Open information can be the biggest threat to freedom of speech

NORAD at 80's
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/open-information-can-be-biggest-threat.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is coming new movie about the book named "Fahrenheit 451", and that movie is more actual than ever before. Nowadays technology would allow us filter and manipulate the information unlimited way. And this is the most dangerous thing in the world. The information manipulation, what is targeted to military systems can cause the nuclear war. And this makes the information manipulation so dangerous, or what do you think about the situation, that somebody would put to the NORAD's (North American Air Defense Command)  screens film of the missile attack.


Then the nuclear war and global destruction of the human civilization would knock to the door. In this scenario, hackers would take control the screen of Cheyenne mountain, and that situation causes the launching of the missiles. Above the text, you might see one of the biggest paradox in the information technology. The paradox is that open information would be the biggest threat to freedom of speech. This means that the open information can be used by the way, what increases will of censorship. And this is the very sad thing because the freedom of speech is the key element in the real democracy.


But there is a problem in democracy, and they are persons, who missuses Internet for delivering anger and hate against other people. This kind of action would be delivering violent material or stimulate people to start violent actions against some people, who are against their opinions, and in some cases would the freedom of information allowed, if it supports the leading class people way to see things.


Filtering and changing the things is one of the most dangerous ways to control the information. The law would prohibit the censorship and in theory, the information would be free, but it would be censored or transform by the leading class. This is called as the "hidden censorship". This method means, that there is a couple of service offers for the Internet, and the state or some group of leading party would actually own the companies, what offer data services in the country. The censorship can be explained to the people that filtered information contained only the child pornography, what is of course against ethics of most common people, but when we are thinking the filtering of unwanted information, there could happen those things with legal homepages, what contains uncomfortable information about as an example of the political leaders relationship with the financial world.


After that, the political censorship would be possible, and nobody even knows what happens behind the walls of some telecommunication companies. This means that there is freedom to deliver information, what is supported the leaders of the telecommunication companies, but if the information doesn't serve them, the result would be, that the information would be disturbed by cutting the net in the middle of writing or sending photographs.


And also the homepages would be banned because they are revolting against copyrights. In this hypothesis, the telecommunication companies are the tool to control the state. In this case, the person, who controls the information, controls the nation. Those companies are the best tool for erasing uncomfortable information from the net, and in the worst scenarios the original information would be replaced by other texts or films, and this can be used to get political refugees return to the countries, where they left. There could deliver the false information about the crimes, what that person have made. And there could be faked and manipulated photos, where this person would sit in the front of drugs, and that would give an excuse to deliver that man or woman to that country, what that person has left behind.


This is one scenario, what might be interested some persons in the head of the national security.  Another way is to replace the home page with another one, what is full of weapons and stimulating for political violence. That kind of violence can make censorship possible. In some scenarios, those homepages can use subliminal flashing photos and infrasound commands to activate violent behavior. And that kind of systems might be used for some activists. When those usually young persons have stimulated to violence, that violation can be used to excuse for massive police actions against them.


In some rumors, the pilots, who flew the planes, what strike to World Trade Center and Pentagon were targeted this kind of messages. Those messages could be installed on airplanes by using USB stick, and program, what would deliver those messages by using aircraft loudspeaker- and the computerized avionics. And the meters would start to deliver those flash pictures, what are prohibited in normal marketing. Those techniques were developed for MKULTRA and PHOENIX-programs. And they were effective against enemies. So if those techniques would be programmed to some computer, would it become more dangerous than any tool before.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program

Picture I

https://fsmedia.imgix.net/0b/f1/84/2b/9478/40fb/9b86/5e618413338a/norads-command-center-in-all-its-eighties-glory.jpeg?rect=0%2C0%2C1600%2C800&auto=format%2Ccompress&w=650

Why the Russia is one step before west in information warfare?

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.fi/p/why-russia-is-one-step-before-west-in.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many specialists in the west are concerning the situation, that Russia is a step ahead west in information warfare. And the reason for that is, that offensive part of the warfare has always advantage against the defender. The fight against information warfare is very difficult because that would mean that some homepages would be censored by the government. But there is one very good thing to ask: "How the things went so wrong, that superpowers want to begin the new cold war"? And another question is: "Who wants this situation"?


Why Russians wanted Trump to become The President of the United States of America? And why they gave money to that campaign? Did they believe, that they would not catch for that action? Taking money from other nations is prohibited in the elections all around the World. At the same time, Russian authorities claim that every organization what are talking about Kremlin's official politics would be Western agents.


 Russian way to make propaganda is very clever because the propaganda is targeted to leaders of the state like members of the parliament. Also, that information, what is used in that kind of operations might come from the trusted source. And that would make very difficult to act against that kind of way to work in the political situation. There are two lines to accomplish those operations, and another is the uncover very embarrassing information about the leaders of the nation. One case was Panama, where the western leader's connections to tax evasion companies are uncovered.


And the same time there would be articles, that "real leaders must not tolerate that kind of writings about themselves". At the same time, Russian military shows the new weapons and tells that it would destroy NATO-troops at Baltic states in 15 seconds. Also, Russian actions in international field are very aggressive, and they would very often show their military power. Also the handling the media in Syria is very interesting.


All members of "White helmet" organization are mentioned to be western agents and the connections to western nations are always taken out from the scenery. And in same time Russian authorities deny investigations in that area, where claimed chemical agents were used. At the same time as United Nations Russian foreign minister says that the Russians have evidence, that the poison what was used in poison case in the United Kingdom was made by western laboratories.


But in this case would be very interesting to see the chemical structures of the chemical, what was used in Skirball's case and the "Novichoke", what was made by Russian laboratory, because only that comparison would show does Russian authorities tell true or lies. And this would show, how bad the media handling is in Russia. Also, cyber attacks against other states are not the very nice commercial for Russian policy, if the leaders of that nations want peace. Those supercilious claiming are not very convincing if there would not make third part analyzes of that chemical. But this kind of actions are not stoppable, and the role of defense is only waiting for next move from the attacker.

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.fi/p/why-russia-is-one-step-before-west-in.html

Writing about information warfare

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/writing-about-information-warfare.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/writing-about-information-warfare.html

What propaganda really means?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-propaganda-really-means.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-propaganda-really-means.html