Skip to main content

New visions for Standard Model.



The LHC observation proves that the Standard model stands. And that means the Fermilab's hole in the Standard model is closed. Then we must say, that even the new particles will not mean, that physicists must rewrite the Standard model. The model itself is open, and physicists can involve new particles in that model as much as they want. And then the new particles might not be found anymore. 


Big Think article says: There are three things that researchers should check. 


the mass of the top quark,


the mass of the Higgs boson,


and the mass of the W-boson,


as all three of these are interrelated.  (BigThink, New LHC results refute Fermilab’s “hole” in the Standard Model)

The interrelation between those particle's mass can mean, that those particles can transmit energy to each other. 

The similarities with masses of the W boson and Top Quark can mean that the W boson is the predicted (or at least hypothetical) Chameleon particle. And that can mean that the W boson and top quark can be the same particle. 

If the W and Z boson's weight is not the same, that means energy flows to lighter or lower energy particles. If Z boson orbits W boson that explains the weak nuclear force abilities. When energy travels to other particles like neutron's poles, that thing makes the weak nuclear force pull neutrons separately. And when the sides of those particles to neutrons that causes a situation where energy from neutrons travels to that boson pair. So the W and Z bosons are together in the transmitting particles of the weak nuclear force. 

And that causes the thought: could some other transmitting particles, transmit the four fundamental forces be the particle pairs? That can explain why we cannot find gravitons. If a graviton is a pair of some known particles, that can tell many things about gravity. The bubbling effect in the Higgs boson tells us that this particle could have some companion particle. But they can also be measurement errors. 

"Because the masses of the Standard Model particles are all related, the expected mass of the W-boson depends on the masses of the other particles. With arguably the most important constraints. Coming from the mass of the top quark, itself only discovered in 1995 at Fermilab. Initially, early evidence indicated the top quark’s mass (in terms of its energy equivalent) could be anywhere from about 165 GeV up to 180 GeV, which would constrain the W-boson to be no lower than 80.33 GeV (for a low-mass top quark) and no greater than 80.40 GeV (for a high-mass top quark)." (BigThink, New LHC results refute Fermilab’s “hole” in the Standard Model)


The results can mean three things. 


the CDF (Fermilab) measurement was wrong,


several other collaborations made errors or missed a key piece of evidence,


or this CDF result was an indication that something was wrong with the Standard Model. 


(BigThink, New LHC results refute Fermilab’s “hole” in the Standard Model)


The W boson is heavier than researchers believed before. And that thing tells us that it's possible that at least part of dark matter hovers in some other particles.  The charm quark in protons supports that theory. The Charm quark is heavier than an entire proton. But it still exists in that hadron. So maybe some other particles involve that kind of surprise. 

The LHC is the most powerful tool in the science, and the problem is this. It used all its power to find Higgs boson. The new particles require new particle accelerators that are so large, that they don't fit to Earth. 

Sometimes researchers discuss the theory that maybe the Higgs boson and the particle, that Peter Higgs predicted are not the same. The Higgs boson is the newest particle. But sometimes somebody says that the energy level of the Higgs boson is too low that this particle can be "The real Higgs boson". 

This new still hypothetical elementary particle requires so powerful particle accelerators that their length is about the same as an asteroid belt. That is the reason why researchers cannot find new elementary particles after the Higgs boson. The fact is. The new particles don't mean that the entire model must rewritten. 

But the new measurements tell that in, or near some particles can be some new and high energy particles. There is some anomaly in Higgs boson decay. And that gives a hint that there could be a small high-energy particle near or in the Higgs boson. 

The existence of things like Higgs bosons is very short. And that makes it hard to measure. Higgs boson itself is a very small, and high-energy particle. When Higgs boson decays its flash will cover that yet unknown particle. Whose existence is shorter than even Higgs boson's existence. 


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/lhc-refute-fermilab-hole-standard-model/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_quark


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The hydrogen-burning supernovas are interesting models.

"Researchers discovered a significant magnesium anomaly in a meteorite’s dust particle, challenging current astrophysical models and suggesting new insights into hydrogen-burning supernovas. (Artist’s concept.)Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Rare Dust Particle From Ancient Extraterrestrial Meteorite Challenges Astrophysical Models) If the star is too heavy when its fusion reaction starts, it can detonate just at that moment, when its fusion starts. If the collapsing nebula is heavy enough, it can form a black hole straight from the nebula. But if the nebula's gravity is too heavy to  form  the blue giant or too  small  it can collapse  straight  into a black hole . If  the forming star is a little bit larger than the blue supergiants. It can explode immediately when the fusion starts.    The theory of hydrogen-burning supernovas consists  model  of the giant stars that explode immediately after their fusion starts. When the interstellar nebula  falls  it can form
Post a Comment
Read more

Transcendence, or the ability to transcendent thinking may grow in teen's brains.

   "New research has discovered that transcendent thinking, which involves analyzing the broader implications of situations, can foster brain growth in adolescents. This form of thinking enhances brain network coordination, impacting developmental milestones and future life satisfaction. The study emphasizes the need for education that encourages deep, reflective thought, underscoring the critical role of adolescents in their own brain development". (ScitechDaily, Scientists Discover That “Transcendent” Thinking May Grow Teens’ Brains) "Scientists at  USC Rossier School of Education’s Center for Affective Neuroscience, Development, Learning and Education (CANDLE) have discovered that adolescents who grapple with the bigger meaning of social situations experience greater brain growth, which predicts stronger identity development and life satisfaction years later". (ScitechDaily, Scientists Discover That “Transcendent” Thinking May Grow Teens’ Brains) The transcendenc
Post a Comment
Read more

The neural network is the mind of the tiger.

  The neural network is the mind of the tiger.  The difference between traditional computers and neural networks is the role of the CPU. In traditional computers, the CPU (Central Processing Unit) makes all work, and that causes limits in computing. In neural networks, the CPU preprocesses data that senses send into it. That means the CPU will just recognize the situation and then resend it to a sub-processing unit. The receiving sub-system must have responsibility for that kind of case. That means the subsystem has databases where there are reactions for certain types of events.  In neural networks, all sub-networks use sorted data. And they are meant to respond to things that senses are sending to the neural network. Each of the subnetworks has certain operational or response areas. And the CPU is like some kind of router. The system finds certain details from the data. Then it can route the information to the right subnetwork. In real life, neural networks could be multiple subnetwo
Post a Comment
Read more