Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Differences with the United States and Soviet military.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Cold war armies were many differences in the comparison to modern armies or military forces. The Soviet military believed the ordinary man's skills and ability to make military maneuvers. And the production of the Soviet army was the so-called general soldier, who had the ability to operate any kind of systems. Bad rumors say that the Soviet Union used the military forces also for threat, that if somebody said something against the political system, would that person called to military refreshing, where that person would be informed, that it would be wrong to criticize the political system of the Soviet Union and other communist countries. I sometimes write about communist block armies, because they are made with the same format with Soviet military forces.


The United States military forces believed in professional military force, and that have caused critics against that institution. There is claimed, that those professional military men are spending all of their life for practicing killing techniques, what makes them extremely dangerous. But the defenders of professional military forces are asking: "what else must the military men be than dangerous?". The purpose of the military is to cause fear in the mind of the enemy.


This supports the model of professional military men. And of course, the use of robots in the combat zone is supported by avoiding own losses. Robots are good warriors because they would not make anything, what operators are not allowed them to do. The robot operators would not need hand-to-hand combat skills for accomplishing their missions and that's why those persons are safer than some green berets. The loss of robots is very easy to tolerate, and nobody even notices if some drones are shot down. If the human pilot would be shot down, will all world know about it, and that person could tell something, what is classified. But robots would not know anything if they are destroyed. And that's why those systems are so high in the western military shopping lists.



 The tactics were different in both sides of the Iron curtain. Soviet tactics were simple frontal assaults where were used tanks in the massive formations and massive firepower against the enemy and that tactics were effective against more technical but outnumbered German army in the Second World war. But the problem with that tactics was great losses. United States military believed smaller groups movements by using helicopters.


The United States military was more technical and uses more complicated tactics against the enemy, but that would save men at least in the limited conflicts. The philosophy of the Soviet army was, that the men were recruited for a couple of years, and then they were released for civil works. The United States military used professional and voluntary troops, what was able to operate in the overseas situation, and those voluntary men were excellent fighters, but the problem was that they were not released for other works.


Professional soldiers lose contact with the normal life, but they are easier to send far away from home for the military actions. There are good points for supporting both sides of military training. When we are thinking about the technical stuff, what the military forces were got in the United States, the mission of that equipment is to make those forces capable of highly mobile operations, where the helicopters and aircraft would replace tanks and artillery. The problem with frontal assault tactics is the high number of own casualties, what are seen in many combats, where the communist army have taken apart.


When we are thinking about the long-term war between the nations, that would be hard to understand, that the long-term wars are the good thing only for the commanders of the armies. The problem with that kind of actions is, that the commanders would be untouchable in the long-term conflict. And this is the reason, why the United States created nuclear weapons.  Those weapons allowed to stop the conflicts very fast, and that was the reason, why also the Soviet Union made their first nuclear weapon in 1947. That weapon was worked perfect cover for Kremlin and other governments.


The user of nuclear weapons would not need very much training, and this is the reason for creating the ballistic missiles. When we are thinking about the Soviet political system, that nation would stand better in the long-term war. But the USA:s tactics was, that if the Soviet Union would crush the defense of NATO, the use of nuclear weapons would be possible. And every democratic state is talking about defense forces. Attack forces are the term, what is used for communists armies. Many things were secret in the Cold War military forces, and there were made many experiments, what are not mentioned.


But when we are talking about the military equipment or toys, we must remember the wisdom of some admiral. I don't remember was that person Jellicoe during the First World War, but the thing goes like this: "if the equipment is bad, and the ships would be sunk in the battles, it would be better to stay in the harbor". Or something like that went the philosophy of that admiral. The Soviet side was not well known about open information about military forces and in that country, and even the factories were prohibited to photograph from outside.



And that tells something about how open that nation was in the time of Cold War. Of course, AK-47 was the better concept than M-16 in the Vietnam War, and the U.S military used too many toys. But if the bombers would always send on one way trip in the war, would that also mean something. And when we are thinking about this kind of situation, that other side of the conflict would consume the conventional forces, would that drive the conflict to the point, where the use of nuclear weapons would be possible.


When we are talking about the economy and its relationship with the military, we must concern that democratic nation would not get any equipment for free. Every worker must get the salaries, and if we would think that the use of political prisoners in the production of military equipment, that would make the work cheap, but are those products actually so branded, that they could use in the real battleground.



The problem with prison work is always sabotage and the poor brand, what was one reason for the collapse of Germany in the 1940's. So every military product of German army was good on paper, but the practical apps were far away, what they should be. This is one problem with undemocratic countries. The workers have the bad motives and the equipment would be made with spoil, and that would make them even dangerous in the real situation.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/military-vehicle-news/us-ussr-cold-war-armies.html

Deep blue dune found on Mars

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/deep-blue-dune-found-on-mars.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

NASA:s probe has been found deep blue dunes on Mars-planet and those dunes might be the Copper sulphate , what might involve the water in the crystals, what means that water might be used in the water supply for the Mars flight. Those dunes are looking exciting, even without the crystal water, and they are marks, that sometimes there is been oxygen in the atmosphere of that planet. But as we know this would not mean anything, and if we want to know about the life of this planet, we must search the fossils of the bacteria much more intensive and they should find in the larger area, that behind one rock.


If there would be found the fossils only in the one rock, that means that those bacteria have come from somewhere else. What means that the origin of these bacteria is not Mars. And in this case, we should investigate the DNA or genomes of those fossils. If those fossils are from Earth, what means that their genomes are similar with the cyanobacteria on Earth, there would be some reason, why those bacteria are found on Mars.


And one reason could be that somebody has made secret spaceflight to Mars or those drones, what are send to that planet were not sterilized soundly. Or some meteorite would be transferred those bacteria to the Red Planet. Here is one question, what I sometimes wonder, and that is, what has been happened to the parachutes of the probes, what are sent to that planet? Or have some Mars-rover took any pictures of landed probes like Viking or Soviet Mars probes.


Those pictures would be great to see, and when we are thinking about the high rate of failures of those probes, we might get answers, why those probes send data only less than a minute from the surface of that planet? Soviet scientists tried to send the Mars-rover to that planet, but that was the failure. And as you might see from the link below, there are very much failures in the Mars missions, and the reason for that would be nice to find out.


There have been rumors, that somebody would sabotage the missions to Mars on purpose, but another question is, why would somebody do those things.  But as you see the list of those missions, many of them have faced the fate in failures, and the data would not be been get from those flights. And why there are no pictures of other probes or parachutes in the net? Those questions are very interesting things.


List of Mars missions:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_Mars

Picture I

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/11/15/22/3A67E2E400000578-0-image-a-28_1479249213423.jpg

The secrets of the state are big thing even in the Soviet Union

Vostok I launch
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The secrecy feeds rumors, and this is true even in the Soviet Union. This text is not based on any trusted source. It is meant as the thinking about the secrets, and as you might know, we ever find out the truth about claimed "secret spaceflights". The documents of those flights might be destroyed by KGB, and what we must consider before we even start to read this text is, that if somebody would fail in the space program in front of the politburo, the results would be terrible for that person.


And that's the reason, why somebody claims that there were one or even three cosmonauts before Yuri Gagarin, who took honor about being the first man in space. When we are looking at the life of Gagarin in the honor and his death, we must think that maybe that cosmonaut committed suicide. Maybe he could not stand the thing, that some other man or woman was sacrificed before him. Maybe Gagarin was chosen to tell the lies for international press because he was easy to silent. Here I claim that if this rumor about cosmonaut, who fly before Gagarin were true, Gagarin would not know anything about it. And in this case, the system of the Soviet Union made the lie, and Gagarin was innocent.


Or maybe Koroljov or some other chief of the program send the cosmonaut without the permission to the orbiter, and then happened the accident. The story about lost cosmonauts is only one conspiracy theory. And there is no evidence that they even existed. This hypothetical flight might be some kind of ballistic jump, what supposed took only a couple of minutes, and then something went wrong. Maybe the heat shield was the wreck and the spacecraft would burn.


Sometimes I have thought that Koroljov might promise to that person, that this cosmonaut would make another flight in public, but then the person would be changed. That way Gagarin was easier to control. But we don't actually know are those "lost cosmonauts" true. Or is some cosmonaut disappeared in the holiday? But I believe that there were many accidents what was not able to talk. And maybe this accident happened during some normal test flight. I don't know how long this hypothetical space flight might be, but it would be a ballistic jump, and then something bad has happened.

The secrets of the Soviet Union are a big thing, and there have been rumors about lost cosmonauts, who were lost during their missions. Soviet way to hide their secrets is legendary, and there were many things, what should be explained. One of the things is the recording, where the female cosmonaut talks with ground crew and that record seems very rare, and nobody still knows what was going on in that spacecraft. The record seems like adult entertainment, and it is very untypical in that situation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Sgc1I9sjfc

I sometimes am played with thinking, that what if some very important member of Soviet military technology or some other job would steal the space capsule and move to the United States. This theory might seem very rare, and I think this as the playing with ideas or thoughts. In this idea, some very important engineer or scientist would go in some Soviet biological research capsule and then jump to the states.

This is a very good idea for some book, but I don’t actually believe it myself. One of the mysteries of that nation hangs over despotic leader  Joseph Stalin. But when we are talking about secrets of Soviet Union, we must know little bit psychology. One of the most remarkable thoughts is that Joseph Stalin was afraid of something. I don’t know if this true, but when I wrote this thing, I asked myself “how acts person, who afraid something?”.


A person who scares something might want to be with somebody all the time. If some person scares something personal, this person probably wants to work all night. The fear is easier to handle in the daylight. Anthropologists have explained that every person in human race afraid dark somehow. Reason for this is that the animals, what are dangerous for the human would hunt in the night.


If this natural fear is connected with another fear, would that cause the situation, the person doesn’t dare to be alone in a single minute. Those persons afraid the dark, because another thing that this person afraid rises psychological pressure in the mind of that person, and it might seem like fear of the night. So if Stalin was afraid of something, would that cause the situation, where he would work all night long.


But this man had enemies because those 20 000 000 dead Soviet citizens had friends and family members who wanted to revenge the Stalin. They might be the reason, why this notorious dictator was working all night long. Or that might be the reason, that Stalin drinks too much coffee. Who knows the truth, but if the person is very hated, this might cause the fear reaction.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Cosmonauts

Picture 1

http://www.spacefacts.de/graph/drawing/drawings2/vostok-1_launch.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-secrets-of-state-are-big-thing-even.html

Strange painting from the medieval age might innovate the engineers to build the most modern Mars probe.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-painting-from-medieval-age.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-painting-from-medieval-age.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-painting-from-medieval-age.html