the habitable zone of stars would have intelligent life. Here we must go to the Fermi paradox, the attempt to explain why there would be no answer from another civilization? The one thing in this paradox is, that when the civilization would get some special level of science and technology, they could destroy themselves with nuclear weapons.


This explanation is one of the most well-known things about this paradox. And then somebody would ask, "Was the Second World War the ultimate test", and if the mankind passed that test, would it become super civilization? The other thing in the Fermi paradox is that the gamma-ray bursts would destroy the civilization, and the opponent would claim, that if the civilization would have enough high technical level, they could evacuate to the dark side of their home planet.


And also moving to the dark side or underground network of tunnels, would that civilization survive even from the biggest cosmic catastrophes. When we are thinking about the communication between civilizations, there is, of course, the possibility that the hypothetical alien would not answer, because it would not feel the communication safe. That means it afraid that some other hostile aliens would locate it, and then the war between worlds would raise.


Sometimes some persons think, that maybe the afraid of conflict between two very technical civilizations would survive the Earth. Because if some civilization would use weapons like Death Star, it would show the power to other civilizations, what have the even better equipment and technology. Sometimes I have faced the theory, that other civilizations would leave us alone because we would be too pathetic being seriously taken.


That kind of talking is very usual between philosophers. Or maybe the radio signals, what are left to the universe are too weak to notice. Maybe the radio waves, what are coming from other stars and galaxies are acting like ECM-jammer system. That radio-transmission can cover the radio-waves, what is sending by using Hydrogen Alpha-frequency. Maybe we are alone maybe not. But the searching would continue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox

The thoughts about the Apollo program, and its three men crews.

Saturn-V rocket
(https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/saturnv-3_0.jpg)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many explanations for why NASA returned to the Moon, and why they send three-man crews on that journey? The most common explanation for staying out from Moon is of course that the costs of that project would be so huge, and that explanation is the most acceptable of those stories. But if I would stop writing here, I must give you the very short text, and that's why I must start to write something, what is not proven in anywhere. Only thing what is interesting is, that NASA sends three-men crews to the Moon, and that would make social problems in the spacecraft because only two of those crews could land to the Moon. But everything else is pure fiction, or I hope so.


One of those explanations is that the military is testing some kind of weapons at the Moon, and that would be the reason, why the humans did not go in there since 1973. At above this text is a picture of the Saturn V-rocket. In some theories, there would be the nuclear missiles dug under the dust of the moon, and they could be inside some kind of tubes. Those missiles would cause horrified surprise if they would be used against the target on Earth. And some stories tell that this study project had code name "Project Luna". The weapon base would be fully automatized and remote controlled.

 But there are some other things, what makes that leaving out of the Moon very interesting thing.  In some other stories the moonwalk and other things in that project, what was called as "Apollo" served the top-secret or semi-secret project called "Ozma". In this attempt to make the relationship between the civilizations were send the message to some stars, that humans are here. And when the astronauts were sent to Moon, the investigators of NASA tried to recognize if the footprints on the Moon would somehow be changed.


 And they send Apollo to the Moon for making two missions one is public and the second was somehow childish attempt to uncover the secret moon base of aliens, and until yet the NASA would not be given answers from humanoids. and there is no evidence about the connection with the "Project Ozma". There is one remarkable detail in the Apollo program, and that is why NASA used three men crews, and only two of them would land to the Moon. This is the only fact what is shown true in the stories, why humans did not send back to Moon.


Three persons in the small space cause always anger and other problems with social relations. and maybe NASA tested the anger management process of the most qualified military personnel, but if we are thinking carefully the three men crew would cause that the astronauts were unable to make observations because of they afraid fights or anger, and did NASA that election for the strength of the crew because they had something to hide.

https://read.bi/2uyP3Lj

The moon-shuttle and space station

David A Hardy's painting
"Eros expedition"
(Picture I)

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/the-moon-shuttle-and-space-station.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We are all read about plans to make the moon shuttle and that plan is very interesting. The moon shuttle would be the spacecraft, what would not land to the Earth, and the use of that spacecraft would be like, the crew and other things would transfer to the normal shuttle at the Earth orbital, and then the moon shuttle would be refueled. The shape of this shuttle would be the simple tube, what can be made by using the rocket stage of Delta or Atlas rockets. That stage would be equipped with feet, what are similar to the rockets that are made by David Hardy in the painting above the text. The name of the painting is "Eros expedition", and it portraits the fictional journey to the asteroid Eros, but the similar spaceship can operate from the Moon and travel to Asteroid belt.

An aerodynamic cone, what would protect the docking unit would be removed at the orbital. Or it can be made for turning away from the head of this spacecraft. The technology, what might be used in this enhanced lunar vehicle is basically similar, what have used in the Apollo-program. The big size allows a big cargo bay and this spacecraft would be also used as the space station for the astronauts. In distant future, this kind of spacecraft can also be equipped with ion motors and small nuclear reactor, what allows it to maneuver in large areas in the asteroid belt and investigate the asteroids. And sometimes I have imagined, that it would be equipped with the high power electric generator, what allows to produce the electromagnetic field over this spacecraft, what would protect the crew against cosmic radiation.


If we think the most conventional model of this planned spacecraft, what would use liquid hydrogen and oxygen as a fuel, we must notice that  the biggest difference of this vehicle for Apollo-craft is, that it could fly between Moon and the Earth many times, and if the operator will want, this spacecraft would be land to the Earth without the parachute. The main motor would impose the thrust, that the speed of falling thru the atmosphere would be safe. And if we are honest, the similar technology can be used to send that tube-looking spacecraft to the orbital. The answer for keeping the speed low enough will be in the computerized ventilation system, what imposes the flow of oxygen and fuel all the time during the flight, that the nose of the rocket would not rise too high.


The secret of rockets is they need the mass of fuel to fly to the orbiter, but the rocket must create enough exhaust gasses, that the pressure of those gasses would be bigger than the weight of the rocket. The motor ventilation allows imposing the pushing force of the rocket, that the non-aerodynamic shape would be possible. But the aerodynamic cone can make that way, it has the hinge, what turns it away when the spacecraft is out of the atmosphere.

Picture I

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/61/49/45/614945d6efb3c534338229d76c881bf1--universe-art-alien-art.jpg

What if we would combine the HULC-exoskeleton and space suit

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/what-if-we-would-combine-hulc.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This writing is pure fiction. I took the idea for it from the movie "Predator", and this solution would be pure science fiction. The space suit is very suitable for deep-sea scuba diving, and also the use of this equipment in high-level radioactive areas feels a good idea, but there is one problem with that suit. The weight of the space suit is enormous, and the weight of this system causes, that it is useless in this kind of missions. But with one special equipment, this thing can revolutionize the handling of nuclear disaster and diving technologies. This equipment is HULC-style exoskeleton, what allows the capacity to use the space suit in the surface of Earth. The exoskeleton would give extremely big power to the person, who uses that machine. The space suit is suitable also in deep-sea missions because the suit is very hard. Actually, the space suit is a man-shaped spacecraft.


And in theory, the team, what uses this equipment can be dropped from the spacecraft to operational area, and the space suit is hard enough to resist the pressure of the deepest sea. Those persons can carry the heat shield, what looked like shields, what the knights used, and they can return to the atmosphere. Then the parachutes would be open, and those persons could start their operation in the deep sea or in the radioactive area. Those systems are very expensive, but they can be allowed to operate in the areas, what is too hostile for normal rescue or operative team.


The space suits can allow getting the things from the sunken ships, what are very deep.  The connecting that very heavy thing with HULC-system, could the operator also work in the places like the nuclear disaster. The space suit can allow that the man can handle the uranium fuel without risk of getting radiation illness, but this would make very bad visions in my sight. Space suits are equipped with the thing, what is called the "micrometeorite protection". That means that this suit could be used as the armor suit, what would resist all kind of threats. The suit can be equipped with RTG-generator and lasers. The laser would be in the back of the operator, and the laser rays can be transferred to the arms by using light cables. And the RTG would give enough power to that system. The exoskeleton would give enough force, that one person could carry this kind of equipment.


When we are thinking, that the space suit would be used as some kind of "predator" mission, that thing can also be equipped with the nuclear detonator. The nuclear detonator could be modified RTG-generator, where would be connected with another bite of plutonium. Power of that device would be extremely low, what means about 0,5-2 kilotons. The military might be interested in this kind of devices because they would cover the identity of the operator if this person would be injured. The space suit allows avoiding the DNA markings of the operator, and it will be very hard, and maybe in some laboratories are tested, how suitable this thing would be in some kind of missions. But the high price of that system would limit its use to the space missions. This thing could be very good equipment in some science fiction book, and in the real life, the space suit can be too expensive in the everyday use.

https://www.army-technology.com/projects/human-universal-load-carrier-hulc/

Picture I

https://www.draper.com/sites/default/files/news/spacesuit.jpg

Lockheed-Martin and fusion powered fighter, real-life Millennium Falcon

Picture I

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Lockheed-Martin corporation is trying to make fighter or airplane, what would use Fusion reactor for flying. That seems like something from Science fiction books, but in this case, would this fusion motor become the real thing. The fusion motor doesn't mean that the aircraft needs nuclear reactors or the fusion would be self-sustain.


In those concepts, what is theoretically investigated in tens of years, the fusion will give only the driving force. The motor itself is theoretical very simple, the fusion element would be conducted thru the reactor, and then the lasers would ignite the artificial sun inside or outside the reactor. Those lasers can get their electric power from fuel cells, conventional turbo-generators, what are rotating by jet turbines or by nuclear reactors.

"Daedalus"
Picture II

Also, windmill-generators what is used in some Electronic warfare aircraft can be used in that role (Picture IV). That kind of fusion reactor was planned to interstellar spacecraft "Daedalus" what was planned by interplanetary society. In that solution, the fusion reactor would use assisted by another propulsion system, what gives power to those lasers. Of course, those lasers can use acetylene lights in their lightning tubes, and that would decrease the need for electric power.

Picture III

Those lasers can be carbon-monoxide lasers, what are most powerful chemical lasers in the world. Their mission is to create enough energy, that fusion would start in the middle of them. That motor would be the very revolutionizing solution in aviation, and that would give change to travel in the universe at least in our own solar system and also in the atmosphere of planets.

Picture IV

In some wildest dreams, that fusion powered aircraft would look like the normal fighter, and it air intakes would use as the port for the interstellar ramjet. In that fictional motor, the powerful magnetic field would suck the ions thru the fusion motor, and in this process, the magnetic field would pressure that ion flow like wire, what goes thru the reactor, and then the laser rays would ignite the fusion. The problem of that system would be auxiliary power, what is needed to make those laser-rays and magnets what would press that ionic flow.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Daedalus

https://www.space.com/37146-nuclear-fusion-rockets-interstellar-spaceflight.html

http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/realdesignsfusion.php

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUUuMAsaJBU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeJCneMkxQk


Picture I

http://cdn3.theeventchronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/lockheed-martin-patents-nuclear-fusion-powered-fighter-jet.jpg

Picture II

http://public.media.smithsonianmag.com/legacy_blog/fusion-engine.jpg

Picture III
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2010/03/george-h-miley-presentation-on-nuclear.html

Picture IV

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8g2DinNhXCU/maxresdefault.jpg


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lockheed-martin-and-fusion-powered.html

About the dominance of the space and world

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/07/about-the-dominance-of-the-space-and-world/

The starship of tomorrow

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why Starcraft or the body of space telescope is good to be the triangle shape, is the question, what might be interested people. The triangular shape allows making more powerful radios or DEW (Directed  Energy Weapons) than any other shape. In the middle of this triangular body is one very strong maser and both sides are two weaker radio transmitter. That's why this shape is so good for spacecraft.


The maser what is in the middle of the triangle collects the radiation, and that would raise the power of that system. If the system uses one powerful antenna, the problem of that system would be overheating. And three smaller transmitters would keep the heating problem under control. The use of maser would make the signal more clear than using the normal radios. The coherent signal, what has only one frequency would carry messages far away from the transmitter.


Also, visible light can be used, but this would need that some optical telescopes would equip with light cells, what makes possible to read about those messages. The transmission would happen by binary codes, and the marks what would be used are zero and one. So this system is actually similar to the normal Internet. But the range of communication would be extremely long. The signal must be allowed to read, even if it would send from thousand astronomical units from earth.


If we think that this triangular shape would be used in some laser satellites or weapons, the system works like communication system. There would be three lasers, and those rays would be collected with the central laser to one very powerful ray, what would burn every other satellite. If we would have enough budget, we would make the 300 meters long triangular spacecraft. That spacecraft would not ever land to other planets, but it can travel in the solar system, and offer its crew very good room for their trip.


That spacecraft size would be so huge, that it must build at the space, and at the planet operates robots, what would make the flight more comfortable and also safer, because the crew would not be infected by those planets bacteria.  And that kind of vehicles would need laser-cannons to protect them against asteroids, but there would be a danger, that this giant spacecraft would become the military system. This kind of system would be very useful in many military space operations like catching opponents satellites and investigating their electronics and secrets in that giant laboratory, what might look like Imperial Starcruiser from the Star Wars movies.

Sources:

Picture 1.

https://www.koniec-swiata.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/tajna-flota-kosmiczna-600x300.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-starship-of-tomorrow.html

Nature and its relationship with art and science.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/nature-and-its-relationship-with-art.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/nature-and-its-relationship-with-art.html

Monkeys are very intelligent animals, what can be trained almost any mission, what mankind can imagine.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/monkeys-are-very-intelligent-animals.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/monkeys-are-very-intelligent-animals.html

Anti-gravity for fixed magnet-rails, what pushes the aircraft, what has the magnet with the same pole is possible in theory.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/anti-gravity-for-fixed-magnet-rails.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/anti-gravity-for-fixed-magnet-rails.html

What kind of spaceships would the aliens use, if they want to observe us, or we if we want to observe them?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-kind-of-spaceships-would-aliens.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-kind-of-spaceships-would-aliens.html