Should we trust science?

 Should we trust science?

We must determine things what we mean about "trust science"? The fact is that the purpose of science is to search and observe things and find answers to many questions. 

In the beginning, we must separate science and scientist. The scientist is the person who is making science. So scientists can tell lies. And also greatest scientists sometimes make mistakes. 

When we think about things like the universe. Our knowledge of that thing is increasing. But then we are facing one thing. We want to know more and more about that thing. We are part of the universe. 

And when we can think that our knowledge is like the universe itself. Limits of our knowledge and confirmed knowledge expand. And we find new connections between the particles. In the same way, we can find new connections between other things. 

The exosolar systems, exoplanets, and other kinds of things were pure science fiction. Today we know that there are many other solar systems than our own. 

In the past, we believed that the species are alone. Today we know that the species are cooperating. As an example, some trees call ants to protect them against aphids. But in sociology is the thing called conspiracy theory. 

Sometimes conspiracy theories are told in purpose for shaking the trust of authorities. Sometimes we might say that things like the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy are a conspiracy. Sometimes is also said that if the murder of the JFK is open because there are no convicted persons in that case. There were too many chefs in that soap. And great publicity made it impossible to give the solution for that case. 

Two commissions researched that case.

The Warren Commission was set by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1963, just after the Kennedy murder. That commission is the major source for the people who are believing that Oswald shot President and operated alone. The problem with that commission was that it acted very soon after the shot of JFK. 

The chairman of the commission was the judge, Earl Warren. The thing that caused criticism was that the commission was not the research was there somebody behind Lee Harvey Oswald. And another thing was that the authorities like the FBI didn't have any kind of room to operate. So Lyndon B. Johnson set the Warren Commission too soon. And its work was disturbed by the media. (Wikipedia/Warren Commission)

The other commission: the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was supported the Warren Commission report. But they could not exclude the possibility that some individual members of some paramilitary- or criminal organizations were involved in that crime. 

"The committee also stated that the conspiracy did not involve any organized crime group, anti-Castro group, nor the FBI, CIA, or Secret Service. The committee found that it could not exclude the possibility that individual members of the national syndicate of organized crime or anti-Castro Cubans were involved in a probable conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy".  (Wikipedia/ United States House Select Committee on Assassination).

But today, we can only notice that nobody will ever get punishment. But things like papers full of black lines and censored details feed the conspiracy theories. So what have we learned about this case? The secrecy and hiding information are feeding the theories. 

Unusual equipment, such as the Mannlicher Carcano rifle, sparked debate. Was that rifle meant to be taken home after someone was shot? Was Oswald staging someone to blame for that incident? Or did someone carry that gun to Oswald's home? Officially that question remains open. 

There is an example of the story that probably meant releasing the military forces from their responsibility of nuclear weapon development.  When scientists created nuclear weapons. Some people told. That scientists alone carried the responsibility of the development of nuclear weapons. 

Department of Defense gave orders to develop nuclear weapons in all nuclear states. Head of the state and general staff have accepted those weapons and their development. The military command has been given the materials for testing those systems. And that means there were many other people than scientists who play a big role in those projects. 

In great public, the "conspiracy theory" is used in a very negative way of the view. In many stories, conspiracy theories are connected with mental disorders. The juridical term "conspiracy to commit the crime" means that a group of people is planning criminal activity. 

 But there is another thing in that kind of "theory". Many times the news is full of conspiracy theories. And sometimes the voice of that news is very stamping. 

People who believe those things are often marginalized as stupid. And that thing happens very often before things like massive cartels (illegal fixing the prices between companies) or some high-scale financial crimes uncover. 

But there is the thing that is called mass-effect that makes people answer as they believe in those theories. That mass effect is the social pressure that forces people give some answers. What they don't mean. Or they don't want to give. That thing is called virtual believing. 

Researching and confirming information is the best way to fight against falsified information. The thing is that the world is full of things that are not told to the public audience. Or those things are published in a very limited publication. And some high-level researchers are reading those articles. 

https://bigthink.com/questions/should-we-trust-science/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

FOGBANK the secret nuclear material

https://marxjatalous.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

FOGBANK is the secret aerogel, what mission is to create heated plasma during the explosion of the nuclear warhead is highly classified material, what is created in the Y-12 laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. That material is very secret, but engineers and analysts believe, that this aerogel is some kind of soap with small pieces of iron. This aerogel is made for boosting and stabilizing the nuclear warhead explosion for making the fireball more symmetrical, what makes this weapon more capable to operate. There are claiming that this aerogel, what probably looks like soap foam is made for creating the most advanced fission weapon, what have ever seen.


In that foam would be injected the lithium and plutonium, what could create the three dimension fission unit, where the fusion could be easier to adjust in the right power to that thing. But the advantage about this warhead would be that fusion material is overlapping in the middle of fission materials. The 3D shape could be very interesting about the fission weapon. There is one very interesting thing about this kind of weapon. If the fission material like Plutonium would be connected to little iron bites, that material would become magnetic.


And if in the middle of the implosion system would be put the magnet, what would pull those fission bites against it, and that would cause the nuclear reaction. If that fission material is over the nanoballs and the iron is inside them the magnet-based nuclear weapons would be possible. The problem is that those bites must be kept stable positions, and that's why the foam is needed in that structure. This is why that material is so highly secretive, and that can revolutionize all way to create nuclear weapons. That foam allows using extreme small size bites of fissile and fusion material, what makes possible to make nuclear weapons, what is extremely sharp calculated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOGBANK

Modern sea mines are very devastating devices

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sea mines have been very effective weapons against ships and submarines. The similar magnet- and horn sea mines are still using, what was used in the First World War, but the advantages in materials like using composites in the cores of mines make those weapons more dangerous because composite core would not be detected by using magnets. Also, computers are allowed to make so-called smart mines, what detonates only near enemy major surface combatants or submarines.


 Some of those mines have the nuclear detonator, what makes them capable to destroy the entire battle group. In those cases, the mines can use voice compilation and SONARS, what detects the form of the target, and then those weapons would be detonated. They can be delivered from aircraft, surface ships, and submarines.


Some of them are actually very advanced torpedos, what uses RTG or some other long-term propulsion. Those torpedos can deliver to the sea even from the opposite coast of the ocean, and they can travel near any harbor on Earth. They can lay on the floor of the ocean, and if the war would begin, they can be detonated immediately. Those systems can change place if they were suspected to detect, and they can also hit submarines and their bases by driving near the target. And then those torpedos can explode their nuclear warheads. The tsunami would be very devastating, and the nuclear submarine base could be destroyed.


When we are thinking about another modern advantage in those mines, the electromagnetic warhead, that would increase the capacity to damage vessels. If the normal horn sea mine would be equipped similar system, that is used in EMP-bombs, would that cause damages for more units than one. The EMP-mine works like the explosive would pressure the battery. That electricity is conducting to the transmitter, what would give a very powerful radio or microwave.


The EMP-mines are very dangerous because they induct high voltage electricity to submarines core. Some devices are planned to be the modified machine used in demining magnet mines. Those systems are basically similar than those demining systems, what uses the electric field to detonate magnet mines. In the EMP system, the used electricity level is higher, and it could eliminate the submarines electronic equipment like GPS, computers, communications, and weapons would be jammed.


That could make possible to steal nuclear weapons from those submarines. In some novel, the bad guys used high voltage electric cables to make the submarines unable to operate, and then the propel of that vessel would be cut off by using magnesium sticks. Those things are very interesting and frighten visions of the situation, where some scuba divers would steal nuclear warheads from the submarines.

The problem in the democracy is, the leaders must please voters if they want to continue their political careers.

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/the-problem-in-democracy-is-leaders.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin two most powerful men in the world are meeting together here in Helsinki. And the problem is that another one must ask voters, what they want this man to do. Donald Trump's internal political problem is that maybe he would make the decisions better way if the meetings with Kim Jong-Un and Vladimir Putin would happen during his second period as the President of the United States. There is another season for making bad decisions, but getting there must Trump confess that he would be the man, who makes something else than begins the war in somewhere. This is the problem in the international politics. If Trump would continue the threatening North Korea, would this man marked as the maniac. And when he wanted to talk with North Korea he mentioned in descriptions as the supporter of Kim Jong-Un.


The voters are the problem for Trump because if this man would not be satisfied the people of the United States, the second period as the president would not have existed, and in the second period the President Of The United States would make uncomfortable decisions, and that means that this man would give something to his supporters. Putin must just come to the meeting, and show something that this man wants. But we must remember that Russia should not leave alone. The isolation made possible that Joseph Stalin raised in power of that nation. When we are talking about the western world, we must make another confession. NATO needs the nuclear force of USA for supporting it, and the advantage what went the world to this point is the political resistance against nuclear weapons.


Only The United Kingdom and France have national nuclear armaments and the United Kingdom would operate with United States origin Trident missiles. That means Europe must start to develop own nuclear arsenal if it would want to kick the USA out of that coalition. France has national nuclear missiles, and other equipment, that makes it the nuclear power. But is those two countries nuclear power enough big threat and does it have enough firepower, that it can replace the United States nuclear missiles in the arsenal of NATO? This is the question, what allows Trump to act in the NATO as he wants.



The doctrine in NATO is, that the military equipment would be produced in another side of the Atlantic Ocean in the United States territory and they would carry to Europe if there is a conflict in Europe, and the own forces would get support from the strategic nuclear forces of the USAF. And the war would happen in Europe. This strategy is the straight copy of the allied production strategy from the Second World War, and the nuclear weapons are the only difference with that strategy.


That's why Russia has developed many submarines, what can attack deep inside the USA with the nuclear cruise- or ballistic missiles. The purpose of those strikes would destroy the production units inside the United States or Canada. And the convoys are also the targets of those submarines, what would first shoot their missiles, and then start to act against NATO convoys with torpedoes and missiles. And the major problem with NATO is that most of its equipment is of American origin, what gives the very much political influence for the United States in that union.


The ruling position in the production of the military equipment would give the USA the position, where it can almost order the equipment, what other countries will use, and that makes the position of the USA very interesting in NATO. Other NATO countries might believe, that the aid would come automatically in the form of military equipment if the Russia attacks against NATO. And this is very problematic for Trump. If the USA and Russia would begin the war, there are two nuclear states on the opposite side of the conflict, what would grow the global nuclear war.

And the truth is, that if that equipment would not come at the right time, must Europe go to conflict alone. And then is metering, how good threat the European nuclear weapons are for the attacker. I mean that NATO is the defense union and some of its member countries must face the attack before NATO can come to fight with it. And if some NATO country begins the war, other would not defend it. This is the idea of NATO-co-operations. The small countries are strong together, but they need the nuclear power of the USA to guarantee that the attack against NATO would not allow somebody to attack in the area of NATO countries, meanwhile, those countries are working against terrorists.

Open information can be the biggest threat to freedom of speech

NORAD at 80's
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/open-information-can-be-biggest-threat.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is coming new movie about the book named "Fahrenheit 451", and that movie is more actual than ever before. Nowadays technology would allow us filter and manipulate the information unlimited way. And this is the most dangerous thing in the world. The information manipulation, what is targeted to military systems can cause the nuclear war. And this makes the information manipulation so dangerous, or what do you think about the situation, that somebody would put to the NORAD's (North American Air Defense Command)  screens film of the missile attack.


Then the nuclear war and global destruction of the human civilization would knock to the door. In this scenario, hackers would take control the screen of Cheyenne mountain, and that situation causes the launching of the missiles. Above the text, you might see one of the biggest paradox in the information technology. The paradox is that open information would be the biggest threat to freedom of speech. This means that the open information can be used by the way, what increases will of censorship. And this is the very sad thing because the freedom of speech is the key element in the real democracy.


But there is a problem in democracy, and they are persons, who missuses Internet for delivering anger and hate against other people. This kind of action would be delivering violent material or stimulate people to start violent actions against some people, who are against their opinions, and in some cases would the freedom of information allowed, if it supports the leading class people way to see things.


Filtering and changing the things is one of the most dangerous ways to control the information. The law would prohibit the censorship and in theory, the information would be free, but it would be censored or transform by the leading class. This is called as the "hidden censorship". This method means, that there is a couple of service offers for the Internet, and the state or some group of leading party would actually own the companies, what offer data services in the country. The censorship can be explained to the people that filtered information contained only the child pornography, what is of course against ethics of most common people, but when we are thinking the filtering of unwanted information, there could happen those things with legal homepages, what contains uncomfortable information about as an example of the political leaders relationship with the financial world.


After that, the political censorship would be possible, and nobody even knows what happens behind the walls of some telecommunication companies. This means that there is freedom to deliver information, what is supported the leaders of the telecommunication companies, but if the information doesn't serve them, the result would be, that the information would be disturbed by cutting the net in the middle of writing or sending photographs.


And also the homepages would be banned because they are revolting against copyrights. In this hypothesis, the telecommunication companies are the tool to control the state. In this case, the person, who controls the information, controls the nation. Those companies are the best tool for erasing uncomfortable information from the net, and in the worst scenarios the original information would be replaced by other texts or films, and this can be used to get political refugees return to the countries, where they left. There could deliver the false information about the crimes, what that person have made. And there could be faked and manipulated photos, where this person would sit in the front of drugs, and that would give an excuse to deliver that man or woman to that country, what that person has left behind.


This is one scenario, what might be interested some persons in the head of the national security.  Another way is to replace the home page with another one, what is full of weapons and stimulating for political violence. That kind of violence can make censorship possible. In some scenarios, those homepages can use subliminal flashing photos and infrasound commands to activate violent behavior. And that kind of systems might be used for some activists. When those usually young persons have stimulated to violence, that violation can be used to excuse for massive police actions against them.


In some rumors, the pilots, who flew the planes, what strike to World Trade Center and Pentagon were targeted this kind of messages. Those messages could be installed on airplanes by using USB stick, and program, what would deliver those messages by using aircraft loudspeaker- and the computerized avionics. And the meters would start to deliver those flash pictures, what are prohibited in normal marketing. Those techniques were developed for MKULTRA and PHOENIX-programs. And they were effective against enemies. So if those techniques would be programmed to some computer, would it become more dangerous than any tool before.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program

Picture I

https://fsmedia.imgix.net/0b/f1/84/2b/9478/40fb/9b86/5e618413338a/norads-command-center-in-all-its-eighties-glory.jpeg?rect=0%2C0%2C1600%2C800&auto=format%2Ccompress&w=650

Russian naval exercise began in the coast of Sweden

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/russian-naval-exercise-began-in-the-coast-of-sweden/

The problems with the relationship of superpowers

luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/
luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/04/12/the-problems-with-the-relationship-of-superpowers/

The risks of ultra-clean nuclear weapons

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above the text is a mushroom-shaped cloud, what has been formed by the warm gas bubble, what has been raised from the water. The formation process of this cloud is similar to nuclear explosions. But temperature is lower. Normally nuclear explosives would be noticed by increasing level of radiation. And that would uncover the atmospheric nuclear tests. The nuclear test is prohibited in the atmosphere, undersea an Earth orbiter.


The latest fusion weapons are problematic because they would not leave radioactive fallout behind them. Ignition process of those fusion devices would happen by heating lithium pieces by using high-power laser rays. The laser would raise the temperature high enough for starting fusion reaction in the piece of lithium. Those weapons are so clean, that they would not uncover by the radioactive fallout. The ignition of that system would happen by using carbon monoxide laser, what would power by acetylene light. Those systems are extremely powerful.


Ultra clean nuclear weapons can be launched by internal or external lasers. The laser can be installed on separate aircraft, what would also drop lithium canisters. Those canisters would be equipped with targeting device, and the highly powerful chemical laser can be targeted to those pieces. Same lasers can also use for anti-satellite missions.


Also, the powerful SDI-lasers could use for that purpose. The external lasers can be done easier, because the size of the bomb would not be limit. In some scenario, the lithium canisters would be dropped from satellites, and then they would be heated by using ground-based lasers, what would target to those canisters by using mirror satellites, and those weapons can be very deadly. The used lasers might be free-electron type particle accelerators what can be kilometers long.


The problem with lithium canisters is that they would not seem in radioactive sensors. So they can be installed in the boat, any kind of aircraft and missile. Those weapons are very frightened because they would be used in the terrorist attack. The only thing what the striker needs is the powerful laser, what would make enough heat for the beginning of fusion.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-risks-of-ultra-clean-nuclear-weapons.html

Writing about the deportation of the Russian diplomat and international politics.

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The deportation of Russian diplomats from EU is meant for the signal that the nerve-gas attacks and cyber warfare against other nations are not the acceptable way to work in international politics. The reason for deportation is that its mission is to give pressure against Russian leaders, that they must do something, that this kind of actions doesn’t continue. That is the same thing if the orders for those actions have given by official leaders of Russia, and that is the same thing, are the strikes made by official Russian intelligence.


Russia is a state with powerful nuclear weapons, and that’s why the international community is very tolerated with it. Same way the United States is dealt in United Nations, and this is the reason, why many other nations have got their own nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons would grow the respect for the state and its citizens, and this would please many leaders in the world. Nuclear weapons would increase the tolerance for any nations, and that’s the reason for nuclear programs around the world.


The purpose of the deportation is that the leaders of Russian government would resign from those actions, and also start to find guilty persons from Russia.  Also, the purpose of those deportations is that Russian government would start to cooperate with western authorities, by using little bit different methodology, then asking permission to search the western intelligence offices databases. The cooperation means that the actions, what are made in those operations are benefiting both parts of those parts of cooperation.


When we are talking about the trolls, what are made in the name of Russian authorities, we must notice that they are targeted to the leaders of the nation like members of the parliament. The purpose of those propaganda-actions is to claim, that in Russia the leaders would not need to tolerate any worlds, what are targeted against them. And of course, the real leaders should not tolerate any uncovering of their tax evasions. Real leaders would silent those things by making censorship laws, what allows them to do anything, what they want.


And of course strong leaders use police and military forces to scatter the opposition and all protests should be terminated. There is only one aspect in this kind of actions. It would please the persons, who believe the power of weapons. For some of those persons, the threat of Russia is the reason for giving the demonstration of their militaristic power. Those movements want to hide behind back of Russian government. Some of them are only criminal organizations, what claims that they would get support from Kreml.


When we are talking about those gangs, who would demonstrate their power by portraying with weapons in the cover of magazines, we must say that those movements want the censorship-laws, because they would not want to show their faces in public. So the best way to create those laws claims, that those organizations would get support from Russia. And here we must say that the Russian government has the most powerful nuclear weapons in the world. And that’s why the Russian government is the very good tool for domestic politics in many nations. Asking censorship laws for keeping the relationship good between Russia sounds better than asking them for hiding the tax evasions.


And this is one of the reasons for demonizing of Russia. Every time, when something is happening, the Russian intelligence would kill somebody. This is the very good argument when normal people wanted to keep their mouth shut for some business, what would not be tolerated in normal life. If some businessman would catch from tax evasions, might this person claim, to working with Russian businessmen, who are of course agents of FSB. All of those things were of course done under the protection of FSB when this kind of businessman would catch by police. This would frighten the reporters and prosecutors, who would not raise charges or uncover those actions.

Sources:

Picture 1:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/Moscow_Kremlin_from_Kamenny_bridge.jpg/1200px-Moscow_Kremlin_from_Kamenny_bridge.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/writing-about-deportation-of-russian.html

What is MIRV (Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle)?

W87 Warheads on MIRV-bus
 (Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa People normally ask what actually means term MIRV? The term means that nuclear missile carries many warheads, what it can target to the same point or different locations on the enemy ground. This means that one “Sarmat” missile can destroy one big area or 24 cities around the world. Term MRV (Maneuverable Reentry Vehicle) means normally that nuclear missile carries warheads, what can change their course during flight. This weapon is very devastating, and it can avoid kinetic energy ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) system. That warhead is equipped with sensors, what notices the incoming ABM-rocket, and then it starts to turn, what makes the direct hit to target very difficult. Intercontinental ballistic missiles would operate many ways, and there would be many advantages in that equipment since 1960’s. Modern missiles are equipped with artificial intelligence, what makes the defense against them difficult. First, the hit to enemy ground would happen that some warheads detonated in orbital trajectory. That would cause damages to radars and other equipment, what are guided those ABM-systems. Also, some of those warheads could probably return to Earth and re-installed to missiles. That makes the threatening with those weapons more effective because those weapons can send to the skies and park over the enemy capital city. And if the war would begin, those weapons can strike with warning time, what takes seconds.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_independently_targetable_reentry_vehicle

Picture 1.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/W87clr.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-mirv-multiple-independently.html

North Korean nuclear facility Yongbyon Nuclear Scientific Research Center

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/north-korean-nuclear-facility-yongbyon.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/north-korean-nuclear-facility-yongbyon.html

What if the "Tsar Bomba" would explode in the Mariana Trench"?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-tsar-bomba-would-explode-in.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-tsar-bomba-would-explode-in.html

Why are we investigating the super heavy nuclear particles?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/why-are-we-investigating-super-heavy.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/why-are-we-investigating-super-heavy.html

"Lighthouse at the end of the world": The tale of the nuclear weapon before Manhattan project

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lighthouse-at-end-of-world-tale-of.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/lighthouse-at-end-of-world-tale-of.html