Is the hypothetical fifth force between electromagnetism and gravitation?

When we are talking about the fifth fundamental force. We are facing one thing that makes the researchers believe that the standard model in physics is not perfect. That thing is the gravitation.

Why gravitation is not fit in the standard model? So even if the standard model would be ready to this point. There might be something that is needed to include or increase to that model that fits perfectly without gravitation. So there are four fundamental interactions or forces.

1) Strong nuclear force that connects quarks to neutrons

2) Weak nuclear force that connects protons and neutrons to the nucleus of the atom.

3) Electromagnetism that connects electrons to their orbiter around the nucleus of the atom.

4) Gravitation that pulls atoms and atom groups together.

The reason why scientists cannot connect gravitation with other natural interactions. Is that its transportation particle "graviton" not founded yet. And that means the gravitation is a mystery. All other fundamental interactions have transportation particles.

That means the gravitation should have transportation particles. The other thing is that the gravitation has no repelling effect. Gravitation just pulls the objects together. Those things cause that gravitation cannot straight conduct from electromagnetism. And that causes the idea of the fifth fundamental force.

But the question about the fifth force is: what is its place in the standard model? Does the hypothetical fifth force stand between electromagnetism and gravitation?

We always search for those kinds of interactions from the far ends of the systems. But we can ask is it possible that something is missing between the rows and lines of the tables. So could the place of the fifth force between electrons and the quantum core of the atom. That thing could easily explain why researchers cannot find the fifth force.

We always believed that the place of the hypothetical fifth force is outside of gravitation. So the order of the forces where the fifth force is included is always introduced like this:

1) Strong nuclear force

2) Weak nuclear force

3) Electromagnetism

4) Gravitation

5) Fifth force?

But that model requires that the atom has some invisible core. All other fundamental interactions are affecting the cores as electromagnetism affects electron cores. And the weak nuclear force affects the core of the nucleus.

The strong nuclar force affects the core of the proton and neutron. Those cores can be called quantum fields. So why do we cannot see the fifth quantum field or quantum core of the atom? The reason for that is. We are looking for that outside from the most out the visible core of the atom.

But what if the place of the fifth force is between electromagnetism and gravitation? And the order would be like this:

1) Strong nuclear force

2) Weak nuclear force

3) Electromagnetism

4) Fifth force?

5) Gravitation

Could that explain why there is no visible graviton? What if the hypothetical fifth force is the force that interacts between quantum cores of the atoms? In that case, the fifth force is like a tornado or string that is jumping between quantum fields. So is there some yet seen layer in atom and its structures?

The reason why the most reasonable position for the hypothetical fifth force. Is between the electron core and the most out quantum core that surrounds the entire atom. Is that there is something that is missing between electromagnetism and gravitation. That missing part could be the thing why we cannot just connect gravitation with electromagnetism.

https://astronomy.com/news/2020/03/the-fifth-force-what-is-it

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The hydrogen-burning supernovas are interesting models.

"Researchers discovered a significant magnesium anomaly in a meteorite’s dust particle, challenging current astrophysical models and suggesting new insights into hydrogen-burning supernovas. (Artist’s concept.)Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Rare Dust Particle From Ancient Extraterrestrial Meteorite Challenges Astrophysical Models) If the star is too heavy when its fusion reaction starts, it can detonate just at that moment, when its fusion starts. If the collapsing nebula is heavy enough, it can form a black hole straight from the nebula. But if the nebula's gravity is too heavy to form the blue giant or too small it can collapse straight into a black hole . If the forming star is a little bit larger than the blue supergiants. It can explode immediately when the fusion starts. The theory of hydrogen-burning supernovas consists model of the giant stars that explode immediately after their fusion starts. When the interstellar nebula falls it can form

The ancient galaxy mirrors the Milky Way.

"This image shows the galaxy REBELS-25 as seen by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), overlaid on an infrared image of other stars and galaxies. The infrared image was taken by ESO’s Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA). In a recent study, researchers found evidence that REBELS-25 is a strongly rotating disc galaxy existing only 700 million years after the Big Bang. This makes it the most distant and earliest known Milky Way-like galaxy found to date. Credit: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)/L. Rowland et al./ESO/J. Dunlop et al. Ack.: CASU, CALET" (ScitechDaily, Astronomers Baffled by Ancient Galaxy That Mirrors Modern Milky Way) Researchers found the youngest Milky Way-type galaxy. The distance to the galaxy is enormous. And the light that comes from that galaxy named REBELS-25 comes from the Universe that is only 700 million years old. The distance to that galaxy is enormous about 236 billion light years. And that means it's a very dista

Transcendence, or the ability to transcendent thinking may grow in teen's brains.

"New research has discovered that transcendent thinking, which involves analyzing the broader implications of situations, can foster brain growth in adolescents. This form of thinking enhances brain network coordination, impacting developmental milestones and future life satisfaction. The study emphasizes the need for education that encourages deep, reflective thought, underscoring the critical role of adolescents in their own brain development". (ScitechDaily, Scientists Discover That “Transcendent” Thinking May Grow Teens’ Brains) "Scientists at USC Rossier School of Education’s Center for Affective Neuroscience, Development, Learning and Education (CANDLE) have discovered that adolescents who grapple with the bigger meaning of social situations experience greater brain growth, which predicts stronger identity development and life satisfaction years later". (ScitechDaily, Scientists Discover That “Transcendent” Thinking May Grow Teens’ Brains) The transcendenc

Mysteries of the world

Search This Blog