The neuron densities in the cortex area follow a consistent distribution pattern.

   The neuron densities in the cortex area follow a consistent distribution pattern.

The consistent distribution pattern, or Gaussian pattern, is the key element of modern mathematics. The consistent distribution model of neuron distribution in the cortex determines everything our brain can do. The cortex is the key element in productive thinking. And the distribution of cell types determines what our cortex can do. Some skills that neurons have are determined by their genomes.

Researchers have noticed that fruit flies have extraordinary numerical abilities. That thing means that the DNA determines what skills neurons have. All neurons are not similar. And when we are learning something, we transport that information to our neurons.

But then all of us realized that we don't learn all skills in the same way. Some of us learn math easily, but things like languages are harder to learn. And that means we are learning things differently. That thing causes the idea that we can teach any skill to our neurons, but some neurons receive some skills more easily than others. 

"Neuron densities in cortical areas in the mammalian brain follow a consistent distribution pattern. This finding that has profound implications for brain modeling and the development of brain-inspired technologies. Credit: Morales-Gregorio" (ScitechDaily/Mind-Blown: Mathematical Rule Discovered Behind the Distribution of Neurons in Our Brains)

What if we have only one neuron type in our cortex? What if we only have "math neurons" or musical neurons in our cortex? Could that thing cause the phenomenon called "savant"? 

That means some neurons are "math neurons" because they receive mathematical information better than others. Some neurons are "musical neurons" because they learn or receive information that is required for music. 

If we think that we have math neurons, linguistic neurons, and drawing neurons, we might uncover the mystery of the Savant. What if a person has only math neurons? Or what if we only have musical neurons? 

Neuron-type distribution in the cortex might uncover things like autism and savants. A savant is a person who is very good in a very narrow skill area, like math or drawing. But otherwise, those people might have no other skills at all. That leads to the idea that maybe the reason for Savant is that there is only one kind of neuron in the cortex. In that case, extraordinary distribution in neuron types causes a situation where a person has one extraordinary but very narrow skill. 

https://scitechdaily.com/does-a-childs-math-skills-have-a-genetic-basis/

https://scitechdaily.com/mind-blown-mathematical-rule-discovered-behind-the-distribution-of-neurons-in-our-brains/?expand_article=1

https://scitechdaily.com/perceiving-quantities-fruit-flies-astonishing-numerical-abilities/

Is the reason for autism that there are "too many" certain type neurons in the human brain?

The math neurons are causing a question: is autism an anomaly about neuron groups that control certain skills. If the neuron group that is controlling mathematics skills is too dominating. That means there are fewer neurons for handling some other skills.

The discoveries like math cells in human brains are leading neurologists to track the origin of autism. The savant autism and math-cells are causing an idea that maybe autism is the disorder. In the relation in cell groups in human brains. The specialized neuron group is controlling every single skill that person has. That means there are "math neurons", "language neurons", "musical neurons", etc.

 And if there are "too many" neurons that are controlling some skill. That means there are fewer neurons that are controlling some other skill. Even if we have 300 billion neurons in the human brain every single neuron is responsible in its area. And every single neuron has the area where it's best. So that means autism can be an anomaly in the relations of the neurons that control certain skills. 

There is made new research about autism. And one sad thing that is seen. Is that sometimes undiagnosed autism is the thing. That is driven a person to suicide. This thing is reasonable because autism causes problems with social relationships. The need to be social is the thing that causes sad things. And I certainly hope that nobody must die because society wants them to be "normal". 

Modern society benefits good social skills, and that means a person, who has autism must always force and drive themselves to social contacts. Being different than others causes. Other people would start to show them with thumps. And being different means fear of being closed out from social relationships. 

Why people would not get autism diagnoses? The problem is that autism is the diagnosis that is stamped as "mental". This means that autism causes thoughts that this diagnosis has caused that person would kick out of school. 

Autism is a problem with social communication. And that means the autistic person must use more energy in social relationships than the so-called "normal" person. The problem is that society is benefiting so-called "normal" people who are social. And if there is some kind of anomalies in behavior. That means the person is "weird". And especially at a young age, that kind of thing is a catastrophe. 

This means that person would need more energy for creating social relationships. And that thing will bring extra pressure in the life. If the person must always concentrate on behavior and force being social. That thing can drive that person to self-destruction. And that thing is sad to read. 

So is autism the anomaly in the relations of the specific neurons that are controlling certain skills? 

Autism is one of the things that are not researched very well. Things like savant where the person has extraordinary skills in the very thin sector are causing the question, why some person can make the computer program or play some composition. But they cannot make things like cooking potatoes. There is no certain skill that savant autists have. 

Savant-autists might be extraordinarily talented music players. Or they might be extraordinarily talented mathematicians. That thing means that there is might be too many neurons. Those are needed for controlling some special skills. Researchers found so-called math cells in human brains. So there must be "music cells" and "language cells" and "computer programmer cells". 

The new findings like the math-cells in the human brain are causing theories that maybe autism is the disorder in the specialization of neurons. When we are looking at savant-autistic people we sometimes see extraordinary mathematical skills. And that thing means. That there is a possibility. That too many math cell is in their neural structure. So that means autism would be the disorder in the specialization process of the neurons. 

https://scitechdaily.com/high-rate-of-possible-undiagnosed-autism-discovered-in-people-who-died-by-suicide/

https://scitechdaily.com/specific-math-neurons-identified-in-the-brain/

https://scitechdaily.com/new-clues-to-autism-mystery-different-risk-genes-with-same-effects-on-brain-development/

https://scitechdaily.com/treatment-in-early-life-prevents-autism-symptoms-from-developing-in-mice/

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Crystal skulls, annihilation and artificial brains

This text is not handing morals and ethics about the use of the cloned neurons in computers. Those things are the thing that is different from technical solutions. So the law books are the thing that limits this kind of thing. 

The reason why the researchers are interested in the use of cloned neurons is clear. For making more powerful computers the cloned neurons are the ultimate tool. Human brains use 20 watts of electricity and they are much powerful than any known computer. The reason why the cloned neurons are causing problems is that they have their own will. And the second thing is that the cloned neurons are problematic in the point of view of memory handling. Memory handling means that the memories of the neurons cannot remove.

The modern bio- and life support technology can make the modern crystal skull-looking biological computer possible. So are those artifacts attempt to talk with the dead? If somebody steals a corpse for that kind of test that brings prosecution

Maybe the next part of this text is science fiction. But even if the famous crystal skull of the British museum is made to store the dead people's brain waves. In that case, brains will be put in the skull. And then the electricity is put to travel through that tissue. Then it will be stored to record. The fact is that even if that strange artifact could be fake, its purpose could be serious. 

The electricity of the brain the EEG can store to the tape. And then transmit to the brains of other people. But I don't know if this thing is possible to use by using dead brain tissue. The EEG can store easily during the EEG tests. Then that thing can be played by using the record player. 

But the cloned neurons and modern equipment make it possible to create cloned brains. Or in some ideas, the crystal skull can use for making "human robots". In those ideas, the pineal gland of the person would be put in the crystal skull. And the electric signals will send through that organ to the crystal skull. But the thing is that this kind of writings might seem non-scientific. 

And the fact is that there have been made many experiments during history that were not successful. The occultists and other groups made many things that were illegal or against morals. They stole corpses and bones from cemeteries and made many things that are causing imprisonment or even sending them to mental hospitals. 

When the cloned neurons are finishing their mission their memories should remove.  And that is the problem with the "living" or biological computers.  But there has been introduced an idea of the modern "crystal skull". In the chamber will make the artificial brains by using cloned neurons. 

And then that structure will connect to the platform and the decoding system by using neck nerves. Then data will download to the brain structure by using brain-core stimulation. And then the data will put to travel through the brain cells. That thing means that the system will act as the biocomputer. And the heart-lung machine can deliver nutrients for those cells. 

What if the crystal skulls were an attempt to talk with the dead? Or are they more frightening things?

By the way, the tale about the 12 crystal skulls that can destroy the world can be true even if those crystal skulls were fake. There is the possibility that to the eyes of the skull is put the leaf gold. And then the high energetic cathode ray will aim at those eyes. The system might work that behind the skulls is put a magnet and then the cathode ray will strike to leaf gold. That thing can use natural electricity. And if the lightning strikes through the leaf gold layer that can cause an annihilation reaction.

If those artifacts were fakes made for some occultists in the late 19th century. That is not a guarantee that the purpose of those merchandise is legal. There is the possibility that the occultists wanted to "steal" memories of the dead. And then they made those crystal skulls and then put brains in those systems. Then they could conduct the electricity to that thing. And after that, because they were afraid of authorities they took those crystal skulls to the jungle. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skull

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The plant intelligence, and the abilities, what it can give to us

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are scientists, who believe that plants have some kind of intelligence, and they would communicate with the similar chemicals what neurons use to communicate together. In this scenario, the plants would change information about the threats. The problem with that communication is, that it happens with chemicals, what makes difficult to translate it. But if we sometimes can do that, would that open change to make extraordinary and more sophisticated sensors, what the human could ever imagine.


Those systems could probably communicate someday with plants, and use them as biosensors. The proof about this communication would be that sometimes we have heard that the plants would grow better if the people talks to them. In that case, for the growing plants can give the very natural explanation. They grow better because of the carbon dioxide, what comes from the mouth of the speaker would stimulate the photosynthesis and forming the sugars.


But when we are thinking about the forming of the chemicals, what the plants are using to communicate, I didn't find any information about that. In fact, there is very little information about the communication between plants, but if the chemical communication system would be true, that thing could revolutionize the information technology, and open the road to the most awesome method to make extremely high powerful computer system. In this system, the computer would communicate with those plants, like corn by using chemical communication, what bases the synthetic arbiter chemical.


In this communication, the computer would be connected to the similar gas detectors, what are using in the chemical warfare protective systems. And in theory, the similar system can allow that the computer could communicate with those plants. But if we would put this system in practice, we must open that chemical communication code, and then we could create two layer computer system. The upper layer would be the computer, what could be used for so-called fast computing, but the downed layer, where the plants are can be used as the slow computing. But when we want to create this kind of computing system, with intelligent corn Plantagenet.


And if we could communicate with plants, we could create the warning system, what can detect any threat in the world. When scientists would try to break the chemical messages between plants, they use the methodology, where the plants are damaged, and then the detector would be used to analyze those chemicals, what are released in that process. If the chemical code can be open, that thing can be used to create the biological warning systems. In some theories, the plants can identify the threat, what is facing them.


Those things might be the technology of tomorrow, where the plants and animals can communicate with people when there would be computerized decoders with loudspeakers and some parts of the animal communication can be emulated by the human. In those cases, the signals of the animals like orcas are recorded, and the sensors will follow the behavior of those whales. That makes possible to communicate with animals, and in some cases give them some orders.


If after some signal the group would start to flee, that signal can play them if there is some kind of volcano eruption on the bottom of the sea, that the group must flee the area. And maybe in some day some of those animals can equip with EEG-transmitters, what would follow the actions on brain core and then the scientists can compile those signals with the behavior of that animal. That can open us the gate to the world of the animals and give us the new way to communicate with them.

Thoughts about the book named "The Borrowers"

(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is writing about fictional, small size human-style organisms. I mean, that maybe some aliens, what life in other planets would be very small size, and in same time something brought my mind the book, what was read to me at the childhood.  Ata, strange Chilean mummy, brought one book in my mind. The book for children is written by Mary Norton, and its name is "The Borrowers". This is the very nice book for children if you wish to read it, and it would be found in the local library.


The book was published in Great Britain, and it was published in 1952, That is the story about the Clock family, what was consisted of four characters, Pod, Homily, Arrietty and Peagreen Clock, who were the extremely small human style fictional aliens or characters, that was the size of the thumb, what were created by Mary Norton. Those small characters were not stolen people property, they just hide that thing. And I have sometimes thought, that could some strange mummies like Ata made the influence of those characters.


Mary Norton made actually six books, where those small characters are adventuring. and the last one has been written in 1982. These book series were read to me when I was the child, and I sometimes thought that there could be very small, human style intelligent characters somewhere, and there are many myths and legends about "small people", who live somewhere, where light ever is shown.  Those "small people" are in the same category with pixies and gnomes. There are many folk stories about those strange characters, who are sitting on the mushrooms, and in some stories, gnomes would look, when pixies were dancing in the middle of mushroom circles.


Those circles, of course, feed the imagination of the people, because of the mushrooms bought in mind the seats, where some very small character would sit and follow the show. When we are thinking the physical and biological aspect of those mythical characters, we would mention, that the number of the neurons is not made any species intelligent. Another thing what makes species intelligent is the number of connections between those neurons. And of course, the size of neurons is the very remarkable thing. And if the neurons would be the very small size or they could have many connections, would even small size alien or creature be intelligent.


When we are thinking about the number of neurons, what would have very much connections, we must face the truth, that the bugs have very effectively working brains, and they do more things than us by using single neuron. So if those fictional "Borrowers" would have small brain cells and they would be connected same way as the bug's neurons, the result would be the intelligent character. But this is only thoughts about one child's book, what is written the long time ago.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Borrowers

Picture I

https://www.scholastic.com/content5/media/products/03/9780439325103_mres.jpg