Beyond the standard model and curving spacetime
Image 1:
The splitting photon along with the Muon G-2 anomaly caused a situation. Re-estimation of the entire standard model of particle physics is needed. The question is that what if the photon is not an elementary particle? The photon or every other elementary particle can be superpositioned. But they cannot split in two. What if the photon is some kind of meson? And that thing causes another thought. What if there are some other particles like quarks that involve other particles.
The thing is that we should look for the particles that are connecting the photons. Like gluons are connecting quarks. So is the particle that makes photon stay in one piece some very small and very energetic particle that looks like gluon. The splitting photons are giving a tip that the Majorana-particle exists.
But could that mysterious "Majorana Particle" or "Majorana fermion" actually be a hadronic boson? Could it be possible that some Fermions are bosons?
And could that "Majorana Boson" be the graviton. Graviton is the hypothetical transportation particle that transports gravitation. So if the graviton is the thing that keeps the photon together. It should be a very small, and at the same time high energetic particle.
The thing that photons are splitting means they cannot be elementary particles. The elementary particles are not splitting. The term elementary particle means that there are no other particles in it. But if even a photon is not an elementary particle. That means that there might be some other particles that are just believed to be elementary particles. But they involve something smaller particles.
So could there be other yet unknown particles inside quarks and even gluons? Or is it possible that we don't know any real elementary particles? There is predicted an exotic six-quark particle by using supercomputers. But is it possible that there are super protons or super neutrons where are seven or more quarks? But are there sub-structures also in the quarks? understanding the interactions of particles and gravitation are required for making TOE(Theory of Everything).
Image 2:
x-x-x-x-x--x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
Is gravitation some kind of superposition?
The main question about gravitation is could the graviton exist? And the second thing is is it pulling or pushing force? And one of the questions is: could the gravitation be some kind of superposition effect. The idea is that the hypothetical gravitons are forming the strings between each other. And those strings are pulling or pushing the gravitons to each other. That graviton-connected string starts travel from the higher energetic object to the lower energetic object.
Then those strings which are are wave-movement or energy start to pull those gravitons together. So the gravitation would be the wave movement that travels from the higher energetic area to the lower energetic area. Like all other forms of energy. The question is: does the gravitation travel the opposite way against the flow of those hypothetical gravitational strings.
x-x-x-x-x--x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-
Image 3:
Curvature of spacetime
Measurements of the curving spacetime are the thing that is used to confirm Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. There have not been found errors. And that is the evidence of the extraordinary well-documented theory. The Theory of Special Relativity is the thing that can use in a straight universe. But the Theory of General Relativity is suitable for curving spacetime.
When we are thinking about the curvature of spacetime in the 3D environment we must realize the thing that the curving spacetime is curving all around the object. So the rubber levels and iron balls are not helping us in modeling that phenomenon.
When we are thinking that curving space around the massive object has the ball form. We should think that space is getting shorter in that area. The thing is that modeling the curvature in a 3D environment is very difficult. So when the object is curving spacetime we should think that there is a ball-looking pit in the spacetime. So the curvature of spacetime around the 3D object is more like a tunnel than the pit.
The Brane theory is one of the things that can model the curving spacetime in a 3D environment. The branes or layers are surrounding the gravitational center at a 360 degrees angle. And those layers are also surrounding the central object of gravitation from all directions. That theory is created for modeling the gravitation effect. But the problem is that researchers can just model the gravitational interaction between one layer and the gravitational center.
The problem is that there might be one common gravitational center in the area. But there are also sub-centers. As an example, Sagittarius A is the gravitational center of the Milky Way but the local gravitational center in our solar system is the Sun. And if we increase accuracy the Earth is the gravitational center for the moon etc.
The problem is that the gravitational center is not only a black hole or some other most massive object in the area. Every single object is turning gravitational center if we are using high-enough resolution. If we are using high enough accuracy.
Even a single electron is turning to a gravitational center if the zoom is high enough. And the gravitation is interaction. That means there is no straight universe at all. If we use high-enough resolution. And at that point, I must say that every gravitational center is acting the same way. But the pit that the gravitation is making is always depending on how powerful gravitation is. The black holes are extreme objects, but also other objects are curving spacetime.
The gravitational interaction curves spacetime also around other objects than just the gravitational center.
Above is the image of the curvature spacetime. There are three objects the Sun, the moon, and Earth. The gravitation of the Sun pulls Earth to the Sun. But the centripetal force keeps it at the trajectory. And then the moon is also pushing energy to the Earth.
When the moon is orbiting the Earth. The direction of its gravitation effect changes. When the Moon is at the side of the Sun it pulls Earth stronger than when it's at another side. Also, the side-movement is chancing the energy transportation.
And then that thing is pumping energy to the Earth. But the thing that makes energy transportation and modeling difficult is that gravitation and energy transportation is interaction. This means that energy travels also from Earth to the Moon.
Also, things like gravitational waves are the thing that transmits energy. Maybe gravitational waves have no big effect in large systems. But they can affect microgravitational systems. And if the gravitational waves affect billions of years. They might cause some even large-scale effects.
Sources:
https://muon-g-2.fnal.gov/
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2301876-photons-could-be-split-in-two-to-create-a-weird-new-form-of-light/
https://phys.org/news/2021-12-exotic-six-quark-particle-supercomputers.html
https://scitechdaily.com/split-photons-new-research-predicts-the-existence-of-a-previously-unimaginable-particle/
https://www.techexplorist.com/new-groundbreaking-technique-reveals-new-details-long-theorized-fifth-force-nature/41165/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curved_space
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particle
https://www.zmescience.com/science/physicists-claim-that-a-photon-can-be-split-into-halves/
Image 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
Image 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model
Image 3: https://forum.babylonjs.com/t/general-relativity-simulation-of-spacetime-curvature-due-to-mass/10731
https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/
Comments
Post a Comment