The genetically manipulated tomatoes contain neurotransmitters claimes one company.

The genetically manipulated tomatoes contain neurotransmitters claimes one company. 

The genetically manipulated vegetables are creating chemicals that are not normally in those vegetables. That thing is making a great step to genetic engineering. But there is the possibility that this kind of genetic engineering is used for criminal purposes. There is the possibility to connect genomes of the different species. So in the future flowers can produce medical chemicals like antiseptics or some antibiotics. 

Also, there is the possibility to produce synthetic blood. By using vegetables like watermelons or some other juicy fruits. In those cases, the genomes of the bone marrow cells will transfer to those vegetables. And their fruits will start to produce blood. This kind of vision can be true quite soon. 

Things like liver cells or stem cells can produce in vegetables. In that case, genetic engineering turns the pollen stockings into human stem cells. But in the wrong hands, genetic engineering is one of the most dangerous things in the world. 

And that can make it possible to turn harmless vegetables into drug vegetables. There is the possibility that the genomes of vegetables like corn can connect with the genomes of the Errading sin. 

That makes the corn produce LSD. Or the potatoes can transform to produce cocaine. The possibilities of genetic engineering are limitless. And that thing is making that technology dangerous. The drug mafia of South America has money. And it can buy laboratory that is making it possible to create new versions of the corn. And other vegetables that can form the product of those cartels. 

Advanced biological weapons like microchip-controlled insects can be extremely dangerous tools. When we are thinking about some horrible projects like the "Big Itch" and the "Big Buzz". There were tested insects like flea and mosquitos. Those insects can carry things like the plague, dengue fever, and malaria. 

We must remember that those researchers from the 1950s didn't have nanotechnology and genetic engineering. Which transforms the poison of those small insects into botulinum. That thing makes them the deadliest things ever. 

Genetic engineering is making it possible to create things insects. That is creating botulinum as their poison. The thing is that combining the abilities of the organisms has no limits. And in some visions, the insects like honey bees would get the poison stinger that injects the tetrodotoxin. That poison is making a person unwilling to resist commands. There is the possibility that the poison stinger is manipulated to take nutrients from the victim's body. 

https://futurism.com/the-byte/japan-gmo-tomato-psychoactive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Big_Buzz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Big_Itch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Drop_Kick

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_May_Day

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

  

 The small liquid robots can run as long they have "food".

Image 1:

The liquid nanomachines that can operate without electricity might be connected with microchips. Those microchips can equip with a small mustache. That it can use to control the direction where that small nanomachine should go. The microchip can get electricity from outcoming radiowaves. Or they can get energy from the rolling nanomachine itself. Which turned into a nano-generator. 

The new liquid nano-size robots can be fascinating tools. The first aqueous robots that can move in liquid are under research. The tiny robots can walk on the surface of the water. Or which can visit below the surface and then return are tools that are giving a great improvement in nanotechnology. 

But if researchers are creating the nano rolls. That rolls on the surface of the water that tool will have possibilities that have never been before. Those nano-rolls could use as nano-size generators for nanotechnical microchips. The ability to connect the robots. That can move without electricity to the electric production. That kind of thing has a great future in the world of nanotechnology. 

Image: 2

The superconducting layer makes it possible to create helium-based nanomachines that are hovering above the superconducting layer. 

The nano-rolls or nanomachines can hover above the layer by benefiting the electron pillar. When a nano-size machine is put near the superconducting layer. The electrons would start to travel between that object and the layer. If the electrons of the layer and the nano-object are towards each other. T hat effect makes the nano-structure hover above the layer. 

The helium nano-crystals or nano-droplets can use as nanomachines. Those atom-sized machines can move objects above the superconducting layers. 

The system can use the same tunneling effect. That a scanning tunneling microscope uses. That nano-crystal can hang in a physical stylus or an electromagnetic field. 

Those helium or some other atom-based nanomachines are like small UFOs. The helium is suitable for that work because the atom has a corner that can position the layer. The molecule or atom should be like a small pyramid that is upside down. 

Then the nanomachines would rise to hover above the extremely cold superconducting layer by using quantum tunneling. A machine that size is about one or two atoms. Would hover on the top of the quantum pilar. That is formed by the same effect that is used in a scanning tunneling microscope. The atom can hang in a stylus or electromagnetic field. 

Then the operator can move those nanomachines by shooting them with a laser. Or that person can control the location of the nanomachine by using a maser or coherent radio or microwaves. Those hovering nanomachines can move other atoms over the layer. 

https://scitechdaily.com/helium-bath-splash-physicists-discover-surprising-phenomenon/

https://scitechdaily.com/these-tiny-liquid-robots-never-run-out-of-energy-as-long-as-they-have-food/

Image1) https://scitechdaily.com/these-tiny-liquid-robots-never-run-out-of-energy-as-long-as-they-have-food/

Image 2) https://scitechdaily.com/helium-bath-splash-physicists-discover-surprising-phenomenon/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Should we trust science?

 Should we trust science?

We must determine things what we mean about "trust science"? The fact is that the purpose of science is to search and observe things and find answers to many questions. 

In the beginning, we must separate science and scientist. The scientist is the person who is making science. So scientists can tell lies. And also greatest scientists sometimes make mistakes. 

When we think about things like the universe. Our knowledge of that thing is increasing. But then we are facing one thing. We want to know more and more about that thing. We are part of the universe. 

And when we can think that our knowledge is like the universe itself. Limits of our knowledge and confirmed knowledge expand. And we find new connections between the particles. In the same way, we can find new connections between other things. 

The exosolar systems, exoplanets, and other kinds of things were pure science fiction. Today we know that there are many other solar systems than our own. 

In the past, we believed that the species are alone. Today we know that the species are cooperating. As an example, some trees call ants to protect them against aphids. But in sociology is the thing called conspiracy theory. 

Sometimes conspiracy theories are told in purpose for shaking the trust of authorities. Sometimes we might say that things like the murder of John Fitzgerald Kennedy are a conspiracy. Sometimes is also said that if the murder of the JFK is open because there are no convicted persons in that case. There were too many chefs in that soap. And great publicity made it impossible to give the solution for that case. 

Two commissions researched that case.

The Warren Commission was set by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1963, just after the Kennedy murder. That commission is the major source for the people who are believing that Oswald shot President and operated alone. The problem with that commission was that it acted very soon after the shot of JFK. 

The chairman of the commission was the judge, Earl Warren. The thing that caused criticism was that the commission was not the research was there somebody behind Lee Harvey Oswald. And another thing was that the authorities like the FBI didn't have any kind of room to operate. So Lyndon B. Johnson set the Warren Commission too soon. And its work was disturbed by the media. (Wikipedia/Warren Commission)

The other commission: the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) was supported the Warren Commission report. But they could not exclude the possibility that some individual members of some paramilitary- or criminal organizations were involved in that crime. 

"The committee also stated that the conspiracy did not involve any organized crime group, anti-Castro group, nor the FBI, CIA, or Secret Service. The committee found that it could not exclude the possibility that individual members of the national syndicate of organized crime or anti-Castro Cubans were involved in a probable conspiracy to assassinate President Kennedy".  (Wikipedia/ United States House Select Committee on Assassination).

But today, we can only notice that nobody will ever get punishment. But things like papers full of black lines and censored details feed the conspiracy theories. So what have we learned about this case? The secrecy and hiding information are feeding the theories. 

Unusual equipment, such as the Mannlicher Carcano rifle, sparked debate. Was that rifle meant to be taken home after someone was shot? Was Oswald staging someone to blame for that incident? Or did someone carry that gun to Oswald's home? Officially that question remains open. 

There is an example of the story that probably meant releasing the military forces from their responsibility of nuclear weapon development.  When scientists created nuclear weapons. Some people told. That scientists alone carried the responsibility of the development of nuclear weapons. 

Department of Defense gave orders to develop nuclear weapons in all nuclear states. Head of the state and general staff have accepted those weapons and their development. The military command has been given the materials for testing those systems. And that means there were many other people than scientists who play a big role in those projects. 

In great public, the "conspiracy theory" is used in a very negative way of the view. In many stories, conspiracy theories are connected with mental disorders. The juridical term "conspiracy to commit the crime" means that a group of people is planning criminal activity. 

 But there is another thing in that kind of "theory". Many times the news is full of conspiracy theories. And sometimes the voice of that news is very stamping. 

People who believe those things are often marginalized as stupid. And that thing happens very often before things like massive cartels (illegal fixing the prices between companies) or some high-scale financial crimes uncover. 

But there is the thing that is called mass-effect that makes people answer as they believe in those theories. That mass effect is the social pressure that forces people give some answers. What they don't mean. Or they don't want to give. That thing is called virtual believing. 

Researching and confirming information is the best way to fight against falsified information. The thing is that the world is full of things that are not told to the public audience. Or those things are published in a very limited publication. And some high-level researchers are reading those articles. 

https://bigthink.com/questions/should-we-trust-science/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

Does the end of the universe begin?

  

 Does the end of the universe begin? 

Is the final era of the universe began? The fact is that we must determine the final era of the universe. Before, we can answer that question. What is the length of the final era or final sequence? We can say that the entire existence is to wait for the end. But can we say that the final era begins from the birth or the point where the observer stands? Is the final era only the era that is left and forward to us? Or did the final era of the universe begin just after the Big Bang? 

The fact is that the universe is going to its ultimate fate. The road to ultimate fate began when the Big Bang released material to space. After that, the universe is going to its ultimate fate. In the same way, we can think. That when humans borns the road is to the grave. The universe is one of the most interesting things. And there are two ways how the universe will face its fate.

If the universe is a ball or spherical it's closed. The ultimate fate of the closed universe is a big crunch when the entire material drops to the black hole. There are two other possibilities for the shape of the universe. Those two other shapes are open universes. And that means the ultimate fate of the universe is a big silence or big freeze where the particles turn to wave movement and the universe will just vanish after it will enlarge enough. In open universes, gravitation cannot stop the expansion. And that means the universe will just vanish. 

The Big Bang theory will support the theory of the ball-shaped universe. There is the possibility that the Big Bang would throw the material into the form of time class like some supernovas are made. But there is the possibility. That between hyperbolic structures is a large mass of dark matter. That is making the universe a spherical structure. The problem is to determine the shape of the universe. At least 85% of the universe is formed of dark matter that is invisible to us. So we don't know the real shape of the universe. 

In this text, I use the name "modern universe" for the universe where we live. The young universe might seem the same as our universe. But that young universe was very different than the modern universe. 

It was smaller, higher energetic. And the material was a little bit different than in our universe. The energy level was higher and the weight of individual particles in the young universe was higher than it's now. 

When the Big Bang released material to the space that thing was also released "visible energy". Visible energy means the wave movement that interacts with visible material. Dark energy means wave movement that doesn't interact with visible material. The origin of dark energy is suspected the dark matter particles. Dark matter is the name of the mysterious gravitation effect in the universe. 

The dark matter is predicted to be similar material with the visible material. But the size of the particles of dark matter is different from the size of particles of visible material. That means the wave movement that origin is in dark matter is invisible to us. That is the most believable explanation for dark energy. 

Dark energy means mysterious wave movement. That expands the universe. So the dark matter would send the wave movement that is invisible and unable to capture. 

All energy in the universe. Also released in the Big Bang. That means there is no place where the universe gets more energy. And the expansion of the universe causes. That the energy density or energy layer in the universe is decreasing. 

When the size of the universe grows the energy must fill bigger space. And that causes the universe is losing its energy. The reason for expansion is that the space outside the universe has a lower energy level than the universe. And that causes the energy to flow outside the universe.

There is nothing that can replace that energy. And that means the universe will turn so large that there can not form new stars. The pressure of quantum fields will decrease. And thermal energy will rip galaxies in pieces. Because there is only thin gas in the universe that thing causes that the new stars will not be forming. 

When the distance between atoms increases high enough the protons and neutrons will be destroyed. And finally, electrons will turn to wave movement. The thing is that. Even the ultimate fate of the universe would be the big crush. There is a moment when the stars would not form anymore. 

The expansion of the universe began just after the Big Bang. And it continues today. The expansion speed of the universe is the so-called Hubble constant. But when we are trying to compare the modern universe with the young universe. We are facing one thing. 

In the young, hot, and thick universe the speed of light inside the young universe was lower than it's in the modern universe. The reflection, scattering, and more powerful quantum fields caused that photons travel slower than they are traveling in our universe. The speed of light was cosmic speed limit but it was lower than in our universe. 

Same way time moved slower in the young universe than in the modern universe. The higher energy level meant that the particles in the young universe were higher energetic than in the universe. There is suspicion that the  Big Bang was the white hole. That theory has formed one of the most interesting and incredible theories of the ultimate end of the universe. 

In that theory, the universe would collapse into a black hole. Because time moves backward inside the event horizon that black hole would take the material to the point where it was formed. 

Time dilation means when escaping velocity is the same as the speed of light time stops. And when escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light time moves backward.  

So if the ultimate fate of the universe is the big crunch. The material travels to the point where the black hole was born. The same thing happens when the entire universe falls into the black hole. And that theory is called as Phoenix theory. That means the universe is reborn again and again. 

But when the material would travel through the black hole it would not be the same material again. The size of the particles would be different. And the new universe would be reborn as the mirror universe to the original universe. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-final-era/

https://www.wired.co.uk/article/how-will-universe-end

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

  

 Physicists are quite sure that the multiverse exists.

Image 1

If somebody wants to say that "certainly multiverse" does not exist I must say. That history is full of things. That was "certainly do not exist". Things like exoplanets, exosolar systems, and even other galaxies are mentioned as the product of imagination. Our knowledge of the universe expands all the time. And we must remember that Edwin Hubble found other galaxies in the 1920s during the researched spiral nebulae. 

Long time people believed that the Milky Way was the galaxy and other galaxies orbit it.  Now we know that there are many galaxies in the universe. But the fact is that the reason why those galaxies are spirals is just confirmed. 

The spiral structure of galaxies is the reason for supermassive black holes that are forming that whirl around them. Without supermassive black holes, the formation of the spiral structures is impossible because the supermassive black holes are acting like axel in that structure. 

But is it possible that deep inside the universe is a hyper massive black hole? The size or diameter of those predicted monsters' event horizons is larger than galaxies. The beginning of that theory is in the hypothesis that. 

When the Big Bang happened. A part of the material dropped to the black hole that formed just after the explosion. Some scientists believe that the Big Bang was a white hole where the material was released. 

But then we might say that now we know more things about the universe than ever before. And surely, there are other universes. The reason for that is that universe is a bubble. That formed after the Big Bang. And, of course, there should be other big Bangs and other universes. 

Image 2) Cosmic microwave background (CMB). Note the blue areas which are cold points in CMB.

Three facts support that theory. 

1) The cold spots in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). 

Those cold spots are seen as blue areas in the image. There are suspicions that the reason for those cold areas is the enormous eruptions. 

The caliber of those eruptions is larger than any supermassive black hole can ever create. And one explanation could be that the extremely powerful radiation effect which source is outside the universe is the reason for those blue areas. The source of that energy could be in another universe. 

Because energy cannot form from emptiness. There must be some material that forms energy. And that material must locate in another universe. 

2 Dark flow. 

For some unknown reason, some extremely large galaxy supergroups are flowing in the common direction in the universe. There are two possible explanations for that thing. The other could explain the fark flow by another universe. 

Another explanation is the energy flow that travels outside the universe. And that thing means that the energy will push galaxies in the same direction. 

2.1) Maybe some extremely powerful gravitational effect will make those galaxy groups travel in the common direction. The other universe can cause that effect. 

But there might be giant dark matter clouds. That causes a similar effect. The fact is that the "dark" means that the reason for that flow is unknown. 

2.2) The energy flow outside the universe. Because the energy level of the universe is higher than the space around it. Energy travels from the universe to the lower energy areas. 

So the dark flow can be the reason for some kind of asymmetry in that flow. And the question is there something outside the universe that causes the dark flow? 

3)  The part of dark energy could be the wave movement that hits the halo of the universe. Or maybe dark energy is the wave movement which source is in the other universes. 

The part of dark energy could be the wave movement that hits the halo of the universe. Every single star and galaxy is surrounded by plasma. The size of that ball can be millions of light-years. 

There is the possibility. That also entire universe is surrounded by that kind of plasma. Which is extremely thin. When that plasma is impacted by outcoming radiation. That causes the effect that the material inside it will get energy. 

The plasma ball will also conduct the outcoming energy in the middle of the universe. And if there is some kind of material that can receive that energy it sends it back in the wavelength that is the size of those particles. 

If the source of the radiation is in the particles. Which size is different than particles in our universe. That means we cannot see that radiation. So there is the possibility that other universes are a form of material that is invisible to us. 

If that material has different size particles that make it "dark". Dark matter means material that is invisible to us. And the reason for that. Could be that the quarks of that material are a different size. 

Which is the size of the quarks of visible material is. So the only possible interaction between those particles and particles of visible material is gravitation. 

There is also a theory about "dark Big Bangs". That theory is that even inside our universe is forming new universes. We cannot see those universes because they are formed of dark matter. Even those other universes have existed they might be invisible to us. And there is the possibility that some of those universes are formed of antimatter. Even in our universe is suspected of being the stars and galaxies that are formed of antimatter. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physicists-multiverse-exists/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_flow

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Hubble

Image 1: https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physicists-multiverse-exists/

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

  

 Hacking the brains is needed for advanced robotics. 

Hacking the brains and creating synthetic memories is one of the biggest conspiracy theories in the world. The thing is that these kinds of things are under research and the purpose of that kind of technology, where brains are hacked or cracked is to fix brain damages. Hacking the brains is theoretically very simple. The researchers must only record the EEG from the brains and then connect that EEG signal to certain images. So this thing makes it possible to read dreams and affect them. 

The person would see images about things like animals or humans, and then the EEG will record while that process. Then the person looks at a longer film. And then the EEG that is recorded during that process. Will compile with the EEG records that are taken while the person looks at images. The problem is only if those EEG curves are unique. But if the EEG curves are similar there is the possibility to download things like dreams to the screen of computers. 

The thing is that hacking brains are giving the ultimate possibilities in many areas from science to the military. There is the possibility to educate people simply by inputting data into their brains. And the false memories are making it possible to give combat experience to soldiers before they even go to combat. But these kinds of systems are extremely dangerous in the wrong hands. 

There are visions of the external robot body. Brain hacking gives those systems the ability to communicate with the nervous system without borders. This kind of system requires brain hacking for working perfectly. 

Hacking the brain is needed for developing the prosthesis. That is reacting to nervous signals. The system must "only connect" certain EEG curves to certain movements. The same system can use to control robots and especially human-looking robots by using brain waves. The reason, why the human-shaped robot is easy to control by using the EEG. 

Is that the manipulators and the senses have the match in brains and robot body.  So that thing makes it possible to make a robot emulate the movements that the operator makes. If the system uses the signals taken from the brain areas. Which controls the person's movements the controlling that kind of system requires that person is moving. 

So the system that controls the EEG signal requires the brain tracks that are activating the neurons that are moving muscles. The problem with that kind of external body is that the person who is using them must move while using that robot. The system uses the signals that are taken from the movement centers. So making that kind of system using the system requires the data that activates the neurons that are moving muscles. 

The series of neuron activation while the person will move hands

1) Will to move hands will be sent 

X) To the transmitter-neuron sends that data to 

2) Neuron what is controlling muscles

So the series of actions that this kind of system needs to move robots. While a person sits on the chair is this:

1) Will to move hand or leg will be sent 

X)  to transmitter neurons

2) The robot control level

The problem is how to aim the signals of the transmitter neurons to the robot. That means that those signals must reroute to the robot without those signals can activate the neuron that controls muscles. But if the operator can move all the time. That thing is not the problem. 

Of course, muscles can be disabled, by using some medicals, but that thing is dangerous. And that means the system that controls the external bodies by using the EEG is a challenging but fascinating mission. 

The BCI (Brain-Computer Interfaces) are the key to BMI (Brain-Machine Interfaces). Those systems are control robots by using EEG. Normally the BCI is connected to the speech center in the human brain. And that thing transforms EEG to speech. The same system can use to control robots. The same signals that control the speech synthesizer can route to control robots. So when the operator thinks "robot move forward" the robot moves forward. 

The problem is. How the AI knows which commands are meant for the robot? The solution is taken from dog training. When trainers give commands to dogs they must separate the commands from common noise. 

Certain gestures or certain words predict those commands The purpose of those things is to tell the dog that commands are meant to it. The same problem is with robots. Robots must separate the commands that are given in purpose from other words. 

Before every command is a confirmation word. And the purpose of that prediction word is to route the command to the robot. 

Every order that is given to the robot is forwards the control word. That the AI recognizes that commands are meant for the robot. The same system can use voice commands. And the BCI is only the enhanced version of this system. 

The operator can use virtual reality sets and headphones to connect themselves to the robot. But there is the possibility to connect the robot to the body by using the neural connection that allows controlling robots straight with the EEG. 

https://futurism.com/could-we-hack-our-brains-to-gain-new-senses

https://scitechdaily.com/cracking-the-neural-code-to-the-brain-how-do-we-provide-meaning-to-our-environment/

Image: https://scitechdaily.com/cracking-the-neural-code-to-the-brain-how-do-we-provide-meaning-to-our-environment/

https://networkedinternet.blogspot.com/

Why do we research history?

  

 Why do we research history?

We should learn from things that were made in past. 

Why do we research history? History is a series of things that happened in the past. Those things that are happened in history can use to make models for the future. Research of history is the thing. That purpose is to find the things that will happen in the future. The key question in the history research is to find answers for the questions like "what made something happen"? 

What mistakes were made in cases that are under the research? And what did people learn about those cases? Another thing is that that the purpose of the research of history is to find the answer to the question "what should we do in similar cases"? What went wrong? And what went right? 

When we are thinking about questions like "which side had better generals Confederate or Union side in the United States civil war?". We must realize that the thing that fights is the entirety. Even the best generals in the world cannot win battles alone. In those cases also henchmen are playing roles. If the henchmen don't have the equipment, will, or skills to use weapons. The battle is lost. 

When we are thinking questions "what should we do" in those cases when something has happened. We must remember that when we are looking at history. We might know all answers. We might think that the King of Sweden Charles XII of Sweden. Should not advance to Poltava, where he faced Peter the Great army. 

But the King of Sweden didn't have the same knowledge that we have today. Today we can go to the library and find history books that are telling about the history of Sweden. And there are all answers. But Charles XII acted by using the information that he had. And that was the mistake. 

When we are looking at history we are easy to justify people. Those people made mistakes. And we would be different. And at this point, I must say one thing. In history, people acted by using the information that they had. They lived in different types of society. When they made their decisions they cannot look at results from the library. 

Today history repeats itself. We are thinking that joining the common currency of the European Union Euro was a mistake. The fact is that the Euro planned to be the virtual currency. Which purpose was to help to compile prices. But it turned to real currency. When countries joined the Euro nobody criticized that thing. There was the biggest boom in the history of Europe.

And people wanted to join that boom. But they forgot that even the biggest and strongest economies will face bear markets. So when the bear markets begin that kind of thing will cause things like bankruptcies and unemployment. What do we learn about Euro? When we are middle of the booms we can join everything. But when the boom is over. We still are in the system. 

We can of course, always step out from Euro. That kind of signal would please Russian leaders very much. When we joined Euro nobody said anything against that decision. But now Euro is facing criticism. And of course, we are independent nations who can always start to think about their national interest. We all can step out from Euro immediately, and maybe we are facing a new bull market. But then sooner or later our economy will face a bear market. 

And in that case, we can search for friends. Of course, we can always let those loans that are taken from the EU without paying and then ask for more loans. We have the right to do that thing. But when we are asking for money. There should be somebody willing to offer that money to us. The thing is that when we are looking at history the best wisdom is the hindsight is the best wisdom. 

Now, today we can say wisely. We should not ever join Euro. We made a big mistake wise men say. But we always make mistakes. Only people who are not making anything are not making mistakes. And that is the fact. When we joined Euro nobody saw anything negative about that thing. Or those people said nothing against that thing. Where were the wise men when those political leaders made that decision?

Why did they keep their mouth shut? Why didn't they offer their advice when the nation joined Euro? Now the media is full of advisors who are telling that the Euro was the mistake? 

Today we can say that Euro should remain as the virtual currency. But people made the decision. By using information that was in use at that time. It's too late to cry. We are in Euro and that's it. And then we can make new decisions. 

Technology is advancing. And that brings new challenges and opportunities. 

Sometimes I have thought about what kind of decisions the King of Sweden Charles XII would make if that person had recon satellites? What if he would get confirmed information of his enemies?

At this point, I must say that we should not stare at history too much. Things like artificial intelligence are making it possible to return Euro to virtual currency or even delete that currency. The AI-based solutions offer possible to show the prices in multiple currencies. The modern internet has more capacity than some year 2000 version. And that thing makes it possible to make many things that were impossible in the year 1999. 

And if somebody is willing to pay with some other currency there is enough to put the bank card in the payment system. Then the system would change the price to the currency. That is in use in the country where the bank card is offered. The that we are living in the new era of history. And that era is full of threats and possibilities. Things like quantum computers would revolutionize data processing. And that is the thing that we should benefit more from in our life. Data processing and the internet are tools that began the revolution in the world. And that revolution continues today.

But when we are making decisions we should understand that they all have effects. We cannot make decisions undone. The decisions are made by using data. That was in use at that time.  And that's it. We cannot retake time and make them undone. But maybe we can learn something from history. And maybe, we should listen to more people when we are making some decisions in tomorrow world. And then we must say that somebody will pay the price. When some person gets something. That affects everything. 

https://thebrightchronicle.blogspot.com/