New supercomputers made wider simulations of the universe than ever before.

"DESI’s recent analysis confirms gravity’s standard model and hints at dynamic dark energy, reshaping our cosmic understanding. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Dark Energy May Be Evolving, Transforming Our View of the Universe)

The new supercomputers can connect data from multiple sources. And they made a more comprehensive simulation of the universe than before. Those simulations offer a theoretical model that researchers can compare to observations that they made using their finest systems. The fact is that there are also missing things about the universe. 

Things like dark energy and dark matter are important for those models because they are dominant effects in the universe. And without a dominating effect, all models of the systems are not well. 

The thing is that sometimes researchers say that even small missing bites of the system make it impossible to make models of it. But what if we miss 95,1% of the system? Can we make any trusted models about the system using that data? The thing is that the supercomputers process information that exists.  And those systems can make models. About the interactions of the forces in the system. 

"The largest astrophysical simulation of the universe was achieved using the Frontier supercomputer, involving enhanced computational power to simulate both atomic and dark matter comprehensively. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (Scitechdaily, Frontier Supercomputer Unveils the Largest Universe Simulation Ever)

Einstein was right. There was no different type of gravity in the young universe. The thing that makes errors in calculations and observations is normally the energy level in the young universe was higher than in the modern universe. That thing causes a stronger repel effect than energy causes in the modern universe. The relationships between dark and visible energy were different. 

The energy effect of visible energy was higher in the young universe. The effect of dark energy was lower if we compare it to visible energy. There was a time in the young universe when visible and dark energy interactions had the same strength. When the expansion of the universe continued. The distance between the objects increased. And that made the visible energy interactions weaker. 

Dark energy may evolve. But nobody knows why. Does the dark energy change its form when the effect of visible energy turns weaker? 

When we think about energy like electromagnetism we often forget that electromagnetic radiation makes standing waves between objects. Those standing waves cause asymmetry in energy flow because the dominant or brighter object pushes that energy back. 

"An animated look at how spacetime responds as a mass moves through it helps showcase exactly how, qualitatively, it isn’t merely a sheet of fabric. Instead all of 3D space itself gets curved by the presence and properties of the matter and energy within the Universe. Multiple masses in orbit around one another will cause the emission of gravitational waves." (Big Think, What happens when a gravitational wave meets a black hole?)

"When a gravitational wave passes through a location in space, it causes an expansion and a compression at alternate times in alternate directions, causing laser arm-lengths to change in mutually perpendicular orientations. Exploiting this physical change is how we developed successful gravitational wave detectors such as LIGO and Virgo. However, unlike this illustration, the gravitational waves do not simply propagate in a "tube," but rather spread out through all of three-dimensional space." (Big Think, What happens when a gravitational wave meets a black hole?)

The other thing is gravity is also an interaction. There are also other objects in the universe than black holes. And also other objects than black holes pull fields and objects to it. The fact is that if two particles fall to a black hole those particles can impact each other before they fall through the event horizon. That means that. Even if black holes have dominating gravitational effects. Also, other particles around them have their own gravity fields. 

So if we want to use potholes to model those things we can draw black holes as big and deep potholes that other potholes orbit. But. There are also many other gravity points. That interacts with black holes. Another interesting thing is the situation where a black hole pulls gravity waves into it. That causes oscillation in the black holes. 

Another thing is that when the gravity center moves in the gravity field that thing causes a situation in the Higgs field or quantum field around it turned denser. That means the Higgs field goes somewhere. The particles spin. And that spin means. The particles transform some part of the field into kinetic energy. In the same way, a black hole's spin transforms energy that falls into the back hole into the kinetic form. 

But then we must ask, where black hole pull that energy? When a black hole or any other object spins it turns energy around it to the kinetic form. When an object rotates friction turns that energy into thermal energy. But what if there is no friction? 

Or what if an object can tie all energy that it gets into it? That means that the object's spin turns faster and faster until it releases its energy. So can the ball spin forever? The ball can spin forever if it gets more energy than it releases. The thing is that the spinning ball creates thermal energy. 

And only a small part of that energy travels in the ball. The thing. That makes the situation more complicated and denies the perpetual motion that the heat also travels out from the ball. The energy asymmetry in energy flow causes energy to travel out from the ball. 

The IR radiation that we call thermal energy or thermal radiation makes the standing wave that hovers a little bit above the ball. That standing wave makes a small vacuum around that ball. The standing wave causes the energy not to impact the ball. The same heat energy that can accelerate will slow the speed of the ball. 

The thing that spinning ball could conduct thermal energy into it and turn the energy asymmetry that way that it gets more energy than delivers and can turn it into the fundamental thing. But if it cannot release that energy, the ball turns into a black hole. The energy rises the mass of the object. That means. If the object gets enough energy, it becomes a black hole. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/gravitational-wave-meet-black-hole/

https://scitechdaily.com/dark-energy-may-be-evolving-transforming-our-view-of-the-universe/

https://scitechdaily.com/frontier-supercomputer-unveils-the-largest-universe-simulation-ever/

The Curiosity rover found strange structures on Mars.

"NASA’s Curiosity Mars rover captured this last look at a field of bright white sulfur stones on October 11, before leaving Gediz Vallis channel. The field was where the rover made the first discovery of pure sulfur on Mars. Scientists are still unsure exactly why these rocks formed here. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS" (ScitechDaily, NASA’s Curiosity Rover Uncovers Mars’ Mysterious Spiderweb Rocks and Hidden Crystals)

There was warm water on Mars about 4,41 million years ago. But then. Some cosmic catastrophe destroyed that sea on Mars. We can see remnants of that sea today. But cosmic rays turned that planet into a dry and cold place. Cosmic events can push large planes off their trajectories. The case of Formalhaut B is an event where a cosmic catastrophe turned a planet that orbited the star,  Formalhault into a molecular cloud. 

The strange spiderweb rocks are things. That can make a breakthrough for the researchers researching living organisms on that planet. The spiderweb can also form in some kind of electron or electricity eruption. But that is only a guess. The spiderweb stones are interesting because they can form because of electric eruptions. Lightning can play a crucial role in the birth of life. 

"This weblike crystalline structure called boxwork is found in the ceiling of the Elk’s Room, part of Wind Cave National Park in South Dakota. NASA’s Curiosity rover is preparing for a journey to a boxwork formation that stretches for miles on Mars’ surface. Credit: NPS Photo/Kim Acker" (ScitechDaily, NASA’s Curiosity Rover Uncovers Mars’ Mysterious Spiderweb Rocks and Hidden Crystals)

The structure is similar looking to sand there the lightning hits on sand on earth and creates a structure sometimes called "thunder roots". The lightning just melts sand bites and probably those spiderweb structures formed when lightning hit the sand on the red planet. Those electric eruptions can form when some of the Martian volcanoes erupt. 

"Scientists think that ancient groundwater formed this weblike pattern of ridges, called boxwork, that were captured by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on December 10, 2006. The agency’s Curiosity rover will study ridges similar to these up close in 2025. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona" (ScitechDaily, NASA’s Curiosity Rover Uncovers Mars’ Mysterious Spiderweb Rocks and Hidden Crystals)

It's possible. Those stones formed when positive and negative iron bites hit each other on Mars' atmosphere. But things like DNA samples can help to find out those mysteries. It could be possible that life started to form on a red planet same time as on Earth. But then suddenly some cosmic impact stopped that advance. The life on Earth began in the non-organic reactions. 

"A study reveals ancient hot water activity on Mars, indicated by a 4.45 billion-year-old zircon grain from a Martian meteorite. Designated Northwest Africa (NWA) 7034, and nicknamed “Black Beauty,” the Martian meteorite weighs approximately 11 ounces (320 grams). Credit: NASA" (ScitechDaily, 4.45 Billion-Year-Old Meteorite Points to Hot, Habitable Waters on Early Mars)

And maybe the same process was going on on Mars. But then some asteroid hit the red planet. That wiped out its seas and other things. The interesting thing would be how long that process was on Mars.  And then. We can think about things like what would happen if that meteorite or other catastrophe had not destroyed Mars. That could cause a situation. That there would be two intelligent species in our Solar system. 

https://scitechdaily.com/4-45-billion-year-old-meteorite-points-to-hot-habitable-waters-on-early-mars/

https://scitechdaily.com/nasas-curiosity-rover-uncovers-mars-mysterious-spiderweb-rocks-and-hidden-crystals/

Researchers created the image of individual photons.

"A new theory, that explains how light and matter interact at the quantum level has enabled researchers to define for the first time the precise shape of a single photon. Credit: Dr. Benjamin Yuen" (ScitechDaily, Quantum Leap: Scientists Reveal the Shape of a Single Photon for the First Time)

The new quantum leap is interesting. Researchers observed the single photon for the first time. The photons structure can tell researchers,  why that strange particle can act like particles with mass. But there is no measured mass in the photon. That means photons should not have the ability to carry energy or information or make quantum entanglements with other photons. 

The image of a single photon makes it possible to control that strange particle, which is the only particle that can reach the speed of light. The image of the photon introduces a structure that looks like a little bit of benzene or a peanut. The shape of a photon can tell why a photon can reach energy stability. That means while a photon travels, it gets as much energy as it releases. 

We can put a presumption that the image of a photon can unveil the mysterious and still hypothetical graviton, the transmitter particle of gravitation. The ring-shaped structure is similar to the ring around stars and other gravitational centers. So could the photon be an electromagnetic field or superstring that orbits the graviton? 

That means. It's possible. That graviton exists. If that wheel-shaped superstring harvests energy from around it, that thing could send wave movement into the middle of that wheel. The idea is that those superstrings are not the same size. And when that photon travels in quantum fields it sends energy as well as around it. And to the middle of it. That can form a stylus-looking structure. 

In some models, photons travel around superstrings. That means the photon would be a quantum skyrmion that is formed around those superstrings. The theoretical superstring is the gravitational or quantum tornado that forms a channel through the universe. That formation makes strings through the Higgs field. 

That means there is a vacuum in that structure that allows particles can travel faster than in a normal Higgs field. The energy comes to the particle backward and. from sides. In some models, a graviton is a quasiparticle that forms at the entrance of the superstring. 

And maybe that thing slows the photon's speed. Or maybe the electromagnetic low pressure will pull the photon´s structure backward. That vacuum or void would deny the photon's acceleration to a speed that is faster than the speed of light. 

So if we try to use that model with another still hypothetical, faster-than-light particle called tachyon, we can think that maybe that tachyon is the particle that looks like omega. When the tachyon crosses the speed of light, the back side of it travels forward, because there is an electromagnetic vacuum in that structure. That thing sends the wave movement or energy strike through that quantum low-pressure. And when that thing hits the tachyon. That pushes it faster-than-light speed. 

The knowledge of the shape of the photons is the thing that allows to creation of new communication tools. Those quantum communication tools are the systems that allow to create the single-photon-based communication systems. In those systems. The shape of the photon determines the state of that particle. 

And if the system can control the shape of the photon, that allows to creation of new and powerful technologies and ultra-secured data transmissions that are in the shape of the photon. The shape of the photon can be like an image. In macro-scale systems, the image like a cross or wave can mean some letter, or they can mean zero and one. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-leap-scientists-reveal-the-shape-of-a-single-photon-for-the-first-time/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

The Schrödinger's cat: how to turn living creature into the quantum world?

"In quantum mechanics, Schrödinger's cat is a thought experiment concerning quantum superposition. In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat may be considered simultaneously both alive and dead, while it is unobserved in a closed box, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This experiment viewed this way is described as a paradox. This thought experiment was devised by physicist Erwin Schrödinger in 1935  in a discussion with Albert Einstein to illustrate what Schrödinger saw as the problems of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics." (Wikipedia, Schrödinger's cat)

Scrödinger's can or cat which is time living and dead same time. Is the model that dominates quantum theories. That model means that the particle can exist and not exist. When we know about the existence of the cat, the cat lives. The existence in the quantum world is not an absolute thing. The knowledge of the existence turns particle existent. But we can be sure about that existence only when we see that thing. Or we can be sure about the cat's existence when we touch it. 

The simplest version to return the cat back to life is to make a clone of the cat. Then if the cat has the neuro-implanted microchip that stores the memories from the cat. This allows it to take the EEG and then transfer its memories to the clone. That requires the knowledge of the position of the memory cells. The thing is that we know that also other tissues than neurons participate in the memory process. And then that makes this process difficult. 

Or. If we want to return the dead cat to life we must reactivate the cell membrane and ion pumps. Replace the leaked liquids and then transfer the mitochondria and give them power. That could return that cat to life. And that makes "it possible" to create the Frankenstein cat. 

The thing is that information that made the cat exist after it's gone. Nothing can destroy information. The information can turn so small bites and it can spread those bites to so large areas that we cannot put them back in their original form. And one of the reasons is that those information bites are spread to other information bites. So it's hard, but not impossible to find those information bites. And collect them back into one piece. 

"Schrödinger's cat: a cat, a flask of poison, and a radioactive source connected to a Geiger counter are placed in a sealed box. As illustrated, the quantum description uses a superposition of an alive cat and one that has died."(Wikipedia, Schrödinger's cat)

It's possible that this model can be used to return destroyed particles back to existence. The hypothetical "Frankenion" particle can be created by storing its oscillations in a certain energy state and environment. Then if that "Frankenion" is an elementary particle. That thing means that the system copies the environment and energy states where that particle is measured. And then it transfers the recorded oscillations into those particles. That allows us to make a copy of that particle. 

All particles whose size and depth are limited have a limited number of information. That means information that creates limited particles and space is limited. 

When we think about the material that lost all its energy. That means the material turns into a 2D material or wave movement. Theoretically is possible to push energy back to the particles and return their shape into a 3D model. 

Theoretically is possible to return divided neutrons to their form. And if we think about things like quantum entanglements that will be broken, the information that the superpositioned and entangled particle exists after the superposition is broken. Theoretically is possible to fix the string of those superpositioned and entangled particles. The requirement is the thing that researchers find the right particles and the right superstrings. Theoretically, they could use a quantum-size black hole to make that thing. 

If the cat is dead that thing is meaningless. We know that once there were cats. But now there is a statue that lost its life. The statue is only a shell of the substance. The cat's existence can also be virtual. If we just imagine that cat. We can say that its existence is virtual.  The virtual object can cause changes to our behavior. That thing means that even if we imagine. That there is a cat in the room, we might be careful. We might be afraid that we let the cat away. 

That cat's statue or filled cat pulls people to it. The people want to know why that cat is dead. 

If we think that the cat is locked in the box, like in the image of the Schrödinger's cat we face the model of the locked position in that image. The cat is in the box. It cannot get out because it has no immune system, There is food but sooner or later the radioactive element sends a radiation burst, that activates the system and opens poison or a bomb in the chamber. That is the model of the locked position. If we touch that particle it loses its energy. That means we cannot touch the locked particle if we don't want to make a change to its position. 

The thing that we can call the cosmic Scrödinger's cat is the black hole. The massive gravitational field locks the black hole into its position. That thing exists. But same time it does not exist. Existence requires interaction. And black hole interaction is one-way. The Scrödinger's cat is also the model of the third type of material that can exist in both, main states of the material. That third material would not annihilate when it touches the antimatter and matter. 

We can say that the superstrings are the third form of matter. Those things can form both antimatter and regular material. And if that third material is possible to create that allows to store of antimatter safely. That is one thing that can be Scrödinger's cat in the material world. Or the cat itself is material. But how to transform a living creature into the quantum and elementary particle's world? 

Maybe we can say that when a particle transports important information. That particle exists. When that particle loses its information. Its existence ends. That means the particle turns meaningless. And that means the particle exists and does not exist. Same way as some sand bites that exist on the road. The sand bites exist, we know them. But we don't notice them. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger%27s_cat

There is quite simple math behind the two-stage encryption.

When we log in to some internet services. We see the famous screen, and there are two lines. The upper line is the normal login. Where we write things like Email or username. That username is called a public key.  The fact is that the username is also non-public. That means that is hidden from other users.  

Below that line is the space for the password.  That is called a "hidden" or non-public key. In that kind of encryption. The user first logs in to the system using the public key. That tells the system that the user has the right to use the system. 

Then the passphrase is the key to the step in the system. This is the key procedure in modern cryptology or encryption process. When the system wants to encrypt information. The system first sends the information who is the sender. Then that system encrypts data and sends it to the receiver. And if the receiver has the right key, that thing allows the receiver to open the message. 

Encryption allows the receiving system to select the information that it uses. That thing makes it possible to transmit information by using the same frequency to multiple receivers. And without that public key. The system cannot find the right receiver from the network. In the network, routers and switches use the public ID to route the message to the right address.

In the RSA encryption process. The system uses long binary- and quantum binary decimal numbers to secure information. The thing that secures information is the selected binary numbers. The formulas that the system uses are always the same. There can be different formulas or calculation series in the encryption process. But the process itself is similar all the time. 

The weakness of that encryption is this. The receiving system must know the formula and binary numbers that the transmitting system sends. The public key requires that the receiver knows what algorithm or formula it must use in the decryption process. And then another thing is that the receiving system must know the binary numbers. That transmitter is used in encryption.

And why do those systems require binary numbers?  It's possible to divide The binary number by using only that number itself. That denies the ability to use other numbers. Then the binary number itself opens the message. The problem is that the user must set the right and the same binary numbers to the transmitting and binary systems. 

The encryption process is based on the ASCII codes. The encryption system multiplicates and divisions those codes by using binary numbers. The system can make multiple divisions and multiplications. The receiving system must make those calculations backward so that it can open the message. The math behind the encryption is very simple. 

It contains divisions, multiplications, and maybe plus-minus calculations. That makes it very simple and effective. The problem is that this type of encryption is old-fashioned. That encryption was made in the late 70's and the short algorithms are a piece of cake for the fast, high-speed supercomputers. Quantum computers can make the code braking in seconds, even if the binary computers generate those numbers for years. 

The periodic table of elements and the island of stability.

"Moscovium and nihonium have been identified as more reactive than flerovium, demonstrating the significance of relativistic effects in superheavy elements." (ScitechDaily, The Periodic Table Just Got Wilder: Scientists Unveil the Secrets of the Heaviest Element Ever – Moscovium)

The main question is when the periodic table of elements ends. Researchers made superheavy elements that existence is measured in microseconds. The synthetic element moscovium or element number 115, has last confirmed existence time. The heaviest known element 118, the oganesson. That element is so unstable that researchers cannot measure its abilities. And maybe the heaviest known element is a noble gas. The superheavy elements are extremely unstable elements. Whose existence remains only less than a second. In the world only a couple of atoms. 

The reason why researchers work with new synthetic elements is that those elements can theoretically give solutions for nuclear reactor problems. It's possible that those, still unconfirmed elements are nuclear elements that divide into non-radioactive elements. And if those things are the fission products of some still unknown element, that thing can solve nuclear energy's worst problem which is the radioactive waste. The superheavy elements allow to creation of the ping pong-ball size nuclear reactor. That kind of reactor can give energy to the aircraft and ships.

"The height of the bars of the highlighted elements represents the strength of the bonding on a quartz surface. Credit: A. Yakushev/Ch.E. Düllmann" (ScitechDaily, The Periodic Table Just Got Wilder: Scientists Unveil the Secrets of the Heaviest Element Ever – Moscovium)

But the problem is in the short lifetime of the superheavy elements. Sometimes is introduced that the system uses time dilation so it accelerates those elements into the particle accelerators that rise their speed into the speed that is as close to the speed of light as possible. The miniature nuclear reactor can use things like antimatter. The system can turn the particles that form in the nuclear fission into antimatter particles. Another way is to drop those reactors into liquid gas. And then it could boil the liquid hydrogen. 

Source: Wikipedia, Island of stability. 

The thing that can solve the problem is the element that is in the hypothetical "Islan of stability".  

The term means the "island" of the stable superheavy isotopes. The thing that makes researchers believe that thing is that elements 106, seaborgium, 107, hassium, 110, darmstadtium, and 111, roentgenium don't seem to follow the logical line. You can see from the table that the heavier elements will suddenly have a longer divide time than the lighter ones. That lifetime curve causes an idea that there are stable superheavy elements behind, including element 126, that have not been detected yet. Researchers calculated the magical numbers of nuclei that can tell where the long-living superheavy isotopes are lurking.

"The fermium isotopes studied by laser spectroscopy are highlighted. Credit: S. Raeder" (Where Does the Periodic Table End? Exploring the Mysteries of Superheavy Elements)

"

"The composition of a nuclide (atomic nucleus) is defined by the number of protons Z and the number of neutrons N, which sum to mass number" (Wikipedia, Island of Stability). 

The magic numbers mean that a certain number of protons and neutrons make the superheavy isotope or element very long-living. 

"As early as 1914, the possible existence of superheavy elements with atomic numbers well beyond that of uranium—then the heaviest known element—was suggested, when German physicist Richard Swinne proposed that superheavy elements around Z = 108 were a source of radiation in cosmic rays. Although he did not make any definitive observations, he hypothesized in 1931 that transuranium elements around Z = 100 or Z = 108 may be relatively long-lived and possibly exist in nature. In 1955, American physicist John Archibald Wheeler also proposed the existence of these elements; he is credited with the first usage of the term "superheavy element" in a 1958 paper published with Frederick Werner. " (Wikipedia, Island of Stability) 

"Three-dimensional rendering of the island of stability around N = 178 and Z = 112" (Wikipedia, Island of stability)

"This idea did not attract wide interest until a decade later, after improvements in the nuclear shell model. In this model, the atomic nucleus is built up in "shells", analogous to electron shells in atoms. Independently of each other, neutrons and protons have energy levels that are normally close together, but after a given shell is filled, it takes substantially more energy to start filling the next. Thus, the binding energy per nucleon reaches a local maximum and nuclei with filled shells are more stable than those without. This theory of a nuclear shell model originates in the 1930s, but it was not until 1949 that German physicists Maria Goeppert Mayer and Johannes Hans Daniel Jensen et al. independently devised the correct formulation." (Wikipedia, Island of Stability) 

"The numbers of nucleons for which shells are filled are called magic numbers. Magic numbers, 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126 have been observed for neutrons, and the next number is predicted to be 184.  Protons share the first six of these magic numbers, and 126 has been predicted as a magic proton number since the 1940s. Nuclides with a magic number of each—such as 16O (Z = 8, N = 8), 132Sn (Z = 50, N = 82), and 208Pb (Z = 82, N = 126)—are referred to as "doubly magic" and are more stable than nearby nuclides as a result of greater binding energies." (Wikipedia, Island of Stability) 

So, the most long-living isotopes would be flerovium-298, unbinilium-304 (eka-activium, element 121), and unbihexium-310 (eka-plutonium, element 126). The two last ones have not been produced yet. The island of stability is the thing that can change everything in nuclear technology. If those synthetic elements 121 and 126 are possible to produce they open the road to the skies. Those things allow them to make small nuclear reactors or pocket-size atom bombs. 

https://physics.aps.org/articles/v17/150

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0535

https://scitechdaily.com/the-periodic-table-just-got-wilder-scientists-unveil-the-secrets-of-the-heaviest-element-ever-moscovium/

https://scitechdaily.com/where-does-the-periodic-table-end-exploring-the-mysteries-of-superheavy-elements/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability

Element list: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohrium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darmstadtium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscovium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihonium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oganesson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaborgium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbihexium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unbiunium

The universe's dark second origin is unveiled.

"Dark matter may have sprung from its own “Dark Big Bang,” separate from the traditional Big Bang, with potential proof coming from future experiments detecting gravitational waves. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab, edited" (ScitechDaily, The Dark Big Bang: Unveiling the Universe’s Hidden Second Origin)

It's possible. That dark matter is the shadows in the Higgs field. But we cannot be sure about that. 

The evidence that the universe did not begin from one event is stronger. That means that the Big Bang was a series of events that included many forms and energy levels before the material and energy formed. The dark Big Bang is the model that there were material before the universe. The dark Big Bang means that the dark matter is released in its own event. And that is one of the most interesting theories in the world. If the dark matter formed in a different, unique event that means it would be hard to see that material even if it's similar to visible material. 

The reason for that is that the dark matter particles or their elementary particle size will be different from than visible material. That means the wavelength that the dark matter particles send would be different than the wavelengths that we see. The different origin of the dark matter is one of the ways how to close that mysterious interaction. The young universe was different than the modern universe. The temperature of that universe was higher. And differences between energy levels were lower than in the modern universe. 

That means the energy flow from higher energy levels was slower and that means in the very young universe other fermions than just up and down quarks and electrons could form "stable" particles. The thing is that the muons and top and bottom quarks should have the ability to form "similar" particles as up and down quarks and electrons. The fast energy flow destroys those structures in the modern universe. But in a very high-energy environment that kind of hypothetical material could be possible. But that cannot happen in the modern universe because of the short existence of those particles. That material requires higher energy and more stable conditions. 

The sombrero model tells how gravity destroys the material. A standing gravity wave surrounds all particles. That gravity wave is the low energy area around particles or other gravity centers. If the differences between the particle's energy level and the bottom of the energy ditch around the particle are high enough, energy travels out from from particle so fast that it destroys it. 

When we think of models that gravity destroys the universe or all matter from inside it, we can think that the gravity ditch or gravity wave surrounds all particles. The gravity wave or lower energy area that forms the ditch around particles is the thing, that causes energy flow in it. The energy travels from outside and another energy wave comes from the particle inside that "sombrero". 

If the standing gravity wave or pothole is too deep particle vanishes into it. If we make a model where energy travels to that particle from above, that thing can cause reflection that covers the gravitation or energy pothole. Just like water that creates a roof-like form when we aim water dush to peg straight from above. The problem is that if the gravitational pothole is deep enough that causes a situation where energy travels out from the particle very fast. 

That thing rips their structure immediately. So can gravitation be the negative energy?  The idea is that. Negative energy is the energy that travels away from a particle. And the energy that travels into particles is positive energy. The determinator is in the energy flow direction. If the gravity wave is a lower energy point in the base energy field in the universe that means gravity itself or the energy flow that gravity causes is the negative energy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/the-dark-big-bang-unveiling-the-universes-hidden-second-origin/