The universe's dark second origin is unveiled.

"Dark matter may have sprung from its own “Dark Big Bang,” separate from the traditional Big Bang, with potential proof coming from future experiments detecting gravitational waves. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab, edited" (ScitechDaily, The Dark Big Bang: Unveiling the Universe’s Hidden Second Origin)

It's possible. That dark matter is the shadows in the Higgs field. But we cannot be sure about that. 

The evidence that the universe did not begin from one event is stronger. That means that the Big Bang was a series of events that included many forms and energy levels before the material and energy formed. The dark Big Bang is the model that there were material before the universe. The dark Big Bang means that the dark matter is released in its own event. And that is one of the most interesting theories in the world. If the dark matter formed in a different, unique event that means it would be hard to see that material even if it's similar to visible material. 

The reason for that is that the dark matter particles or their elementary particle size will be different from than visible material. That means the wavelength that the dark matter particles send would be different than the wavelengths that we see. The different origin of the dark matter is one of the ways how to close that mysterious interaction. The young universe was different than the modern universe. The temperature of that universe was higher. And differences between energy levels were lower than in the modern universe. 

That means the energy flow from higher energy levels was slower and that means in the very young universe other fermions than just up and down quarks and electrons could form "stable" particles. The thing is that the muons and top and bottom quarks should have the ability to form "similar" particles as up and down quarks and electrons. The fast energy flow destroys those structures in the modern universe. But in a very high-energy environment that kind of hypothetical material could be possible. But that cannot happen in the modern universe because of the short existence of those particles. That material requires higher energy and more stable conditions. 

The sombrero model tells how gravity destroys the material. A standing gravity wave surrounds all particles. That gravity wave is the low energy area around particles or other gravity centers. If the differences between the particle's energy level and the bottom of the energy ditch around the particle are high enough, energy travels out from from particle so fast that it destroys it. 

When we think of models that gravity destroys the universe or all matter from inside it, we can think that the gravity ditch or gravity wave surrounds all particles. The gravity wave or lower energy area that forms the ditch around particles is the thing, that causes energy flow in it. The energy travels from outside and another energy wave comes from the particle inside that "sombrero". 

If the standing gravity wave or pothole is too deep particle vanishes into it. If we make a model where energy travels to that particle from above, that thing can cause reflection that covers the gravitation or energy pothole. Just like water that creates a roof-like form when we aim water dush to peg straight from above. The problem is that if the gravitational pothole is deep enough that causes a situation where energy travels out from the particle very fast. 

That thing rips their structure immediately. So can gravitation be the negative energy?  The idea is that. Negative energy is the energy that travels away from a particle. And the energy that travels into particles is positive energy. The determinator is in the energy flow direction. If the gravity wave is a lower energy point in the base energy field in the universe that means gravity itself or the energy flow that gravity causes is the negative energy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-dark-big-bang-unveiling-the-universes-hidden-second-origin/

Spin and gravity.

In this text, I write about neutron stars. But you can replace the word neutron stars using black holes. The idea of gravity could be that gravity or gravitation forms when a spinning object stores kinetic energy in its material structure. And then it conducts that energy into the center of that structure. 

Then that energy travels out from the spin axle. That means that gravity or gravitation is the force with field effect. That field effect means that gravity is a field that travels in the gravity center. That field is like a river that takes particles into it. The fact is that. All gravitational objects spin or move. They all have poles. 

The other thing is that. What if the planet is locked? The nucleus of the locked planet spins. And the shadow side puls energy out from that planet. 

Could spin be the thing that causes gravitation or gravity? When we think about very fast-spinning extremely heavy objects like neutron stars those things can explain the special features of gravity. The idea is that the fast-spinning object stores lots of energy into its material structure. Or it bends the energy that travels into it into its particles. 

Massive gravity forms when the speed of the spin axle slows. And the outer shell spins faster than particles in that axle. The question is this. Where lighter gravitational centers like Earth will conduct that energy? When we think about quantum gravity and large-scale gravity.

It's possible that the same things cannot form quantum and planet-size gravity. But if a large mass particle that spins very fast starts to vaporize it can form channels at its spin axle and then those channels pull that particle into them. That causes a situation where a particle causes an electromagnetic vacuum and other quantum fields fall to fill that emptiness. 

In this text, energy- or quantum fields mean the same thing. So gravity centers pull energy- or quantum fields into itself.  Those energy fields raise that object's mass. When we think the gravity as the situation where energy travels to the gravity centers we can ask one question. Why weak gravity centers like Earth don't turn always heavier and fall into black holes? The answer is that it conducts energy that it gets to somewhere. Same way why black holes and other neutron stars don't expand and fill the entire universe. The answer is that they conduct energy somewhere. 

*****************************************'

The idea of this gravitational model is this. A spinning object stores energy or quantum fields in its material. Then that energy starts to travel to the middle of that object. Then energy travels out from that object. So things like neutron stars and other things do not form energy they just concentrate it.  

*****************************************'

That causes situations where outcoming energy will be stored in the material of the neutron star. Then energy that travels to the neutron star's spin axle pulls that structure into its form. It's possible that in the neutron stars is the neutron liquid in its spin axle. That allows that there from the whirl there is a vacuum. 

That vacuum can pull other electromagnetic fields into that structure there they can travel out from the neutron star's poles. If there is a whirl that thing causes a situation that outcoming energy that is from the neutrons and has a homogenous wavelength the impacting wave movement in the middle of that whirl forms the maser effect that increases the power of escaping energy. 

When a neutron star pulls energy fields from its environment it travels more energy or quantum fields to fill that energy vacuum. Those energy fields transport particles like rivers. That means neutron stars are not forming energy from anywhere. It just collects and transforms energy into another form. In this text energy is the common name for all four fundamental interactions, strong, and weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism, and gravity. 

The idea of a falling field means that gravity is not force like electromagnetism. It's a feature in spacetime. Or if we think that spacetime is Higgs field or some other field, it's the movement in fields that form the 3D spacetime. 

That thing means that there is a lower energy point in the neutron star. That means the energy that comes from the neutron shell falls to that spin axle. There the spin axle will transmit that energy away from its structure. And that forms the vacuum. 

In fast-spinning objects, the centripetal force pushes that neutron star's shell out of its structure. That interaction between the inside vacuum or lower energy level in a neutron star and the neutron star shell and outcoming energy can explain why gravity is so different from other forms. 

When the energy level in particles rises.  Normally, they send energy impulses that destroy the structure. In that model, energy travels to the middle of the neutron star. That thing denies the outgoing effect. They form electromagnetic shadows in front of the particles. But those shadows form the inner side of those particles. 

That causes an effect. The electromagnetic radiation travels into the middle of the neutron star. Their energy starts to travel to the neutron star's poles. And that forms those powerful plasma beams from its poles. The thing is that also black holes have similar structures if we look at them outside. 

The world inside the event horizon is mysterious. But we can think that maybe all gravitational centers act the same way. The spin movement stores kinetic energy into their structure. And then that energy travels in the middle of them. 

https://www.universetoday.com/157257/gravitational-waves-will-give-astronomers-a-new-way-to-look-inside-neutron-stars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://aiandnaturaldemo.blogspot.com/2024/11/the-black-holes-can-turn-other-energy.html