The Hawking radiation can change everything.

"The simulated decay of a black hole not only results in the emission of radiation, but the decay of the central orbiting mass that keeps most objects stable. Black holes are not static objects, but rather change over time. Black holes formed of different materials should have different information encoded on their event horizons, and it is not understood if or how that information is then encoded in the outgoing Hawking radiation. Recent work has suggested that even horizonless objects may emit Hawking radiation as well, but that result is still debated." (Big think, Ask Ethan: Will everything eventually succumb to Hawking radiation?)

"50 years ago, Stephen Hawking showed that black holes emit radiation and eventually decay away. That fate may now apply to everything. "(Big think, Ask Ethan: Will everything eventually succumb to Hawking radiation?)

The Hawking radiation will show the fate of the universe. Or if somebody can prove that radiation. That thing makes the fundamental step for physics. In Einstein's theories, any object can turn into a black hole, if the pressure force is strong enough. 

That means that if the pressure force is strong enough even a single electron can turn into a black hole. If. Those primordial black holes exist. And if low-mass black holes can form near quasars and Hawking radiation is true, that radiation can explain the dark energy. 

The problem with the Hawking radiation is that. People don't know what depth that radiation comes from. That radiation turns a black hole into wave movement. But then we can ask, does the Hawking radiation come from inside the event horizon? If that thing is true that is one of the most fundamental observations in history. 

But. How the Hawking radiation can travel so fast, that it can come out from a black hole. The event horizon is the point. Where escaping velocity turns higher than the speed of light. Is there some kind of hole in the black hole's gravitational field? In some models the Coriolis force. That makes water whirl on earth. 

It's possible. That Coriolis force makes whirls into the black hole's gravity field. That means there can be some kind of holes in that field. Or there can be a situation. That some strings can travel out from the black hole. If the black hole tries to pull something like a superstring inside it that causes a situation where those superstrings can conduct energy out from the black hole. If the length of that hypothetical string is about 100 ly, that means the superstring falls into a black hole 100 years. 

Can the gravitational force create similar forms? As the magnetic field around the Sun? That means around the black holes could be gravitational protuberance and flares. Those things could transport energy out from those objects that gravity field locks even light inside it. 

In some other models, the string-shaped wave that travels in a parabolic trajectory can jump out through the event horizon. That means that things can be like the flare of a black hole. Theoretically is possible. A black hole creates the gravitational flares. That means. Extremely powerful gravitational fields can act similar way. Like the Sun's magnetic field. That means there can be gravitational protuberance and flares around the black hole. If that gravitational protuberance and whirls are true, that is a great advance to physics. 

Another thing is that energy falls into lower energy levels. Gravitational fields are energy fields just like all other energy fields. The energy level is the power of the field. Same way gravitational waves travel from the more powerful gravitational field to the lower powerful gravitational field. And that is the reason for gravitational waves. But all the time when a field. Without depending on the type of field it will send part of it out. 

When that wave starts to travel out from the stronger field, that stronger field turns a little bit weaker. Or the difference between energy levels turns lower. So when a black hole sends gravity waves it sends part of itself into somewhere. That means the mass of black holes turns lower. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/everything-hawking-radiation/

Protons and B-mesons challenge the Standard model.

"Quark and gluons inside a proton. Two up quarts, one down quark, gluons holding them together. Credit: Brookhaven National Laboratory." (ScitechDaily, Science Made Simple: What Are Protons?)

Proton: the particle that cannot decay. 

The thing that makes protons so interesting is that they cannot decay. Or nobody saw that protons can decay. The complex inner structure of a proton is the reason why it exists longer than a neutron. The energy can travel to those pockets when it travels down quark to two up quarks. And that shares energy flow into the larger area than in neutrons. In neutrons, two down quarks transmit energy into one up quark. 

That thing means that the up quark turns into the antenna that transmits energy into one point. And that energy breaks the shell of the neutron. The energy jumps from the quantum field between those three quarks and pushes them away. 

The proton involves a more complex structure that can pull more energy into it than a neutron that has only three quarks. There are also antimatter-matter particle pairs in neutrons. There is some other particle between those particle pairs. And that denies the annihilation. But if something pulls the quantum field fast enough out that makes space between those particles. 

Then those particle-antiparticle pairs could annihilate and that shockwave can destroy the proton. But as we know, nobody saw that happen. The fact is that the proton's internal structures expand when the proton expands. And that means the lifetime of the proton is very long. The proton is a particle that challenges the standard model. 

Another thing that can challenge the standard model is B-meson. 

Could there be some small, yet unknown hadron? Protons and neutrons are both hadrons. Their lifetime is different. The neutron decays in 15 seconds and the proton can last as long as the universe is. There is one interesting question: can hadrons form internal structures? Or can hadrons be inside other hadrons? The mesons are hadrons like protons and neutrons. 

"In particle physics, a meson is a type of hadronic subatomic particle composed of an equal number of quarks and antiquarks, usually one of each, bound together by the strong interaction. Because mesons are composed of quark sub-particles, they have a meaningful physical size, a diameter of roughly one femtometre (10−15 m), which is about 0.6 times the size of a proton or neutron. All mesons are unstable, with the longest-lived lasting for only a few tenths of a nanosecond. Heavier mesons decay into lighter mesons and ultimately into stable electrons, neutrinos, and photons. (Wikipedia, mesons)

"In particle physics, a hadron is a composite subatomic particle made of two or more quarks held together by a strong interaction. They are analogous to molecules, which are held together by the electric force. Most of the mass of ordinary matter comes from two hadrons: the proton and the neutron, while most of the mass of the protons and neutrons is in turn due to the binding energy of their constituent quarks, due to the strong force." (Wikipedia, Hadron)

Normal particles decay into the same particles. Or there is a certain cycle. Or some other dominating actor like spin or energy level determines how those particles decay. And their decay productions. 

W-bosons can decay to a lepton and antilepton (one of them charged and another neutral)[d] or to a quark and antiquark of complementary types (with opposite electric charges ⁠±+1/3 and ⁠∓+2/3⁠). Those bosons are the transmitters of the weak nuclear force. (Wikipedia, W, and Z bosons)

As the authors of a brand new paper, published in late November of 2024 in Physical Review Letters, note, all of the decays that involve B-mesons decaying to either:

two pions,

two kaons,

or one pion and one kaon,

(Big Think, How B-mesons are threatening to break the Standard Model)

Kaons and pions are hadrons as well as protons and neutrons. The main question is: do those hadrons (muon and pion) form after the decay of the B-meson? Or do the bonds inside the B-meson cut in different places during the decay process because of some asymmetry? But is that asymmetry in energy or materials? 

"B mesons are an important probe for exploring quantum chromodynamics. They consist of an antibottom quark paired with an up, down, or strange quark. B mesons decay via multiple pathways, several of which result in the production of π 𝜋 and K mesons. Measuring these rare branching fractions. Set limits on new particles." (https://physics.aps.org/articles/v17/s142)

The problem is that B-meson is not an elementary particle. The non-elementary particle should decay through particles that form it So the problem is that there should be something wrong if the decay productions are always different. In the case of B-mesons, the decay is similar to W-boson decay. And that thing means. That the B-meson acts like an elementary particle. There are theories that it's possible. That the hadrons can form internal structures. 

The protons and neutrons are both hadrons. Hadrons are subatomic non-elementary particles. They act like elementary particles. There is a possibility, that some of those particles that we see as elementary are the hadron inside other hadron. And that means the standard model is the thing, that requires some actions like updating. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/will-protons-last-forever-why-scientists-are-searching-for-signs-of-decay/

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v17/s142

https://www.quantamagazine.org/inside-the-proton-the-most-complicated-thing-imaginable-20221019/

https://scitechdaily.com/cracking-the-proton-code-unveiling-the-secrets-of-the-universes-building-blocks/

https://scitechdaily.com/ghostly-neutrinos-provide-groundbreaking-new-way-to-investigate-the-structure-of-protons/

https://scitechdaily.com/science-made-simple-what-are-protons/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_meson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons#W_bosons_2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

It's possible that primordial black holes can lurk even on Earth.

"An illustration of small primordial black holes. In reality, such tiny black holes would have a difficult time forming the accretion disks that make them visible here. Photo: NASA" (Buffalo.edu, Evidence of primordial black holes may be hiding in planets, or even everyday objects here on Earth)

In theories the primordial black holes formed before material. Some of them are very small masses, lighter than Earth.  And those black holes can hide almost everywhere. 

The new evidence about the theoretical primordial black holes. Is the path to fundamental science and technology. The primordial black holes were born in the young universe. In theoretical models. Small whirls in the young and hot universe formed those primordial black holes. 

That means those things are closest to a theoretical phenomenon called "Kugelblitz black hole" where radiation turns around photons and turns them into black holes. In the modern universe, Kugelblitz black holes are probably impossible. Because the energy flow out from those structures would be so fast. 

And the turbulence is so powerful, that it destroys those structures before their energy level turns so high. That the black hole can form. But in the young universe, the outside energy level was so high, that it could resist and pack the energy that comes out from the primordial black hole. 

"NASA's Curiosity rover will soon explore a patch of spiderweb-like "boxwork" features on Mars. This photo, taken in 2006, shows a similar area to the one that the rover will explore. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona)" (LiveSciece, Gigantic 'spiderwebs' on Mars are the next big target for NASA's Curiosity rover, agency reveals)

The idea is that those small black holes are locked because of their acceleration disk and plasma layer that keeps energy inside that small black hole. In the same way in normal black holes the plasma shell presses against the event horizon. Without that counter pressure, the black hole will vaporize. 

In some theories, the primordial black holes can hide almost everywhere. That means that it's possible that somewhere is the hollow planet or some cave or tunnel where those cosmic seniors could hide. The impact of a so-called primordial black hole would be a very high energy effect. 

This could explain the so-called spiderweb stones on Mars. And that could also explain the mystery tunnels below the Moon surfaces. It's possible that if the huge spiderwebs formed in electromagnetic phenomenon like lightning. One explanation for those mega-lightnings is the impact of one or more primordial black holes. 

"Formation of the universe without (above) and with (below) primordial black holes." (Wikipedia, Primordial black hole)

The primordial black hole can make the "invisible" planet possible. One offered explanation for hypothetical Planet X is the planet there is a primordial black hole in the hollow planet. And that thing makes that planet invisible. Calculations tell that Planet X must have a mass of about 10 Earths. 

Planet X is the mysterious gravitational effect and if the source of the effect is small and dense we might not see that thing. If the primordial black hole forms some small planet-looking object around it that structure might deny to see the radiation that the black hole sends. The black hole pulls material through the ice and stone. Because it's smaller than grapefruit the stone shell blocks that radiation. And maybe that object is smaller than the Moon or Ceres, the largest known asteroid in the asteroid belt. 

The mass of those black holes is about the Earth or even lower. The idea is that there formed a hole in the young universe's plasma and energy fields. That hole pulled the energy string through it. And then the outside energy fell against that string. If that energy couldn't get out it could form a small black hole. 

The black hole can pull material against it, and if the dust and gas fall symmetrically into that black hole they may lock around it. If that happens at the right distance those particles form a ball there they orbit the black hole. And that forms a so-called hollow planet. 

"An international research team discovered a lava tube on the Moon, indicating a potential habitat safe from harsh lunar conditions. The study, which reanalyzed NASA LRO mission data, offers significant insights for future lunar exploration. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, NASA’s Lunar Orbiter Reveals Hidden Tunnels on the Moon)

Can some Wolf-Rayet stars be so-called quasi-stars that form around the low-mass primordial black hole? 

In some models, the supernova explosion or other black hole relativistic jet can cause the situation that the planet's shell turns so hot that energy travels into the planet's core. There that energy can form a black hole. Sometimes similar effects can explain the blue supergiant stars. The star's shell turns very hot for some reason. Energy falls into its shell forming a black hole. 

Then the black hole pulls material from around it into it. But shells of those stars happen the fusion reaction that pushes part of the star away from the black hole. And then the shell of the star starts to orbit the black hole as a quasi-star. If the Earth-mass black hole forms a quasi-star that star could be like some blue supergiant or Wolf-Rayet stars. 

Theoretically is possible to transform any object in the universe into a black hole. The system would cover the structure with a hollow- ball-shaped antimatter chamber. Then the system explodes antimatter-material annihilation in the ball-shaped chamber's shell. That creates an energy impulse that presses an object in it into a black hole. 

Artist's concept of a hypothetical Planet 9 orbiting far from the Sun

The orbital trajectory of hypothetical Planet X. (BBC)

The thing is that the small black holes can make it possible to make many new things like stable superposition and entanglement. If the quantum superposition and entanglement are made between two black holes or black holes and neutron stars that thing is the breakthrough for quantum computers. But the problem is where we can find those neutron stars and black holes? 

The antimatter system can be the answer to those things. The ball-shaped antimatter system can create energy impulses that press plasma in the ball-shaped chamber into the same material that forms neutron stars. Or the antimatter explosion can press that plasma to form what we call a black hole. 

And if we would find primordial black holes from somewhere? 

Primordial black holes can be the answer to the Earth's energy problems. And things like quantum computing and interstellar travel. The primordial black hole can be used to make a stable quantum superposition. But the primordial black hole can be the energy source for the entire Earth. If that kind of small black hole is found, it's possible to build a ball-shaped chamber around that thing. 

Then that ball can collect energy from the gas and particles that fall to the black hole. The ball must have hatches that allow particles and gas can come into contact with that primordial black hole. The small black hole can also give energy to interstellar spacecraft. 

https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/08/planet-x-why-not-a-tiny-black-hole-instead/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/49910160

https://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2024/12/primordial-black-holes-may-be-hiding-in-planets-or-even-everyday-objects-here-on-Earth.html

https://interestingengineering.com/science/everything-you-need-to-know-about-planet-x-the-mysterious-9th-planet

https://www.livescience.com/space/mars/gigantic-spiderwebs-on-mars-are-the-next-big-target-for-nasas-curiosity-rover-agency-reveals

https://scitechdaily.com/nasas-lunar-orbiter-reveals-hidden-tunnels-on-the-moon/

https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planet-x

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_black_hole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-star

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf–Rayet_star

JWST might uncover many secrets from black holes.

"The Sombrero galaxy, Mesier-104, commonly viewed in optical light (as shown at bottom, via Hubble), displays a vastly different set of features in mid-infrared light (by JWST, top). At last, we've seen beneath the Sombrero's hat, and can paint a coherent picture of this brilliant object." (BigThink, What JWST found beneath the Sombrero galaxy’s hat)

It's possible. That many models of black holes are somehow wrong. Maybe researchers have not noticed dark energy and dark matter that the black hole can pull inside it. The fact is that Einstein was right again.

Detailed image of the center of the Sombrero galaxy.

Large-scale measurements make the Theory of relativity still suitable today. But our knowledge of dark matter and dark energy increases. We know that there can be places where there is more dark matter than in other places. 

That means dark matter forms similar nebulas. As visible material.  And maybe. The dark energy forms a similar structure as the cosmic microwave background. That means it's possible that dark energy is not a homogenous structure. But those things are only conclusions.  

Cosmic microwave background. 

The acceleration disk pushes energy into the black hole. But if there is the whirl that Coriolis force makes in the plasma layer. That whirl causes asymmetry in the plasma and the material and energy that the black hole pulls into it. And if that point is the point where hypothetical Hawking radiation impacts with material. That can explain the power of a relativistic jet. 

And anyway, if material flows through that whirl. That superhot plasma surrounds. And that plasma pumps energy into the jet. The acceleration disk pumps energy into a black hole from about the middle of those relativistic jets. That makes the structure act like a balloon that the rope pulls in the middle of it. 

Relativistic jets of supermassive black hole.

The JWST telescope images of the Sombrero Galaxy uncover new structures from that galaxy. There are interesting ring systems in that galaxy and its supermassive black hole. Those rings form similar way as Saturn's rings. There is some kind of radiation structure. That traps gas and dust at that point. As we know there can be some kind of standing wave or plasma structure that makes the outer ring. 

And maybe that structure is forming when energy. That comes from the acceleration disk impacts with plasma or energy fields that travel to the black hole. That impact makes it possible that an impressive ring system around that galaxy is forming. The ring is like Saturn's ring or Kuiper Belt. But much bigger. That means there is some kind of energy or plasma impact that can create that marvelous structure. The source of that energy could be in the acceleration disk. 

Or, if we look at the image with very high accuracy. We can see another, weaker ring system in the outer ring system. That ring can form when some higher energy structure pushes gas away. And in some hopeful models. That can be the evidence of Hawking radiation. But that is speculation. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/jwst-beneath-sombrero-galaxy-hat/

Wikipedia commons. 

Astronomers found a black hole that eats 40 times more than predicted.

"Blazing away inside a dwarf galaxy in the early universe, black hole LID-568 is consuming material some 40 times the theoretical limit, perhaps solving an old riddle of how supermassive black holes grow to maturity so quickly in cosmic time. Credit: NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/J. da Silva/M. Zamani" (Astronomy, This black hole is gulping material 40 times faster than the theoretical limit)

When some black hole or object does something other than others there is some difference in the object itself. 

Or the difference or anomaly is in its environment. When we think of a black hole and its massive gravity field we must understand that it eats visible material and energy.  But black holes also pull dark energy and dark matter into them. 

Maybe that black hole eats more material inside it than it should because there is more visible material near its environment than dark matter. We can say that black holes pull dark matter inside it. So, that means its possible that somebody forgets dark matter's role in the interactions near black holes. 

As we know dark matter is the mysterious gravitational effect. Dark energy is the wave movement that rips the universe in pieces. When dark matter falls into the black hole that event can form energy waves, hot dark energy that pushes material back. 

Because dark energy affects material the black hole should pull also dark energy into it. And dark matter has gravitational interaction. So that means a black hole can pull dark matter into it. 

And even if a hypothetical weakly interacting massive particle, WIMP isn't the source of the entire dark energy it should send wave movement when it interacts like impacts other WIMP. 

That kind of thing can cause energy impulses. And those energy impulses can push particles back. In some other models, the black hole pulls dark energy inside it. That means dark energy forms the ring around the event horizon, just like photons. That means it's possible that dark energy can interact with photons near the black hole event horizon. 

In theories, There are actually, two versions of dark matter and dark energy.

*Cold dark matter

*Cold dark energy

*Hot dark matter

*Hot dark energy

Black holes don't just pull material into them. Acceleration disks around them create energy that pushes objects away from black holes. If some black hole pulls "too much" material into it. That could mean that. There is something. That is missing from its acceleration disk. And if that missing thing is the dark energy sources. That black hole should also pull inside it. And if the missing part of the acceleration disk is the thing that forms dark energy. That black hole could be more "wow" than nobody even dared to think. 

When we look at black holes we always forget one thing. The black hole doesn't just pull objects into it. The black hole's acceleration disk or material disk along with the relativistic jet also creates energy. Or they don't create energy. They transform energy into another form. That energy is the radiation that we see coming from black holes. 

That energy pushes material back from the area around it. That means. If dark matter or WIMP exists those particles should also create the invisible acceleration disk around the black hole. If there is some kind of source for dark energy and black holes pack those sources around it, that means there can be a lot of dark energy that travels out from the black hole's acceleration disk. And if that energy is missing the black hole can pull more material inside it than it should. 

And if that invisible acceleration disk exists that gives part of the energy that pushes objects away from the black hole. So if some black hole eats more than it should that means something can be missing in its acceleration disk. That means energy that travels out from the acceleration disk is weaker than normal. And that causes an idea that maybe the source of dark energy is missing from that black hole's acceleration disk. 

If the dark energy source is in some kind of particle. A black hole should pack those particles around it. And if those particles are missing. Dark energy. That travel out from the acceleration disk is weaker. That causes the effect that less material turns away from around the black hole and its acceleration disk. 

So what does that mean to the black hole that pulls 40 times the material inside it as it should? 

That means. It's possible. That a black hole is in an area. Where there is no dark matter. Or. Maybe dark energy can form similar structures as the radio, microwaves, X-rays, and gamma rays form. Maybe, there are dark energy bursts in the universe. Otherwise. It's possible. That dark energy forms a structure that looks like a cosmic microwave background. 

The observations about galaxies' rotation are opening new models of dark matter. And that means dark matter can form at least nebulas there the dark matter or dark gravity effect is denser than otherwise. So, if the hot dark energy has a source in dark matter that means there might be less dark matter around the black hole that eats 40 times more than it should. But that thing requires research before nobody can give confirmed answers to that mystery. 

https://www.astronomy.com/science/this-black-hole-is-gulping-material-40-times-faster-than-the-theoretical-limit/

 

Coriolis force and black hole: can Coriolis force form a whirl in a black hole's gravity field?

Things behind black hole's event horizon are an interesting thing. When we think about gravitational interactions and black holes. We often forget the Coriolis force. The Coriolis force is the thing that makes air statues spin and form a tropical storm. The Coriolis force exists in all spinning structures. 

The extremely dense and heavy objects may have a so strong Coriolis force that they can turn electromagnetic fields and gravity into a whirl. Those whirls require an extremely strong Coriolis force. But it's possible that neutron stars and black holes can have the force to make the gravitational whirl. The electromagnetic and gravitational fields are around the black hole. 

Like the atmosphere is on Earth. There are movements in those fields. Those movements are like quantum winds. The Coriolis force interacts with other fields through the gravity field, and that means it could be possible that there is a so-called quantum tunnel through the black hole's event horizon. The Coriolis force could be an important factor in the black hole's complex world. Or maybe not. The black hole is the most extreme thing in the universe. It's the most dense and the most powerful object that we know. 

In some models, the Coriolis force makes the static whirl that is at the same point over the event horizon. That thing can create a situation where there is no quantum field against some point of the event horizon. 

The black hole is the object with the most powerful gravitational field that we ever seen. That monster forms when a supernova explosion blows the most out shells of the star away. That thing forms a quantum bubble. That is the vacuum in the universe. That vacuum pulls the material back into the center of the explosion. That thing pushes material and the quantum fields into one entirety called a singularity. 

During that process, the gravity field grows stronger. The object in the middle of supernova remnants starts to spin. Then it's possible. At some moment of that process, the fast-spinning object separates from the quantum field. That means the quantum field jumps off the shell of the forming black hole. 

"In the inertial frame of reference (upper part of the picture), the black ball moves in a straight line. However, the observer (red dot) who is standing in the rotating/non-inertial frame of reference (lower part of the picture) sees the object as following a curved path due to the Coriolis and centrifugal forces present in this frame." (Wikipedia, Coriolis force) 

If that is possible the relativistic jet comes from the equatorial area of the black hole. And a black hole lying in its acceleration disk. That means the acceleration disk travels through the poles of the black hole. 

And maybe some material falls faster than the quantum field around a black hole falls. Maybe there is fusion around the forming singularity. And that thing kicks quantum fields away from the event horizon. That forms a quantum vacuum around that spinning singularity. That allows the object to spin faster than light travels around it. That thing makes the situation that the object pulls or binds into itself lots of quantum energy from around it. 

That means that. Maybe the gravitational radiation or gravitational waves are similar to Cherenkov radiation. Cherenkov radiation is the blue light flash that forms when a Neutron that comes from a nuclear reactor travels a short moment faster than light. That is possible because a neutron's speed is higher than the speed of light in water. 

But it's not higher than the speed of light in a vacuum. There is no vacuum in the regular universe. If there is a quantum bubble that minimizes the scattering effect. That forms conditions. That light can travel faster than usual. 

That causes an idea that could be possible in the black hole simulation. Or maybe even form a black hole by putting particle spin in the bubble. Then. That system breaks the bubble. In some theoretical models, the acoustic system makes a small vacuum chamber hover in water. 

The difference between this case. And. In the case where neutrons hit the water, the energy effect around the particle is effecting symmetrically. In the case of neutrons, the energy travels through particles asymmetrically. The electromagnetic shadow and vacuum behind the particle pull energy out of it. 

In the case of spinning particles the electromagnetic shadow is different. That forms in the structures on the particles layer. That makes it possible that their energy travels into the particle faster than it travels out from it. 

That means. It's possible that extremely fast spin. That happens in the cosmic void and then the void collapses can cause a situation in which the particle turns into a black hole. The idea is that. The extremely fast interacting field allows the spinning particle to get so much energy that it turns into a black hole. 

Then there the extremely heavy ion starts to spin so fast that the magnetic system can spin it. Then the system makes water fall in the chamber. And. Allows particles to spin a short moment faster than light travels in water. Maybe that thing doesn't form a black hole. But it's an interesting thing. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force

Neutron stars and gravity waves affect space-time.

"Neutron stars are incredibly dense remnants of supernovae, potentially featuring mountains capable of creating gravitational waves. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Gravity’s Giants: Neutron Star Mountains Create Ripples in Space-Time)

Neutron stars are the smoothest objects in the universe. They are also some of the most dense objects. And the mass of neutron stars is incredible. The teaspoon of that material mass is the same as Earth. And that makes them one of the most interesting objects that researchers can use in gravitational research. The neutron stars are not completely smooth. There are little mountains and hills on those fast-spinning objects. 

Even if neutron stars seem smooth there are small balls on it's shells. Those balls are neutrons. The inequity on the neutron stars' surface causes the phenomenon where the energy level of waves that neutron stars transfer to the quantum field changes all the time. There are lower energy valleys between those balls. 

And that causes changes in the interaction between a neutron star and the quantum field around it. If neutron stars were totally smooth that thing would not make changes in energy levels. And the fact is that we don't see fields themselves. We see changes in those fields. The gravity field is an interference in the gravity fields. 

The height of those mountains is about less than a millimeter or if the neutron star is heavy, those mountains height can be micrometer size. Gravity on those neutron stars that are one large neutron is incredible. The neutron star's massive gravity pulls space-time against it. 

The space-time is the energy, or quantum field around the neutron star. That quantum field is like fog or water around the neutron star. The mountain on the neutron star's shell pushes that quantum field away. If neutron stars were absolutely smooth there would not be that kind of interaction. 

The hill on the neutron star's surface transports energy to that field and that hill creates the gravitational waves. The hill on the neutron star's surface acts like an antenna that transports energy out of the neutron star. Behind that thing is the vacuum that pulls the energy field to a neutron star. And that structure forms the gravity waves. 

When a neutron star sends energy to the universe it doesn't create energy from emptiness. The spin of a massive but dense object transforms energy around it into kinetic energy. 

Also, particles that impact it form the fusion that transports energy into neutron stars. The spin of neutron stars continues as long as the neutron star gets more energy than it delivers. When energy flow turns to another way. That will end the spin of the neutron star. 

**********************************************************

Can a similar interaction in a black hole form still hypothetical Hawking's radiation that forms gravity waves around neutron stars? 

If we think that small hills and valleys on neutron stars cause interference with the quantum field around them. That thing makes interference that we see as gravitational waves. The black hole or singularity that forms a black hole is far denser and smoother than a neutron star. But it's possible. 

There are also hills and valleys on that structure all quantum fields and other particles are in the same structure. It's possible. These small energy strings form a structure that causes similar interactions and interferences as neutron star's structures. 

That means it's possible that in the black hole form the radiation. That radiation may have so short wavelength that we cannot measure it. And that hypothetical radiation or wave movement's name is Hawking's radiation. 

The problem with Hawking's radiation is that forming that kind of interference in the quantum field is that the hills and valleys on the singularity must be much smaller than the hills and valleys on the neutron stars. In some models, the superstrings or photons that are glued on the singularity can form waves that could escape from black holes. That thing can make the Hawking radiation true. 

**********************************************************

But why neutron star will not turn into a black hole?

But why neutron star will not turn into a black hole? The neutron star is not smooth. If we look at the shell of that thing with high-power microscopes we would see. That there are small balls on the neutron star's surface, as I wrote before. 

There are small valleys between those balls. Normally energy can jump out from neutron stars from those valleys. The top of those balls will take a bit of energy that impacts neutron stars. That makes the gravity and other waves around the neutron star. 

Neutron stars and black holes are the most dense known objects. The neutron star interaction helps researchers to map the birth of the gravitational effect. If we think that quantum fields surround all massive objects. And that object spins. That object's spin to bind oneself. That means the bonds that are like channels or tubes between particles bind that field into themselves. In that process, the structure transforms that field into the kinetic energy. 

The idea is that the neutron star's or back hole's mass or gravity causes an effect where energy travels into those structures. That structure stores a little bit of that energy. That thing makes it possible that spinning structure get more energy than it releases. In some other models, the energy can escape from only one point. That makes it possible that the structure can pull energy into itself. 

https://scitechdaily.com/gravitys-giants-neutron-star-mountains-create-ripples-in-space-time/