Are anti-science, religious movements, and unemployment connected to each other?

When preachers speak to their audience. They tell. What people want to hear. And that makes them dangerous. “Why must people educate, when they can gain joy and piety?” This is how cult leaders market their cult. They offer joy and happiness, and of course, they carry the heaviest of the weight. They think for their society. Education gives the ability to resist 

There are used chemicals. Those cults sometimes prohibit doctors who are not accepted by their leaders. This means their members are not warned about things like drugs. 

This is why some medieval religious leaders. Once said. That “education brings responsibility and takes joy from life”.  And then that leader said. “Stupid people are happy people; they don’t rebel, they don’t ask, and they believe everything that this leader said.“ This attitude supported the absolute power of the King. 

The king ruled because. God wanted that. And that’s why resisting or excusing the kind was a crime against heaven. And the god himself. That allowed the Inquisition to burn people: Who? Dare to excuse the king in a bonfire. The reason for anti-education attitudes was simple: people cannot demand change. If they don’t know any other models than those they see. Or, the models that their leaders want to introduce. 

When an unemployed, poor, and uneducated person hangs around, there is a strong possibility. Those people will attract. Into some sects that take advantage of them. So, can we consider that the reason for modern anti-science attitudes is the situation where unemployed people are attracted to some “right-wing religious movement”? The attraction happens by promising food to those people. If those people get free food. They might go to those meetings. That saves. Their social security money is to be used for something other than food. Those religious movements are very sharp. For their members ’ morale. 

That means they collect smartphones away, and offer basic phones. To replace those smartphones. The reason. Why that is done, is that done? The internet is full of sin. Then they will go to sell those phones. And of course, things like social media are always prohibited. There, people can get things. Like warnings about those cults.  

Those preachers offer simple reasons why their audience feels so bad. If people in the audience have alcohol problems. or drug problems, they search for outside reasons for their problems. And those preachers offer them those outside reasons. If they get. A little bit more money. Their lifestyle will be better. They offer things that those people want to hear. 

The anti-science can make those people seem strange. That isolates them from the rest of society. And this makes. Those people get support and acceptance from those events. And finally, all the people that those cult members know are other cult members. That allows those cults to tighten their grip. To its members. And of course. The person who invites those cults must be fully involved. That means there must not have. Any smartphones or computers. Or the internet. That allows the leaders to control information that is not meant for those people. 

Those people must not talk to other people, because other people, or outsiders, don’t understand what real believing is. When an outsider comes to talk with cult members, a real cult member just turns their back. The cult member. Must get only accepted information, and they must not know anything other than what their guides or leaders want. 

Far wing movements can offer things. Like food to make people come to their events. It’s possible that those movements can also put drugs in those foods. And then they can make sure. That people come to their events again. 

Three major hazards in modern society are anti-science, poverty, and unemployment. Poverty means that people leave their schools, because they want to earn money. Then, in later ages, the earnings of uneducated people were. Can earn. Are not. Very good. Actually, uneducated people. Earn low salaries. But. Those salaries might feel very high. If a person has not earned anything. And lived 5 €. Income per week. Before a person must pay for everything from their living, things like a cleaner or a hamburger clerk can feel very high-paid jobs. But in the later ages. Money from those works is not enough. 

Or, maybe. The workplace faces bankruptcy. There are billions of reasons why a person is fired. That thing brings unemployment and many other things into a person’s life. And maybe that thing explains anti-science attitudes. People who are working in the “religious right-wing movements” offer the reason for poverty and low social status, the educational and research institutes. Like universities.

And then... Remember Jim Jones and the People’s Temple. In that case, the cult leader stole the entire property of his followers. Then that charismatic cult leader murdered his followers. That is not only the case when a charismatic leader attracts followers to commit suicide in their order. Another case was Waco, Texas, when David Koresh, another cult leader, caused the so-called. The Waco incident, in which he and his followers committed suicide and killed other cult members. 

When the police (ATF, FBI) came to arrest them. The case began when ATF came. To conduct home research on that cult’s HQ ranch. That caused a firefight, there 4 federal officers died. Then the FBI came and surrounded the ranch, and that caused a siege that took 51 days. Then the FBI began an assault, and 82 cult members died, including 20 children. 76 of them, including children, and Koresh, died in the second assault. When the FBI. Started to use CS (Tear Gas).  In that assault, the Ranchians set their houses. To burn. It’s possible that the reason why those people made the decision to kill themselves was the earlier firefight against the ATF, where they killed four on-duty ATF agents. 

Earlier,  on April 19, 1993. 6 cult members killed on February 28,1993 in a firefight against ATF. Killing four federal officers causes the death penalty. The fact is that the Waco incident shows what a manipulative and cold-blooded mind can do. It also shows what fanaticism. And other things make in cases. Their religion and law are not in line. Another thing is that anti-science, or fashionably “science criticism,” causes a situation where vaccines that are effective against biological weapons are not delivered to people. This means that science criticism can be controlled. By forces that wish to use those bacteria or viruses against people. 

Those people say that universities and scientific institutes waste taxpayers' money on things like space flights, when they could use that money for social security. The thing is that. Poor people are packing into those religious events because at least some of those religious movements offer food to people who come to listen to the words about god. So, poor, unemployed, and uneducated people can use their social security for something other than money. When they visit in those meetings. 

This means people who think that things. That universities make are far from their own world. Who has. No will or ability  to challenge authorities. Or  people who tell simple things. To them. They might believe that scientific institutes just waste money, which the government can use for social security. The charismatic speakers offer some outsiders whom their audience can blame. 

A person who has bad self-esteem, is uncertain, and who might misuse drugs can feel that those preachers give them. Some outsiders to blame. Those outsiders are homosexuals, and of course, people who want to excuse things that preachers say. Some of those. People think that slips and suits are things that make those preachers wise. 

That makes those people easy to manipulate. This thing made it possible for people like the famous cult leader Jim Jones to order his followers to commit suicide. In the same way, anti-vaccine propaganda opens society to things like biological weapons. This means that in the wrong movement, a person can lose money, clothes, everything they own, and finally, they can give their lives for “wise men” who lead them. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Koresh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Jones

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples_Temple

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege

Wolves and men.

Game theory and everyday life

Pixelation in game theory means that. When the entirety tuns unnecessary the individuals are starting to rise. There is a point where the individual benefit will face the benefit of the entire group. The benefit of the entire group is not always the benefit of its single members. 

And at that point, there is the possibility. That benefit of the individual will win the benefit of the group. The pixelation means that the entirety is forming of the smaller and smaller subgroups. And the smallest possible sub-group is a single person or member of the group. 

When wolves are sharing their meal. They start to fight with each other That thing can use as an example where remove outcoming threats causing the entirety to turn chaotic. 

The benefit of an individual member of the group wins the benefit of the group. And that causes problems with safety when wolves start to fight with each other. 

When we think that the species want to maximize their benefit that thing will also continue in the level of individual organisms. The species is forming the main group. And then there will be the sub- or internal groups of species. That means there is always the situation where the benefit of the individual organism. Would cross benefit of the group. That thing is visible in things like wolfpacks. 

When wolves are hunting their prey they are cooperating. But when the prey is killed it's time to eat. At that moment the wolfpack would not make anything controlled. Those predators start to fight about the food. At that moment the benefit of the individual crosses the benefit of the group. When wolves are fighting about their food there is the risk. Other predators like eagles or foxes are attacking wolfpacks' small members. 

And because the hierarchy in wolfpack is extreme. There is the possibility that some pack members will not get food. Or in the most shocking cases, nobody will get food because their time will spend to fight. And the meat is frozen or some other animals steal the prey. In that case, the personal benefit that is the position in the hierarchy risks the entire group. 

The outside threat or opportunity is making the group work together. But when the goal like caribou is dead and food is ready. The internal order is gone. This is the thing that we should think about when we are making contracts. If somebody offers something cheap. We should as why that actor is making those things? Nobody offers anything for free. There is always some kind of reason for cheap offers. 

When the outside actor wants to break the alliance against itself it can offer something that it has. That offer would consist of the energy supply or some high-tech shipments. The purpose of this strategy where the other actors get cheaper offers than others is unequal to the alliance. That means some nations feel that cheap energy is the thing, that may make them leave the line. And the stick is the nuclear weapons. 

Cheap energy and natural resources are carrots. Nukes are the stick.

But they have other roles. The purpose of nukes is to increase the power of the nation. In the international arena. Nuclear weapons are meant to give extra value to the military forces. Political leaders of the country are highlighted as the persons who decide the use of nuclear weapons. Military forces are not independent. They are part of the state. They exist in all areas and sectors where that nation and state are acting. 

Those very destructing weapons make shields against outcoming attacks. But they can also use to offer an honorable way to withdraw the situation. If a country owns nuclear weapons. That guarantees that the patience against it is endless. 

People in the states are acting a little bit like wolfpacks and wolves. They are acting as a team as long that is a common benefit. The common benefit is to act for some goal like eliminating the outside threat. But when the outside threat would not exist anymore that will break the internal homogeneity of the state. The consensus will break. And the benefit of the individual members of the groups will rise above the benefit of other individuals. 

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Writing about statues and attitudes

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-statues-and-attitudes-kimmo.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Society gives us the norms how to live, and the norms might understand the synonyms as world "attitudes".  Attitudes have been changed, but the remainings from the old time are still visible in the street views. Above the text is the picture, what might show the well-known place, but there is one very small thing, what I'd like to show you. In this view is two statues, where another is the man, who keeps the boy on the right side, and the woman, who keeps daughter on the left side.

As we all know, the heart is at the left side. I don't know if this the purpose of the sculptor, but this composition might mean, that the women always be persons, who make the decisions with feeling, and the man would make the decisions by using rational way of thinking. When we are looking those statues, the woman is on the right side and the decisions, what she makes by using feelings and heart feels right, and the man who is positioned on the left side might mean, that the decisions, what man makes, might seem wrong.


But when we are looking at the things from their side, they would be made right things, if the things are looking from their side. This is the problem with the things like getting the education have been understood the very masculine thing, and of course, the decision, what educated person made are always difficult. But the life is not easy, and if the person would have no education, would other people make the decisions for that person. When those sculptures are made, the man actually owned women.


 And being free, must the women stay unmarried. In that time masculinity was right, and the masculine man was the thing, what symbolized the advantage and power. Women and feminine things meant traitorous attitudes, and the best example of those attitudes is the old detective films faithful women, who set the traps for the detectives, who used brown poplars and who were portraited famous actors like Humphrey Bogart, who smoked cigarettes non-stop.


This man died because of throat cancer at the age of 58, and he smoked over 100 cigarettes per day. In the modern movies that would not happen, because the laws are prohibiting the marketing of cigarettes.  Science was the very masculine thing and that's why in Finnish language Scientist is almost every time translated in the way "tiedemies", what exactly means "science man", and this is the very good example of the attitudes in 19th. century. This is writing about attitudes, and the thing, that those attitudes were very different in the past. Or if you lived in the time of those black and white movies, would you ever believe, that in some day, would gay people get in the married or woman would be portraited the action hero?

Maybe some civilizations have two kinds of individuals, what doesn't even look like same species.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The degeneration and focusing on increase brain capacity might cause the situation, what the mankind ever thought as possible. In this scenario, the increasing of individuals brain capacity would cause the separation of the society of those things from the real community. In this scenario, the species would take two lines for evolving themselves.


The first line could be “workers”. The individual members of the community what would have normal muscles, and what makes all works in this hypothetical society. Their mission would defend the “thinkers”, the leaders of this society. Or maybe those “thinkers” would not be leaders. They might be only the “computers” what mission would generate the products for that hypothetical society.


Another line could be “thinkers” the individuals, what might have extremely large brain capacity, but those persons might be handicapped by another way. Their muscles might be extremely weak because that maximizes the nutrition transferring to brains. If those individuals would have weak muscles, they would not need to feed muscle cells, and all available food can be used in brains.


“Thinkers” would be unable to defend themselves against physical attack, and they would need the “workers” help in any actions. When we are thinking this hypothetical society as the result of brutal genetic engineering, we must say that there are many things, what could make this kind of act of sorting very attractive way to generate the species.


I had sometimes the very dangerous vision of the space station or greenhouse, where those  “thinkers” would live. The greenhouse would first come to my mind because that allows the skin to product D-vitamin. Their skin might be sterilized because that makes them impossible to escape. And here I’m thinking about the situation, that those members of the society would be handicapped because of their weak bodies.


Their heads could be extremely heavy, and the neck would not able to hold them head up, and that would be good for information security. When I’m thinking about the secrets of the government, the persons who make strategies and equipment for the government would be advantageous to be handicapped. Those “thinkers” would need the support from “workers” or they must build robots, what serves them. Even those individuals could be extremely weak, they could operate on the surfaces of planets by using remote-controlled robots.


Landing on the planets is extremely dangerous because there might be microbes, what can be put all crew in danger. The reason for that is no species would not have an immune system, what can fight against organisms, what have different amino acids in their layer. Or maybe some humanoids might have the immune system, what would be fully controlled by their brains, but we don’t yet have contact with those civilizations. But as you see we might use our imagination for creating that hypothesis in our brains.


The handicapped individual doesn’t flee away, and they are easier to control. The problem with society is always that those individuals might step at the front of the car. And that could cause the death of those individuals. If those thinkers would sit in a wheelchair, they can be kept always in control.


But if they were locked in some space station, they would need food from the planet. And their work can be controlled by other members of the community. The space without gravity would make those persons extremely weak, and they would not able to land on the planets because the gravity would kill them. This would be a very effective way to handle information security, and it could be compiled with the methods of some security police-organizations like NKVD and Gestapo.


This method would be effective but totally unethical. And remember that this writing is only the production of images. But maybe in future, we will face the situation, where human race would be separate in two lines. Another line would live on Earth and maybe on some other planets and another would live in giant space stations. The last ones could be physically weak, and they might be different than the people, who live on planets. But this would happen in distant future.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/maybe-some-civilizations-have-two-kinds.html

Individual's Behavior and “social guillotine"

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The method “social guillotine" was created on 1920’s to demonstrate the bad and unhealthy lifestyle of the  British high-society people. The non-stop parties, where wine was flowing and cigarettes were burned caused many times more deaths in the British community than the World War 1. Of course, those parties were sometimes boosted with opiates like morphine, heroin, and opium, what are very dangerous things, because the person will take an overdose of those things. The problem with opiates is also aways that they will benumb the stomach, and the user will eat too much simultaneously, and then the too fatness cause the death. Also, those narcotics caused the situation, that those people forgot to take care of their children, and this caused more problems because those children were living at the streets. Also, tumors in stomach, liver, and lungs caused the death. The “social guillotine” is same way lethal as some weapons.


And when we are talking about the bad and unhealthy lifestyle of the wealthy persons, we must notice the same thing, what many sociologists have been noticed many times before I have written this text. If the person has been made the property self, there is no problem with those people. They realize normally, that they are not alone in the world. But sometimes their children are acting like, they would be owners of the whole country. We all have met the persons who begin to all speeches by telling the people, who are son or daughter this person is, and this is sometimes very tiresome. If the person adjusted for service, this might be seen in the behavior. When Karl Marx created his model of societies, he noticed that the right wing industrial leaders were supporters of the violent model of controlling the society. Those persons, who were standing at the top of society ever want to change things in the country and the social situation in society.


They refused to talk with the people, and the arguments what aristocrats gave for using the violence against the commune of Paris and executions, what happened after it, was that the law was their side. Why they should ever listen, anybody because the law allowed the executions if some persons rebel against the state of France. Because military followed the law, there was no crime in those actions, what were the result of bad conditions of the working class people. The law is the strange thing because, until Nürnberg trials, there were no convictions about murders, what was made by the government. If the pressmen were not been followed the liberation of the concentration camps, the crimes of Nazis maybe not ever set in the trial. The crimes that were made under the communist flag, were ever prosecuted and after the Stalin’s death, his head of security service got the death penalty.


We always see that Stalin was a genocide, and in some situations, some genocides, who made crimes before his “cleanings” were able to return their honor, even if they were executed people by themselves. The thing that made the judgment wrong, was because the punishment was given by Stalin. So what we have learned about this? Hitler and his Nazis had just bad luck because they lost the war. The allied air forces were, of course, trampled German cities as the dust, but making this way, the genocide would seem more acceptable than neck-shots and gas chambers. The cement dust and high-temperature air would cause the same effect than poison gas, but they are legal methods because all Germany were mobilized, and the allies were went to total war against this state, what produced military equipment in all buildings.


The total war is one version of absolute war, what was the great idea of general major  Carl Von Clausewitz. In absolute war, there would be no room for a moral or ethical aspect of actions, what will help the army for winning the war. And in some sarcastic comments, the difference between total war and absolute war is just the number of ruins. The army is a key element in this action, and when we are looking at the military service in that time, we must notice that there were three layers in the military forces. The normal workers served as the normal soldiers, who made all work in that system, and the high-society people served in the headquarters as an officer. They just gave the orders to the people, who just followed the orders. This gave a very good reason for hate against high-class people. When we are thinking about the time, when Marx lived, the censorship was very hard. Punishment for actions against those orders was very tough, and in many countries was political prisoners.


So the way as Marx saw the society is the little bit different than modern people. He saw the high-society people only the ruling class of society, who was hiding behind the guns, what was kept in hands the mercenary soldiers. And because the high-class persons were often served as an officer, they were good targets for political propaganda. And in early 20th. century the army was a machine, what was used for denunciations. The idea was that the military men were used as the reporters for political police like Surète or Stalin’s GPU. As mentioned this, because the Eastern blocks governments used the same methodology than some government of Napoleon III. If they would make reports to secret police, they would get sergeant ranks in that organization. The reason why those aristocrats went to the army, was that gave them tough reputation.

But when we are looking the world, the controlling class is many times against the new things, because they will need no reforms. Why the people, who use their own car wants new public transportation for some area? Here we will see. If the person doesn’t use the public services,  this person will be always against investments for those things. The same thing would happen with every service, what we will not use yourself. If the person uses private medical services, why this individual would want to make the payment also for public services? The problem is that those persons won’t hear anything, what they want. They want to be separated from other people and the real world.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

The problem of the asteroid ark. "When there is nothing to do, and days are boring"

Asteroid ark by David Hardy
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I have written about “Universe 25” two times earlier, and I must say that name of this box or dystopia of the rats is very uncommon, and I believe that one of the missions of that test was test how many generations were needed, until those rats became too degenerated for accomplishing their mission. In some theories that data was collecting for some kind of spaceflight, that could be targeted to some other planet or solar system. And it shows that there would be things, what will happen when people will have nothing to do. And in the long term spaceflight would nothing to do in the spacecraft. This will cause the social problems if the population is in the wake when they are traveling in the Universe.


In the mission could be used two very slow spacecraft, what would fly to the target over 400 years or more, and in those spacecraft would generations follow together, and of course this theoretical spaceflight was out of the question. But the philosophy is the way of thinking, and in this kind of writing, I must not prove anything. So in this theoretical spaceflight, would the journey begin with two different spacecraft, where would be two different populations. When the spaceflight turns to the end, those crews would be combined.


This might be made “superrace” for the colonization of the targeted planet. I sometimes thought that this experiment would make by the MAJESTIC-12 group, and here we must say, that the results of those tests and experiments are done for many reasons. So the results of this kind of tests would use in the multiple places and targets. And I think that the world of science is so fascinating, that I must say that we have right to believe in what we want. The test of “Universe 25” was very brutal. It shows how the enemies keep the population strong, and when the enemies were gone, like in this box, the behavior what allows rats to survive in the natural environment lost. But one solution for the boring time could be "the war", where the "Cylons" would attack against the colony. This would keep them in action and sharp condition. Those "Cylons" might be like some "computer game" what creates outer enemies for the colony.


This is one reason, why so-called asteroid-arks are very problematic. If the population in some environment doesn’t face enemies, the result could be devastating, when this ark will land on some planet. Those aliens would never face any kind of attack, and they probably don’t know how to act, if something attacks, those individuals would probably know how to defend themselves. But the asteroid arks would have many more problems. The hierarchy in that colony would become very stressful for the individuals, who are down in the hierarchy. The children of the captain of the ship would be on the top of the hierarchy, and that would make possible to create absolute monarchy in this spaceship.


When somebody grows on the side of the top person of the society, this causes the behavior that will hurt other. This causes hate. And this is the problem of the societies. The individuals who are top of the hierarchy always resist the changes. They would ever be tired by the work, and they want the stable societies and everything is always fine in their opinion. The thing that wants the changes are always workers and the personnel, who are down in the social pyramid. And if the people don’t know another system, they don’t postulate the change. This is the reason for censorship. But when somebody says, that there would be another way to make things, then let one person rule all things in society.

Sources

Picture 1

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bd/9c/7e/bd9c7eb86684479cf77cc3dd7574db8c.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-problem-of-asteroid-ark-when-there.html

"Three nice girls and three bad skeletons" from the medieval time

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/three-nice-girls-and-three-bad.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/three-nice-girls-and-three-bad.html