Was the Tunguska event in 1908 caused by antimatter annihilation?

Fallen trees at Tunguska, 1927 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event)

Was the Tunguska event in 1908 caused by antimatter annihilation? 

The Tunguska explosion happened on June 30, 1908. The thing that makes this explosion interesting is that there was no mark of the meteorite. There is one theory that is ever handled, and that is: did somebody conduct lightning to the leaf gold. And that thing can turn those electrons to positrons causing annihilation. 

When we are facing that kind of thing. That here was the explosion that fell forest in large areas. There must be some kind of reason for that explosion. And one of the things that can make the explosion without a trace is the antimatter. But how antimatter bites could travel through the atmosphere, and fall to the ground? 

The fact is that the Tunguska explosion happened above the ground. There is a little rise in the radiation level at the point where the explosion happened. The reason why the radiation level rises is, that the explosion's heat caused the air starts to rise higher. And that vacuum pulled radioactive material away from the ground.

Did somebody make antimatter that day? 

Did somebody create antimatter on that day? One of the things that ever imagined is that did somebody conduct the lightning to the ball that is covered using leaf gold. The electric force of lightning is extremely high. There is needed only a very thin gold layer above the stone. If the lightning conductor will aim at the gold layer. That thing turns electrons into positrons. 

Lightning can conduct to the core of the ball or balloon covered by leaf gold. That gold layer will turn the spin of the electrons around. And create antimatter. Or sharper saying positrons. The antimatter can explain the explosion of the Tunguska. Could it be possible that some researchers conducted lightning to the bite where was the leaf gold layer? 

Did lightning cause the Dyatlov Incident in 1959?

What would happen if the lightning is conducted to the wedding ring? Did that kind of test explain why 9 people were killed in the Dyatlov Pass in 1959? The avalanche or some kind of thermobaric weapon has introduced the reason for that tragedy. 

Could some kind of physical test explain the Dyatlov incident? There is the possibility that some kind of explosion killed the 9 persons in the Dyatlov pass in 1959. Six of them died because of hypothermia, 2 of chest injuries, and 1 of head injuries. Did some kind of physical reaction cause the explosion that caused the death of those people? If some kind of lightning will impact things like candles or spray bottles. That thing can cause a very powerful detonation. 

Or maybe somebody conducted high-voltage electricity or natural electricity to the things like the fireplace? The smoke is carbon and if there was some kind of high voltage electricity in the air the smoke of the fireplace could pull the lightning to that point. When the lightning hits the fire it increases its energy level. And that thing can cause a very serious situation. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyatlov_Pass_incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

The dark matter and the "Big Bang" theory (What was before the Big Bang?)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The parallel universe theory could be only the academical "joke" without one thing, what astronomers have found. They have discovered the thing, that there is too much matter in the universe and this dark matter, what would not send any kind of radiation makes one thing happen. There is also found the thing, called "dark energy" in the universe, and that means that the dark matter exists. There were actually found also the "dark energy, and this was sometimes explained that at the beginning of the history, just in the time of "Big Bang" was too much energy in the universe.


The "dark energy" is actually the gravitation, what caused by this dark matter, what is actually mostly atomized hydrogen, or there is a theory, that the dark matter is something more exotic. But normally I have thought that this dark matter is hydrogen or some other things like protons, what means ionized hydrogen or electrons. If the dark matter would be electrons, that thing would be noticed as the radio signals, that comes from nowhere. And maybe the "three-kelvin radiation" is part of the dark matter.


But when we are thinking about the source of that matter, what we cannot see straight, but we can see the gravitation of this so-called "dark matter", because of all calculations, what is made for calculating the universe movements are sometimes very inaccurate, what means that something disturbs metering of the objects. And when we are thinking, where that matter is coming from, there is one explanation for that. This is that just after "Big bang" the universe were full of quasars and black holes, what just exploded. In the theory of the "Big Bang", the universe was actually the hypermassive black hole, what was started to send photons.


The origin of that black hole would be in the universe, what was existed before our own universe. This supermassive particle would involve all material, what was in that past universe, And it was in the middle of nowhere in the empty space, and if the supermassive particle  would not get anything in it, would that thing cause that the black hole starts to pull the material away as a "Hawking's radiation", and because the black hole would lose its mass the steaming if the black hole would go faster and faster. And suddenly it would explode.


Somebody like me has sometimes thought that maybe "Big Bang" was caused by the impact of two hypermassive black holes, and another of those particles were antimatter, wah caused the very huge explosion. Sometimes I have seen theories, about the "Big Bang" that this very rough phenomenon, what can actually be caused by the thing, that two interplanetary nebulas were impacted together, and if another one was antimatter cloud, would the released energy level be very huge.


 When we are thinking about that theory, the different electric charges would drive those clouds together, and the annihilation would cause the born of the universe. And because annihilation, what happens when antimatter and matter touch together and the origin of dark matter could be explained that at the beginning of the universe was too much energy, and that caused that there is a matter what was not calculated.

When those clouds of antimatter and matter touched together, the annihilation caused the very big explosion, and in this case, That phenomenon would be known as the "Big Bang"  But there is another theory about the existence of the dark matter. That is that there is another universe in somewhere, and the wormhole or singularity would transfer material between another universe and our universe. This theory is very often passed in the TV-programs, but if some matter comes from another universe, would it increase the mass in our universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

Thoughts about parallel universe theory

Veil nebula
(Picture by NASA)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/thoughts-about-parallel-universe-theory.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Parallel universe is the term, that means that there could be other universes, what are locating in other dimensions. And those universes exist in the same time. There have been articles in some newspapers, that in another universe might have copies of our own planet and those particles might be connected together with very small singulars, what are smaller than quarks.


The name what has been given to those singulars are ”super fibers”, and they are the fascinating thing, what cosmology has ever created. But when we are thinking the possibility, that there would be copy of the planet Earth in some other universe, we must realize that those copies are not exactly similar with together. The ”Earth in other universe” might be smaller than our own planet, and that place might be very cold place, where would be extreme low temperature on it's atmosphere. And there might be very different animals and other organisms that we have in this universe. There is one very big question in this speculation. Is there another ”me” in the other Universum? And would that species or person be the anti-personality when we would compile that thing with us?


I have once thought that if there would be the copy of me in some other universe, and in this time I have thought that if that person would be antimatter, could this danger entire universe. In the ”Parallel universe theory” there is a possibility that those other universes compose of antimatter, and in those other universes, our own material would be in the same role as the antimatter is in our own universe. In this theory, the black holes would open routes between universes. And if some black hole would open enough big and long-term singular route between universes, would that carry the enormous mass of antimatter to our universe. The problem with antimatter is that it would have so high level of energy, that there is needed only metric gram of that material to destroy the Earth. But what if there would open so large singularity between two universes that entire solar system could travel thru it.


That kind of masses of antimatter could cause the massive explosion in the universe, and that might cause at least the destruction on entire galaxy. If some creature would come from another dimension would we meet this hypothetical creature in empty space, because if that creature would compose the antimatter would we and that astronaut destroyed in huge explosion.


There is possibility that in some other galaxy group would be situation that antimatter would be dominating particle in the universe. This causes hypothetical risk for humans and our home planet. if we would want to destroy that asteroid, we must just throw it with piece of matter, what would be destroy it immediately. And in this hypothesis out twin creature might be antimatter, and if we would meet in empty space and touch together, would the result be huge explosion. If we would land to this creature's home planet, would that mean that we would be destroy that planet in the reaction, what is known as annihilation.


And in that reaction entire mass would transform as energy. The problem of antimatter is that is similar than our own material, but in the antimatter the electrons have positive and protons have negative electric capacity. But the chemical qualities are similar with so-called ”normal material”. That means that some asteroids can be compose as the antimatter. And that would cause dangers, because if antimatter asteroid hits any planet in our solar system could that be end of our planet, because that explosion could push all planets from the trajectories, and that would be devastating. This kind of things are fascinating to think.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/thoughts-about-parallel-universe-theory.html

Chinese scientists are creating the 10 petawatt laser-system

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/chinese-scientists-are-creating-10.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/chinese-scientists-are-creating-10.html

Saturnian Mimas moon have been inspired the Death Star for Star Wars movies

Mimas
(Source: NASA)

Some people have a great imagination, and George Lucas or who created a Death Star, a famous part of movie Star Wars, used Saturnian icy moon Mimas as a model of that battle station. But did you know that from that model is created a model of the real model of the space station, what might be done sometime in a distant future? In that model, a space station or spacecraft will be empty ball called "Dyson's sphere".  The ball itself would be made a plastic called mylar.  In this scenario, that mylar space station will be sent to space with rocket and if will fill with gas. In the wildest dreams, those ball-shaped space stations might have even full-scale cities inside them. 

Death Star
(Source NASA)

After that inside of that ball will cover by the net, where builders can inject concrete, where all of those buildings will be made. The idea itself is very old and it worked in 1960's in ECHO-satellites. Those satellites balloons which bigger one's diameter was 32 meters. That giant balloon sent to space and blew full size after it left from the atmosphere. That satellite opened secrets of the Soviet union communication in early 1960's. 

Echo Satellite

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Echo

The size of that ball was very large if that compiles with Apollo spacecraft. Some of the architects think that kind of ball can be used as a space station. In the inner core of the balloon will build normal houses, where the crew can live like people lives in the Earth. But the outer core of balloon will cover with ice because it's very easy to replace if meteors will harm it. And against cosmical radiation would be used thin gold coating what absorbed cosmic radiation.  That kind of space stations was in some NASA:s members minds in 1960's. 

That kind of space station would be easy to build and sent to space with rockets. Airlocks can be installed to that ball quite easily. In theory of course. And after that NASA would have ball shape space station for their missions.  When that ball rolls around that makes artificial gravity with centrifugal force, and that allows personnel of that station live almost normal life at the space. 

But when we return back to Death Star, we might imagine what kind of space weapon can destroy the even entire planet. The weapon what that space station might use will be ion cannon, what uses antimatter. Antimatter-ions will shoot in the central point of the planet, and the magnetic field will stop them in there. Antimatter-ions will pass material like normal ions without any reactions. But when magnetic field stops them inside planets central point, they will explode nucleus of the planet, and shockwaves what comes up from lithosphere will destroy the entire planet. 

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/