Researchers think that Einstein's theories don't stand on the edge of the Universe.

"Gravitational lensing of distant galaxies by the galaxy cluster Abell 2390, observed by the Euclid satellite. © ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, image processing by J.-C. Cuillandre (CEA Paris-Saclay), G. Anselmi" (Unige, Einstein’s equations collide with the mysteries of the Universe)

There is not very much research where the Theory of General Relativity is tested in extremely low gravity and energy levels. Those theories are well-tested around black holes. But there is not very much data about things like how gravity waves or some other waves or particles interact in conditions. Where energy travels out from them very fast. 

The edge of the Universe is a mysterious place. There the energy and material face lower than exists our Universe. Or otherwise saying the energy in our Universe faces a cosmic void. Energy travels from space filled with quantum fields and wave movement to the cosmic void or into cosmic nothing. That space is not possible in the Universe. There are no absolute vacuums in the Universe. That we know. That means energy can travel only out from the Universe. 

When we think about energy fields there is a thin string. Those strings are so-called time arrows (or arrows of time). The time arrow means the particle or energy beam that travels in the Universe. When that time arrow releases its kinetic energy. It transfers it to other particles. So when a time arrow travels forward, it pushes energy to particles around it. And then that thing pushes those particles back in time. 

Then we can think of the time arrows as energy fields that travel out from the point where the Big Bang happened. When the distance between the time arrow and the Big Bang turns longer. There is space between those energy strings. That space means that more energy will travel between those time arrows. And that space makes it possible for particles like photons to start to make curves between those time arrows, like energy beams and particles.  The energy level between those beams or time arrows turns lower. 

That means at the edge of the universe could be very extraordinary gravity waves. Those gravity waves can have a structure where they have two wavelengths. The normal gravity waves and other waves or strings connect them into one bigger entity. Or maybe there are so-called spiral gravity waves that travel forward like serpentines. But that is only theory. 

And that means the particles start to deliver energy or wave movement faster than previously. That means time travels faster in particles at the edge of the Universe. The edge of the universe is a mysterious place, as I wrote before. There the particle travels out from the universe to the place, where there is no energy at all. 

When we think about the shape of the Universe, we must realize that the Universe is a so-called false vacuum. The thing that limits the speed of light is for example quantum fields. Or scattering effect. When a particle travels from a false vacuum to a real vacuum there is nothing that can limit its speed. But the other thing is that energy travels out from the particle faster than in the Universe. Those things are not researched very much. 

https://www.unige.ch/medias/en/2024/les-equations-deinstein-se-heurtent-aux-mysteres-de-lunivers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

The Einstein and the black hole's internal instability.

"Researchers have found that energy instability within black holes may disrupt current models. This finding hints that black holes are more complex and unstable than expected. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Defying Einstein: Hidden Instabilities in Black Holes Could Rewrite Spacetime Theories)

In Einstein's model, gravity is one feature of spacetime. All objects form potholes in the spacetime. And that pothole is the thing that we know as gravity. The gravity pothole is always introduced as being smooth. But what if there are small waves in the walls of that pothole? How those waves can affect gravitational models. 

Challenging Einstein and his Theory of Relativity is a tough thing. But it's possible. That there is a difference between  Einstein's theories and reality. The reason for that difference could be this: Einstein handled black holes in their entirety. He thought a black hole was a single, solid entirety without internal structures. Another thing that gives the limits to Einstein's theories is this: Einstein didn't know about things like dark matter. And those things make it possible to adjust Einstein's theories. 

Can dark matter that falls in the black hole explain dark energy? 

Dark matter that the black hole pulls inside it can explain things like dark energy. If we think that the weakly interacting massive particle, WIMP is real and a black hole pulls those particles inside it. That thing means that in extremely dense and high energy conditions the WIMP can resonate with the Higgs field.  The black hole pulls dark energy, dark matter, visible energy, and visible matter into it. The transition disk around the black hole is a very hot, high-energy place where the particle's speed is enormous. Then the WIMP impacts with Higgs field and sends the wave across the universe. 

Maybe inside black holes are spiral-shaped structures. And if the black hole follows laws similar to that of planets or other ball-shaped structures. We can find a small zero gravity point in the middle of the black hole. That zero-gravity point could be smaller than gluons. But in extreme dense and pressure of radiation, even small things mean something. And that small thing can cause instability in the black hole. Black holes are extremely dense objects even if there is no singularity. 

The radiation or energy and particles that a black hole pulls inside it will pack to the center of that monster. We all hear that black hole sometimes belch when it pulls lots of material inside it. Sometimes black hole eats so much material and energy that its environment will turn empty. Energy and material continue to travel inside the event horizon. And that means when a black hole pulls all material from around it. That causes anomalies in the black hole's internal structures. 

Sometimes we hear stories about the black hole growth after material is lost from around it.  The dark matter can explain that thing. The dark matter and visible material don't interact except through gravity. So dark matter can also form black holes and affect their growth. Theoretically dark matter and visible matter turn into entirety in the middle of a black hole. That situation was before the Big Bang. And it's possible that in singularity the dark- and visible materials are finally turned into entirety. 

https://scitechdaily.com/defying-einstein-hidden-instabilities-in-black-holes-could-rewrite-spacetime-theories/

The MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics)and Beoynd: Can Newton and Einstein be at the same time right and wrong?

 The MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics)and Beoynd: Can Newton and Einstein be at the same time right and wrong?

We cheer for new physics and new ideas about natural interactions. But when we think about General Relativity and Newton's principle that gravitation. Always interacts with particles and wave movement in the same way, there is an area at extremely low acceleration where gravitation doesn't interact with all particles in the same way. 

That means there is an exception in both reality and theory. There is a possibility that the exception is visible only in low-acceleration areas. So there is a window in gravitational interaction at low acceleration where Einstein and Newton fall.

Did Einstein and Newton's models fall near binary star systems because they just forgot that there are other gravitational interactions than just gravitation? There are no pure gravitational interactions in the universe. Also, other fundamental interactions, like weak nuclear forces and electromagnetism, interact with particles.

In some models, the gravitational centers pull quantum strings just to the gravitational center. But some of those quantum strings and quantum fields travel past the gravitational center. That thing forms a network of quantum electrostatic arcs that push particles away. When acceleration is low. That particle's impact energy is also low. And that means those particles cannot travel through that quantum network.

That anomaly was seen near binary star systems. So could the situation where two gravitational centers send gravitational waves cause a situation where those gravitational waves are deleting each other?

But what could happen to that anomaly at low acceleration? Gravitational centers pull quantum strings to the center of gravitation. The anomaly in gravitational interaction was seen near binary star systems. We can find answers to that anomaly in many things. In binary star systems, there are two gravitational centers.

That means those gravitational centers are sending gravitational waves that impact each other. In that model, gravitational interaction deletes some of those gravitational waves. And that causes interesting ideas about situations where impacting gravity waves are destroying each other. That means gravitational waves cannot reach objects with the same power as those near single gravity centers.

Or is the question about the situation where gravitational interaction is not dominating enough?

In regular binary star systems, there is also strong electromagnetic interaction. The thing is that electromagnetic interaction can affect particles differently than gravitation near black holes. The idea is that pure gravitational interaction requires that gravitation become very dominant. 

Or that requires a situation where there are no other interactions other than gravitational interactions. There are always other interactions in the universe. Even near black holes, there is an electromagnetic effect that pushes particles away from the black hole.

https://phys.org/news/2023-08-smoking-gun-evidence-gravity-gaia-wide.html

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ace101/meta

Why do we see only negative or weird things?

In life, we must realize that benefit of the individual is not the same as the collective benefit. When we are thinking about working life the benefit of the employee is not always the same with employers. The thing about unemployment is that offers the workforce reserve for work marketing.

And that thing means that unemployment is causing costs to society. But the same way that thing allows to select workers. The benefit of the employers is not always the same. In the business sector where certain actors are operating are different. Some companies are operating in the unusual sector. And that causes problems for the hiring of trained employees. 

The unusual business sector means. There are not many people who know how to make things. In that business and operational environment. If there is a company that is working in the usual business sector. There are lots of competitors for that company. The name of the game is how to make people select the new actor? If the operating sector is very usual many companies are competitors for the new employer. 

But when we are thinking about the benefit of the employee. We must realize that there are many different sectors. And types of employees in the business life. The problems with the employees who are working in customer service. Are different than employees who work in offices. The young workers have different problems than the people who are spent 30 years in their work life. 

The thing is that the working life is always different. The fixed-period employee might think of being an endless summer worker. And that thing makes those people think that they want to quit. Being an outsider doesn't motivate people to share their knowledge. 

Also, the new thing person says something wrong causes jokes, and cheating is not very motivating. If some person must introduce new ideas. People who had ideas are always being different than others. That thing has caused many times that ordinary people felt the need to isolate those people from "regular people". 

Was Sir Isaac Newton Virgin?

When we are thinking about men and women who were something in history we remember many negative and unusual things about those people. Nikola Tesla invented the radio control device. And induction electric engines. But we remember this man spent a long time. In the nighttime feeding birds of prey. He might have a phobia. But nobody remembers how many inventions that man created. Those people remember phobias but they don't understand that Tesla was entirety. 

When we are looking at some real geniuses who dare to introduce new ideas the first thing that people notice is how "strange" those people like sir Isaac Newton were. Their work means nothing. The only thing that is remembered is that they lived in celibate. The best thing that I read about Sir Isaac Newton is that this man was a virgin. The fact is that Sir Isaac newton ever married. And that thing means that he might want to protect the honor of women. 

All inter-gender contacts with Newton and women would happen outside marriage. In a time Newton lived. Relationships that happened outside marriage would destroy the reputation of the women. If there were born some children in those one-night relationships. They had the same genomes as Newton. So maybe, some people create the story of Newton's virginity that the children of Newton could keep their reputation. Or maybe that man was a virgin.  

But Newton is a typical example of a genius. That man created many things that were before his time. The gravitational theorem, derivate, and integral calculation as well as Newton telescopes invented by that man. Or actually, Newton created integral and derivate with Gottfried Leibniz. Leibniz is the person who created one of the first mechanical calculators in the world. But how do we remember Isaac Newton? 

We remember that man as a man who lived in celibate. The same thing is about Albert Einstein. That man made a couple of very accurate theories. About light and gravitation. Those theories are the Special- and General theories of Relativity. But how do we remember that man? The man is remembered, that he was not using socks. That is a remarkable thing. 

When we remember the great military leaders like Napoleon Bonaparte we always remember Waterloo. That was the end of his career. But how many battles did that man win before he faced the Duke of Wellington? Or when we remember Von Pappenheim, the man who lost the battle against the King of Sweden Gustavus Adolphus in the field of Breitenfeld. 

We forgot that the same man was one of the highest commanders of the Catholic League. He raised to his position by winning battles. And the only battle we remember is that Breitenfeld battle where he lost. So we remember only the negative or some other way "unusual" behavior of those people. 

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Black holes and the Theory of General Relativity are an interesting combination.

(The Image I)The model of the wormhole. "If space were two-dimensional, folding it would enable three-dimensional shortcuts connecting widely separated places. Could our Universe contain similar wormholes?"

Credit:

ESO/L. Calçada (https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/images/1209b-wormhole_cc/)

The thing is that at the point of the event horizon the gravitation effect of the black hole causes that the escaping velocity is higher than the speed of light. And all particles are dropping to a black hole with the speed of escaping velocity. That means the speed of the light is crossed at that point. 

The gravitational lenses proved that the gravitation effect to light. And if the gravitational field is strong enough. That means the gravitation pulls the photons inside the black hole. The point where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. Called the "event horizon". The event horizon means that the light cannot escape beyond that point. 

Do the black holes form new universes? The fact is that maybe someday in the distant future. Erupting black holes would release material to the universe. And that thing causes the forming of the new universe. But are the black holes forming the new universes right now? 

That is an interesting question because it requires the existence of wormholes. And the thing is that the wormholes are part of Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Nobody has ever seen those things yet, but things like "cosmic neural structure" are offering a tip, that there might be some wire-looking gravitational effect. 

Image II: Cosmic web: Is this the first evidence of the existence of wormholes?

The thing is that the black holes are offering data that allows researchers to find evidence about the similarities between the theoretical world of Theory of General Relativity and the real world. 

The thing is that the Theory of Special Relativity from 1905 has confirmed a long time ago. And the Black Holes are also confirmed that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity from the year 1915 is at least mostly correct. When those theories are put in the ultimate tests they are passed. Theory of General Relativity makes wormholes possible. 

And all the time when that theory is put to the critical test. That theory is proven right. The last case when the Theory of General Relativity has proven is recently when the jet of the large black hole is proven that thing possible. So why wormholes can't be true? The fact is that those "channels throughout space and time" would seem very incredible. But the Theory of General Relativity makes them possible. 

The existence of a wormhole means that information like electrons or quarks can travel throughout it. Sending spacecraft through that energy channel is a little bit bigger thing than sending a couple of electrons or quarks through that channel. The size of the elementary particles is a little bit smaller than some spacecraft. 

And then at the last, we must say that even if we can send spacecraft through the wormhole that doesn't mean that the living organism can pass that thing. The radiation in the wormhole would be extremely strong, but the craft travels in that tube with the speed of the wave movement. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/03/17/world/dwarf-galaxies-intl-scli-scn/index.html

https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/1209/

https://scitechdaily.com/supercomputer-simulations-explain-massively-powerful-black-hole-jet-confirms-einsteins-theory-of-general-relativity/

https://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html

https://www.space.com/36273-theory-special-relativity.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image I:https://supernova.eso.org/exhibition/images/1209b-wormhole_cc/

Image II: https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/best-image-yet-cosmic-web/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/