Spin and gravity.

In this text, I write about neutron stars. But you can replace the word neutron stars using black holes. The idea of gravity could be that gravity or gravitation forms when a spinning object stores kinetic energy in its material structure. And then it conducts that energy into the center of that structure. 

Then that energy travels out from the spin axle. That means that gravity or gravitation is the force with field effect. That field effect means that gravity is a field that travels in the gravity center. That field is like a river that takes particles into it. The fact is that. All gravitational objects spin or move. They all have poles. 

The other thing is that. What if the planet is locked? The nucleus of the locked planet spins. And the shadow side puls energy out from that planet. 

Could spin be the thing that causes gravitation or gravity? When we think about very fast-spinning extremely heavy objects like neutron stars those things can explain the special features of gravity. The idea is that the fast-spinning object stores lots of energy into its material structure. Or it bends the energy that travels into it into its particles. 

Massive gravity forms when the speed of the spin axle slows. And the outer shell spins faster than particles in that axle. The question is this. Where lighter gravitational centers like Earth will conduct that energy? When we think about quantum gravity and large-scale gravity.

It's possible that the same things cannot form quantum and planet-size gravity. But if a large mass particle that spins very fast starts to vaporize it can form channels at its spin axle and then those channels pull that particle into them. That causes a situation where a particle causes an electromagnetic vacuum and other quantum fields fall to fill that emptiness. 

In this text, energy- or quantum fields mean the same thing. So gravity centers pull energy- or quantum fields into itself.  Those energy fields raise that object's mass. When we think the gravity as the situation where energy travels to the gravity centers we can ask one question. Why weak gravity centers like Earth don't turn always heavier and fall into black holes? The answer is that it conducts energy that it gets to somewhere. Same way why black holes and other neutron stars don't expand and fill the entire universe. The answer is that they conduct energy somewhere. 

*****************************************'

The idea of this gravitational model is this. A spinning object stores energy or quantum fields in its material. Then that energy starts to travel to the middle of that object. Then energy travels out from that object. So things like neutron stars and other things do not form energy they just concentrate it.  

*****************************************'

That causes situations where outcoming energy will be stored in the material of the neutron star. Then energy that travels to the neutron star's spin axle pulls that structure into its form. It's possible that in the neutron stars is the neutron liquid in its spin axle. That allows that there from the whirl there is a vacuum. 

That vacuum can pull other electromagnetic fields into that structure there they can travel out from the neutron star's poles. If there is a whirl that thing causes a situation that outcoming energy that is from the neutrons and has a homogenous wavelength the impacting wave movement in the middle of that whirl forms the maser effect that increases the power of escaping energy. 

When a neutron star pulls energy fields from its environment it travels more energy or quantum fields to fill that energy vacuum. Those energy fields transport particles like rivers. That means neutron stars are not forming energy from anywhere. It just collects and transforms energy into another form. In this text energy is the common name for all four fundamental interactions, strong, and weak nuclear forces, electromagnetism, and gravity. 

The idea of a falling field means that gravity is not force like electromagnetism. It's a feature in spacetime. Or if we think that spacetime is Higgs field or some other field, it's the movement in fields that form the 3D spacetime. 

That thing means that there is a lower energy point in the neutron star. That means the energy that comes from the neutron shell falls to that spin axle. There the spin axle will transmit that energy away from its structure. And that forms the vacuum. 

In fast-spinning objects, the centripetal force pushes that neutron star's shell out of its structure. That interaction between the inside vacuum or lower energy level in a neutron star and the neutron star shell and outcoming energy can explain why gravity is so different from other forms. 

When the energy level in particles rises.  Normally, they send energy impulses that destroy the structure. In that model, energy travels to the middle of the neutron star. That thing denies the outgoing effect. They form electromagnetic shadows in front of the particles. But those shadows form the inner side of those particles. 

That causes an effect. The electromagnetic radiation travels into the middle of the neutron star. Their energy starts to travel to the neutron star's poles. And that forms those powerful plasma beams from its poles. The thing is that also black holes have similar structures if we look at them outside. 

The world inside the event horizon is mysterious. But we can think that maybe all gravitational centers act the same way. The spin movement stores kinetic energy into their structure. And then that energy travels in the middle of them. 

https://www.universetoday.com/157257/gravitational-waves-will-give-astronomers-a-new-way-to-look-inside-neutron-stars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://aiandnaturaldemo.blogspot.com/2024/11/the-black-holes-can-turn-other-energy.html

Challenging Einstein.

"Research into gravitational lensing, where light bends around massive objects, aligns with Einstein’s predictions from billions of years ago. However, newer findings suggest some deviations, indicating potential variations in gravitational behavior over large distances, sparking further investigation into the validity of Einstein’s theories. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Is the Universe Defying Einstein? New Discoveries Challenge Relativity)

The Theory of Relativity means that everything is relative to something else. Einstein's paradox, called the "Train paradox" is that an object can move very fast even if it's not moving at all. When we stand in a train that moves 200 km/h we can say that we don't move at all. But if somebody stands outside the train, that person can say, that we travel 200 km/h. In that case the space moves. 

So the movement is energy. When we stand or sit in a moving train that means we don't use energy. The moving train, if it's an electric train, takes electricity from wires. And then it transforms it into kinetic energy. When the train slows its speed it transforms its kinetic energy into thermal energy. 

During that process, the energy transformation pulls kinetic energy out of the passengers. But if we jump out from the moving train the kinetic energy that train stored in us would remain in our body until we touch the ground. The paradox is that what if we stand in spacecraft that travel speed of light? And then start to run forward? We can say that the quantum fields and wave movement that we face are like air molecules. We would not interact with those waves and fields if we were in a closed space. 

The thing is that. It's possible. That nothing happens. Because we are in a closed space. But if the nose of the spacecraft opens or we would sit on an open spacecraft and step forward that causes a situation in the impacting energy field that impacts us faster than the speed of light. In that case, the open structure or open platform makes it possible for the field to interact with objects. 

If we think of the effect where impacting wave movement or energy field can cause a situation where the particle virtually crosses the speed of light that effect could make it possible to escape from the black hole. The idea is that the impact speed between quantum fields that travel against a particle's trajectory can cross the speed of light. That effect can form a wave or particle that can escape from the black hole. But that requires that the particle can change its movement direction in the event horizon. 

" Artist impression of ESA's Gaia satellite observing the Milky Way. The background image of the sky is compiled from data from more than 1.8 billion stars. It shows the total brightness and colour of stars observed by Gaia released as part of Gaia’s Early Data Release 3 (Gaia EDR3) in December 2020." (ScitechDaily, Gaia (spacecraft))

The most modern instruments like the Gaia satellite, bring data that has been impossible before this time. Those observations tell us that things like gravity have not been stable in the history of the Universe. The strength of gravity- or gravitational effect- has changed in the universe's history. And that means that Einstein might make mistakes. 

Or maybe there is a distance where we can use Einstein's Theories of Relativity for modeling spacetime. The fact is that things like Newtonian gravity models are still useful tools for calculating gravity and object interactions. 

Same way. Things like Theories of Special Relativity and General Relativity are suitable models for calculating an object's behavior in the different types of gravity fields. The distance between objects from gravity centers determines which theory or equation is most suitable. But those theories are never tested in extremely long distances and in borders like when a particle crosses the line between the "regular universe" and cosmic voids.

The Big Bang was an event that released all known energy and material to the spacetime.  That model means that the Big Bang also released gravity into the spacetime. So when black holes "eat" material and wave movement they should eat gravity as well they eat other wave movements like visible light and radio waves. 

Gravity or gravitation is wave movement as well as electromagnetic radiation. That means there must be some kind of scattering effect between gravitational waves. In the young universe, the energy level was higher than in the modern universe. The Higgs field or base energy field in the universe was also stronger. 

Gravity waves were stronger in dense fields. But gravity waves impact each other. That caused the thing that gravity waves to scatter stronger than in the modern universe. The impacting gravity waves simply shared each other in the smaller pieces. And maybe that happens also today. But in the young universe, those gravity waves were wider than they are today. 

In black holes, massive gravity stretches all objects. That means. Also, gravity waves can travel straight. The massive gravity that pulls objects in the pothole minimizes entropy. And if the wave movement and particles turn into spaghetti-shaped things that are straight there is no entropy at all. In some models, the gravity waves can touch each other inside the black hole. That forms a gravitational electric arc that could create so high energy gravity waves that they can push the event horizon back to space. 

If we think this way the massive gravity fields should also focus gravity waves as they focus other wave movements. That means gravity lenses should also affect gravity waves and focus them into one point. And if that thing is true black holes should also pull gravity waves inside them. Or if a gravity wave is wave in the Higgs field that means black holes pull the Higgs field inside them. 

Same way. When the universe expands there should be less gravity left in the space that turns larger in comparison to energy and material. That thing doesn't mean that there gravitational interaction between particles and objects turns weaker. But is the thing that causes the effect the distance or does black holes pull that gravity inside them? That means cosmic inflation affects also gravity. 

https://scitechdaily.com/is-the-universe-defying-einstein-new-discoveries-challenge-relativity/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaia_(spacecraft)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity

Researchers think that Einstein's theories don't stand on the edge of the Universe.

"Gravitational lensing of distant galaxies by the galaxy cluster Abell 2390, observed by the Euclid satellite. © ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, image processing by J.-C. Cuillandre (CEA Paris-Saclay), G. Anselmi" (Unige, Einstein’s equations collide with the mysteries of the Universe)

There is not very much research where the Theory of General Relativity is tested in extremely low gravity and energy levels. Those theories are well-tested around black holes. But there is not very much data about things like how gravity waves or some other waves or particles interact in conditions. Where energy travels out from them very fast. 

The edge of the Universe is a mysterious place. There the energy and material face lower than exists our Universe. Or otherwise saying the energy in our Universe faces a cosmic void. Energy travels from space filled with quantum fields and wave movement to the cosmic void or into cosmic nothing. That space is not possible in the Universe. There are no absolute vacuums in the Universe. That we know. That means energy can travel only out from the Universe. 

When we think about energy fields there is a thin string. Those strings are so-called time arrows (or arrows of time). The time arrow means the particle or energy beam that travels in the Universe. When that time arrow releases its kinetic energy. It transfers it to other particles. So when a time arrow travels forward, it pushes energy to particles around it. And then that thing pushes those particles back in time. 

Then we can think of the time arrows as energy fields that travel out from the point where the Big Bang happened. When the distance between the time arrow and the Big Bang turns longer. There is space between those energy strings. That space means that more energy will travel between those time arrows. And that space makes it possible for particles like photons to start to make curves between those time arrows, like energy beams and particles.  The energy level between those beams or time arrows turns lower. 

That means at the edge of the universe could be very extraordinary gravity waves. Those gravity waves can have a structure where they have two wavelengths. The normal gravity waves and other waves or strings connect them into one bigger entity. Or maybe there are so-called spiral gravity waves that travel forward like serpentines. But that is only theory. 

And that means the particles start to deliver energy or wave movement faster than previously. That means time travels faster in particles at the edge of the Universe. The edge of the universe is a mysterious place, as I wrote before. There the particle travels out from the universe to the place, where there is no energy at all. 

When we think about the shape of the Universe, we must realize that the Universe is a so-called false vacuum. The thing that limits the speed of light is for example quantum fields. Or scattering effect. When a particle travels from a false vacuum to a real vacuum there is nothing that can limit its speed. But the other thing is that energy travels out from the particle faster than in the Universe. Those things are not researched very much. 

https://www.unige.ch/medias/en/2024/les-equations-deinstein-se-heurtent-aux-mysteres-de-lunivers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

JWST telescope observed distant galaxies that challenge the standard cosmological models.

"The James Webb Space Telescope reveals surprisingly bright early galaxies, indicating they may have formed stars more rapidly than expected. This challenges traditional views on galaxy formation and could lead to revisions in our understanding of the universe’s structure. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Webb Telescope Uncovers Bright Ancient Galaxies That Challenge Cosmic Theories)

JWST is the most advanced tool ever sent to observe the universe. The new observations challenge the existing models of the universe and star formation in the early universe. JWST observed galaxies that formed about 300 million years after the Big Bang. Those galaxies have active growing black holes inside them. 

That means galaxy formation started earlier than expected. The young universe is one of the greatest mysteries in the world. The main question in the Big Bang model is where the energy that the Big Bang released came from. The energy was first and then came black holes. 

But then we face high energy conditions that allow some reactions. That is impossible in the modern universe. The energy level in the young universe was higher. But differences in energy levels were lower. And that means the universe was more stable than it is now. The expansion happened at the edge of the energy ball. But there was no horizontal, or crossing internal energy flow. 

Today we can say that the Big Bang was not a "bang". It was a series of events that turned material into the form as we know it, at some point after the Big Bang formed particle-antiparticle pairs. And then those particle pairs annihilated. The material took the form as we know it. After that "first" annihilation. 

Material in the young universe was not similar to material in our universe. It's possible that also other fermions than just up, and down quarks and electrons formed material. 

If we think about the wave-particle duality and its relationship with the Big Bang model we must realize that there should be some kind of whirl or energy beam that traveled through the wave field. That energy beam could cause the Schwinger effect and form the first particle-antiparticle pairs. 

That means there should be something that forms those energy beams. And there must be something that resists that energy beam. In wave-particle duality that energy beam that travels in an energy field forms two whirls that condense energy into particles. 

If there was some kind of energy field before the Big Bang. It is possible. The detonating Kugelbliz black hole released energy that formed the universe. Kugelbitz black holes are not possible in our universe, because there is so much turbulence. 

Those theoretical Kugelbltz black holes form when high-energy photon pushes wave movement or superstrings away from each other. Then those superstrings or very thin energy fields fall back. And then they start to wrap around each other. This thing forms a black hole. But that process requires a very stable environment. 

Things like the multiverse and other kinds of theories are made to explain the universe or the origin of things that formed the Big Bang. One explanation is that there was a universe before our universe. That theory is called. Phoenix universe. If the ultimate fate of the universe is the Big Crunch that means the entire material of the universe falls back in the black hole. That should mean that material travels back in time to the point where everything started. 

But all cosmological models are theories. Some evidence supports and sometimes the same evidence denies them. The models of things like wave-particle duality require that there was some kind of field and energy from the Big Bang should press against that field. So where does that field come from?  The energy level in the universe is higher than outside its border., That means energy flows away from the universe. And that's why we cannot see energy fields outside the universe. 

If there is an energy field outside the universe the energy or wave movement that travels out from the universe should form wave-particle duality when it hits that field. There, outside the universe, the Schwinger effect forms particles that do not exist in our universe. 

It's hard to see things outside the universe. The scattering effect and brightness of stars and galaxies cause light pollution. But when we think about the Big Bang we must remember that still today we are inside the Big Bang. That's why it's hard to see things like global energy fields. The universe is not strange. It's stranger than we ever imagined. 

https://scitechdaily.com/webb-telescope-uncovers-bright-ancient-galaxies-that-challenge-cosmic-theories/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)

Can Tachyon be real?

"Tachyons are hypothetical particles that move faster than the speed of light and travel backwards through time. (Image credit: Yuichiro Chino via Getty Images)" (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

***********************************************

Article from Space.com. 

"Traveling faster than light and time-travel could be real for tachyons. If one thing science fiction excels at, it's allowing us to marvel at the breaking of the physical laws of the universe. We watch and read in wonder as the warp engines of the starship Enterprise push it to beyond the speed of light, or as Barry or Wally  —  whoever is carrying the name of the Flash at the time  —  does the same in no more than a pair of yellow boots. " (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

"Likewise, we enjoy tales of adventurers like the Doctor, or Doc Brown, using weird seemingly antiquated machinery to violate the laws of causality. What if there was a fundamental particle that could do all these things? Moving faster than light like the Flash, and traveling back through time without the need for a TARDIS or a Delorian or yellow boots. " (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

"That’s a tachyon. But make no mistake, these particles aren’t just the idling's of science fiction writers. Tachyons are the stuff of "hard" science. " (Space.com, Tachyons: Facts about these faster-than-light particles)

https://www.space.com/tachyons-facts-about-particles

***********************************************

Tachyon is a theoretical faster-than-light particle. And it's a mystery. It should exist.  There are theories that tachyons formed before material. In some other models, the black hole can form tachyons. That happens when particles travel against a field that falls into the black hole. 

But it's harder to see than any other particle. In models, the tachyon moves in the higher dimension. And this makes it unable to exchange information with 3D particles. 

This means that the dimension is the limit to the difference in energy levels. If the difference between the energy levels of two particles is high enough, they are unable to exchange information. 

Tachyon cannot interact with 3D material. Because of its energy level is so high. The interaction time between tachyon and other particles is so short, that we cannot notice it. 

When the tachyon starts to interact the lower energy particle pulls it into a 3D universe. In that model, tachyon transforms into photons or some other bosons. This means that when we see a tachyon it transforms into some other particle. 

Tachyon is an interesting particle because if something travels faster than light, it starts to travel back in time. When we think about the tachyon. And its relationship with another hypothetical particle called: graviton the missing gravity transportation particle we can understand tachyons better. 

****************************************

There is the possibility, that also hypothetical graviton particle is the tachyon tail that forms the channel. That channel is the quasiparticle-like exciton. In that model, the graviton is a quasiparticle that is the channel behind the tachyon. 

In some theories tachyon and graviton are the same thing. If a tachyon exists and it travels faster-than-light it leaves the pothole or channel behind it. That channel forms an exciton-type quasiparticle that pulls a quantum field or information into it. But proving that thing requires the existence of a tachyon. 

****************************************

The idea is that the graviton which could be a small- or quantum-size black hole falls through the universe into the past. If the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light, that causes that particle or object to start to travel back in time. When an object travels back in time, it creates a hole in the spacetime. And we see that thing as a black hole.

Then the photon can fall into that hole. The quantum-size black hole makes the channel where photons can fall. The side-coming energy presses the photon and raises its energy level higher than it should be. In that model, the quantum-size black hole turns the photon into the tachyon. The quantum-size black hole itself pulls photons into the channel where it start to travel into the past. 

When some particle travels in that kind of tunnel or wormhole the side coming energy pushes it to the shape of spaghetti. When the speed of the particle closes the speed of light. 

There grows the nose at the front of the particle. The reason for that is the reflecting quantum field that denies crossing the speed of light in a normal universe. 

In a critical moment, the quantum field jumps away from the particle. And that causes energy to flow out from it in critical moments. The particle or object can accelerate its speed only if energy travels into it. When energy travels out, that slows particles. In the wormhole, side-coming energy continues the energy flow into the particle that travels in it. The side-coming energy accelerates the particle even if the quantum field in front of it jumps away. 

There are three ways that a tachyon can cross the speed of light. The one thing is tachyon travels in an energy channel that pumps energy into it. If that channel is small there is forming an energy wave behind the tachyon. 

If energy cannot bypass that particle. The difference between energy levels behind and ahead of the particle turns high enough. That thing acts like Alcubierre WARP drive. 

In another version, tachyon spin is so fast that when it travels near the speed of light, that spin takes it over the border. The third version is that the particle travels against the quantum field that travels in opposite directions and can cross the speed of light because the impact speed between that field and the particle is higher than the speed of light. 

The energy level in the past is higher than it's now. So the energy that travels through that wormhole from the past to the future can explain dark energy. The tachyon would travel to the past and open this kind of channel into the past. 

The graviton or quantum-size black hole can turn this channel into a spiral-shaped whirl. The black hole itself will create the channel and there is the energy low pressure near the tachyon. That means energy that follows the graviton and photon from above pushes them back in time.

There could be some kind of skyrmions. That travels around the channel in the opposite direction. The idea in this model is that. Those wormholes transport energy from the past to the future by using this shortcut. And maybe that energy is the thing, that we see as dark energy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-energy-mystery-mounting-evidence-points-to-black-holes-as-hidden-source/

https://www.space.com/tachyons-facts-about-particles

https://www.thebrighterside.news/post/breakthrough-tachyon-discovery-is-a-major-leap-towards-time-travel-reality/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

Could ghosts exist?

Above this text is a famous ghost photograph. The ghost seems to have a skull face, and that thing makes me think that could that ghost be a so-called hologram or some kind of holoprojection? There is some kind of shine above the head of that creature. That shine looks similar to the shine above the nuclear explosion. And there could be some kind of channel that could cause that shine. 

So is that thing the result of some kind of expansion of quantum field around atoms? And is there some kind of annihilation in the space of the picture? Does that reaction bring energy to that point where that shine seems to start? 

Or is that channel only the error in the image? There is another creepy creature on the left side of the "main ghost". So is there some kind of sudden energy stress that causes those creatures to turn visible? 

One version of that kind of thing is that something causes X-ray stress that makes people hollow ghost-looking creatures. If there is some kind of X-ray flash in the house that could explain those strange creatures. 

Could this ghost form when some kind of otic fiber brings light from catacombs? Or is it made on purpose by using some kind of projector? Or does that light come from some optical cable? 

But ghosts are interesting. And there are made models of what that creature requires existing. The ghost needs the ability to turn itself into fog and tunnel itself through walls. So could those so-called ghosts be so-called intelligent fog? 

Or are they the result of some kind of electromagnetic field? There is the possibility that the high-power electromagnetic field can cause the feedback-type phenomenon. In some other visions, ghosts are forming when the Einstein-Rose bridge or wormhole takes light from great distances. Theoretically that energy bridge can transmit information through time. 

There is one vision about that still hypothetical energy bridge. There is suspicion that ball-lightning is the case where the quantum field of single atoms expands. And that thing makes the wormhole bring light to that point. 

The idea is that the black hole pulls wave motion to the other side of the wormhole. The side where material or wave motion comes out from that channel is a white hole or opposite phenomenon to a black hole.  So the ball lightning could be that white hole. 

There is made one small theorem or vision of what ghosts could be. When we are thinking about intelligent fogs we forget one thing. Could the quantum computer form spontaneously?

When we think a cloud of atom-sized particles forms a ghost. We think that ghosts do not exist. But the quantum computers are forcing us to re-estimate that thing.

Quantum computers are an atom or molecule clouds. And in those clouds data travels between quantum entanglements. So could some atomic or molecular cloud turn into a spontaneous quantum computer? That thing requires the powerful, or long-term electromagnetic stress that makes the quantum entanglements in that cloud possible. 

Could it be possible that the human nervous system can form a spontaneous quantum computer when it affects the ions around the person? Could some kind of electromagnetic field turn the ion cloud in the right position so that the nervous signals are stored in those atoms? 

If that thing is true, there is the possibility that the human EEG can transmit to the ion cloud by using a hologram. The purpose of the hologram is to adjust that cloud to a certain energy level. And then the radio impulses will take those curves to the cloud. The fact is that there are lots of mysteries in the world. Maybe some of them ever can be solved. 

Images: Pinterest

Is technological singularity the next step for humanity?

The allegory of the cave is one of the most well-known philosophical examples. The idea is that. If people see only the cave's wall the cave is their entire world. All information that people in the cave get delivered by some other people. That means the goodwill of those people determines what kind of information those people in that cave get. 

So we can say that Plato's Allegory of the cave is the first case of synthetic reality. What differentiates the people in Plato's cave from the people who are serving in the underground nuclear weapon facilities? The fact is that those people who are serving in those underground facilities get also information that other people want to share with them. In the modern nuclear center, high-tech screens have replaced the shadows on the walls. But the set is the same as that cave about 500 B.C. The screen just transmits information to people who are fully isolated. 

Allegory of the cave (Wikipedia)

Internet is the next-generation Plato's cave. If somebody wants that tool would use to deliver filtered and corrupted information. The case that some person would sit in a place where are no windows entire life? The only way how to get information would be a computer. That case would be like Plato's cave allegory. 

The information that this hypothetical person gets. Could be fully controlled. Like the shadows on a cave's walls, the internet would deliver information that might be true or false. The information that this person gets would be true or it could be grotesque. 

 What if we would stay in one building and one room our entire life? What if our only contact with the outer world would be the internet? When we are thinking about theories like synthetic reality, which claims the entire universe is a simulation, we might ask why that thing is done? 

If we would close people in the closed bunker and use the simulated, and synthetic reality. We might claim that those people are Adam and Eve. And the person who created the enhanced or virtual reality is God. In that case, the idea of the simulated or synthetic reality is to train those persons for their ultimate mission. 

The technological singularity is based on implanted neural circuits. Those microchips make the nervous system interact with the internet. And that means the person would not even know what is reality. And what is virtual reality? When we think about movies like "Matrix" where people die in real life, when they die in the virtual life is possible by using the existing technology. The requirement for that kind of thing is that a small explosive device is implanted inside the player's body. 

And when the character that this person controls dies the explosive destroys also the physical player. Or the player sits on an electric chair. And when the player's avatar dies. That activates those electric chairs. When we are thinking of the case that the person is connected to the internet all the life. That person would not even know what real reality looks like. There is one very interesting and the most extreme theory about existence. 

That theory is called the "Simulated universe theory". We know that there is a 50% possibility that this theory is true. But then the thing that fights against that theory is the motive. Why somebody would make that kind of virtual place called the universe? The origin of that theory is in Plato's cave.

The people who would see only the cave. Where they are. Believe, that the shadows of the wall are true. Their entire world would be in that cave. And then the persons who would live in that cave for their entire life would believe that the cave is their entire world. There are many versions of that allegory. And in the modern version, there are people inside the nuclear shelter, deep underground. Those people have not seen the world at all without technical filters.

The internet delivers all information that those people get. That means those people can believe that they are on another planet. All things that they see happen on the screens. 

But we know that reality is reality. 

The idea of the simulated reality is taken from the nuclear command centers. Those extreme underground facilities communicate with surface systems by using extremely secured communication lines. There is introduced an idea that what if somebody will claim that outside is the nuclear war. Then the system shows that personnel the fake film about the launch of the nuclear weapons. 

And then they would get faked information about the highly polluted Earth. The persons who are in that center would get the faked information about the destruction of the civilization. So would they come to the surface for checking that thing? There is an urban legend that some of those facilities tried to launch. And then the entrance of that center was buried. That means that there are people in the underground facility who believe that they are the only people on Earth.

 There are many versions of that urban legend. Some people are born in those underground facilities. And whose only contact with the surface is the internet. Those tales are inspired the philosophical discussions about the people who see only things that other people want to show them. There are many tales and versions of Plato's cave. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_reality

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The perpetual motion machine is the dream of inventors.

What is the perpetual motion machine? It's the machine that recycles 100% of its energy. The perpetual motion machine is impossible on Earth because friction removes energy in the form of heat from the machines. And that means nothing can move forever. 

But perpetual motion machines are interesting philosophical objects. And they are very interesting objects for hypothesis. 

The time crystals are the quantum-size perpetual motion machines. The time crystal is the quantum system. Or the ion line that is closed in the common quantum field. That ion line is wobbling back and forth. And those ions transfer their energy to the quantum field around that line. That quantum system recycles energy through it.

One of the most interesting versions of the energy harvester is the laser ray that jumps between mirrors that reflect 100% of the radiation that hits them. When outcoming radiation hits that laser light it rises that laser rays energy level. And the system can collect that extra energy and then transfer that energy to the electric circuit. The small silicon crystal can use to collect electricity from the back and forth moving laser ray. 

But can we someday make a perpetual motion machine? And why that machine is so interesting. The perpetual motion machine would solve the energy problems of the Earth. The system would act like all other systems. It can get more energy from the radiation or seismic and pressure impulses around it. So the perpetual motion machine that recycles 100% of its energy can harvest energy from around it. And that thing would be the ultimate power source. But it's impossible to make on Earth. The friction is the thing that makes the perpetual motion machine impossible. 

But the thing is that the perpetual motion machine can operate in space in the vacuum outside the atmosphere and gravitational field of Earth. The idea is that there is a wheel that hovers in the middle of the generator. The system could look like a little bit turbine where the energy takers or generators are at the axle without contact with the core. The wheel would harvest the energy of the sun. 

And then it transforms the movement into electricity. The sun's energy will put the wheel to rotate and the minimization of the friction would put the wheel to rotate. And because the system produces electricity. It has something else to do than just rotate. Can we someday make a real perpetual motion machine? Maybe that thing is possible in the future. But still today, the perpetual motion machine is the dream. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

How many universes exist?

Image 1. Cosmic microwave background

The fact is that we know only one universe. That only confirmed universe is the universe where our species lives. And there is the possibility that there are other universes. That means those other universes might look similar to our universe. But there is the possibility that the another is forming of antimatter. 

In the antimaterial universe, time moves as it moves in our universe. But the material of that universe is antimatter. And if we would go to that universe that causes the destruction. The fact is that another universe might remain in theory. 

If we want to make observations of those things. We should travel outside our universe for confirming that some radiation will come from another universe. When we are writing and talking about the other universes we are testing the limits of science. And where science ends the hypothesis starts. 

A brief history from the Messier List, to multiverse theory.

About 100 years ago we knew only one galaxy, and that galaxy is the Milky Way. Of course, things like Andromeda Galaxy were well-known as a nebula. 

But people believed that all other galaxies were orbiting the Milky Way and the center of that galaxy was the center of the universe. In the 18th century, The French astronomer Charles Messier (1730-1817) made a list of nebula objects, and that Messier list was published in 1774. In that list. The Andromeda Galaxy is number M31 and M is for Messier. 

But in 1926 Edwin Hubble (1889-1953) showed that the Milky Way is just one galaxy in a group of other galaxies. And that point was the separation of cosmology and astronomy. After Hubble died better equipment is uncovered new and fascinating structures in the universe. Researchers found black holes in the 1990s, and the confirmation of dark energy is opening new visions for cosmology. 

The largest known structure in the universe is the cosmic radiation background. The cosmic radiation background comes from the particles that are sending that radiation. The size of the particles determines the wavelength of that radiation. So the source of the cosmic microwave background is in the micrometer-size particles. The reason for the radiation is the expansion of the universe. 

Light pollution makes it impossible to see other universes. 

This cosmic background might just cover the radiation of the other universes below it. Just like if we would travel on the foggy road where is bright streetlights. Those streetlights are covering the stars. When we are looking at image 2, we see how difficult is to see stars on foggy evenings in bright streetlights. 

The cosmos is a foggy and bright place. And that thing makes it impossible to see other universes. The stars, as well as the galaxies, are covered by plasma clouds. That covers the distant details under them. The size of that plasma could be billions of light-years and they cover those other universes under them. 

The expansion causes the energy level in the universe to decrease all the time. And the pressure of the quantum field that surrounds all particles in the universe will decrease. That causes expansion of the quantum field. 

Image 2

And because the material is at a higher energy level than the universe around it energy travels to the area that is at the lower energy level. That transfer of energy continues until the energy level in particles is the same as the space around it. 

This energy flow causes the material is getting old. And it pushes the edge of the universe away from the point where the Big Bang happened. So the expansion of the universe continues as long as there is material in the universe. Or the energy flow turns so weak that the gravitation wins. 

The possibility that time moves backward in some other universe requires that energy travels to the center of that universe. In that hypothetical universe, the negative energy or energy that travels in the middle of the universe causes that material cannot old. The material will get always new energy. And that will deny that the material turns to wave movement.

Quantum mechanics can boost cosmology.

Also, the ability to connect things like quantum mechanics and quantum gravitation in large-scale structures is opening new visions for the research and knowledge of the universe. But how many universes exist? The fact is that if there are other universes. The starlight of our universe will cover the light that comes from the other universes. 

The thing that covers the existence of the other universes is the cold areas in the cosmic background. Those holes are forming only when high-energy radiation pushes particles away from each other. The thing is that other universes are the next logical step in the findings of the new structures in the universe. 

https://www.messier-objects.com/messier-object-list/

https://www.technopython.com/2021/10/the-multiverse-theory.html

https://www.universetoday.com/77523/multiverse/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Messier

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hubble

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messier_object

https://miraclesofthequantumworld.blogspot.com/

About WARP bubbles and Alcubierre drive:

 About WARP bubbles and Alcubierre drive: 

"A properly constructed Alcubierre warp bubble. As space constricts in front of the vessel and expands behind, the ship is theoretically pushed forward at speeds faster than light."

"Image: LSI, White, et al."(Paging Zefram Cochrane: (Humans have figured out how to make a warp bubble)

"Don't pack your bags and move to Bozeman yet. This micro-scale warp bubble won't be capable of propulsion, but it could have myriad other applications, says its discoverer Dr. Sonny White"(Paging Zefram Cochrane: Humans have figured out how to make a warp bubble)

At this moment, WARP is theoretical but the most promising tool to travel very close to the speed of light. Or it can also even cross the speed of light. But that technology is in the study and theory. There is no evidence about existing of Alcubierre drive. But studies around that thing are continuing. 

The idea of one version of the WARP bubble drives is that the craft is surrounded by using bubble where the quantum fields are removed. Then there is the extremely low-energetic point behind the craft. That point will pull the radiation or energy through that point. And then that energy will impact with craft and push it forward. That thing can be the basics of one version of the WARP drive. 

There are two ways to make WARP-drive. Another is that the craft itself will surround by using WARP-bubble. And another is that the exhaust gas-like electrons are surrounded by using a WARP bubble. In that other version, the exhaust gases could travel faster than the speed of light. And the biggest bottleneck of the faster-than-light theories is to make exhaust gas that travels faster than light. 

The first thing that is clear when people are talking about an accidentally made WARP bubble is the phenomenon that affects subatomic particles. If some electron is surrounded by a WARP bubble that proves that some scale of WARP drive is possible. There is a long way that the spacecraft can benefit from that thing. So they didn't create a WARP bubble that could make some USS Enterprise possible. But the quantum-size WARP-bubbles can make it possible to make quantum computers more effective than they have ever been before. 

The idea of the WARP-bubbles is that they could be areas where is fewer quantum fields. In the case of electrons, the WARP effect can be created by pumping energy to that particle while they are traveling at an extremely high speed. Then the radiation that comes from electrons would push the quantum fields away from it. When an electron is coming from the accelerator the energy pushes it backward. Maybe in the distant future, this kind of system is possible. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/no-warp-bubble/

https://www.inverse.com/innovation/warp-bubble-space-time

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/paging-zefram-cochrane-humans-have-figured-out-how-to-make-a-warp-bubble/

Image:https://www.techrepublic.com/article/paging-zefram-cochrane-humans-have-figured-out-how-to-make-a-warp-bubble/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Dark matter and its relationship to parallel universe theory.

Image 1

Is parallel universe or multiverse theory science or science fiction? The answer is that theories are theories until they can be proven true or false. That's why we might say that multiverse is only a theory. 

But if a multiverse exists we can explain dark energy by using the multiverse theory as the base. And simply saying that outside gravitational effect from other universes causes the expansion of the universe. So the fact is that if the other universes exist they are there can we see them or not. The ability to observe the thing doesn't affect its existence. 

The thing that makes the dark matter so interesting is that is invisible to us. It's similar material with other materials. But we just cannot see it. 

There is no evidence about the existence of other universes. There was one big thing or hype that NASA has found the mirror universe. 

But that thing was a so-called false alarm. The article that caused that alarm was the highlight that "NASA has found new universe". But the original article told about exoplanets. 

The existence of other universes would explain why we cannot see dark energy or dark matter. The radiation and gravitation source outside the universe could explain dark matter and dark energy. But there is no observation about other universes. 

Theory about mirror-universe. 

So sometimes is introduced an interesting hypothesis that dark matter is the superposition of the visible material. The thing is that the dark matter would be opposite to the visible material. The origin of that idea is in the hypothesis. 

That during the Big Bang, the fast-spinning black hole formed two bubbles of material. Or rather saying send two rays of radiation to the opposite directions. And both of those wave movement rays would turn to the universe. 

That means the material would be the superposition. If the material is a superposition that would explain why we cannot see the dark matter. The thing that makes the superposition is the radiation that comes behind the dominating particle. The term means that the oscillation of the dominating particle would copy to the recessive particle. 

And when the wave movement travels through the universe the power of that radiation would get lower. That means the superpositioned particles would be a little bit different in size. Maybe that thing is meanless if the distance of superposition is a couple of hundred meters. But when the distance of those particles is about billions of light-years that thing has a mean. 

What if dark matter doesn't exist? The thing that can explain the expansion of the universe is the outcoming gravitational effect. So what if dark matter does not exist? Does that close the dark energy away? 

Dark energy is not connected to dark matter. That means the dark matter is the wave movement which origin is unknown. Sometimes the empty bubbles of the universe are introduced as the source of dark energy. The origin of those bubbles is interesting because something has been pulling material away from those areas. The reason for that is the introduced black holes. But there seems to be not that kind of object. 

So could the reason why those mysterious bubbles are formed the vaporized black hole. Or is it some mysterious radiation that has pushed material away from those bubbles? Sometimes even the anti gravitation has been introduced as the reason why those bubbles formed. 

And in the wildest theories, there are new universes formed in those bubbles. In some versions of those theories, our universe is also a bubble in the far bigger universe. If the material of our universe has different size particles than other universes we cannot see that other universe. 

Image 2: The relations of the parts of the universe. And as you see the most dominating effect is dark energy. The part of visible material is only a couple of percent. That's why we should not call visible material "regular material". There are unconfirmed theories that also dark matter can form dark or invisible atoms.

But those theories are just theories. The confirmation of those theories requires that the researchers would know dark matter better. And the fact is that the only observation of dark matter is the gravitational interaction. So there is needed much more research to confirm that theory. 

How do empty bubbles form dark energy?

When some particles like neutrinos or gluons are released near the empty bubble their speed can cross the speed of light in the regular universe. There is no medium in those empty bubbles. That means the speed of photons and other particles is higher in those bubbles. And when those particles hit the medium they release their extra energy as radiation. 

The thing that can prove that dark matter does not exist is the existence of other universes. If the parallel universes are true, that means the outcoming gravitational effect will expand our universe. 

The thing is that these kinds of theories are interesting.  And there is one thing that can break the hypothesis of dark matter. But otherwise, if the dark matter forms similar structures with visible material. The question is: why cannot form invisible universes? 

There is one thing that can erase the dark matter.  That thing is the parallel universe theory. If there is another universe or bubbles of material the gravitational effect of those bubbles can explain the universe's expansion. 

But the thing is that those hypothetical other universes might hide behind giant clouds of dust and matter. They might be so dim that the light of our universe and its objects are covering their existence. But there is another explanation. And that is that those hypothetical other universes are formed of dark matter. 

What if those parallel universes are formed of a material. Which particles are a different size than particles in our universe? That means they are formed of dark matter. 

https://astronomy.com/news/2020/12/is-the-multiverse-theory-science-fiction-or-science-fact

https://www.livescience.com/truth-behind-nasa-mirror-parallel-universe.html

https://scitechdaily.com/building-an-innovative-cross-border-dark-matter-experiment-deep-underground-during-a-pandemic/

https://www.space.com/32728-parallel-universes.html

https://www.space.com/40584-parallel-universe-aliens-survive-dark-energy.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

Image 1:https://astronomy.com/news/2020/12/is-the-multiverse-theory-science-fiction-or-science-fact

Image 2:https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/d/Dark+Energy

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Black holes and the Theory of General Relativity are an interesting combination.

(The Image I)The model of the wormhole. "If space were two-dimensional, folding it would enable three-dimensional shortcuts connecting widely separated places. Could our Universe contain similar wormholes?"

Credit:

ESO/L. Calçada (https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/images/1209b-wormhole_cc/)

The thing is that at the point of the event horizon the gravitation effect of the black hole causes that the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light. And all particles are dropping to a black hole with the speed of escaping velocity. That means the speed of the light is crossed at that point. 

The gravitational lenses proved that the gravitation effect to light. And if the gravitational field is strong enough. That means the gravitation pulls the photons inside the black hole. The point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. Called the "event horizon". The event horizon means that the light cannot escape beyond that point. 

Do the black holes form new universes? The fact is that maybe someday in the distant future. Erupting black holes would release material to the universe. And that thing causes the forming of the new universe. But are the black holes forming the new universes right now? 

That is an interesting question because it requires the existence of wormholes. And the thing is that the wormholes are part of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Nobody has ever seen those things yet, but things like "cosmic neural structure" are offering a tip, that there might be some wire-looking gravitational effect. 

Image II: Cosmic web: Is this the first evidence of the existence of wormholes?

The thing is that the black holes are offering data that allows researchers to find evidence about the similarities between the theoretical world of Theory of General Relativity and the real world. 

The thing is that the Theory of Special Relativity from 1905 has confirmed a long time ago. And the Black Holes are also confirmed that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity from the year 1915 is at least mostly correct. When those theories are put in the ultimate tests they are passed. Theory of General Relativity makes wormholes possible. 

And all the time when that theory is put to the critical test. That theory is proven right. The last case when the Theory of General Relativity has proven is recently when the jet of the large black hole is proven that thing possible. So why wormholes can't be true? The fact is that those "channels throughout space and time" would seem very incredible. But the Theory of General Relativity makes them possible. 

The existence of a wormhole means that information like electrons or quarks can travel throughout it. Sending spacecraft through that energy channel is a little bit bigger thing than sending a couple of electrons or quarks through that channel. The size of the elementary particles is a little bit smaller than some spacecraft. 

And then at the last, we must say that even if we can send spacecraft through the wormhole that doesn't mean that the living organism can pass that thing. The radiation in the wormhole would be extremely strong, but the craft travels in that tube with the speed of the wave movement. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/17/world/dwarf-galaxies-intl-scli-scn/index.html

https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/1209/

https://scitechdaily.com/supercomputer-simulations-explain-massively-powerful-black-hole-jet-confirms-einsteins-theory-of-general-relativity/

https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html

https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image I:https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/images/1209b-wormhole_cc/

Image II: https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/best-image-yet-cosmic-web/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Crystal skulls, annihilation and artificial brains

This text is not handing morals and ethics about the use of the cloned neurons in computers. Those things are the thing that is different from technical solutions. So the law books are the thing that limits this kind of thing. 

The reason why the researchers are interested in the use of cloned neurons is clear. For making more powerful computers the cloned neurons are the ultimate tool. Human brains use 20 watts of electricity and they are much powerful than any known computer. The reason why the cloned neurons are causing problems is that they have their own will. And the second thing is that the cloned neurons are problematic in the point of view of memory handling. Memory handling means that the memories of the neurons cannot remove.

The modern bio- and life support technology can make the modern crystal skull-looking biological computer possible. So are those artifacts attempt to talk with the dead? If somebody steals a corpse for that kind of test that brings prosecution

Maybe the next part of this text is science fiction. But even if the famous crystal skull of the British museum is made to store the dead people's brain waves. In that case, brains will be put in the skull. And then the electricity is put to travel through that tissue. Then it will be stored to record. The fact is that even if that strange artifact could be fake, its purpose could be serious. 

The electricity of the brain the EEG can store to the tape. And then transmit to the brains of other people. But I don't know if this thing is possible to use by using dead brain tissue. The EEG can store easily during the EEG tests. Then that thing can be played by using the record player. 

But the cloned neurons and modern equipment make it possible to create cloned brains. Or in some ideas, the crystal skull can use for making "human robots". In those ideas, the pineal gland of the person would be put in the crystal skull. And the electric signals will send through that organ to the crystal skull. But the thing is that this kind of writings might seem non-scientific. 

And the fact is that there have been made many experiments during history that were not successful. The occultists and other groups made many things that were illegal or against morals. They stole corpses and bones from cemeteries and made many things that are causing imprisonment or even sending them to mental hospitals. 

When the cloned neurons are finishing their mission their memories should remove.  And that is the problem with the "living" or biological computers.  But there has been introduced an idea of the modern "crystal skull". In the chamber will make the artificial brains by using cloned neurons. 

And then that structure will connect to the platform and the decoding system by using neck nerves. Then data will download to the brain structure by using brain-core stimulation. And then the data will put to travel through the brain cells. That thing means that the system will act as the biocomputer. And the heart-lung machine can deliver nutrients for those cells. 

What if the crystal skulls were an attempt to talk with the dead? Or are they more frightening things?

By the way, the tale about the 12 crystal skulls that can destroy the world can be true even if those crystal skulls were fake. There is the possibility that to the eyes of the skull is put the leaf gold. And then the high energetic cathode ray will aim at those eyes. The system might work that behind the skulls is put a magnet and then the cathode ray will strike to leaf gold. That thing can use natural electricity. And if the lightning strikes through the leaf gold layer that can cause an annihilation reaction.

If those artifacts were fakes made for some occultists in the late 19th century. That is not a guarantee that the purpose of those merchandise is legal. There is the possibility that the occultists wanted to "steal" memories of the dead. And then they made those crystal skulls and then put brains in those systems. Then they could conduct the electricity to that thing. And after that, because they were afraid of authorities they took those crystal skulls to the jungle. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skull

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Could "Nibiru" mean some secret military base or group of investors?

jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/
jotkutasiatvainkiehtovatihmisia.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/could-nibiru-mean-some-secret-military-base-or-group-of-investors/