Why do we research history?

  

 Why do we research history?

We should learn from things that were made in past. 

Why do we research history? History is a series of things that happened in the past. Those things that are happened in history can use to make models for the future. Research of history is the thing. That purpose is to find the things that will happen in the future. The key question in the history research is to find answers for the questions like "what made something happen"? 

What mistakes were made in cases that are under the research? And what did people learn about those cases? Another thing is that that the purpose of the research of history is to find the answer to the question "what should we do in similar cases"? What went wrong? And what went right? 

When we are thinking about questions like "which side had better generals Confederate or Union side in the United States civil war?". We must realize that the thing that fights is the entirety. Even the best generals in the world cannot win battles alone. In those cases also henchmen are playing roles. If the henchmen don't have the equipment, will, or skills to use weapons. The battle is lost. 

When we are thinking questions "what should we do" in those cases when something has happened. We must remember that when we are looking at history. We might know all answers. We might think that the King of Sweden Charles XII of Sweden. Should not advance to Poltava, where he faced Peter the Great army. 

But the King of Sweden didn't have the same knowledge that we have today. Today we can go to the library and find history books that are telling about the history of Sweden. And there are all answers. But Charles XII acted by using the information that he had. And that was the mistake. 

When we are looking at history we are easy to justify people. Those people made mistakes. And we would be different. And at this point, I must say one thing. In history, people acted by using the information that they had. They lived in different types of society. When they made their decisions they cannot look at results from the library. 

Today history repeats itself. We are thinking that joining the common currency of the European Union Euro was a mistake. The fact is that the Euro planned to be the virtual currency. Which purpose was to help to compile prices. But it turned to real currency. When countries joined the Euro nobody criticized that thing. There was the biggest boom in the history of Europe.

And people wanted to join that boom. But they forgot that even the biggest and strongest economies will face bear markets. So when the bear markets begin that kind of thing will cause things like bankruptcies and unemployment. What do we learn about Euro? When we are middle of the booms we can join everything. But when the boom is over. We still are in the system. 

We can of course, always step out from Euro. That kind of signal would please Russian leaders very much. When we joined Euro nobody said anything against that decision. But now Euro is facing criticism. And of course, we are independent nations who can always start to think about their national interest. We all can step out from Euro immediately, and maybe we are facing a new bull market. But then sooner or later our economy will face a bear market. 

And in that case, we can search for friends. Of course, we can always let those loans that are taken from the EU without paying and then ask for more loans. We have the right to do that thing. But when we are asking for money. There should be somebody willing to offer that money to us. The thing is that when we are looking at history the best wisdom is the hindsight is the best wisdom. 

Now, today we can say wisely. We should not ever join Euro. We made a big mistake wise men say. But we always make mistakes. Only people who are not making anything are not making mistakes. And that is the fact. When we joined Euro nobody saw anything negative about that thing. Or those people said nothing against that thing. Where were the wise men when those political leaders made that decision?

Why did they keep their mouth shut? Why didn't they offer their advice when the nation joined Euro? Now the media is full of advisors who are telling that the Euro was the mistake? 

Today we can say that Euro should remain as the virtual currency. But people made the decision. By using information that was in use at that time. It's too late to cry. We are in Euro and that's it. And then we can make new decisions. 

Technology is advancing. And that brings new challenges and opportunities. 

Sometimes I have thought about what kind of decisions the King of Sweden Charles XII would make if that person had recon satellites? What if he would get confirmed information of his enemies?

At this point, I must say that we should not stare at history too much. Things like artificial intelligence are making it possible to return Euro to virtual currency or even delete that currency. The AI-based solutions offer possible to show the prices in multiple currencies. The modern internet has more capacity than some year 2000 version. And that thing makes it possible to make many things that were impossible in the year 1999. 

And if somebody is willing to pay with some other currency there is enough to put the bank card in the payment system. Then the system would change the price to the currency. That is in use in the country where the bank card is offered. The that we are living in the new era of history. And that era is full of threats and possibilities. Things like quantum computers would revolutionize data processing. And that is the thing that we should benefit more from in our life. Data processing and the internet are tools that began the revolution in the world. And that revolution continues today.

But when we are making decisions we should understand that they all have effects. We cannot make decisions undone. The decisions are made by using data. That was in use at that time.  And that's it. We cannot retake time and make them undone. But maybe we can learn something from history. And maybe, we should listen to more people when we are making some decisions in tomorrow world. And then we must say that somebody will pay the price. When some person gets something. That affects everything. 

https://thebrightchronicle.blogspot.com/

Could computer someday predict future?

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In Isaac Asimov's book, "the Foundation" is the fictional or hypothetical thing, known as "psychohistory" This thing s actually the way to predict the behave of billions of humans by using similar mathematical formulas, what are used to calculate the movements of the giant gas masses. The idea of psychohistory would be that those computers would collect all data, about what has been happened in history, and then use that data to predict the future. In those predictions is used similar software what is used in astronomy and meteorology for predict the large mass of gas.

Mathematical formulas, what is used in this action would be given the predictions with the large mass of humans. The reason for that is the single individual would have too many transformers, and that makes single persons or individuals very hard to predict. When we are thinking of clouds, we cannot predict the place of single waterdrop, but meteorological computer programs can predict quite well the place of the cloud. What bigger is the gas mass, the sharper is the result, what calculations would give about the prediction of the gas mass.

The idea is similar than in the rivers. We have hard to predict the place of the individual water molecule, but the prediction of the water line, what goes in the river is quite easy. Same way is easy to predict the route of water if the dam would collapse. When we are transferring this thing to sociology, we must think the ants. It's very hard to know, what single individual Ant would do next, but when we see the Ant group, what is looking for food for their group, we can predict quite good, how those bugs would act.

This is the idea of psychohistory. Individual human prediction is hard to predict, but the large groups of humans can predict quite easy because controlling large groups is very hard. When large groups of people would be released the stopping and controlling those groups is hard. But the predictions about their behavior or direction, where that group is going is very easy. And this thing has caused the thoughts, that there are plans to make that kind of experiments.

Here we must say, that this kind of systems would give sharper predictions for the long time period than the short period. Here we are talking about the thing, that the common prediction can be sharp, but then that thing disappears in the jungle of single cases. This thing is like a highway. We don't know every turn of the road, but we know where the road is going. This is the thing in that kind of attempt to predict the future. Using computers make possible to collect and handle multiple variables, and compile them with together.

The ideas of the modern architecture

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above this text is a picture of the modern building site at Helsinki, Finland, and I thought that this shows, how the modern materials and innovation change the way to make buildings. The modern materials and the CAD-based computer research allows making more advanced and sophisticated planning for buildings. The next generation buildings are made with CAD/CAM (Computer Aided Design)/(Computer Aided Manufacture)  methodology, what allows to make the buildings, where every part fits perfectly in the position, where it is planned. In this process, the computers would send the CAD  pictures to the company, what makes the elements, and that allows to make unique elements, what have different shapes and metering.


The size and color of each element can be unique, and that makes possible to apply new kind of things in the structure of the buildings.  That allows using the elements and material very sharp, and there would become the minimum number of building waste.  But that technology allows to make houses, where are new kind of components, what was ever before in the normal buildings. That kind of solutions could be the balconies, what can be pulled in, when the weather is bad. That could deny the accumulation of snow. But that kind of detail could be a very interesting part of the building.


That kind of things are the things, what could be standard in the houses of tomorrow. Also, computers would follow the moisture of the elements by using special nanosensors, what collects the information about the moisture and other erosion in those elements. That "smart sand" is the microchips, what meters the quality of the elements, and also the movements of the building. The idea of the intelligent house is that the ventilation and the brightness of the windows would react continually for the temperature and sunlight, that the houses would become more comfortable for people, who live in there.

The gravity energy and its use in power supply

Picture I

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/the-gravity-energy-and-its-use-in-power.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We are using gravity energy currently in the form of water power, but when we are thinking about the use of the pure gravitation as an energy supply, there are three possibilities to make that thing real. They might look simple, but there are many technical problems with their practical solutions.


The motive for this kind of operation would be, that the And some of those solutions are extreme unpractical, and they would ever take in use. Those things need so large-scale technology or traveling to other planets, that they are not nowadays technology at all, but in theory, the gravitation engines can give the civilization opportunity to continue it live without their sun after it has been detonated as the supernova.


So this writing is purely hypothetical and its purpose is to think about the technology, what would be used in that kind of power supply. One motive for large-scale projects would be that the central star of the solar system would start to become unstable. And this would make the civilization to build the gravity power. And here are those three ways to use the power of gravitation. Here I'm not going to write about water power, because this writing is meant for hypothetical thinking about the gravity energy.

1. Tunnel thru the planet

There is a possibility to drill the tunnel thru some planet, what have not the liquid nucleus. In that theoretical operation would be used the laser-drill, what allows to make the extremely deep hole.   If the planet would have solid lithosphere and it would have the possibility to drill the tunnel thru the planet, and then install the generator in that structure. The drill would look like the cylinder, and it could land to the surface of that planet, and then it must just begin to use its laser.


After that in this tunnel would be dropped to the particle or particles, what would rotate the juniper and generator. This particle would travel inside this tunnel like Jojo, and it can rotate the generator by using the wire or another way would drop those particles on layers, what would cause the rotating of the generator. This might seem very simple, but there are many practical problems to make that kind of system.

2. Using the heat of dropping particles as an energy

The second one is so unpractical way to use gravity power, that it would be ever take in the real use. The technology is that thru the atmosphere would be dropped the particles, what would be getting heat in the process. Then those particles would drive to the boiler, what creates steam, that would conduct to the turbines.


This way to make gravity power system is very unpractical, and the power, that it can be made is so expensive, that even in theory it would not be used even in small-scale systems. Here we are seen, how in theory we can make something, what would work, but what is so unpractical, that it will make us laugh. There is a version of this kind of system, what would actually be used in some drones.


Those drones would be dropped into the atmosphere of some planet and the propels would start to create the electricity of the drones electric motors. The system would be used to explore the atmospheres of other planets like gas giants and Venus. Drones would not be larger than some toys, but their mission will be collecting the information from the planet's atmosphere. And they might also be used for the reconnaissance missions, where the satellite drops them to hurricanes or near military bases if their mission would be military intelligence.

3. Use the radiation, what is forming near Black Holes as an energy supply

The most fascinating way to use gravity energy will be using the transfer disc of the black holes as the energy supply. Those areas around the supermassive particles in the universe are the brightest thing, what astronomers have seen. And the energy would be collected with normal solar panels. But the problem is, that we have no black holes in our own solar system, and traveling to them is taking an extremely long time. That makes this version of the gravity power also theoretical.


But we could use gravity power if we could make the artificial black hole. The hypothetical gravity power plant would be the system, where the artificial black hole would be set in the ball-shaped chamber. This chamber could be covered with the silicon layer, what gives electricity, and sometimes the gas would be conducted in this chamber. Then it would send the radiation to the system. But if the ball would be damaged, and the black hole will be released to the atmosphere, could that destroy the entire planet, and that's the reason this system would not be tested in the atmosphere of Earth.


There is the possibility, that in someday we could make the electromagnetic black hole, what can be transferred in the spacecraft. The black hole can be forming, that way, there could be accelerators in the spacecraft, and then the support system will start to pump energy to that system by touching it with tongs, what transfers the energy to that hypothetical spacecraft. And then the spacecraft would use this thing as the energy supply. When we are discussing the UFO:s we can think that this kind of energy will be used in some kind of spacecraft. The size of the spacecraft would not be necessary big, and the size of the black hole would be smaller than golf-ball. But if that small black hole will release to the atmosphere, will the results be devastating. And this will make the hypothetical unknown spacecraft dangerous.

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/M101_hires_STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg/1280px-M101_hires_STScI-PRC2006-10a.jpg

Could this be the future of mankind?

9 Hours capsule hotel at Kyoto
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/could-this-be-future-of-mankind.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This text is meant for example as an image. Can our future be something very strange and could our privacy turn that way, that all human civilization would melt into one gigantic organism. In this scenario, the future of mankind is that the man is living in some kind of dream without the body. This version of the losing ability to live independently, would the mankind live in the virtual reality. The movie "Matrix" came that version of the future in the front of the audiences. That movie told the story about the world, where humans are totally losing their identity and privacy.


And the resistance, what fought to get the mankind back in reality. But after that film was the feeling, that was everything fake or reality, and how many layers of the reality could be in that imaginational computer's memory? In this texts, I can think the layers of virtual reality as the one version of parallel universe theory. If the mankind would live in some kind of matrix, the layers of this super-reality would have similar forms with the multiverse theory. In this "matrix" would be many layers like universes, and it could be theoretically impossible to move between the layers.


When we are thinking about the "hyper-reality" we would face many fascinating theories, what are actually quite silly, but they would show that persons dare to think the different way than other people. The theory that human being would be the computer program is, of course, one of the most brilliant ways to make philosophical thoughts. There is no limit of imagination, and imagination is the way to make innovation and new products. And the imagination is in the key role when people make their inventions. Imagination is also called as the term "productive thinking". And this way of thinking makes innovations for the human race.

Once I saw pictures of Japanese plastic-tube hotel, where people would not have actually own rooms. They would sleep in small ski-box style tube, and this is seen as a very suitable solution for airport hotels. But this picture brought one thought about the privacy of human being. And also I can see that kind of living for solution one of the biggest problems on Earth. That is overpopulation, and here I can think about the next step of privacy. What if some people would live in those tubes, and work in the cities, what is looking like giant shopping centers.


Maybe I wrote this sometimes earlier, but as we can see, the people of tomorrow would live actually in the cities, what is made inside one single building, where would be same services than modern cities, but all things in this combination would place inside one single building. Maybe people of tomorrow would ever go out, and they would live inside those houses, and work in there. When we are thinking about architecture, the most well-known cities could be covered by giant bubbles, and they would be stored as a historical monument of the people, who lived in 21 st. century.


And the people of tomorrow would automatically leave many things about their privacy away, but then we must ask: how much privacy one man or woman needs. Here I'm writing about things that would make our society more social, but same times this advantage would need changes in the people attitudes. When we are thinking about growing population, we must make something. We have no space for traditional living style. And probably there would be implants in the human body, what would send their health information to central computers because that would able to make health care more effective.


Of course, many illnesses can be cured by vaccines, but there would always found new kind of mutation of viruses and bacteria, what would cause that the health care must have more capacity to fight against new organisms. In that society of tomorrow, we are losing our privacy and probably we would turn as machines by step by step. In the society of tomorrow, we can have many keys, what we had ever before. But the problem is that we would lose our privacy. The machines would make all our work, and that could cause the end of privacy. And if this advantage would continue, would the man lost the body to some computers, what need only our nervous system for working. In this scenario of an advantage of human civilization, our future would be to merge in one super mind.


Once I read one book about this kind of advantage. In that book, the main character would solve the murder case, but then this character realized, that he was in some kind sleep, because the characters were in 1920's style houses, and suddenly they were traveled in flying cars. And at the end of that book would the main character noticed, that he was only a computer program, that traveled in the 2nd. Lifestyle virtual world, where computer programs met and talked together. This is one way to think about risks, what computerization and other things like virtual reality would cause.


Sometimes I thought that could some person in future earn money by laying in EEG-machine, what would connect that person to computers. And could the "plastic tube"-type solution cause the advantage, that our all civilization would transfer to the neurons, what are assembled in one giant brain structure. Those brains could be connected to robots and other systems, but in this case, we would lose our individualism. In the world could be only one brain, and that would make them very lonely.


For creating new, brains would need also ideas and stimulus. And also for making right things would even the most powerful brains need other brains what give ideas to that massive neuron structure. This is only the most horrifying road for mankind, and thank god we have understood that real strength of mankind is individualism. We all think different things, and that makes our species very surprising. And our genetic variability would give us a possibility to stay alive even in the most lethal epidemics. Individualism is the power of our species. That individualism makes us humans. And all advantages would go forward from individual thoughts.

Sources:

https://www.uniqhotels.com/9-hours-capsule-hotel

Picture I

https://www.uniqhotels.com/media/hotels/46/9-hours-capsule-hotel-07.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/could-this-be-future-of-mankind.html

Is ability to see future only hoax?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking of our nervous system, and the situation, that somebody sees the things, what will happen next while sleeping, there would be a couple of explanations for this strange thing. The first one is, that this person has been in the similar situation somewhere before, and that would help this person to predict what will happen.


The second explanation is that the person has heard something, and the brains would not let this thing come to awareness while this person sleeps. That thing can cause the feeling, that the person is in that situation before. And of course, there is a possibility, that our main character has heard everything, and just kept it in own head. This might happen in some army, and if some man was heard the plan before, I think that this person would not tell others that thing.


But there would be many explanations for that kind of things, what seems like supernatural. Those explanations are that if somebody has been in some sports league, there would creating the ”magic eye” when this person sees if everything would be all right. If as an example the referee of ice hockey has been corrupted, the experienced sportsman would see that the way, how referee acts and sees the players.


Also if we are thinking about cases, where somebody predicts the attack, the reason would be that this person sees something dangerous. Those men see many things, what normal people don't even notice, and maybe there was a man in strange clothes or something in the area. Or maybe somebody was hurry or nervous in the attack place. And the finest explanation for the ability to see things before they happen is that this person has the ability to see the light, what comes from the nano-sized singularity. If somebody would have so sharp senses, that this person sees, when the light comes thru the wormhole, this person would have real ”Jedi force”.

But this is only thinking about this marvelous phenomenon. If this ability is real, we must ask another question: can we build the telescope, what is sensitive enough to see those extreme short-term flashes of light. That would be the finest camera in the world. The problem with this theory is that the tiny wormholes exist in only the one-millionth part of the second, and the camera must be targeted straight to the wormhole. But if somebody would make this machine, would this person come very wealthy man. In theory, there would need only the absolute ball-shaped crystal, where would be pumped enough energy, that it would transform as a wormhole or electromagnetic black hole. And maybe this kind of machine can be done by particle accelerators. Then the camera would be targeted to that point, and in theory that would allow taking the photograph of the future.

Sources:

Picture 1:

https://i2.wp.com/clairvoyancereadings.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/what-is-clairvoyance-1.png

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/is-ability-to-see-future-only-hoax.html

Is the Isaac Asimov’s “Solaria” from the book “Naked Sun” same thing as “Utopia”?

Hohenzollern Castle in Germany symbolizes isolated  societies
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are analyzing the book, named “Naked sun”, we must think, the name shake between Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter top secret “Solaria-project”, what was mentioned in some UFO-book. Admiral Hillenkoetter was one name on the list, what is claimed to be a list of the Majestic-12 group. When we are thinking about Asimov’s Solaria, on that planet was only 20000 citizens, and when we are looking the structure of this book, we must say that this book seems very strange. In that book, Solaria is creating the next generation super weapons. The mass army of robots.


And the thing, what makes it strange is that maybe those “planets” were actually the “moon bases” on earth. I don’t know if this ever made, but those “moon bases” could be used in highly advanced genetic experiments. In this text, I think the possibility to make the network of isolated bases, what lives separately from other people. Of course, if that kind of network would exist, it could use the genetic engineering. In this book, the Solarians keep their planet population 20 000 and their behavior would be very unsocial. This is the thing, what is highlighting for centuries.


If there would be the capacity to select the human genomes, that the human would always get the skills, what that person might need to increase the team, that thing would make possible to create the members of the society, live hundreds of years. Or maybe those persons would use retrovirus, what can renew the genomes inside the cells. In this scenario, every person, who would be in this secret society would be taken the DNA. And then some laboratory would make virus by using this DNA. When the person is getting old, this DNA would use to replace the genomes from the nucleus of the cells and mitochondria to the new one. That might fix the cells of the body to be like young people.

Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter
(1897-1982)

The people of those isolated societies would be selected from the most capable and intelligent persons on Earth, and they would be living in the place, where the birth rate is extremely well controlled. In this scenario, the scientists would make artificial people by using artificial fertilization. This would cut the connection of population to normal people. And nobody misses them. This world might be the very interesting way to test, what extremely intelligent people would create when they can do things together.


But when we are looking this fictional network of secret scientific places, we must think about “Utopia”. The mythical secret isolated society, what based the book of Thomas More from 1516. It was the book of the society of tomorrow, and this book has given names for the thing what cannot be reached. Also, the unidentified flying objects can have name shake between utopia. So if those plans were real, could this kind of experiment be the most disturbing thing, what people ever imagined.


In many books and films have been introduced the “utopia”. The isolated farm or castle, what involves the group of carefully chosen persons. In the book, “Naked sun” were the names of the fictional planets like “Nexus”. And this would be very fascinated. If some person like Hillenkoetter investigates the things like isolated bases, what have the mission to create advantages for some government, must this man has good evidence about the existence of this kind of structure.


Roscoe Hillenkoetter was the chief intelligence officer of the United States NAVY. He also worked as the first chief of CIA. His idea of humanoids was that they might be from Earth, and the origin of those very mysterious creatures would be some kind of network of camps, where the population was generated in centuries. This hypothesis was created by the books what have written by the persons like Bulwer-Lytton and H.G Wells. Those books were contained the secret societies and isolated places.


So Hillenkoetter created a very interesting hypothesis that some very intelligent persons were hidden inside some structures like camps of GULAG, and those persons would have the network across the earth. This structure is fictional, but Hillenkoetter had many good ideas of this kind of things, and maybe the tests for isolated societies have made by some men in the past. But how serious can we take those things? I’m saying, that I certainly hope that this writing is telling about the fictional story about the network of secret communities. And I think that was only the fictional idea of those places. Some kind of thought about the sociological and genetic experiment, what could be the very fascinated thing, what sometimes comes to pages of some magazines or Internet pages.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roscoe_H._Hillenkoetter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12

Picture 1

http://www.wtbitakora.com/ficherosweb/EU1738_24-11-2016_Castillo-de-Hohenzollern-0-881x491.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/is-isaac-asimovs-solaria-from-book.html

Maybe some civilizations have two kinds of individuals, what doesn't even look like same species.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The degeneration and focusing on increase brain capacity might cause the situation, what the mankind ever thought as possible. In this scenario, the increasing of individuals brain capacity would cause the separation of the society of those things from the real community. In this scenario, the species would take two lines for evolving themselves.


The first line could be “workers”. The individual members of the community what would have normal muscles, and what makes all works in this hypothetical society. Their mission would defend the “thinkers”, the leaders of this society. Or maybe those “thinkers” would not be leaders. They might be only the “computers” what mission would generate the products for that hypothetical society.


Another line could be “thinkers” the individuals, what might have extremely large brain capacity, but those persons might be handicapped by another way. Their muscles might be extremely weak because that maximizes the nutrition transferring to brains. If those individuals would have weak muscles, they would not need to feed muscle cells, and all available food can be used in brains.


“Thinkers” would be unable to defend themselves against physical attack, and they would need the “workers” help in any actions. When we are thinking this hypothetical society as the result of brutal genetic engineering, we must say that there are many things, what could make this kind of act of sorting very attractive way to generate the species.


I had sometimes the very dangerous vision of the space station or greenhouse, where those  “thinkers” would live. The greenhouse would first come to my mind because that allows the skin to product D-vitamin. Their skin might be sterilized because that makes them impossible to escape. And here I’m thinking about the situation, that those members of the society would be handicapped because of their weak bodies.


Their heads could be extremely heavy, and the neck would not able to hold them head up, and that would be good for information security. When I’m thinking about the secrets of the government, the persons who make strategies and equipment for the government would be advantageous to be handicapped. Those “thinkers” would need the support from “workers” or they must build robots, what serves them. Even those individuals could be extremely weak, they could operate on the surfaces of planets by using remote-controlled robots.


Landing on the planets is extremely dangerous because there might be microbes, what can be put all crew in danger. The reason for that is no species would not have an immune system, what can fight against organisms, what have different amino acids in their layer. Or maybe some humanoids might have the immune system, what would be fully controlled by their brains, but we don’t yet have contact with those civilizations. But as you see we might use our imagination for creating that hypothesis in our brains.


The handicapped individual doesn’t flee away, and they are easier to control. The problem with society is always that those individuals might step at the front of the car. And that could cause the death of those individuals. If those thinkers would sit in a wheelchair, they can be kept always in control.


But if they were locked in some space station, they would need food from the planet. And their work can be controlled by other members of the community. The space without gravity would make those persons extremely weak, and they would not able to land on the planets because the gravity would kill them. This would be a very effective way to handle information security, and it could be compiled with the methods of some security police-organizations like NKVD and Gestapo.


This method would be effective but totally unethical. And remember that this writing is only the production of images. But maybe in future, we will face the situation, where human race would be separate in two lines. Another line would live on Earth and maybe on some other planets and another would live in giant space stations. The last ones could be physically weak, and they might be different than the people, who live on planets. But this would happen in distant future.

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/maybe-some-civilizations-have-two-kinds.html

What kind of spaceships would the aliens use, if they want to observe us, or we if we want to observe them?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-kind-of-spaceships-would-aliens.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-kind-of-spaceships-would-aliens.html