Strange things about WikiLeaks

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

WikiLeaks has brought to the people know the things, what the government would want to hide, but there is one big mystery in this website: why it is not banned by DDOS-attacks? When the governments and private security corporations Emails were delivered to WikiLeaks, it was targeted the short period DDOS-attack, and in some claiming, some of the files were removed or changed during the attack, and in those files were some very interesting knowledge of the co-operation between governmental and private security corporations, what are actually intelligence agencies.


Somebody has even claimed, that the  CIA has been behind the WikiLeaks and the reason, why almost all the files, what are published in those sites are American origin, but the thing is made for confessing the audience, that the USA would be the primary target for those uncovered secrets. This means that the purpose of publishing those papers is meant for countenancing the persons, who want to steal the papers from the Pentagon or NSA send them to WikiLeaks, where counterintelligence has very easy to find those documents, and then I must say that those files can be used to track the information thief.


This means that in every single file may have the unique code, what is unseen for normal computers. But if the person has the right program, would the number of the handler be seen on the screen. And that number allows tracking the person, who has been downloaded that file, and also foreign partners have their own numbers, that the NSA can track the persons, who deliver the secret material to the Internet. That's why those papers must no be delivered to the Internet.


Those PDF-files seems like the normal, but the NSA:s main computer makes there the covered digital signature in those files. That's why everybody must know, that there are many secrets, what is very interesting, but those papers are meant for confidential. And in the real world, we must ask, is it better to track people by using electronic equipment, or is it more comfortable to make a very large police force, what comes to the people's home for searching the missing persons. This is one argument for supporting the surveillance of the people. But sometimes is clearly seen, that the terrorist attacks are supporting the growing security business.


Those corporations collect very much data, and that can be used for many things. If the information, that is collecting by using Trapwire, would contain business secrets, and somebody would sell those secrets,  some corporations will get very much benefits in their work. And this is one of the most concerning things in the world. If some private intelligence would sell those pictures and data, that would give the very good position for that corporation, that buys those pictures and data from the security corporations.


If some corporations would get too close cooperation with the government, that company would allow accessing the data, what is only reserved for governmental purposes. This means that the surveillance cameras can also collect data from the screens, and in those cases, there would be no sign of the security leak. So those servers data security, what operates surveillance cameras must be extremely highly secured. If the information would leak from secured areas, the benefits, what some company would get are extremely high.

What is the difference between bio- and genetic manipulation?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are some differences of bio- and genetic manipulation. Biomanipulation actually means to make artificial cell-lines, and actually, there would be no touch for genomes. One version of biomanipulation is to make artificial retina and surgically implant that retina in the eye, and the retina can be made by cell base, what is filled only with cone cells. Also, two type of vegetables can be connected mechanically, and those combinations make the saplings, what are from an upper vegetable.


Biomanipulation is effective, but it takes time. The modification of the organisms will not transfer to next generations. And mass production of those organisms is very difficult. Genetic manipulation is the more effective way to compile species and give them new features. The needed thing is an artificial virus, what has wanted genome, and that little DNA-bite would be transferred to the nucleus of the cell. The problem is that those manipulated organisms are that those features would transfer to next generations of that organism.


One of the possibility of genetic manipulation for improving some species like a human is to connect genomes to the cells, what makes possible to create chlorophyll in the cells of mammals, and in some visions, those manipulated humans may have roots or threads in the skin, what can take food and water from the air. Those threads might also have harpoon cells, what protects this creature. When we are thinking about the combination of the human and other species, we might face the situation, where we are creating an alien, the species with superpowers. That creature might have a similar nervous system like bugs. It can use only electricity, what means that neurons could connect together and close the synopses.


That would make the brains more effective. Also, those manipulated organisms blood might be poisonous. And the chlorophylls in the skin makes possible to produce sugars in the creatures own body. This might be the route of controlled evolution, and maybe tomorrow we can order the features, what we will have in our next life. In this futuristic scenario the human would record their life by using WLAN-implants, and of course, the body will be cloned. This might make the person live forever. The cloning of the creature will happen by changing the DNA inside the nucleus of just when fertilized ovum. And that would allow making modifications even to human body and mind.

Sources:

Picture 1

https://www.biology-questions-and-answers.com/images/Genetic-Engineering.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-difference-between-bio-and.html

How the Internet-observations officer chooses the individual, who is put under surveillance?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many people are thinking, that it is safe to avoid the hotel's WiFi networks because the operators can catch the data from the WiFi, but they are entirely wrong in this case. The reason why those persons are wrong is that if they don't use the free Internet, there might be something to hide with those people because they don't use that WLAN even with big laptops, and this makes the observers curious. They are looking for people, who use sophisticated and robust network security when that will compile in the things what they do on the Internet.


The situation, when the safety makes person suspected data criminal is like using the enterprise-level security solutions in-home network, and of course, if those solutions are expensive, could that cause that the interest of put this person under surveillance will grow extremely high. Those surveillance operators will not use only one method to break the privacy of the targeted person, and those operators use normally also telescopes, binoculars and small remote control helicopters in their missions. But the massive number of data will go thru the Internet Sockets all the time.


But somebody will know, that exception to the normal behavior will be noticed by the surveillance team. If some person normally uses credit-cards for paying, but suddenly will that same person starts to use cash, will that cause the reaction in the surveillance screens. And the reason for the change of behavior must be found. Another way to make the surveillance team very interested in avoiding some services.


One of the misunderstandings is just avoiding the franchise hotels, what belong to some ring. In the small independent hotels have the smaller number of information in those databases and the operators must just check the data.  If there were many more users, the data storage will be so large, that the systematical check of that information would be very long action. But in the big and small systems is small differences. Then somebody wants to keep the name as the secret, will this person choose small size system, where the "surface data" flow only in the hands of the small group.


But in the small system, the deep scanning of data will be possible and give more effective information for surveillance operators who work in this kind of system. In big systems, many operators will see "surface data" of the users, but deeper analyze of information will be difficult because there is the larger number of bytes and there are many same-ranked officers who are watching the system. In small system might have only one high-school trained operator or maybe that service is produced by some other actor. This allows those men to work alone without afraid that somebody even sees what is going on.

Picture 1

http://www.sifytechnologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/datacenterhosting_managedservice_taxialways_fod.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-internet-observations-officer.html

Data is the new oil for markets

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/data-is-new-oil-for-markets.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/data-is-new-oil-for-markets.html

The science of statistics can help to find criminals

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-science-of-statistics-can-help-to.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-science-of-statistics-can-help-to.html

What means the analytical form of the "big data"?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-means-analytical-form-of-big-data.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-means-analytical-form-of-big-data.html

What if the antivirus program transforms as the spying tool?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-antivirus-program-transforms-as.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-if-antivirus-program-transforms-as.html

Miniaturization of technology gives new ways to mark documents

RFID-chip inside person's hand

Kimmo Huosionmaa 

Print media is problematic for data security. Those print files could be put just in the pocket and after that thief of that data could walk out the building. But modern technology gives very effective methods to deny that kind of work. This method basis itself in miniaturized RFID-chips, what can put in the ink tanks inside ink liquid.

Those nanosize chips are so small that they can inject to a paper same times, where text and pictures are, and those chips are so invincible that they can't be separated from other text and that equipment can put in the normal ink tank. So even printer operator doesn't know that those systems are in the ink. And in that RFID-chip can save information about who printed that paper, and if the thief walks throw security gate, what might be covered in the doorframes.


Of when security personnel is looking for those documents they must only use GSM-phones, what will take near persons and their pieces of luggage, and after that security personnel can take that thief in the hands of the law. That reading application might be similar, what is used by ticket checkers in public transportation. And that application might send the report of those papers to firms security. And if I really want to think nasty, those applications might send report same time to the security police. It also might work as a ghost software, what is secretly installed in all that workplaces workers telephone, and if they don't see or know that application that might cause them lots of trouble if they steal papers from the workplace.

That system could be also metal detector and that magnetic field will be inducted electricity to that tiny little microchip, what will send data about the person who printed that document, and even what kind of is in the document. The printer or copy machine can also take PDF-copy of that document, and mark it with register number what will put in the chip. And if some prints will attempt to take out the building, they will alert chief of security and he will see what documents are taken out of the building.

After that, if a thief can slip off those documents will deliver to hands of patent officials and police. And if somebody will sell those documents or try to capitalize them, will patent authorities notice that. This is very important if stolen material consists research and developing the technology for company's tomorrow products. Those kind of stuff are in marketing at least couple of years and they might be wonderful equipment in many things. 

Small size implanted microchips might be put surgically in some people bodies, and that thing might read by airport's security gates. That kind of RFID-chips are put in dogs, but they can also implant in bodies of some special forces operators like NAVY SEAL- or other persons who the government doesn't want to go somewhere. And also dangerous prisoners must be implanted that law enforcement could find them in the crowd of people.



That other persons are technical and scientific specialists whose skills are that kind of that government ever let them go to the country what is hostile. Somebody thinks that some key members of some nations government and scientific laboratories are implanted with GPS-chips, what looks like pills and contains very long life batteries, that government can follow them around o'clock in every day of the year.


Yläkuvan osoite:  http://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/world-government/item/global-control-through-the-rfid-chip


https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/