Birds have the mysterious quantum sense that makes them see the magnetic fields.

Birds have the mysterious quantum sense that allows them to "see" the Earth's magnetic field. That thing means that the magnetic sense of the bird is connected with the sense of sight. The ability to see magnetic fields causes of course the idea that the birds can see the things like the nervous signals of another animal. 

And help them to predict what predators or prey are going to do. The ability to see the nervous signals makes birds the telepaths who can predict things that other animals are going to do. But proving that thing requires more research. And for confirming that claim requires that the distance that this quantum sense can feel magnetic field. Will be measured. 

The magnetic sense is not unique in the world of animals. But if it is connected to the visual lobe of the brains of the birds that thing means that it has something else to do than just navigate the bird. The thing is that the birds can see magnetic fields is interesting. The sense is enough for navigation and the thing that would be interesting is that it is giving the visual sight. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/birds-have-a-mysterious-quantum-sense-and-scientists-have-seen-it-in-action

Does the skull of chaffinch in the mouth of a young girl have something to do with this sense?

The next part is speculation. Does the skull of chaffinch in the mouth of a young girl have something to do with this sense? The people who buried the young girl in Poland in the cave head of the bird in mouth c. 1650. Might believe the head of that bird. Which was Peipo (chaffinch) will fly her spirit to a home. 

In some wilder vision, the girl was the "human-robot". The person who was kept in sensory adaptation and the idea was to use the bird's head as an antenna. That transmits the electric phenomenon of other people to the brains of that girl. This thing is speculation. And I think that I'm wrong but it's an interesting point for that thing. 

The thing is that the persons who buried that girl might make that ritual under the supervision of the priests. Or they could dig the body up from the grave and transfer it to the cave.

The quantum sense is giving a strange idea. Does the strange case where a young girl buried in Poland the Peipo's skull in the mouth. Some kind of connection with this strange sense? This is speculation and probably that skull meant for sending the spirit of that girl home. 

https://newsfounded.com/finlandeng/peipos-skull-buried-in-a-girls-mouth-was-admired-in-poland-archaeologists-estimate-that-the-girl-had-finnish-background-abroad/

I have written about this case in Finnish.

https://yhteisojahistoria.blogspot.com/p/oudosti-haudattu-tytto-joka-on-loytynyt.html

Image:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Songbird

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Who found America part II?

The image I: Leif Erikson's statue in Boston

The founder of America is a mystery. But we know that Cristopher Columbus (1451-1506) was not the first European in America.  Neanderthal people traveled to the North America by following the isthmus that connected North America to Asia. When we are talking about the pre-Columbian journeys to America, we must realize two things. 

1) The journey to America is not the same as the regular journeys. Maybe some pirates visited New World a long time before Columbus. And that could explain why those pre-Columbian explorations are not told to people. That means those pirates or outlaws might rest in that land. And that means they wanted to keep it secret. 

In some other versions, the noblemen hide gold or pieces of jewelry that they stole from the crown to the New World. Out from the eyes of the king. It could mean very big trouble if somebody is caught stealing the king's gold. So the beaches of America could be good places to hide the gold taken without permission. 

2) The new lands were explored and marked to the maps when they were allowed to mark. And permission came from the ruler of the nation. 

So there is the possibility that the explorers put the explorations in storage that they would not cause disappointment for their financial supporters. And maybe those explorers sold the instructions where to find new islands to their friends. So that means that this thing was a very lucrative business. 

 And the main thing is that the maps were not so good during the time of Columbus as they are today. There was a possibility that the ships sailed out from maps. And maybe the skippers were not told that thing to the crew. And if that thing happened in the Atlantic Ocean the ship must only take the course back to east. That maneuver took the ship back to the mapped area very easily. 

Images II and III: Djoser and Yucatan pyramids

Europeans were active in America 1000 years ago claims new studies. The fact is that I presume myself that the Carthaginian admiral Hanno the Navigator (5th century BC) was probably one of the first sailors who might find America. That man lived in the fifth century BC. But the pyramid of Djoser that built during the rule of the pharaoh Djoser (c. 2670–2650 BC).

And its similarity with the Mayan Pyramids in the Yucatan peninsula is giving a tip.  Europeans or Egyptians knew America about 3000-2000 BC. So we cannot say that Columbus found America. The thing is that there is evidence that Leif Erikson (c. 970 – c. 1020) the son of Erik the Red (c. 950 – c. 1003) lived in Newfoundland in c. year 1000. But the thing is that there was suspicion that Leif Erikson was not the first European in America. 

Image IV: The Columbus Voyages to America 

The thing is that the Egyptians, Sumerians, and Phoenicians might travel to America over the Pacific ocean. During those trips, those explorers could benefit the Micronesian archipelago. Or they might travel through the land to Angor Watt and then over the Bering Strait to the new world. So we know that Columbus was not the first man, who saw the New World. 

And in fact, that man ever visited on dry land when he traveled through the Atlantic ocean. There is the theory that Columbus bought the instructions on how to find the new world. And maybe that man once visited the new world before he offered the great exploration for his funders. 

https://scitechdaily.com/move-over-columbus-europeans-were-already-active-in-the-americas-1000-years-ago/

https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-history/pyramids-in-latin-america

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Anse_aux_Meadows

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Columbus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanno_the_Navigator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoamerican_pyramids#:~:text=Mesoamerican%20pyramids%20form%20a%20prominent%20part%20of%20ancient,on%20the%20top%29%20and%20stairs%20ascending%20their%20faces.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact_theories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyages_of_Christopher_Columbus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Djoser

Image I:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson

Image II: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Djoser

Image III: Pinterest

Image IV:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyages_of_Christopher_Columbus

Tunguska explosion on June 30, 1908

The image I: The nuclear test at Pacific

The structure of the meteorite that caused the Tunguska detonation is a mystery. There is the possibility that the asteroid was the bite of methane ice under the dust. And that thing makes it possible that the explosion happened in the air. The fact is that nobody can prove that they saw an object flying in the air. Many people saw that explosion. But nobody has proven to see that object when it was flying. I use the term "object" for meaning the meteorite that caused the explosion. 

The fact is that the shape or form of the meteorite is a mystery. The Soviet science academy started the research of that case in 1927. And there were almost 20 years of that case. So the memories of people were not clear. And maybe some of the "witnesses" played mad because they were afraid Soviet secret police. Between the explosion and the start of research was a long time. 

 Leonid Alekseyevich Kulik (1882-1942) 

Image II

The first research of the Tunguska case began in 1921. And the notes of the first, 1921 exploration lost. The problem was the Russian civil war. So the conditions in the Soviet Union stabilized in 1923 when the civil war was over. And that's why I will claim that the first real investigations were possible in 1927. Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik (1882-1942) was the leader of all explorations in that area.  In the years 1921, 1927, and 1937. 

There was the First World War, the Russian revolution, and the civil war. That means the research team had a very small chance to solve that mystery. When the story of the changing trajectory of the object is told the researchers might just forget to ask did the self seen that thing or was it some cousin? 

And another thing is that they probably didn't ask what kind of trajectories that person saw? Did the object come to the ground at 90 degrees angle? Or was it gently and what was the position of the observer? Was that person under the trajectory? Or did that person standing at the side of the trajectory? Did that object leave smoke trails or was it like some kind of laser ray? And what color was that trail? Was it black that might be the sign of carbon meteorite that vaporizing in the atmosphere? 

Image III: The ground zero of Tunguska

If the antimatter arrived in the atmosphere that should cause the detonation in the upper atmosphere. So if the reason for the explosion was antimatter it should be inside some kind of magnetic bite. The magnetic core could cover the antimatter bite so long that it would be near the ground or at least in a deep atmosphere before the explosion happens. 

Or was there the meteorite at all? Could some kind of radiation like XRB or GRB (X- or gamma-ray burst) that the spin of electrons will turn opposite in the atmosphere. In that theory, the antimatter was formed spontaneously by the radiation impact deep in the atmosphere. So that would also explain why there is no mark of meteorite left. 

Image IV: Famous image of fallen trees in Tunguska

There are strange stories about that case. One of them was that the object that flew in the air turned its direction. But there is no evidence that the persons who told that story didn't even be there. The person who told that story didn't describe the size of the detonated object. 

The mystery is why there is no impact crater? The meteorite that exploded in the air is the answer. But the thing that caused the worries is that nobody saw anything special before that explosion happened. That means that the object that caused the detonation was quite small. So could the reason for the Tunguska detonation be the antimatter?

Image V: The marks of the explosion are still visible

The mystery of Tunguska is why the meteorite or object that dropped from the space detonated on air? The detonation didn't leave any kind of craters behind it. But the "ground zero" of that impact is still visible. Also, the fallen trees are seen on the ground. And the reason why no trees are growing on ground zero and trees are remaining so well is that the particle that detonated on air caused intense heat.

The pressure wave caused the vacuum in that area. And that thing caused that fire itself to end. Because trees didn't start to burn. That explains why there is no carbonized wood or marks of fire. 

Also, powerful wind denied that the fire had not started to burn in the area near the explosion. The vacuum, along with rising air, pulled radon up from the ground caused a small rising of the radioactivity in that area. 

How antimatter could pass the atmosphere? If the ionized antimatter particles are in the bubble of magnesite meteorite. That thing makes the situation possible that the antimatter can travel deep inside the atmosphere. When the meteorite falls through the atmosphere it will melt, and then the antimatter particles touching the air. The result is an explosion.

There is the possibility that if the extremely thin gold layer is in the bubble of the small asteroid. The cosmic radiation can cause that antimatter is forming inside those asteroids. And even a small-size asteroid can cause large destruction. 

Sometimes is introduced that the Tunguska explosion was the UFO. The thing is that there is no evidence about that thing because the meteorite vaporized in the explosion. So officially, the reason for the Tunguska explosion was the object that came from space and detonated in the atmosphere. 

https://earthsky.org/space/what-is-the-tunguska-explosion/

https://ksc.krasn.ru/en/news/micro_particles_of_the_tunguska_meteorite/

https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2013.13163

http://scihi.org/leonid-kulik-tunguska-event/

Image I: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/Operation_Castle_-_Yankee.jpg

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Kulik

Image III:https://osr.org/blog/news/tunguska-asteroid-event-of-1908/

Image IV:https://media.sciencephoto.com/e6/70/00/80/e6700080-800px-wm.jpg

Image V:https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5686713

Could the Tunguska explosion cause because by human activity? Did someone accidentally make the antimatter bomb?

I hope that I'm wrong. But in some creepy visions, the Tunguska explosion was the result of human activity. There is the possibility to make the antimatter by using lightning. The system would be the capacitor like the Leyden jar that is on the tall mast. 

Then the electricity will conduct to the extremely thin gold layer. The electricity will collect to the  Leyden jar and then sooner or later it will strike to the gold. 

If the power of the electricity is high enough that thing causes that the electrons turn to antimatter. The system can be the lightning collector and the small gold bite. The Leyden jar stores the electricity in electrolytic liquid. Then the antenna must target the gold plate. And the detonation would be impressive. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Crystal skulls, annihilation and artificial brains

This text is not handing morals and ethics about the use of the cloned neurons in computers. Those things are the thing that is different from technical solutions. So the law books are the thing that limits this kind of thing. 

The reason why the researchers are interested in the use of cloned neurons is clear. For making more powerful computers the cloned neurons are the ultimate tool. Human brains use 20 watts of electricity and they are much powerful than any known computer. The reason why the cloned neurons are causing problems is that they have their own will. And the second thing is that the cloned neurons are problematic in the point of view of memory handling. Memory handling means that the memories of the neurons cannot remove.

The modern bio- and life support technology can make the modern crystal skull-looking biological computer possible. So are those artifacts attempt to talk with the dead? If somebody steals a corpse for that kind of test that brings prosecution

Maybe the next part of this text is science fiction. But even if the famous crystal skull of the British museum is made to store the dead people's brain waves. In that case, brains will be put in the skull. And then the electricity is put to travel through that tissue. Then it will be stored to record. The fact is that even if that strange artifact could be fake, its purpose could be serious. 

The electricity of the brain the EEG can store to the tape. And then transmit to the brains of other people. But I don't know if this thing is possible to use by using dead brain tissue. The EEG can store easily during the EEG tests. Then that thing can be played by using the record player. 

But the cloned neurons and modern equipment make it possible to create cloned brains. Or in some ideas, the crystal skull can use for making "human robots". In those ideas, the pineal gland of the person would be put in the crystal skull. And the electric signals will send through that organ to the crystal skull. But the thing is that this kind of writings might seem non-scientific. 

And the fact is that there have been made many experiments during history that were not successful. The occultists and other groups made many things that were illegal or against morals. They stole corpses and bones from cemeteries and made many things that are causing imprisonment or even sending them to mental hospitals. 

When the cloned neurons are finishing their mission their memories should remove.  And that is the problem with the "living" or biological computers.  But there has been introduced an idea of the modern "crystal skull". In the chamber will make the artificial brains by using cloned neurons. 

And then that structure will connect to the platform and the decoding system by using neck nerves. Then data will download to the brain structure by using brain-core stimulation. And then the data will put to travel through the brain cells. That thing means that the system will act as the biocomputer. And the heart-lung machine can deliver nutrients for those cells. 

What if the crystal skulls were an attempt to talk with the dead? Or are they more frightening things?

By the way, the tale about the 12 crystal skulls that can destroy the world can be true even if those crystal skulls were fake. There is the possibility that to the eyes of the skull is put the leaf gold. And then the high energetic cathode ray will aim at those eyes. The system might work that behind the skulls is put a magnet and then the cathode ray will strike to leaf gold. That thing can use natural electricity. And if the lightning strikes through the leaf gold layer that can cause an annihilation reaction.

If those artifacts were fakes made for some occultists in the late 19th century. That is not a guarantee that the purpose of those merchandise is legal. There is the possibility that the occultists wanted to "steal" memories of the dead. And then they made those crystal skulls and then put brains in those systems. Then they could conduct the electricity to that thing. And after that, because they were afraid of authorities they took those crystal skulls to the jungle. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_skull

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Who found America?

"Leif Eriksson Statue by Anne Whitney, erected in 1887 at the west end of the Commonwealth Avenue Mall in Boston, Massachusetts, the United States" Wikipedia

In SciTech Daily was an article highlighting. "Ancient Documents Suggest Italian Sailors Knew of America 150 Years Before Christopher Columbus" So where those Italian sailors got those documents? 

So who found America?

How Leif Erikson knew that return to home was safe when he lived in Vinland?

Who found America? That is an interesting question. Maybe we should ask how we describe the founded of America?  The thing is that the Son of Eric the Red, Leif Erikson (c. 970-c. 1020) was the man whose statue is in Boston was the first European in America. 

He lived a year in Newfoundland. But there is the possibility that his father Eric the Red (c. 950-1003) visited Newfoundland before his son. Eric the Red made settlements in Greenland and there was no long journey to Newfoundland. But the reason why Eric the Red hired that place was that his son must escape his enemies. So maybe the advice about the place of Newfoundland came to Leif Erikson from Eric the Red. The thing that Leif Erikson returned to Iceland or Greenland a year after the escape. 

Makes people suspect that somebody told them that the controversy agreed. So there must be some connection between Leif Erikson's settlement and his home. Or how that man knew that return was safe? The fact is that we just believe that the Vinland is Newfoundland. The evidence of that thing has been introduced the Viking house that is found in that place. But was it made by Leif Erikson? Or somebody before him.

But there are suggestions that even the ancient Egyptians and Phoenicians knew America. The Chinese and Siberians may be traveled to America over the Bering Strait. And the fact is that there might be other more or less deliberate visits to the American coast and Antillian archipelago. 

Image II: Recreated Norse buildings c. 1000 A.D at L'Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland (Wikipedia)

The German pirate Klaus Störtebecker (1360-1401) was also claimed to visit America but there was no evidence about that visit. The thing that supports this theory is that the Störtebeckers treasury is lost forever. There is the tale that Cristopher Columbus (1451-1506) was the descendant of Klaus Störtebecker and he followed the tale or some documents that Störtebecker. For supporting that theory is introduced the blond hair of Columbus. 

Columbus was born 50 years after the death of Störtebecker and that thing means that he could be a descendant of that pirate. Maybe he heard stories of that man and then realize that nobody remember Störtebecker. What confessed the funders that there was more than just some trees and mud in the new land? Were some documents were the thing that made funders confess that the funding that exploration was necessary. Somebody people are saying that Prince Henry the Navigator (1394-1460) gave that money. But that well-known funder of some explorations died when Columbus was about 10 years old. 

If we want to describe who founded America we are facing a very difficult thing. In the time of Vikings and great explorations was no GPS and only skippers knew how to navigate. Maps were limited. And if the ship slip out of the map the captain would not tell that thing to the crew. Also if some pirates wanted to hide their treasury at some cost they might not know where they were. If we want to think about the relationship between Störtebecker and Cristopher Columbus we cannot ever be sure.  

Or maybe we should use the DNA test for making sure about that kind of story. Of course, if Störtebecker visited New Land and made some documents. There is the possibility that the Italian traders bought them from Hansa. The fact is that anyway, Störtebecker was not found America. That thing was made long before he was ever born. But were those European explorers Vikings or somebody long before them? Did somebody escape from Europe to that mysterious land? If that person exists there is the possibility that also ancient Romans or Phoenicians knew that area. 

https://scitechdaily.com/ancient-documents-suggest-italian-sailors-knew-of-america-150-years-before-christopher-columbus/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Columbus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_the_Red

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_St%C3%B6rtebeker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Anse_aux_Meadows

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newfoundland_(island)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Henry_the_Navigator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinland

Image I:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leif_Erikson

Image II:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%27Anse_aux_Meadows

Maailmanlaajuinen mysteeri saa jatkoa, ja tällä kertaa paikkana on Savonlinna, johon on ilmestynyt krominen monoliitti

 

“Tällainen monoliitti kiiltelee parhaillaan Savonlinnassa". Kati Rantala / Yle (https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11691117)

Maailmanlaajuinen mysteeri saa jatkoa, ja tällä kertaa paikkana on Savonlinna, johon on ilmestynyt krominen monoliitti

Savonlinnaan on ilmestynyt outo metallinen monoliitti, joka tietenkin on todella hienon näköinen. Kyseessä on siis metallinen laatikko, joka on kuin jostain elokuvasta, mutta mitään syytä siihen, miksi tällainen monoliitti on rakennettu ei ole ilmoitettu, eikä kukaan ole sen tekijäksi myöskään ilmoittautunut. Noita samanlaisia monoliitteja on löytynyt Utahin aavikolta sekä Romaniasta, ja joidenkin teoreetikkojen mielestä kyseessä olisi ikään kuin muunnos jonkun MC-jengin käyttämästä pääsykokeesta, jossa henkilön pitää tehdä jotain päätöntä, jotta hän osoittaa omaavansa “kanttia”.

Mutta kuitenkin kyseessä lienee hieman omaperäinen versio tällaisesta pääsykokeesta, vaikka tämä hypoteesi olisikin totta. Se miksi tuo monoliitti on rakennettu, ja millä se tuodaan paikalle on myös kysymysmerkki. Tuollaisten metallisten monoliitti-patsaiden rakentaminen tietenkin vie aikaa, sekä se vaatii tietenkin myös raaka-aineita sekä jonkinlaista osaamista ja sopivat työkalut. Se että monoliitti-laatikoiden rakenteissa ei näy saumoja kertoo siitä, että ne ovat huolellisesti valmistettuja, eli joko saumat on hiottu pois huolella tai monoliitit on joko valettu muottiin tai sitten ne on hitsattu käyttäen jotain muuta kuin MIG-hitsausta, eli onko nuo liitokset sulatettu toisiinsa kiinni esimerkiksi thermiteä, mikroaaltoa tai elektronisuihkua käyttäen?

Tuollaisia hitsauslaitteita ei aivan joka pajasta löydy, joten ehkä ne on valmistanut henkilö, joka on todella taitava hitsaaja, joka on sitten huolellisesti poistanut saumojen kohoumat, joten hänellä on ollut osaamista sekä aikaa tällaisen esineen valmistamiseen.Mutta koska noita monoliitteja on löytynyt eri paikoista ympäri maailmaa, niin se tarkoittaa että joko noita monoliitteja on lähetetty rahtina jostain, kuljetettu yksityiskoneella tai rekan kontissa mutta on mahdollista valmistajia on useita eri puolella maailmaa. Eli se miksi tämä salaperäinen kromista valmistettujen monoliitti-pilareiden ryhmä on valmistettu on jäänyt pimentoon. Mistä ne tulevat ja mitä niillä halutaan viestiä ovat asioita jotka kiehtovat ihmisiä.

Pari ehkä hyvinkin kaukaa haettua ajatusta tuli tässä mieleeni. Ja jos niitä itse tässä analysoin, niin ne ovat hiukan liian kaukaa haettuja, mutta ne kuitenkin tässä ilmaisen, eli ei kai kukaan nyt tällaisesta suutu. Mutta nuo villit ajatukset ovat sellaisia että niitä ehkä voidaan pitää hiukan outoina. Eli ovatko nuo kromiset patsaat ehkä viestejä siitä, että joku haluaa liittyä johonkin internetissä olevista ryhmistä?

Vai ovatko ne ehkä aineellistuneet jostain toisesta ulottuvuudesta?Tai ehkä niillä halutaan viestiä sitä, että ihmiskunta on päässyt niin sanotulle Kardachevin skaalalle eli olisimme saavuttaneet “Tason yksi” sivilisaatioiden luokituksessa. Vai onko joku vain yksinkertaisesti perustanut Avaruusseikkailu 2001 faniryhmän, johon päästäkseen pitää valmistaa krominen monoliitti, joka sitten laitetaan julkiselle paikalle, niin että kaikki voivat sen nähdä? Ja tuo monoliitti olisi sitten ryhmän pääsykoe.

No ehkä tämä oli vähän turhan villi ajatus. Mutta kaikki asiat pitää käydä läpi, ja tietenkin joku näistäkin mahdollisuuksista puhuu tai kirjoittaa.Tai ehkä meidän pitäisi etsiä kuitenkin maanläheisempiä paikkoja sekä selityksiä sille, että miksi nuo metalliset patsaat on valmistettu? Ja toki kaikki mahdollisuudet ovat avoinna ennen kuin pilareiden tekijä ilmaantuu paikalle ja kertoo sen, että miksi hän nuo esineet on tehnyt, ja miksi hän niitä valmistaa? Tai miksi niitä on valmistettu, ja asetettu näytille ympäri maapalloa? Kas tässä sellainen arkipäiväinen ongelma, johon voi jokainen asettaa oman mielipiteensä.

Lähteet:

Britannian monoliitti:
https://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/a/c9e5e6c1-7d99-4eaf-8fd6-260fc52f2900

Romanian monoliitti https://www.iltalehti.fi/ulkomaat/a/b3e88c2e-361f-4ae7-9cac-8a5c38de2b04

Savonlinnan monoliitti: https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11691117

Utahin monoliitti: https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11665681

https://historiaajapolitiikkaa.wordpress.com/2020/12/12/maailmanlaajuinen-mysteeri-saa-jatkoa-ja-talla-kertaa-paikkana-on-savonlinna-johon-on-ilmestynyt-krominen-monoliitti/

Cognito Ergo Sum II

     

.

Image I

Cognito Ergo Sum II

Cognito Ergo Sum "I think I am," said René Descartes, and the question is does the thinking mean that person or creature exists. So when we are thinking that only aware creatures can think we must realize that there is a question what makes this Descartes quote one of the most interesting topics in history. That question is that would the creature need the ability to think that it exists?

If we are thinking about things like stones they exist. We can test that thing by kicking the stone without a shoe, and that thing proves that thing exists. So does the ability to react to some kind of things like yelling by saying, "are you all right" mean that the creature understands the meaning of the words? The artificially intelligent robot can emulate feelings by looking at certain marks from the face of a human.

When the volume of the speech rises very high that robot can say "please low down your noise". Or if a person seems to be red or breathing badly that robot can go and offer help and use things like Heimlich Maneuver, but the thing is that certain parameters activate the action what the robot makes. Those actions are stored in the database, certain modules that include certain actions. But that doesn't mean that the robot understands what it does.

The fact is that if we are thinking of things like bugs, we must ask are those things real or are they alive. The answer is biologically bugs are alive creatures because they can make descendants and they can defend themselves. If some wasp would sting you, that thing means that the wasp exists, and that experience would be painful. But then we might think robot what would make copies of itself, and defend its operation area. The robot that makes copies of itself could call the "Von Neumann machines".

The fact is that if some car factory, what can make sub-robots that can find the raw materials independently and make copies of itself would also defend its area what makes it less living than some bug? The Von Neumann-machine can make powerful things like copies of itself, but it might not realize what it does. So does wasp understand what it does, when it puts its sting in the human skin? That thing is interesting. The very complicated Von Neumann-machines would be the things, what would revolutionize many things.

Quantum computers are causing the revolution in artificial intelligence. Quantum computers can run more complicated algorithms than we ever imagine. So even the computing capacity would put limits to the operations of artificial intelligence, we must realize that the quantum computers would make things, what computers ever make.

Image I: https://artanddesigninspiration.com/think-outside-the-box/

.

Image II

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer?

Can we turn our brains into the quantum computer? Here I mean that could we put a person in a controlled dream, where the neural network of brains is operating as a quantum computer.

And that thing causes the discussions, what are the limits of artificial intelligence? Can we someday turn our brains into the quantum computer? In that case, the person would put in the condition, where the consciousness is connected off. Then the person would turn to the quantum computer, what operates by following the electric impulses, what are giving the impulses through the neural tracks.

In that case, the person would put in the "controlled dream", and then the brain would acting like the quantum computer. In some of the wildest ideas or jokes, the abductions are things, that are made, when the humanoids need more calculation capacity in their crafts. The fact is that the neural tracks neural systems that are connected to a computer can act as the quantum computer.

Image II: https://www.artstudio.org/surrealists-melded-reality-with-dreams-ito-create-imaginative-juxtapositions-of-imagery/

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2020/12/09/cognito-ergo-sum-ii/