When we think that something is ordinary, that thing can be very extraordinary.

When we think about things like material we might think that is the most common thing in the universe. The fact is that only we see only about 15% of the universe. And 85 % of the material is invisible to us. So if 15% of the material is visible we must realize that the most common thing in the universe is invisible. And the universe what we see is the very extraordinary thing.

If we are transferring this idea to sociology we are facing an illusion. We believe that all people are similar to us. And that thing brings another illusion to our minds. 

We believe that we are common people. If we make some developing works in some company we believe that every worker in the work-life is a developer. There is the possibility that we know only other developers in our workplace. And that thing causes a certain illusion to us. 

If we are members of some MC club we might believe that all people are members of those MC clubs. We think that some Harley Davidson is the most common hobby in the world. So we are forming our social network from people who are similar to us. There is the possibility that some biker knows only other bikers. 

Another thing is that we are selecting our company from people like us. That's the shame. The thing is that this thing makes our environment monotonic. That thing means that there is no room for other opinions. That makes the environment poor. And when we need many different ideas people who are thinking as we think are causing those ideas are turning similar.

Of course, that thing can seem nice. But when we are innovating something there is needed many different ideas. If every person has the same ideas. That makes the idea of the meeting one-sided. The idea in innovation meetings is to develop new things. And in that process, the focus should be on clients. The users of the application make their choice. They buy the product. And that means there should be a representative of the potential customers in the development team. 

Because we are all similar people in our workplace, we forget who we are creating things. The most common mistake in that process is we are starting to make the product for ourselves. We forget the point of view of the user. When adults are making toys as an example. They are making toys from the point of view of adults. 

They believe that children are mini-size adults. And when adults like something, children like that thing too. Same way when people are developing the things like mobile telephones and something like that. They sometimes forget the conditions where the user uses those products. 

When the person makes things like user interfaces they forget one thing. The developer who is working with that kind of thing certainly finds the right things at the right moment. For the person who is made those user interfaces is easy to find things. Especially when our person is sitting at laboratory or office everything goes right. But have you ever been in a situation where you must buy a bus ticket one minute before the bus is coming in rainy or freezing weather?

The thing is that when the ICT developers are making their job they sometimes forget so-called ordinary people. Their customers might be highly trained people like medical doctors and lawyers. 

Those people can be the most well-educated persons in the world. But they are not ICT specialists. And there is the possibility that when we must find some application in rainy and dark weather, we are in a different situation than the person who tests those things in laboratories. 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The non-random DNA sequence is telling about eugenics.

Natural selection is the thing that is the key element in evolution. The idea is that the DNA sequences are transforming randomly. But when we are going back to the story of evolution. We must understand that also the environment is aiming for the mutations of the DNA. If the environment is black that thing benefits the black species and dark forms of the things like insects. 

If the insects are dark and the environment is bright that makes the insect a good target for predators. The thing can go so far that all dark insects are eaten. And only remaining things are insects that have a blond pigment. If there is no place to hide. That thing removes the entire dark genome from the environment. 

But things like the Olympic games in ancient Greece had a purpose. That purpose was to select the most capable individuals for the service of the kings. And of course. Most cable women were meant for the spouses of the most capable men in society. 

The non-random DNA sequences are against the evolutional principle. But they are proving the thing called eugenics. When we are thinking about inheritance. Even the ancient Greeks might notice that the children of good warriors and good sportsmen would be also good warriors and good sportsmen. Eugenics or breeding the race is the thing that is the well-known thing in history. In so-called pure-line breeding, the creatures. Like horses will be put to make descendants with their siblings. And that will highlight certain attributes of those creatures. 

In that process will create two pure lines of genetic material. So if we want to make black tulips we must make the genetic line where are only blue tulips. Then we can pollinate that line only by using blue tulips. That thing will highlight the blue color. Until the result is the black tulip. 

Pure line genetic engineering means. That researchers are choosing the feature that they want to highlight. 

But when we are thinking about people who lived before ancient Greeks those people must know some kind of eugenics. The thing is that the natural selection and environment caused the cavemen and cavewomen to choose their spouses by highlighting their ability to survive and get nutrients. Maybe the respect for the old people is coming from the age before the first cities. 

Old age meant that the person can survive. In the conditions of the ice age. And if the people would get children with those old people they would get the same abilities as those old people. Maybe the thing that the people who were handy and effective hunters got children who were also handy and effective hunters noticed accidentally. But those skills like the skill to make good arrows and axes guaranteed that the person would live a long and good life. 

When we are talking about creationism we should determine that word. Creating the person might mean that somebody has controlled the bloodline. And search the spouses who also were capable. But creating somebody might simply mean that some person would teach some skills to a younger person. People like Samurai or other warriors had the phrase. That their trainer or educator created them. Those trainers are the people who gave them skills to their students. 

https://www.livescience.com/non-random-dna-mutations

Image:https://scitechdaily.com/what-makes-us-human-the-answer-may-be-found-in-overlooked-junk-dna/