Donald Trump meets Kim Jong Un, so the mind is changed and the meeting will be done

COBRA DANE Early warning radar in Alaska
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Donald Trump meets Kim Jon-Un at Singapore and that means the mind has been changed on both side of the telephone line between Washington and Pyongyang. This also marks that people in the world are realizing, how expensive and the powerful weapon is the nuclear bomb. This meeting is the sign, that people of the world want peace, and one of the most important steps in the stable peace in Korean peninsula would be stopping the war between Koreas officially and write the peace contract between those nations.


This is the road, that could make something good for that area, and also that would help to begin the weapon disarming around the world. The international politics is the very complicated thing, and when we are talking about peace contracts, we would say that they are the good beginning in the real peace. But as we know, there would be some problems with this kind of meeting. The reality is, that the full-scale war between Koreas is the very bad thing and this could cost millions of lives on both sides. If North Korea would stand alone, we know, who would win that conflict, but the price in humanity and economical aspect would be horrible.


Nuclear conflicts are the very complicated thing, and if some other nuclear-powered state would involve that conflict, would the situation turn very dramatic, and conflict would send the world to global nuclear conflict, where would be billions of dead people.  Nobody doesn't want to use nukes in that area, but if the conflict would grow to open war, there would be the situation, that somebody wants to break the situation by using nuclear force, and then the counterstrike would be made by using nuclear weapons. And if some other nuclear state would come to support North Korea, are the ingredients ready for global nuclear war. This is why the peace contract in that area would be very important.


The situation in the Korean peninsula is similar than in 1980's Between India and Pakistan. In that time were spoken that this area would go to so-called limited nuclear warfare if those nations would go to war against together. In that scenario, those nations would have the only couple of bombs, but the problem with nuclear weapons is, that they are so powerful destructors. And if the defense against those weapons would not work, the results will be devastating. In the Persian Gulf, United States destroyer got hit by Exocet missile, and that made strategist think the situation that some nuclear missile or fighter, what carries nuclear bomb would pass the defense of some battlegroup, and this might cause the destruction of all group of ships.


And the problem in the defense against nuclear weapons is, that it should not fail a single time. Nobody wants to test those weapons in the real situation against real nuclear bombers or missiles, what is coming from the skies. In that time, the time for the reaction would be very short, and there would be many mistakes, that could be done. When nuclear missile would come against some target, are the members of the defense system in the most stressful situation, what people can imagine. In that situation, the counterstrike and anti-missile operation would fail.

Sources:

https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-today-06-01-18/h_93c4d23f42662913cf11e72ed2979df7

http://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/803875/cobra-dane-team-moves-forward-with-radars-sustainment-plan/

Picture I

https://media.defense.gov/2013/Apr/05/2000061219/-1/-1/0/130325-F-ZZ999-006.JPG

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

The problematic relationships between the East and West

Picture I

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many problems in the relationships between the East and West, as we have seen in the case when meeting with the President of the United States and North Korea have been delayed.  That kind of meetings would seem very nice and necessary thing to get the peace in the world. But the problem of those relationships are the prison camps, what is found in every eastern block states, and there are many persons, who believe, that if talking between Western states and North Korea will continue, that would be signal, that we would accept those prison camps. The problem with the secret prison camps in the communist states is that they are used to make products for public marketing, and the work inside those camps is actually free. That's why the production in those countries is very cheap.


And in those camps have made many crimes against humanity, what makes them problematic for the governments of the Eastern block. If those prison camps would be opened, and prisoners would send free, also the normal people would know, what happened in those camps after the Korean and Vietnam war. Many people, who live in the west know the existence of those secret camps of the government, where the enemies of the state would be closed. The existence of political prisoners is actually very well known thing, but the use of those prisoners in the production of the commercial merchandise is a thing, what is not very well known.


Those prisoners make skirts and jeans even for public markets, and that production is so-called "moralistically suspicious". The principles of the western democracies, in their relationship for work, is that worker must get reasonable payment for the job, and the worker should live with that money. And slave working is strictly prohibited in Europe. Slavery is the crime against humanity and many concentration camp guards were convicted of this crime. This term consists of the separation of the workers, isolation because of political or religious opinions and unrating other persons work, and making the work in dangerous conditions without necessary protection.


And of course, extortion, killing, and humiliation are crimes against humanity. When we are going back to this delayed meeting, we must say, that in the history of this nuclear crises, North Korea has shown many times, what kind of trust other nations should give to that state. The North Korean government made nuclear weapons even it was made in the contract, to stop the developing nuclear weapons it still made those hydrogen bombs. And shooting missiles over Japan in the tests is the very good way to show, how much peace North Korea wants. Those tests are the very good way to alleviate excitement in that area.


The nuclear weapon is the very problematic thing for the leaders of North Korea. Those weapons are the good shield for them, but if somebody wants to destroy the capital of that state with the nuclear bomb, would it now be possible. The nuclear weapons are also good excuse to avoid military conflict with that nation, and that's why it's also good for Western countries, which have willingly given information of the human right condition in that country. North Korean nuclear weapons are not sharp enough to destroy command bunkers and other support systems of the United States, but it can make damages to cities and other civilian targets. The North Korean government need foreign enemies, because of the threat of the foreign nuclear states would keep it citizens restless. And of course, in the very desperate situation, where the army of North Korea would become rebellious, would the leaders of that state shoot the missiles to the USA, because they would want that USA would attack to that state by using nuclear forces.


And that would cause the counter strike immediately. But as we know, North Korea would start the war in the situation, that somebody tries to murder Kim Jong Un with SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition). The material for that weapon could be stolen from the nuclear projects, and then this weapon could be exploded near the government buildings in Pyongyang. In some scenario, some technicians "forget" to remove the warhead before missile would be sent to parade, and then explode it in the middle of Pyongyang. Also, those missiles or their stages can be used as the FAE (Fuel Air Explosive) -bombs, if they are using liquid fuel, and in this case, the detonators would be connected to the tanks of the missiles. Solid fuel rockets can also use as the bombs, by exploding the stages in those parades. This type of weapon could be installed in the trunk of some vehicle and slip it in that closed area, and in this case, the leaders of that state would think that they are under attack by the foreign state. And in that situation, the North Korean government would start the nuclear war against USA and South-Korea.

Sources:

Picture I

https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/img/editorial/2016/09/20/103953633-RTS40TN.530x298.jpg?v=1485364828


https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

What is the problem with the meeting between Trump and Kim Jong-Un?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-meeting-between.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many people, who hope that new era of relationship between North Korea and the United States would begin. But what is the problem with the relationship between those countries? The problem is, that they are both victims of their own propaganda. The leaders of those nations have demonized the opponent so long, that coming to the same table and talk about the things would be difficult both of the nations, and the smallest of the problems is not the human right situation in North Korea.

The leaders of the United States have always mentioned the human rights and citizen freedom for the reason to begin global military operations. And the situation, where the North Korean government wants that the United States would begin the nuclear disarming is, of course, absurd because for the United States would North Korea be only one of the potential enemies, what have Nuclear strike capacity. But this situation that North Korea is an opposite of the United States is quite stressing because North Korea has broken against human rights and international law, by making assassinations on other countries territory, kidnapping Japanese people and keeping concentration camps.

Those things are very uncomfortable because also the United States have made similar actions during Korean and Vietnam war. But as we know opposite side is easy to convict as criminals, if we self-have something to explain. And when we are thinking about military industry, the products of those companies would sell better, if there are some conflicts to find. The sums of money what is moving in the high-tech military industry are not small. This means that also North Korea wants to sell it's military and space technology to other nations. Also launching the satellites by using North Korean rockets would bring money to that country, and maybe Kim Jong-Un wants to sell those services to other nations.

And also selling missiles or other military hardware to some African countries would bring money for that small country. The problem is that there are limitations of selling weapons to Africa, where the human right situation is worse than North Korea. This kind of things brings money and gives supports the power of the dynasty of the communistic party in that closed nation. And this would make this thing very complicating. We can only hope that situation would become normal. Or how we could say, ending the worlds longest war situation what means peace treaty between North and South Korea.

But in real life, the real trust between those nations would raise just after the North would start the democratization process, and this would mean, that Kim's family would lose its power in that land. And I think that they would not accept the situation, that those people would become normal people. That's why they need foreign enemies to keep the nation scary, and turning eyes of their own life, what is full of luxuries and benefits, what normal people cannot even think about.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-meeting-between.html

The international community have very bad problems with authoritative governments

(Picture I)

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/the-international-community-have-very.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

North-Korea and it's relationship to other world are always been problematic. And now the leader of that country have shown, that problems are not over yet. This small country has shown again that they are capable of surprising maneuvers in international area in the very short period, and now the top meeting between the leaders of the North-Korea and the United States have been treated because South-Korea and United States have had military exercise together. This is very well known act from the North-Korea's leader, because of those persons.


They are trying to blackmail other countries by delaying the meetings, and of course, the trust between other nations and the North-Korea is not very good. Even if some contracts can be made, the North-Korean way has been, that they would speak other and do other. That states nuclear program is the very good example of that. North Korean government undersign the treaty, that they would not make nuclear weapons, and after that, they just dug the tunnels to that nuclear plant and continued the project.


The North-Korean way to think that single person doesn't mean anything is the very bad thing, and sometimes I have thought, how many deaths that nuclear program has caused in that country? Or did they actually care about safety instructions, what are given for work with radioactive material? When we are thinking about the complicated relationship with North Korean government and the international community, we must say that is quite complicated. The reason for that is otherwise that state has many very bad human rights problems and loss of food is the big problem in that country, but their leaders live in the middle of outstanding luxury.


Also, political arrests and sending people to prison camps for rest of their life for crimes like looking western television or visiting foreign homepages is quite common. Otherwise, that is independent, what have it's own rights. And this makes the relations with this country very problematic. The western world should show to others, that this kind of way to rule the nation is not tolerable. But otherwise many western leaders would accept silently the occupation of Gaza. And this is also very complicated situation because Palestinians are of course right to want better treatment, but sometimes there is nobody in the Middle-East who is really interested their position.


When we are talking about Palestinian refugee camps those people have kept in there because of political reasons, that some Arab leaders could use them to turn their own people eyes of their authoritative way to rule the countries. And because of that Israel has allowed occupying the Gaza area. That has caused riots suffering and deaths in that area and the major threat in the eyes of the Israeli government is that if they would give independence to Gaza, would that slip to rule under radical Islamist government.


When we are thinking about the situation in the Gaza area, we must know that there is a quite democratic actor in the opponent. Also, the Internet have opened the scenes of that area and the violence between Palestinians and Israel like shooting unarmed protesters in the middle of normal western people live, but then we can think how many people have died in that area before the Internet, and could the shooters, who targeted the fire to protesters continue their careers in some governmental organizations? But then we must know that in many Arab nations Palestinians doesn't have even id-papers, and in officially they are not even existed.


That means that those people could be murdered and nobody ever asked, what happened as example Palestinians, who were rioted against the Syrian army in 1980's. When we are returning to North-Korea, could we even know about the prison camps in that country? Same way we can ask, would the situation in Gaza or Syria kept off the public eye if there would be no Internet? Those are good questions for thinking when we next time look at the situation in Gaza, Syria or North-Korea. Or would they just keep out of TV with comments that there have been disorders in some area, and the army has taken the situation under the control?

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/pohjois-korea-huipputapaaminen-uhattuna/6910762

Picture I
https://statetalks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/totalitarianism.jpg

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/the-international-community-have-very.html

Why North Korea wants to talk with the west?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/why-north-korea-wants-to-talk-with-west.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why Kim Jong Un wants to talk with western world is a question, what is interesting about many people in the East and West. One thing what might make that leader interested to talk with the western world might be that the government of North Korea would notice, that the war might cause military take over or rebellion in that land. Another thing might be those leaders have been understood, that the nuclear strike to other nation would cause nuclear war. And that would be the end of North Korean infrastructure even if those nukes would destroy some cities in the United States.


Those attacks would cause revenge strikes to North Korea and those revenge would cause many deaths in that country, including many members of that government. But there could be one reason, what made the leader of that closed country start talking with the West. That reason could be that North Korean nuclear weapons would not act as they should in the war. Of course, those weapons could destroy civilian targets, but are they sharp enough to destroy military infrastructure like command bunkers and missile silos, what has the key role in the nuclear strike.


And the question is, how many warheads, and how ready to use the North Korean nuclear arsenal is? If those weapons were not tested properly, they might have malfunctions, and if the explosive segments would not work precisely right time, would the effect of nuclear explosion leave much weaker, than predicted or in some cases, those nukes would not even explode. And of course, the war might cause very bad damages for both sides infrastructure and the human sacrifices could be very large scale. And if 50% of people on both side of the war in Korea would die in that conflict, could that be too much even for that leader of North Korea.


https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/miksi-pohjois-korea-on-yhtakkia-kiinnostunut-neuvottelemaan-kolme-teoriaa-kim-jong-unin-aikeista/6876616#gs.gC49Trg

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/why-north-korea-wants-to-talk-with-west.html

The silence of war, democracy, and international politics

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-silence-of-war-democracy-and.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-silence-of-war-democracy-and.html

Why will North-Korean ghost ships drift to the coast of Japan?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/why-will-north-korean-ghost-ships-drift.html

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/why-will-north-korean-ghost-ships-drift.html